as noted by the black line which follows all the other colours during the 1800's and early 1900's but then mysteriously veers out of balance of all the other metrics after 1960..
isnt it both revealing and strange how only the black line goes out of sync far away from the other colours. yet many state how the other colours set the average but then proclaim people should ignore the other colours and only trust the black line post 1960

see what i mean about you just trying to play the waste courts time..
guess what...
to get to a stage of being in a court of jury you have to have either done a vicious crime and gone through the detention, bail, initial precedings stuff, way before standing infront of a jury.

or if for a lesser crime you have to go through even more of thier court administration stuff to get a trial.

do you honestly think you can just wake up one random day an just walk into court without a schedule and some jury is just going to be sat there waiting for such random walk-ins.
the court system dos not hav the same walk-in process as a mens barbershop does

hck even barber shops have a procedure. if they have someone who specialises in female hair weaves but only works on tuesdays. if you took your wife in on a monday and demanded your wife get a weave. they can easily tell you to come back another day.

you have many things to learn.
im still laughing how you want to pretend that fdc doesnt affect you to not need a licence but then pretend they do when it suits you.

you cannot pretend you can walk into court, say what you got to say and just have a case dismissed.
havnt you learned anything about innocent people being imprisoned, fined and such.
even people that have the same mindset as you learned the hard way.

the simple fact is if you use their service and break their rules expect to be judged by that breach of contract. pretending in their court that their contract does not apply is like walking into a farmers barn and demanding to be set free proclaiming you never tresspassed on his land, even though your actually standing on it that very minute

remember if you dont want to follow their rules of the service they provide you. then why do you follow their rules of their court
it was you that was denying the concept of federal acts, civil laws.
it was you that thought that the right of travel(written act/law) was the same as human right/ability to move

your whole topic has ben seemingly trying to deny the authority of courts and feds and laws

sorry badecker but on a highway, you do need a licence.

you still have alot of climbing to go

i can imagine badecker in this scenario
(BD walks onto someones driveway/front lawn)
property owner comes out and say get off my property or ill hurt you physically or financially
BD stupidly says 'you cant order me to do nothing, unless you pay me. so im gonna do what i want on your property unless you pay me'
property owner loads his shotgun, but first indicates to BD the sign clearly saying 'tresspasseres will be shot'
BD still demands payment to move
BD is now 6 foot underground

ha ha ha
you think bread was the reason for the female revolution

ok ill let you take the slow route out the freeman rabbit hole

but while you take the long route i hope u travel by foot or by vehicle on your own private land if you do not wish to follow the rules of the highways

i wondr whats next for you
'freemen say the right to reproduce is a sovereign right and so rape is ok'??
truth is biological ability is biological ability. yes you can walk, talk, procreate (travel, speach, sex) but if your on a certain land mass that has rules to follow whil your on that land mass. either get on your private land and walk, rant and bang your cousin.. or in a civilised world, follow the rules..

many people over the last couple decades went totally deep hole intofreeman and actually got in more trouble than expected doing all the freeman stuff. in the UK i remember early 2000's many police officrs didnt even understand what people wer on about when drivers were shouting out their 'right to travel' and would just hand them pieces of paper to produce their documents within 14 days.
they'd not do so. and one day find their vehicle got siezed

pretending governments dont exist or have no power is like pretending bee's cant sting you. which in that case your better off not going near bee's habitat.

the youtuber talks about doing 5 articles a day..
thats 2 hours an article.
sorry but that does not seem like much research time

ok lets math this out.

5arts a day for 5 days=25 so say someone needs to live comfortably for $400 a week.
thats $16 an article($9 an hour.. sounds about right for such quick stories)

now imagine 2 scenarios.
(a) out of 365 days minus weekends =261 minus 4 weeks vacation= 233
thats on article every 7 workdays
so effectively to 'live' on that amount an article writer cant just blog its way through random statements but actually show a story of such research depth and wordplay that it actually shows 7 days of labour went into it..
.. in short the journalists have to put alot more effort into their work

(b) local news media has to employee staff as actual employees if they want to continue pushing out tripe in the form of quick unresearched cheap crap 'news' stories

2 degree's in 150 years

.. in the 1980s i remember people saying how the average was a few degree's average less than the norm where by the UK had many snow storms

in the 1920's people were saying how temperatures were hotter, blaming the london smog

climate change is just that. CHANGE.. up, down, up down
its not an apocalyptic event.

yes we are causing an impact. and so were dinosaurs when they stampede through forests and grassland eating it all until the tree's were left to die.

the point is though
no matter if we went completely offgrid, carbon neutral, no concreting the ground. no draining the water. we will never ever ever have a planet where the temperature becomes a fixed number

when i start seeing badecker us very 'freemany' buzzwords. i can tell he is very deep in the rabbit hole and not ready to step out.

