Agreed.  Whimpy as f**** -


Do you see what's happening, Arriemoller - I am getting fraidy-cattie at truly expressing my lil selfie in a more direct kind of way... what a world! what a world!

The reality of the matter is that you are likely amongst the most wonderful of persons that any of us mere mortals should appreciate your presence of attempting to help us out within the blindness of this thread, especially yours truly..  

Thank you so muchie for gracing us unworthy ones, especially yours truly, with ur seemingly unworldly and mystifying glory. Amen.    

Wow!!!!!!

Parties might be able to enjoy a decent amount of flexibility in terms of settling some of the matters involving payments to each other, including attornies' fees and damages and perhaps even the construction of statements regarding the extent to which they agree (or not) that the fraudster is satoshi... however, the sanctions matter would remain something that is of public concern, and I doubt that any agreement between the parties would have much, if any, affect upon the court's deliberations on those kinds of public concerns, so getting any potential sanctions leniency would be a matter regarding how persuasive the fraudster's attorney is able to be in presenting the fraudster's various defenses and justifications to present facts and argue logic (maybe asking for mercy or forgiveness) for why that diptwat should not be sanctioned with severe consequences.

I am not hating you.  If you actually are making money and filling such trades, then you seem to be on a decent winning streak.

I just have considerable doubts about your credibility, and merely getting lucky doesn't really mean too much, even if you get lucky 20-or-30 times but then you end up losing the vast majority of your gains because you seem to be endorsing a kind of Martingale principle, which ends up being a losing strategy in the longer run, rather than really having any kind of credibility to show that you might have some kind of meaningful and replicable fundamentals based approach... which kinds of comes across, as well, through your ongoing inclination to want to brag and to suggest that peeps like me give enough fucks about you or your strategy to become envious... .. which seems to be a sign of some delusion that you might have, as well.       

It is so funny that you can be so stubborn and wrong at the same time.  Kind of like roach, just coming from a bit of a different angle regarding the area of your stubborn and the area of your wrong.   

I wonder which one of you get paid more for your ongoing nonsense?  And, how you receive your payments.. in bitcoin, dollars, gold, some shitcoin or some other means or method that I have not considered?

I resemble that statement.

You fuck.

@Arriemoller: Almost like saying "fuck you fatty", but not.   

"Sot" rhymes with "diptwat."


I think that you are stealing from me,,,,,,,,, you, you, you.......   stealer...

well you are used to that kind of behavior from your bedfellows.

That's true and the various diptwat bitcoin wannabes change their logos from time to time and also their stupid-ass deceptive marketing ploys too.

So what's going on with you, BMG?

Are you coming back to any kind of financial sanity when it comes to moderating your bitcoin involvement, yet?

You likely recall that I sometimes had been insensitive to some of your trials and tribulations ---- or at least towards that fuck, Rosewater.... hahahahahaha

Anyhow, are you actually figuring out some meaningful personal balance that will help to better prepare you (both financially and psychologically) for either bitcoin price direction from here on out?  I personally believe if you get the finances in place, then the psychology should be able to follow, but I also recognize (no bad intentions meant) that it is NOT possible to turn a pickle back into a cucumber if such a thing has taken place.. so there is that, too.   

Hairy and jbreher swinging in a tree

K

i


ss

ing


hahahahahahaha


I admit that I am "a bit" - in the micpeep sense -  jealous.   #nohomo     

Surely you are grasping at straws here in your attempt to get some kind of meaning of the failings of a company in bitcoin... Who gives any shits... the failings and flaws of individual companies, even if they might have had a lot of respect in the bitcoin community does not necessarily reflect on bitcoin fundamentals, as you seem to be wanting to suggest to logically follow from your continuing vague-ass nonsensical assertions.

For being such a seemingly smart guy, I cannot believe that you are that fucking amazingly dumb - on an ongoing basis failing and refusing to account for reality of actual facts/logic.  

Let me see if I can 'splain little bitty to your ongoing wannabe disingenuous dumbass... or at least anyone who might get confused by your stupid-ass comment(s).

