water vapour is not just about the cloud layer. its also the ground level evaporation that takes heat with it

EG
put a puddle of oil on the ground  and beside it a puddle of water.  the water takes the heat away from the ground much faster

rain forests are called such because the ecological effects have more of a water impact than a carbon impact


climate change is about water cycle and carbon sulphur and other toxins is the lung/life health of animals and plants
its why in a smoggy city vs a country field even though carbon has alot higher result in the city, the temperature is not to the same degree higher. however people can breathe easier in the country than the city

anyways
until greta and major population actually get to a point and come up with solutions people like greta are just finger pointing while getting rich on sponsored tours and paid guest speakers. which isnt actually going to solve the issue

its not a user with that much funds.. its an exchange changing its cold wallet holdings

not newsworthy as it happen regularly. just usually done in 10k btc batches spread out

its not a exchange public market affector.. but more so of just background exchange admin

do not eliminate sugary fruits and starchy carbs
lactose(dairy sugars)
fructose(fruit sugars)
glucose(animal fats)
^ they are natural sugars found naturally and unprocessed in food
your body needs carbs. just dont over do it


sucrose(honey and granulated sugar)
^ are processed so reduce how much you consume

aspartame, saccharine (fake non sugars, just sweetener)
^ stay away from(yes eliminate these)

its far healthier to have a cup of orange juice/milk than granulated sugar water(tea/coffee)
its far far healthier to have a cup of orange juice/milk than sweetener sweetened water(tea/coffee)

as for things like flavoured milk(kids milkshake). well thats as bad as sugared/sweetened water as it has extra added sugars

by saying dont overdo carbs. i mean a glass/cup of orange juice/milk. not a whole litre of it a day

your over thinking it to try making it seem like carbon is the problem and water has no impact.. and hinting sulphur is a solution
missing the whole point entirely

again
if high carbon high sulphur emissions are the cause of a 2dgre increase... then venus with a high carbon high sulphur are not causing a 9500x impact like math suggest should be happening


the reason is that over 150 years when they done ice core and tree ring studies they were only looking at carbon. yep when the chemically analysed ice core they actually deducted h2o out of the equation like it had no impact

to dumb it down
its like saying that studying teeth health revealed stained teeth cause lung cancer because many smokers have stained teeth so so the correlation is visible and it must be the stained teeth thats the cause, because they excluded the smoking from the equation or simply didnt study it or include it in reports

other things is that most studies are actually based on ground level atmosphere from the last 150 years. because its carbon at ground level that gets frozen into ice an sucked into tree's meaning the studies are not really indicating the upper atmosphere numbers

upper atmosphere numbers only began becoming measured less than 50 years ago
so trying to say upper atmosphere must have ben 0.03% 150 years ago but now 0.04% is also a false number

because they had no number for upper atmosphere composition 150 years ago

trying to dumb thigs down to your level, hoping something actually getss into your head and makes you realise stuff

i have a penis. .. but i also have a vagina between my legs far more often then you(via having a spouse). so for all intense and purposes i could say that.

also lesbians are attracted to women, that must make me lesbian because i like women

point is anyone can identify themselves as anything they like. but it doesnt change reality.
you cannot get away with a crime by fighting that you are really a helicopter or a shemale or a lesbian or just some invisible monkeyboy

you have no clue

for all intense and purposes i could identify myself as a shemale that uses the pronouns: helicopter chopper and swirly whirly bird
but i am not on of those crazy people that demand to be identified as a particular thing because in the end when you actually bother to get into the details it does not matter if you call yourself a helicopter a person or a human or a pink dress wearer.

 in court someone just needs to point in your direction no matter what you identify yourself as

and the accuser does not nd to be the victim. the accuser can be a forensics expert, a witness, a police officer a security camera operator a legal advocate a family member.. anyone
so even you trying to fight over WHO is accusing you is empty. your not fighting the evidence itself

your waffle is just as bad as them odd people saying 'im not a number im a human being' and an employer just stares at you and says just get back to work. you wont get out of doing work by arguing that you want to be identified as something. at most you will just get sacked. (but foolishly in your eyes you'll consider that a win)

playing the 'you cant identify me so i am invisible and not here and dont have to answer to my actions' game is not real common law practice

your freeman stuff about birth certificates and governments is your mis-understood pink dress. you are only seeing like 5% of it because you only believe the freeman stuff which is 95% fluff with the random spray of common law stuff spread in to make it kind of sound meaningful.

