While it's probably impossible to achieve something that is "fair", it's good to avoid the 1% of the people own 90% of the stuff.

Why do you assume they keep it in that?
Maybe they buy stuff with it? It's not like fiat will be worthless tomorrow, it will just slowly lose worth while more is printed out.

I agree that this a bad practice to mislead people.
Also it's very annoying, if you want to search for Bitcoin related stuff.

+1 for this, I may distrust people based on  their actions/posts without being scammed myself (e.g. someone posting phishing links).
It would be nice if you could choose between leaving a negative impression and an actual scam report.

That's probably not worth the effort, GPU mining will be obselete soon.

You need to have at least 5 posts and 4 active forum hours before you can post outside the newbie area.

yes, I wouldn't recommend anyone playing lotto either

What is the house edge of this lottery?
I don't think it can top Satoshidice& Co with 2% and less, so I wouldn't recommend gambling with them even if your offer is no scam.

Well, they might not benefit directly from the share price, but it's a valuation of their company.
But a good website wouldn't just increase the share values only, it would probably also increase their sales and profits.

From the trust-introduction thread in the Meta-forum, so I it was alright to use the trust system this way.

I didn't know my opinion had this impact though, so I will think again about my feedback.

Edit:
I did some research:
- As reaction on my negative feedback you and the users "Badabing" and "zeeshanblc" gave me bad trust ratings in a short time
- You have a lot of Powercoins and the last postings of those other two users are heavily pushing powercoin
- there was no mentioning of this issue in any other thread, so the chance of them both jumping at me by chance isn't that big
-> one could assume those two accounts are your secondary accounts


from your Bitmit auction. This is at least bad pratice.

You are not a scammer, but my impression is that use shady tactics to mislead people, so I think a negative trust rating is justified.
But I've updated the rating to be more appropiate.

I might be wrong, but this is just a warning for people to be cautious.

Yes, the first time I've read about Asicminer shares, I tried to read into this, but the scattered data in 300+ pages scared me away.

Great
Very much appreciated, the old fee was kinda high.

No, enlighten me, what is this default list?
I'm not abusing the system, I'm just using it.

http://www.reddit.com/r/Bitcoin/comments/1ffok8/redditwide_tipping_has_been_enabled_for_all_users/

Give people an amount of Bitcoins to start with ^^
I think Reddit tipping is able to have some impact.
E.g. Make creative people like musicians aware of this easy way to receive money.
(But don't annoy people with spamming lots of tiny tips or preaching please)

gummy bears? :3

Most people won't do any paypal transaction for Bitcoins, unless the other one is a very trusted person (or they take some very high fees).

Only people trusting me will see that warning on the left.
Where does it state that it's only for trades and not for impressions? I would like to be able to distinct between those feedbacks though.

Yes, that's why I want it to be renamed/other options or the information that the trust system is only to be used after a trade.

Is there an other way to leave negative trust? If I don't check the box the rating is postive, isn't it?
So, otherwise it would become a positive trust, but I agree there should be more options.
(and like I said, If I am only supposed to use this after a deal I will remove the feedback)

I don't even know you, why should I want to do that?

This user is me and all it says is that I don't trust you, because of the way you are marketing Powercoin.
It's a trust system, so I made a note that I don't trust your offers, that's what the system is for isn't it?

If you are only allowed to make such entrys after a deal, I will remove it.