man you guys just love drama
also, he left -ve trust because he doesnt trust you, which is the point of the trust system. adzino left feedback in retaliation, which has nothing to do with trust. thats more abuse-y imo. even if you make the argument the feedback is neutral, it explicitly states: "do not trust;" might as well be negative. also, its spelled satoshi, not satochi. also, why do you care? hes no on default  nor is he on the trust list of anyone on default afaik.

it more than smells like it; possibly stolen script (but copied for sure), only willing to prove ownership of mining with screenshots of (rented) hashrate, no mining address, still no proof of hardware pictures, no message from a reputed hardware vendor, etc.

exactly what i said would happen; i wont believe anything until a reputed hardware vendor confirms that this individual/group has purchased the hardware to provide 200 TH of hashing power as well as proof of owning the hardware as stated in the above posts.
so far theres insubstantial "proof" that this is a legitimate operation, stay away until actual proof is given.

i would also like it if there was a person in said video holding up a sign of some sort with the op's forum name written on it, as well as today's date. also, a signed message from the address op's  operation is mining with would be essential in proving op is actually mining.

the onion address for the anonymizer is incredibly easy to remember compared to most other onion links. why would you try to memorize onion links in the first place?

i trust carra to hold the posting requirement to an extremely high standard given the conditions of the campaign (no post limit, highest pay rates). id also expect lots of spammer reports in either this thread  or carra's inbox in the near future

it might be possible that if the account was bought with feedback as a seller, the account might be able to withdraw funds immediately as a trusted seller.

one would have to post a lot to raise the current activity to the potential amount though, not to mention you didnt mention if you could sign a message proving ownership of the account. if you can, you should state so at this time. considering the high potential activity on the account, a price around .3-.35 sounds a better fit.

i just said these methods i have linked are 100% free, no fee or bullshit. you are attempting to charge people for content that is freely available online.

the links i put in my post detail exactly  how to do what youre "selling," and if theres something missing im 100% certain its searchable via google. as i stated, youre attempting to swindle people  be selling content that is freely available. im almost certain that swindling people that didnt know better was your intent and that you were fully aware of this.
there are methods to even change the interface, and music as well, which are all available for free online. http://mapskins.com/category/interface/
http://mapskins.com/wooxy/

oh no.....

i only had to get a phone verification to start using xapo, however, its been a while since ive used that site so things might have changed.

so youre selling a guide on how to install custom skins, which is basically available for free online for anyone that knows how to use google? seriously? secondly, there's nothing even remotely related to "hacking" involved doing this, unless you think replacing files suddenly makes you like this guy:


literally what youre attempting to sell is available for free, i literally googled "custom skins league of legends"
http://leaguecraft.com/strategies/gameguide/1551-how-to-install-custom-skins.xhtml
http://mobaskins.com/installing-custom-skins/

theres other fixes for various changes such as announcer packs, map textures, etc etc, everything can be replaced.

not all of them; if the mining operration can provide sufficient proof that they own hardware and are mining (pictures of miners, mining address, endorsement/message from a hardware manufacturer, etc), then it can be ascertained that the company is legitimate and not running a ponzi. however, that doesnt mean they cant pull off some sort of scam.

funny how you say that, as blockchain.info is actually the one that shows fake transactions because their ledger doesnt even check to see if a transaction is valid. there's actually an unconfirmed transaction (for 2 years and running) from satoshi's address on BC.i that isnt shown on any other block explorer.

try contacting some of these people: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=855778.0
monbux and master-p escrow for free, as do many others, but i would kindly suggest you tip them for their services. just shoot one of those people a pm to see if they are available and set up a trade. also, for the future, avoid having the escrow "services" come to you, youll get contacted by many people "looking to build trust" and will offer to "escrow" for you when they have no prior trading history or trust. not saying its a 100% way to set yourself up to get scammed, but similar cases have happened in the past.

im in a similar boat, more or less. i have not and still do not gamble often, but if anything, exposure to bitcoin gambling has given me a more negative outlook on the people here if anything. cases such as an individual contemplating/talking suicide (even if they didnt really mean it, its still pathetic to see) after losing 0.03 using martingale on a dice site really had a negative impact on my outlook as far as what the majority of people that play on these sites are like or may be like. similar behavior is apparent on this forum as well; people really, and i mean really value small amounts of bitcoin as they would a handful of gold. you see nickel and dime scammers running across the forum or people stingy enough to abuse gambling sites' faucets for 1000 satoshi every few minutes. im pretty much rambling at this point, but i think you get the gist of what im trying to say.

iirc its not that hard or time consuming to change where your miners are pointed to, and just having that hashing power pointed to some pool isnt nearly sufficient as proof you actually own that hashing power. prove you own the hardware, sign a message from your mining address, etc.

op decided to dodge the question for a by saying "wait a few days" when i asked earlier, pretty sure this one's a ponzi, as if it wasnt obvious already. my guess is that the tactic here is to wait it out until someone drops a few dollars, and use that money to rent hashing power for a few hours and point it to said pool to "prove" op is mining.

that thread is asking for a black and white answer: are you broke and homeless or are you burning 100 dollar bills for firewood? im asking for more of "whats changed now?" with this thread, although 99% of the posts here are mindlessly thought up in 3 seconds.