emphasis you believe the 95% fluff but dont understand the real 5% they la la la over. and that has been proven in other topics
you ignore and mis-understand the la la la

even you are not mentioning carbon.. you are saying its about sulphur..
meaning even you agree carbon doesnt even come to the equation

and funny part. if your saying that venus is not 9500x hotter than earth due to high sulphur cooling the planet. is like saying we need to pollute the atmosphere with more sulphur

sorry but water is a bigger differentiator than carbon and sulphur. our planet has abundance of it but its in the wrong places. we need to science the crap out of how to rejuvenate the water cycle because just taking out carbon wont do much and would actually make plants not flourish. and adding sulphur will make the atmosphere more acidic which is more dangerous.

water is the safe medium which we can actually do something with

your soo freeman narrow minded.
you are forgetting tresspass and contracts
yep the constitution is a contract. and so are elections

being frank (straight to the point no kissing ass) has nothing to do with tax
being frank(a name) has nothing to do with tax

having a message franked(postal) has nothing to do with tax

the reason im not a penny pinching person with a bitcoin address in my footer(unlike you) is that i dont even need to consider that payments are needed for my posts.

i self frank, (self authorise and send my own posts) thus dont need to pay or get paid
i got a nice hoard of coins i ben sitting on for many years now so i dont ned to penny pinch or kiss ass

there are other funny word plays for why i chose this name.. but you wiil never grasp the subtle details. as demonstrated by many examples of you not checking things or thinking hard about things.

but anyway
keep having a nice day mis-understanding things

i see you ignore answering the question..
where the camera man is swimming or in a boat. if the edge of the planet is the ice ledge. then what is holding up the water.. shouldnt he be floating in space

here is another on for you

earths shadow on the moon is spherical not a knife edge

have a nice day

keep trying your pink dress strategy.. it a good laugh but wont get the results you want

facial recognition is not a security feature

i know someone who uses it. and i asked to borrow his phone while its locked. i took a picture of him and held the picture at his phone camera and it let me in.
he was shocked

i told him imagine i took your picture in public and pickpocketted you.
now imagine i pickpocketted you and seen a password keypad with only 3 tries
which is easier to crack

he soon disabled the face recog and went back to using password

the way the topic is worded is not about governments just making lots more social housing to give everyone a roof over their head. but a detention centre taking them out of society/public view and not letting them have freedom to go out the door unless they can prove they can sustain themselves

take prisons
try going for job interviews or try getting a job in public while incarcerated is a hurdle in itself.
a persons odds of finding a job locked up is harder than finding a job while homeless

the solution should not be to pay some private company upto $79k a year to detain people. but spend $150k to build a residence for 2+ people which would last 50 years
(detention comparison cost is 50x2=$7.9m)
now what would you prefer to pay over 50 years for 2 people.
$7.9m or $150k

not everyone actually can
for instance
if your disabled and unemployed just trying to get support to get transport is a hurdle. meaning the distance available to work is confined to in-home/small wheelchair ride from home.
(commuter jobs are ruled out)
then there is the pretense that employers have to be disabled friendly. but some disabilities do not actually fit the businesses needs

such as retail shelf stacking of 6foot high shelves is impossible for some disabled people. and for instance a quadraplegic cant exactly operate a grocery stores cashier desk as it involve grabbing tins of baked beans to scan the barcode
and more recently with 'self checkouts' the demand for checkout operators has declined.

so although many think that there is a job 'type' for everyone. there is not enough job vacancies for everyone
and especially for unemployed disabled people that have higher initial costs just to start a job and to hope to be productive long enough to get to pay day to then continue.

this is why homelessness and unemployment doesnt need a 'lock them up' policy at upto the same value as prisons of $79k a year. instead that $79k should be used to prepare people for employment within the community. not by excluding them

for instance instead of spending $79k on a 'lock up' project. spending $20k to give a company a 1 year grant to employ the person and $20k for a disabled vehicle to get to the employment. which initially is cheaper than lockup costs and over the years the net cost benefit would outweigh any future costs when the person becomes fully independantly working

the extreme funny about carbon is this
0.01% change in 150 years has been said to have raised the temperature average by 2 degree

yet venus which is closer to the sun, meaning more heat radiation is 95% carbon. which mathimatically should mean 9500x hotter, right?

