guys i told you BD has no clue he has no personal experience..
he is just a armchair activist watching youtube videos thinking he is changing the world but has no clue how the world actually works.
he cant even tell the difference between a human biological ability and a human right
he cant even tell the difference between a human human right and a civil right

i mean its not that hard.
all he has to do is look at his arm moving freely when not doing a crime vs arm shackld up in cuffs if doing a crime.
all he has to do is look at things like slavery vs citizens.

he has no clue about the constitution and stuff.. like how it was formed to declare america as a separate thing from other countries such as the british centuries ago. thus by being separat and being amrican differnt rules apply to different groups of humans

he dont even know about things like womans right to vot where the civil laws can change more often then he thinks

he doesnt know what jurisdictions are their boundaries or what they cover, who gets what, who's excluded from what.

all he can do is repeat script and words other people have said because its all he knows. he is like 5-10 years behind in any form of research on the matter as many people who first heard about the freeman stuff he is fond of soon learned all the flaws in it too.. BD has yet to come to that tipping point where he sees the flaws and then starts to think independantly and realise what he has been saying is flawed

just let him take a breather and sit back and give him time.. one day he will see the light at the end of the tunnel he dug

there is already a couple hundred altcoins that restarted at block 1 using the satoshi genesis..
but your proposal was not to start at block 1 again but start years after and change some code to make it possible to unlock the coins locked in the addresses from 2009-10 to be used as givaway.

seems your concept is changing so hasnt been thought out.. as i state a couple weeks ago

there is always a difference between those with opposing view and then those with extremes of that opposing view
normal:                                                   extremes
female equal rights                                   feminists
vegetarians                                              vegans
not wanting antiotics for common cold        antivaxxers
christians                                                 KKK white supremecy
muslims                                                   nutjob isis
thos wanting to be thin                              anorexics
those ok with a bit of a belly                       morbitly obese

BD's point is that the human body was not born requiring a licnce to walk or talk. so he has freedom to walk and talk as its a biological ability.
but was not born with a car or a gun.. h got those later by earning them.

what he then does is use myths and scripts from fools that think that tresspass and property are meaningless in regards to other people enforcing their written and granted rights but mean everything to him enforcing his written and granted rights. and also thinks that the property in question(road) is owned by him.
what he does not realise is that roads are government property and people are customers of the government
th government is a management company offering services to its members(customerbase) and if its customer break the management companies rules the customers can get in trouble and be banned from using their service, entering their property.

BD can drive an unregistered vehicle unlicenced on his own private land.
but the public roads for safety of members of the public has rules that must be followed

much the same as BD can set rules for his own private property if someone walks on his private land

again your avoiding the obvious
a job is not 'do some work' pay me

its a job offer. consideration/interview and there is a get out clause. resign/get sacked/retire

you are completely foolish about trade.
you have obviously not even done freelancing or self employment roles before
just standing infront of a door and if someone asks you to move you hand them an invoice for $500. does not mean they have to accept it

1. you can get in legal trouble for extortion
2. where your trying to seek funds can get you in trouble as it may be illegal to work in certain areas
3. expect a punch on the nose and them charging you for their service. as its obvious you were asking for it

in short by you driving around recklessly and without a licence on a public road is you asking for the police service and you accepting they will charge you for it
and thy can because.. its the law.. its general knowledge and also its just plain sanity

oh and if you wish to divert back to 'in my court'
sorry but if you go to a government funded courthouse. it follows the government rules for how it administers things, the jury know what to expect as they are following the government laws.. so you walking in pretending it becomes your personal court of your personal laws.. wont work.
thats like a middle easterner going into fed court shouting 'obey my sharia law, not your american law'.. sorry but sharia law although its the law of the person shoutings personal preference. its not the policy of the court
there are laws that actually exist and general knowledge that if police stop you you can be charged for certain things
there is NO law that exists nor general knowledge that random person can charge random person for being told to stop

i truly cannot believe how little you actually think about things before hitting the reply button

...
you can if you want make your house become your own court where your own house rules apply. but goodluck having the ability, power, authority to sway someone to enter it.

not everything needs to be one or the other. infact by you writing a book you are not centralising anything. you personally did not invent the information you are instead hopefully going to shoort cut the investigation time down so people can find the information that you found in less time.

