Bitcoin Forum
June 20, 2024, 05:50:56 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 »
1241  Economy / Speculation / Re: rpietila Wall Observer - the Quality TA Thread ;) on: March 31, 2014, 06:02:44 AM

agreed...this indicator is very telling (and accurate)!
1242  Economy / Securities / Re: ActiveMining/Labcoin: a comparison on: March 29, 2014, 08:32:05 PM
Currently Activemining is hashing and Labcoin is not. That is my current analysis of the situation, anyone care to chime in?


http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa

http://virtualminingcorp.com/shop1/index.php?id_product=38&controller=product

https://crypto-trade.com/tradex/ipo/amc_btc
1243  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: March 29, 2014, 08:27:32 PM
No thanks I don't do drugs.

Shame, I do tons of drugs


Check out the hot news everyone:

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa

http://virtualminingcorp.com/shop1/index.php?id_product=38&controller=product

https://crypto-trade.com/tradex/ipo/amc_btc
1244  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: March 29, 2014, 08:21:21 PM
Please be nice to thefunkybits.  She is confused between Gigahash and Terrahash.  HER technical knowledge stops abruptly after hash.

Babe I love your ruthless Canadian spirit, how about a night on the town in this great big land we call home?
1245  Economy / Securities / Re: [Active Mining] The UNofficial Active Mining Discussion Thread [UNmoderated] on: March 29, 2014, 07:07:01 PM
bumping this thread for free ad space

http://eligius.st/~wizkid057/newstats/userstats.php/1DJpsvnM7xTnQbWEhLYyCyfxQyxwupEzCa
1246  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 29, 2014, 06:02:04 PM
Is it really possible to go from development to shipping hundreds of miners in 4 days?

A chip is in development up until the last day that it is no longer in development, you fucking dunce.
1247  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 29, 2014, 05:48:22 PM
It just sounds the same and has the exact same description word for word.

Its a great two-syllable buzzword isnt it? It's too bad we came first
1248  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 29, 2014, 05:44:15 PM
Our website clearly states we are using a "Fast-Hash One 28nm ASIC"
For those of you who don't know, ASIC stands for Application Specific Integrated Chip/Circuit
1249  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 29, 2014, 04:48:16 PM
Still 103 in stock.
Yesterday ActM sold out ~100 miners in a matter of hours.
Now we have had 103 miners in stock for 12 hours and noone has placed a single order.

Seems fishy to me.

Perhaps a few whales had insider information on 28nm cards being in stock before the announcement...
1250  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: [VMC] Official Virtual Mining Corporation Discussion on: March 28, 2014, 10:16:27 PM
Now I think 95% chance its a scam and 5% chance it is incredible incompetence.

A magnificent surprise awaits you, my friend
1251  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 25, 2014, 07:20:53 PM
The dividends must be insane for the shares to reach that kind of valuation.

Dividends and Hype. The shares will not be worth that much, but dumb money tends to follow smart money and be irritional when doing so. When this operation succeeds and the selling resistance from shareholders like drawingthesun is dried up the price will be pumped to insane levels by stupid investors, this is when I will be selling. Last year we saw AM share price go to 2-5 BTC +...any fool buying at those prices didn't realize how inflated the company was with a market cap of 2 Million BTC. The same thing is bound to happen to this company when the shock and awe of success kicks in.


edit: I do indeed have information that the public does not, all because of some careful digging by myself Wink
1252  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 25, 2014, 04:31:14 PM
My ability to whip up a shitstorm never ceases to amaze me. We could argue and butt heads all day, but that's not what I came here for.

Have a nice day friends
1253  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 25, 2014, 04:19:25 PM
and you gauge your projection based on the last year of progress/success/communication/etc?

Of course not, it's obviously based on future projections and the fact of a working 28nm chip
1254  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 25, 2014, 04:08:17 PM
^ I find crap like this hilarious...Your shares aren't gonna be trading for months people. Definitely not until this company is well in the black and there's no doubt of our success. I don't necessarily agree with it, but I'm certain that's the way it's gonna be. Not too sure what the point of publicly claiming to dump your non-existent shares are  Cheesy Getting shares trading alone will put confidence back in many of you.

Any approximation to the value of each ActiveMining share?

Just wondering.

In 6 months shares will be trading between 0.01 and 0.04 each. I have already bet on that with my dollar. We will have a farm comparable to Bitfury and probably selling some machines as well. Speculation alone brought the price of shares to 0.009 for a short period of time!
1255  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 24, 2014, 03:28:58 AM
Because pointing the old miners to Eligius and posting a link is bending over backwards?

No because there are many ridiculous requests coming from trolls like yourself that any normal CEO wouldn't even blink an eye at. Ken is in here almost everyday trying to restore confidence and be more transparent (very much so recently)

edit: can all yall tell im hungover today? no hard feelings trolls Smiley
1256  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 24, 2014, 12:44:29 AM
whose's 28nm chips??

I dont even give a f*ck whose 28nm chip it is and im sure many large shareholders don't either.

Trolls will b trolls
1257  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 23, 2014, 11:37:05 PM
moving the miners to eligius is not the chore you make it seem. it is quick and could be done either on the same user account with a different worker, or a different account altogether (not necessary)

Mab was asking for proof of our old hash which is in the exact same place its always been Smiley (minus 300GH?)
1258  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 23, 2014, 11:16:05 PM
Development board running here:

Early Prototype Development Board

Now create another account and put the old miners on it so we can see the two side by side, proving that you're not just using the old miners.

Here you go idiot:



Ken please bend over backwards, touch your toes, do 5 jumping jacks and run 12 laps around the VMC office. Thanks!

1259  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 23, 2014, 11:11:58 PM
+1. all i see is relatively small hashrate with some crazy variance going on - looks like vardiff>1024 using <500GH

Seeing as you are a fairly knowledgeable hobby miner, would a retail ready machine hash with such volatility?
Do you think it's plausible that the variance in the hashrate is due to this being a "demo board" with some kinks yet to be worked out?

This seems like a very reasonable excuse for Ken not to be providing chip specs for the time being until everything is fine tuned and stable. Ken, if this is the case (or something similar) please just let us know. Some transparency on this issue would go a long way for most of us.

1260  Economy / Securities / Re: [ActiveMining] Official Shareholder Discussion Thread [Moderated] on: March 23, 2014, 10:45:05 PM
Pages: « 1 ... 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 [63] 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 73 74 75 76 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!