Misleading post.  It depends WHERE all this money is going.  If it's simply the kike bankers printing money out of thin air and buying up all the real estate and everything else on the market, then it's just a stealth communist takeover and it's not even possible to collapse simply because they OWN EVERYTHING.  

There's a lot of evidence that's what's going on to an extent, Jew moneychangers attempting the same playbook as they did in Russia - nationalize all assets then civilization grinds to a halt, sell them off for pennies on the dollar to select tribal oligarchs.  It might be possible none of this ends until the Jew moneychangers are physically expelled/gotten rid of, otherwise you might be guaranteed to go the Russian oligarch thief route (hint:  95% of Russian oligarch criminals were Jews).

Canada supposedly bans anyone from the US with a DUI from entering, but millions of brown people from 3rd world countries who they have no idea the history of is okay.

Izabella Kaminksa the Polish Jew strikes again.  Her problem with Elwar is:  "The main objective is to squirrel away wealth without paying a fair share of tax" (to the Jews).  Pay your kosher tax Elwar, you godless corsair.

What is he supposed to say?  "I'm here for the pump and dump scams of imaginary, centralized, valueless tokens?"

Don't worry, shitcoiners are such liars and scammers I'm sure you'll likely elect Craig Wright as Bitcoin CEO and let him install MIT chain anchor to prevent the govt from banning it and having your "investment" implode.  You will look up and say, "Wow, this Craig Wright guy is an even more brazen scammer than we are.  He is truly the face of Bitcoin".

You would have an initial wave of frontrunner selloff followed by a second wave of non-front runners.  The only problem there is the front runners would likely be people like Barry Silbert, Winklevoss, Tim Draper, and Mike Novograts, and they have enough coins to send Bitcoin to zero several times over.  It would be a LOL bloodbath with all those sheklers trying to front run each other.  The general public would probably not have any type of bid whatsoever to dump on.  There's a reason the Trump team investigated the economic repercussions of an oil price shock + a Bitcoin price collapse earlier this year.

Already explained it before.  It's both cheap and efficient for the govt to operate a police state on the internet where Bitcoin resides (see Twitter, Facebook, the nation of China), while operating a police state in the physical world where gold and silver exists requires orders of magnitude more effort and expense bordering impossible.  A single demonic Jew can operate a police state online, but it's far too difficult to source a Jew to place on every street corner and living room.

Great, what is this, Larimer's 5th coin?  And putting Twitter on a blockchain solves no type of problem as it only matters who can exert power over the block producers to censor and block transactions.  Since it's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency in the first place, it just means a slightly obfuscated version of the Twitter that already exist.  It will just take you 30 extra seconds of Googling to find out who is banning you or deleting your posts.  

Steemit has a centralized gateway and nobody blocked my posts (yet) just because there was no pressure on the centralized block producers (yet) from the govt, ADL & AIPAC because not enough people use Steemit for it to matter to them.

Since Last of the V8s is completely delusional, we can have a contest.  We can both lobby for the govt to ban both Bitcoin and physical metals then see which one is still actually useful afterwards.  Bitcoin is completely useless just by blocking fiat deposits and withdrawls to exchanges, let alone a complete ban.  On the other hand, it's not actually possible to ban the periodic table from existing.

You guys are dumb if you're not sweating that post.  It's pretty obvious the Craig Wright scam never had any chance of success, and since he's a govt and banker frontman, his threat about them banning it if you don't let him take it over as the CEO is probably likely to be true.  I would also not want to be Gmaxwell getting called out by name from him considering the trail of dead bodies the bankers have left in the past from things like nail gun accidents.  Then you have this Brad Sherman guy talking about banning it the other day.  It really could go from $8000 to $0 overnight like he says if they ban it.

Since Craig Wright is an obvious fraud and is clearly acting as a frontman for some US govt and banking interests, you can sort of read between the lines of his threats.  He's basically saying either everyone will use his version of Bitcoin that he's the CEO and has full control of - in which they formed a greater monopoly on supply and will undoubtedly force things like MIT chain anchor and turn it into a replica of the Chinese social credit score system - or the US govt will ban it.  

This is why I've said all along that nobody should give any credence to (((digital currency))) over physical metals in any form since you're just going to be shilling for your own enslavement in the end.  If the state is unable to turn it into their tool to fuck you over with, they will ban it.  But it's stupidly easy for them to take it over through the legal system since transaction validators are designed to centralize and football-sized ASIC warehouses are a comically large attack vector to serve a warrant against.  The only possible outcome is then mine govtcoin or get swat teamed.  Then later they just force you into a government run proof of stake coin anyway.