take for instance whitepapers. though a summary statement might seem central. it still contains the reference material which is decentralised by different sources
a completely central ebook would have no reference sourcs no independant pathway to allow people to check what you say has validity and all the ebook would contain would be purely your rambling thoughts using no outside information

lets take media/medical information
it doesnt just have to come from a news studio/hospital(central), nor does it require every individual to independantly investigate every word
instead those who love investigating can check if a media/medical information has an actual source,  check if the source vs the summary quote resemble each other and then other independant investigators can do th same. and when a medical/media information appears in public it can have a 'peer review' rating score that shows how accurate it is how bias it is, how open to mis-interpretation it could have, how detailed or lack of detail it has, and such.

that way if rival medical/media outlets wanted to release a version of their own which is peer reviewed those who do not know better can see the review and understand which outlet has more merit, thus saving the non investigative person time while still able to know which version is more believable or not

lets just where conspiracy hat for once

so they killed him without a drop of blood spilled? meaning no blood to test
so they tested dna from when he shat himself? naturally a terrorist fears many things to easily mess thier pants(sarc)
or
did thy kill him by putting a dildo up his behind

by the way dna of his boxer shorts aint proof. what if a gay jizzed on a random male prostitute and it was the jizzer who walked away and still lives that is the leader

no where in the 2nd amendment does it say AR15. nor a loaded AR15
absolutely no where
i can turn up to court and in a sleaveless shirt say 'i stand here using my 2nd amendment right to bare arms'
but you cannot turn up to court with an AR15 say 'i stand here using my 2nd amendment right to bare AR15'

im still laughing

while BD thinks he has found a free money tree of invoicing cops, and suing judges by provoking a car stop by having no licence...
.. the reality is while BD is trying to waste courts time with his money grab the courts found him guilty of no licence and ordered him to pay a fine, with further penalty if the fine is not paid.

ok. so guess what.. karl lentz is not a milionaire from all the invoices and suits
BD definetly aint rich for the same

and BD especially has no first hand experience and is just trying to repeat scripts he heard from people who heard scripts from people who were just running scenarios out without truthful/full detail explanation

i am loving this comedy from BD.. and he still dont realise its comedy

DNA is a biologically written record that shows humans dna contains elements of previous evolutions of animal


also hand written scripture wrote by mans hand using ink. is the thoughts, opinions of the writer.. millions of years AFTER the supposed 'god' event occured so it is not even a witness statement but just hearsay

IN COURT ANSWERING THE DA'S INDICTMENT:

Driver: I, man, am present. I require to face my accuser (first call).
cop stands up 'i witness and accuse the driver'
Driver (says in his head: 'crap wasnt expecting that, dang i dont have a lentz script, what do i do what do i do, what do i do')
driver panics, sweat dripping from his brow, trying to search youtube for a script
judge: 'driver do you plead guilty or innocent to the accusation'
driver panics more , sweat more still searching youtube for a script
judge: 'driver i repeat you shall answer my question do you plea guilty or innocent. this is just a hearing not a trial of jury. we
have to know your response to know if it should be pursued to a jury trial or you accept a plea of guilt'
driver panics more , sweat more still searching youtube for a script
judge: 'driver i shall not repeat a fourth time, if you do not plea you will b held for wasting courts time until your ready to plea'
driver panics more , sweat more still searching youtube for a script

firstly mr BD freeman you are still using the freeman scripts of 'is that an order, heres an invoice'
do you even have any independant thought?


here is the funny thing
you go into a cafe. and you ask for a coffee.. the waitress can refuse to accept your order, can inform you they have no coffee as the machine is broke, they can take your order and accidently give you tea and not charge you for it

you foolishly believe police should pay people for stopping them. is foolish.. you have pretty much just watched a youtube video and accepted it on face value without doing any actual checks indepndantly

you cant just hand someone a invoice if they ask you to do somthing.
its a custom that there is an offer, consideration, acceptance/rejection. and even if accpting the offer. a cooldown period to cancel/reject the service

the whole 'heres a invoice' is not actually legally binding. its just a attempt to cause confusion hoping to scare of a naive cop. but the reality is that if you play that game. you will end up in court. oh and expect to cover their costs.

i absolutely dare u to stand infront of a door blocking it and when someone asks you to move you hand them an invoice. i really do dare you to try it and see where you end up


i find it utter foolish how karl lentz and now BD think people should always take things to a jury trial,  pay admin fee to file claims for things that are cheaper to do just like normal things are done.. where the result ends up the same.. whereby if you dont have a licence you will b banned from driving and then if caught still driving the punishment increases..
seems BD is attempting to actually get people locked up

itis soo soo obvious that BD has no first hand knowledge because all h refers to is karl lentz. and as shown in previous posts and loads of other sources available karl lentz has been debunked and demythed about the crappy freeman scripts he tries