Market cap, by itself, can be manipulated - especially shorter term, so even if some people might make decisions from time to time based on market cap, if the market cap is not really giving indications of various kinds of adoptions through network effects, then there would be overreliance on the significance of that particular indicator saying anything about what is going on in bitcoin on a fundamental level or any of your shit coin comparisons that you would like to make based on some kinds of false short term pumpenings that you and your fraudulent scammy companions attempt to achieve from time to time, when they think that their money spent on scamming, pumpening, spamming or whatever will have a good effect in their hoped direction to bump their bullshit projects and to hopefully negatively affect bitcoin (or at least to provide some meaningful talking points for the disingenuous shitcoin propagandists, like ur lil selfie).

So for reference, you (and of course smarter people because you are NOT going to look at it, because you don't care about actual facts or sound logic) can look at Trace Mayer's seven network effects for starters.  https://twitter.com/tracemayer/status/934672438385954818?lang=en

I would elaborate more, but you are a fucking waste of time, jbreher.  The burden is NOT upon me to rebutt your stupid ass speculative proclamations, and your troll/shilling seems to be getting worse and worse (maybe more desperate?).. maybe based on grounds that your dumbass shitcoins - aka bcash variants (that is bcash abc and bcash sv for anyone who might not recognize my reference) continue to lose a lot of value, especially when they are measured relative to bitcoin.   You fucktwat.

You are correct that I did not lose coins when the bitcoins had come back to me, and I just sent those bitcoins a second time.

However, I did actually lose coins (or dollars, however, you want to calculate the matter) in the second situation in which the coins had gone back to the other person who was supposed to be sending coins to me.  That person did not act honestly and send me the coins a second time, even though I had given him cash, which was a fairly sizeable transaction.. I just looked it up, and it was in February 2017 and the price was a bit more than $1k per BTC. 

Anyhow, I changed my practice after that incident, and thereafter, I always waited for at least 1 confirmation when I was giving cash to someone for an in person transaction like that - especially if I did not know the person very well and the amount was fairly large.  This was a case in which I had interacted directly with the person for a decent amount of time, and perhaps even close to a year with several successful transactions, yet when push came to shove, the person did not act honestly when we discovered that the transaction had never gotten confirmed and it had gone back to him.

Live and learn, and hope NOT to repeat those kinds of mistakes, even though those kinds of mistakes can be possible and I am not even sure if the guy did anything wrong to cause the situation, he just did not do the right thing after the situation had evolved.  I had some similar mistakes, but the fact that each mistake kind of evolves in a different way, there can come a bit of costliness in various kinds of learning.

Sell?

That seems to have explained what happened, and it was about 3 days and the transaction disappeared from my wallet.  I am pretty sure that I had used a blockchain.info wallet for that (or those... it seems to have happened more than once, but one of the times might have been a receiving time, so I am not as clear about whether something might have been done on the other end when I was receiving, especially in the circumstance that the guy did not honor the transaction, once it had been discovered to have not gone through to me).

Your conclusion, LFC, is that checking BTC prices "on the regular" does not help you to become more richie in a faster way?

Only helps to confirm that you might be poor?  while NOT knowing why?



.. like our resident troll?  Not sure why he is poor?

Of course, it is going to be friendly and easy to use if there are hardly anyone using it.  Transactions are going to go through fast as fuck.

I need a bit more  explanation in order to attempt to get closer to understanding what is significant about this way of attempting to arrange the data.  In other words, I cannot really appreciate what the chart is saying.. it just looks like a clumping blob of colors.

When they came back, there were no fees.... everything came back. The main reason that I remember was because I kept thinking that this is not supposed to happen.. .so I still have not figured out why it happen because I did not do anything like attempting to employ Replace By Fee (RBF) or anything like that.

FTFY - Understatement of the year.    even though currently feels a bit "annoying" your team will thank me later, perhaps?

I had a couple transactions come back to me in 2017.... so I am not sure what can cause that because I did not do anything besides attempting to send and getting a pending transaction that ended up coming back to my wallet.