Nice, more moronic charts that claim the price of Bitcoin will go up at a 45 degree angle forever to infinity.  Oh, nevermind.  This chart only claims $1 million per coin in 2024 as opposed to the chart before this one that claimed $5 million per coin in 2024 LOL.

You should probably not be expecting a million when Jewish talk show host Max Keiser's *fantasy* Bitcoin price target is $100k.  His fantasy target, not legit one.  If his fantasy target is $100k, it means that's what he's hoping that you hope for while he hopes he can dump at half that price while leaving someone else holding the bag.

Maybe he discovered the shockingly obvious fact that female looks and their outrageously demanding and entitled attitude are inversely proportional to one another as they age.  ANY good looking woman in today's civilization is given a pass on whatever they do, so there's no negative reinforcement to any of their behavior as well.  As long as that maintains, society will churn out an ever increasing number of foul women.  

There's always been checks and balances on male behavior because another man will just punch you in the face, and nobody is going to worship you for the simple act of having a penis.  Since women are given a pass on everything simply for being women, being bi-polar and other mental insanities have become the norm for women everywhere polluting the gene pool because there's no selection process at all on their genes besides not being hideous.  Nothing is going to fix that until all the ugly guys (obviously not me) in this thread stop worshipping women as their god.

Standard butthurt shitcoiner response.  I started off with MEL, then Python and C++.  Doing computer work is annoying, though.  I'd rather dig ditches than code for a living.  I don't like being trapped in other people's completely arbitrary psycho funhouses whether it's made up financial systems of bonds, yields, carry trades, blah blah, or their completely synthetic coding languages I'm expected to adhere to.

The reason lots of seemingly smart people errroneously support Bitcoin is because programmers have a God complex and assume every problem can be coded around or fixed with some ghetto hack.  Bitcoin in it's initial release was virtually useless except as an intra-bank SDR note, as Hal Finney noted.  Absolutely nothing has changed since then.  Decentralization, scaling, and everything else; the fundamentals, or lackthereof, are all virtually the same right now as when Bitcoin was worth $1.

In the past I thought there might be some possibility to fix it by some random arbitrary code update, but that's just idiotic, coder monkey type thinking.  If you actually study in-depth what can and can't be done, you will realize it's 100% not even possible to create a decentralized digital currency.  Every transaction requires three or more people and has built-in, rent seeking middlemen, so just about nothing in the whitepaper is even true in the first place like being a "peer to peer" currency with "no middlemen".

The price increased 8000x on nothingness, just painting the tape and manipulation from Chinese mining monopoly scammers.  Every single person in this thread knew the Chicom scammers 100% controlled the price back when it was in the $200-$1000 range and were artificially raising and lowering it at their whim.  Now they pretend the price is actually determined by something else when it's not.  It's not possible to create a decentralized digital currency, and Lightning Network is just a permissioned ledger recreation of the already existing banking system.  Since the fundamentals are zero, the only thing holding Bitcoin up is temporary regulatory arbitrage and pump and dump scammers.

It's an idiot chart.  No market trades like an endlessly repeating fractal going upwards to infinity, but assuming it did, time span of the market cycle increases and flattens as market cap rises, so assuming this pattern repeated forever (not likely), it would look more like the picture below (red lines are mine).  In other words, he created a fake chart espousing the value of fractals and then falsified what the fractal or regression pattern would look like to try and trick people.  And you wonder why I can't stand most shitcoiners?  99.9% are just flat out liars and scammers.

The invisible hand of the market isn't instantaneous.  There's asymmetric levels of information everywhere.  Most people, even rich people and bankers can't even tell you what the 'real' inflation rate is.  6% low end, 10% high end? Even if you spent a bunch of money creating your own proprietary models it would differ from others depending on what assets you track, or what assets you deem core.  The ESF also rigs everything, so if they rig the price of corn downwards to fuck over farmers with the side effect of lessening civil unrest due to cheaper food and energy, how are your models supposed to work then?  Regardless, you don't need a model to see inflation is higher than interest rates.

The answer was already posted.  Fiat dollars are only an asset with interest rates higher than zero, or in reality, higher than inflation rate.  If rates are negative or even neutral, there is no reason to touch paper over metals and the invisible hand of the market causes the shift back to the real asset of metals.  Bankers and high net worth individuals are always trying to either increase their wealth or lower risk to their wealth.  This is the base of Exter's Pyramid. People will not set their money on fire on purpose, or stay in a risky asset with no benefit instead of switching to the lower risk one.  

You cannot stop the shift back to metals while having zero or negative interest rates, and you cannot have normal or high interest rates due to infinite growth no longer being sustainable and not being able to service 'the' debt or the debts.  Reset back to metals was always guaranteed.  A Jew bastard like Greenspan himself wouldn't have called for it if he didn't know it was inevitable anyway.