BD until you personally have first hand experience.. i think you should refrain for advising other people from getting into trouble by blindly following your jesus

and then take yourself 5 steps back from your computer, have some calm time and actually have some inner thought time asking yourself 'hat if karl is wrong, lest actually investigate and research as a critic'

so i went on and listened to minutes 18-24

[more facepalms]
karl tries to assume the 'having rights'
sorry karl rights are things written on paper and granted to selective groups of people
(members of the public)(civil AKA citizen rights)

EG human rights might have right to travel. but it applies to humans. but not animals. as its a human right. emphasis human
even though animals have legs too and can put on leg infront of the other to move

biological ability and rights are 2 separate things.
everyone has the biological ability to move around. but that does not give you the right to tresspass or use your hand to grab a girls ass..

once you understand the different categories of abilities and limitations.. rights and responsibilities and which groups of entities have which and which entities can do which. the big picture moment start to click

a right is not the same as a ability no on can tak your ability to walk unless you decide to stand still or they harm you..
a right can be granted and a right can be revoked either individually such as losing your right to freedom when your put in prison
or
rights as a nation/group can be granted revoked. like the right to own slaves was revoked and the rights for black people to vote was granted.

karl believes rights are a basic human thing that cannot be taken away yet prisoners on death row will prove differently

once you learn that rights are given.. you then have to learn they come with responsibilities and concequences and limitations on how you can use those rights

ok so i went on and listened to the 10->18 minutes of badeckers latest link featuring his jesus superstar karl lentz, and found many many flaws

and jusruning minute 17-18 i hear those golden comedy words which i explained earlier
karl lents questioned the attourny and asked if the attourney had FIRST HAND KNOWLEDGE.. where by karl tried to get the attorny dismissed by not being the actual person harmed/damaged

as i said before h even linked the video

i am still laughing at how predictable karl lentz tactics are.

oh and the waffle in minute 10-17.. was karl lentz just trying to say that filing your own claim means you dont have to understand thier laws/codes (he even analogises it like computer code he cant translate) and then says how filing own claim means he can make his own rules and his own law in his own language...

no. the law is the law. the venue has its own policies and procedures and responsibilities and rights if your in thier venue the people in it know the law and the jury know the law they suppose to follow. if you walk in with your own personal law that you created in your language you will get laughed at.
making a counter claim does not make your made up law suddenly valid. otherwise here is a law

i decree from this day forth that BD be recognised as a helicopter
and now in my post where its my authority to speak everyone reading this must comply to my law
??
sorry but i didnt make you become a helicopter because thats not how things work

one thing that BD keeps ignoring is with rights come responsibilities too..
BD and karl pretend they are responsible for nothing and can do anything according to their law

ok so i went on and listened to the first 10 minutes of badeckers latest link featuring his jesus superstar karl lentz, and found many many flaws

take karl saying about 'make it your court' rhetoric
sorry DB sorry karl but the BS of making the court public instead of private, has no sway.
"public" is a membership group of something like a association.. or to make it real simple its like having customers of a gym.. a gym membership..
so those who are members of the gym (members of the public) get certain priviliges/ facilities and also responsibilities granted to them.
these members dont own the gym they are customers of the gym. and they still need to follow the gyms/courts/states/feds rules

karl pretends that filing a claim is about switching from being treated as a customer to being an owner.. but it is not. you do not own the court when you enter their venue.

the actual real world eyes wide open truth is that by putting in your claim, you can then be an accuser and make the accused the one that has to defend themself and show proof and plead their innocence.
it has nothing to do with who has control of the court. the courts rules and policies remain the same.
seriously BD just take your admiration glasses off and just try, just once to be critical of karl lentz, instead of blindly following him
oh and by the way, by putting in your claim. doesnt quash their claim. you still have to plead your case in their claim. and by the way. when people are summoned. they usually dont have time to file their own claim from the time a police officer is knocking at the door with a warrent and handcuffs to the time your in court.
so dont even rely on the whole counter claim stuff.

but if you do counter claim. atleast try to counter claim about something evidential and dont just waffle out some speach you heard on youtube as ifs its gods words. actually have evidence to support the claim your filing involving things that you are involve in.

franky1 [clicks link]
franky1 [listens to first 30 seconds of video]
franky1 [hears karl lentz talking]
franky1 [facepalms]

badecker.. you utter idiot

all you have been showing is freeman stuff. the video you linked is freeman stuff..

your the freeman fangirl

oh and here is some funny things about your 'face your accuser'