nope venus is just 600 degrees which is 40x .. yep 40x not 9500x

what people still not getting is that water vapour is the bigger differentiator of temperature
ic is water
rain is water
clouds ar water
larg aireas of trees are called rain forests and not carbon forests for a good reason

the image above of asia with SMOG is not carbon. but water vapour and other chemmical mix
its dirty mist/fog emphasis on fog=smog

the water cycle of the planet has been affected far more than the carbon cycl and its exactly this water cycle that is changing the temperatures

no one cries danger of raining oil(carbon) they cry danger of hail stones and snow(water ice)
no one cries danger of carbon droughts or carbon floods. its water droughts and floods

water is the real concern of climate change. not carbon

africans using bitcoin is super small. not only due to internet. but also the transaction fee
africans using cryptocurrency is a little more. still limited by internet. but not so much by transaction fee
however due to the ease of SMS africans have a high use of 'digital' currency such as M-pesa requiring no internet

everyone knows i de-test LN due to it not being a blockchain and having to vault up and eventually custodian/co-partner authority).

but a niche that LN can fill is that when someone locks up their bitcoin asset for a month. they can be given a open session LN UTXO of msats which they can then SMS directly with their channel partner during the month, without needing the internet.

the only thing they need to do is SMS a agreed close session with a 'factory'/watchtower(3rd party) to close the session and re-issue an open session (broadcast onchain).

though this means relying on a 3rd party to be custodian/manage the onchain stuff. the users can end up just SMSing payments without the need of the internet

but for emphasis the whole channel partner/custodian problems is my concern as i personally am a 'if you dont hold the only private key the funds are not yours alone'

that said m-pesa is where a phone company holds the real value and people are just telling the phone company who deserves what, and the phone company is the custodian. .. so it aint much of a change..
(m-pesa users dont actually own the value, they just have authority to choose where it goes)
LN 'factory' can distribute a central control of just 1 phone company to become hubs of many 'factory/watchtower' custodians

but its still not as secure/trusted/independent as real blockchain assets
again emphasis on the whole point of blockchains is independant asset ownership, which LN and 3rd parties do not offer

qubits actually have 4 states

binary has 2 states
0-1

qubit is base 4 or otherwise known as quarternary logic (as oppose to binary logic)
0  1
  X
2  3

karl lentz did not win due to the freeman crap rhetoric
remember he la la la'd over the real law stuff

if lents did not mention the freeman stuff you love so much and just done the law stuff he la la lad over he would still have won
thus the freeman stuff you love was not the cause of the win

its like i can tell you the real law stuff.. then karl lentz tells you to wear a pink dress to court.. you win the case. and you decide the pink dress won the case and suddenly your a pink dress preacher
atleast realise it has nothing to do with the pink dress as the pink dress is the freeman mascarade

the whole point of freeman stuff is to cause so much drama and disruption in the hope of not being convicted by reason of insanity/stupidity
that is not a true win, as the consequences could see YOU locked up in a mental home, should you dare try it

and funnily enough your many topics have shown your lack of first person knowledge, meaning even you wont try it
so one last tip. dont provide info if you have not fully researched, vetted, checked, understood and ofcourse dont give info unless you have first person experience of it

in short. dont be a copy and paste drone.. learn about stuff before you try to promote it
learn consequences

as to the gyroscope test. a gyroscope test movement of people and objects above ground vs earth. it does not test movement of earth vs space

your like an ant waling on an orange thinking your endlessly walking in a straight line because you cant grasp the big picture or see beyond whats infront of you

here is a tip. at night look at the stars and then look at the stars 2 hours later.
you will notice there is planetary movement
next keep repeating 12 more times to get  full 24 hours later and you will notice it has come full CIRCLE

if that was the edge then
1. why is there water
2. what is the camraman standing on
3. if your cameraman turned around and went in opposite direction away from the edge. then where would the cameraman go

    notbatmans edge    camera man
_______V                        V
ICE       |                         웃
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ whats beyond this