1. by your silly rhetoric, murder is not a crime if the human who is harmed is dead, as they cant then accuse you. because your flawed crap is trying to todler tantrum a silly rebuttle that the only human that can accuse you has to be the one who has been harmed by you, where no one else can represent thier interest, estate property on the harmed parties behalf

2.your also trying to insinuate that rape is not a crime if the accuser cannot physically identify you because you may wear a bag over your head. even if there is DNA evidence you going to assume that the accuser has to make a physical identification themselves

3. you talk about rights but ignore responsibilities, you talk about rights but ignore who gets the rights and who doesnt. civil rights is a different contract compared to human rights. and its why foreigners to america need to become citizens to gain the right to vote and use public services.

4. your links and rhetoric have not shown any signs of working as proven by the karl lentz video you linked where you were very addiment was about freedom to travel. but the video was selectively 'la la la la' for a reason
karl lentz didnt ned all the pomp and posturing of 'your in my court, i havnt finished talking' crap as its not his court as he doesnt own the deed to the building. nor did h summon the cop. it was the states/fed court that summoned karl lentz
even so. all karl lentz had to say in court was 'the cop just said i didnt harm or damage anything so it wasnt reckless driving'
and the result would have ben the same.. karl lentz just added and twisted it with alot of freeman mumbo jumbo wishy washy stuff just to make it sound like he won in regards to freedom to travel

seriously take a few steps back, take a few calm breathes realise your following of freeman stuff dropped you in it and showed that its not what you expected it to be

P.S i have sat in court as research for many different things just to see how things work. i do do my research and i think you have shown absolutely no care to research and just desire to believe whatever you find on websites/videos as true based on titles or conclusions without testing them out or digging into them or even critically thinking about them

i hope one day you wake up and start doing more research and actually check things out as i look forward to your awakening. but for now ill let you carry on dreaming as its just pure comedy reading the crap you think is true

UK real estate prices in cities are artificially inflated. there is no actual NEED to do all this stuff apart from the fact that landowners buy up land, but dont build on 9of10 plots.. they sell the first plot high. and then build the next making the resell value of the first drop while strangely the initial first sell itself is used as a marker for value for the next plots sell.

by not just building it all in one go, they get to inflate the price and create more demand by limiting supply.

funny part is smart people work out rents/mortgages increase by hundreds a month so they just move to cheaper towns and commute in.

the cases of a guy making a 2m wide apartment or a woman converting a public bathroom is 1 case in a few million. and done so to make it appear like demand is high when reality its not.

as for the camper van scenario. its not really for living 24/7/365 its more like just somewhere to rest your head in a carpark 5 business nights a week and then drive to hometown for the weekend to save on travel costs

real estate agents hate it because no on is renting the 'buy to rent' listings they have so yea they want to make mobile living/camping uncomfortable by trying to get governments to force council tax on mobile homes and temporary homes so that people are swayed back into renting houses.
what happens next is requiring mobile homes to have extended MOT/safety reg checks fr carbon monoxide and electrical fault and fire risk tests. EG things like it cant be a panel van but a vehicle with multiple doors(exits) and windows

nope
LN is a complete separate network which any coin can use if they have the right coin locking mechanisms.
you are playing with unblockchained tokens called millisats that are tokenised as payments within LN in replacement of playing with real coins on the blockchain.
real bitcoin does not leave the blockchain. it cant. thats the point of blockchain

people foolishly conceive that the tokens on LN are the same as the real coin because what they locked up is pegged to what is played with within ln. emphesis on pegged
BTC does not have 12 decimals...
LN's minisat based token does have 12 decimals

the analogy is like someone foolishly thinking a 1920's PAPER bank note is gold
no its paper. but can be redeemed for gold. there is a difference

the whole talk of 'layers' is to make it sound bitcoin/blockchain conjoined.. but they are not siamese twins in anyway.
LN is a separate network utilised for MULTIPLE currencies and not a pure bitcoin thing

remember when playing with LN your not playing with ''gold' your playing with 'paper'. once you understand the risks and implications you will not try to pretend they are the same thing but use each wisely for different purposes and use each for their intended purpose

bank notes are banknotes gold is gold. bank notes were never a 'layer 2 of gold' as some bank notes were also silver sterling pegged

coughing causes lung cancer

studies show that ALL people with lung cancers initially showed signs that they cough more often then people without lung cancer. so its not smoking, nor carcinogens, nor bad diet nor vaccinations.. but the simple act of coughing that causes lung cancer