what he dont realise is the very basics
bill of rights/constitution are written words and are civil contracts

if they were about human rights/ability then illegal immigrants and native americans, african-america in the 1800-1950's would all have them same rights by default. but they dont

the bil of rights/constitution is meant to be a contract that allows certain people to have certain freedoms while on american land. but also allows those fredoms to be taken away. not by mutating people into a llama so its no longer human. but just void its contract with a human when put in prison/detained

come on think about it. if there was no civil contract there would b no prisons or police because no one could stop anyone in an uncivilised world of human nature

as for use of courts.
sorry but thats just playing the time wasting game of hoping they give up by trying to go for the flipping the claim around..
ok heres a thought.
imagine the word court = barn
you trsspass on their property and they take you into their barn. you can flip flip all you like and waste time and hope the farmer falls asleep so you can snek off.. but barn rules still apply

the only true case you can have is if you made a claim in your own barn with your own barn rules
this whole freeman stuff is not about human rights, its civil stuff
each court/barn has different purpose. eg family court dont handle certain cases.
a true defense is not to try making a family court dissmiss a family case due you to counterclaiming murder or other non family stuff
same goes for human rights claims are not done in some civil courts

you cannot claim owner ship of the court/barn when its someone else court/barn you have to follow the court/barn rules.
freeman try to get cases dismissed by wasting the courts time by trying to break the court/barn rules

..
anyway.. point being
if your own your own private land, yes you can drive without a licence...
if you drive on government property, expect to follow rules of their property

im white british decent and athiest/agnostic.. but lets deal with some issues fairly

and christians understanding their radicalism.... hmm white supremecy, KuKluxKlan.. need i say anymore
all religions have radicals. theres even political radicals, social radical.


much like american military and government throw around the word 'god' alot too, while travelling thousands of miles away from USA to bomb entire cities and call it 'defense'.. sorry i just dont buy that one bit.
half a dozen middle easterners destroy only a few buildings in america doesnt balance out to the thousands of buildings destroyed in the middle east.

and christians believed womans place was in the kitchen


...
anyway. i would not think of muslims as terrorists just like i dont think of christians as terrorists. i think of the kukluxklan, white supremisists / isis, da'esh, al-qaeda as completely separate from the religions

i think that media just needs to stop bringing up the religion as the title of a terrorist group and just call them
'middleastern psychos/nutcases'
'western psychos/nutcases'

the hypocricy i see is the fact that if an america KKK walkd around with a gun the US defense wont shoot him as its 'expressing their freedoms' yet would travel thousands of miles to shoot muslims.
kinda surprising middle easterners are so angry, when you research the ottoman wars
but not surprising if you google ottoman top results show a furniture brand. where as type in a building 'twin towers' top results show death stats and fearmongering

gotta love the bias
twin tower death toll >2k civilians directly due to invaders (terrorist action)
syrian death toll >4k civilians directly due to invaders (us military weapons)

a thought to think about

greenlands 'methane' concern comes from vegetation and animal decay from many centuries ago.. hmm vegtation = grass and tree's .. i wonder how can that be possible if greenland was always an ice island.....

next thought to have
ok so lets believe greenland was solid land of having grass and trees and animals living on it.. i wonder how can that be possible i mean wouldnt the planet be too hot to support life. ...

the truth is that global temperatures are not suppose to be a fixed statistic that never goes up or down. ofcourse it should change. there is no denying that climate change exists but what you actually have to ask yourself is what number is 'norm'

to eskimo/inuits 10'c is a hot summers day but to an african its a chilly cold day.
to most developed countries sat between the north pole and the equator they thing 17'c is a nice fine comfortable day
people adapt to their environment
a 2'c change over 150 years is enough for ~7 generations to growup and give birth to each generation that gives better temperature tolerance to new environment
heck i know some african folk who came to england in the 70's(40 years ago) and their children acclimatised and now the grandchildren dont see all the fuss about english winters. and thats just 2 generations

..
so here is some questions
when you look at places like the grand canyon, usa... airs rock, aus.. africa. and many places and you see the water erosion and previous sea levels of many centuries ago. and you see fossils that prove that life still existed in those conditions.
you do have to ask yourself
is a higher water level going to be a planet killer people think. or just nature being itself, adapting and moving

in my view climate change has nothing to do with carbon as carbon is only 0.04% of the air. and as many things prove the 33% increase from 0.03 to 0.04 has not caused a 33% temperature increase. other planets in the solar system with 95% carbon are not 3000x warmer than earth

the actual climate control is more about water.
when you do research into RAINforest's disparaging and what rain forests do for the climate you start to realise why its called rain forest and not carbon forest.

and this is due to de-forestations and building cities on land where land no longer retains water to be evaporated to keep the land cool (like sweat on skin evaporates to cool the body) but instead causes drought
what most people dont realise is that most water evaporation is caused by land retained water not ocean retained water.

i think people should separate the fears of the environment of humans into 2 separate categories
land health - water/climate
lung health - carbon/methane

and not confuse the two. as that seems to be the problem. climate change deniers use the carbon debate in relation to climate to deny climate change. .. carbon is not the metric to use in relation to climate. water is

very simply, because each blockchain has different rules

a blockchain is a batch of data where the identifer is a hash of that data.
this solidifies the batch into a block of data whereby if any data in the block is changed, the identifier changes.
this identifier is then put into the next block with the next blocks new data. thus chaining the blocks together

and edits of the first block changes the identifier which then obviously changes the content of the next block as the identifiers wont be the same which then has a easy to spot check mechanism for edits, while also making it harder to edit earlier blocks when more and more blocks are added as you then have to re hash each block there after.

a blockchain block identifier is not fixed to be sha256 hashing, not fixed to using PoW mining, and the contents are not fixed to be transactional/financial. each and any blockchain can be designed to do different things

websites like bitnodes list a few nodes ~10k and its easy to search out if their 'network' is amazon or other remote service

https://bitnodes.earn.com/nodes/?q=Amazon.com,%20Inc.
out of 9450 at time of writing over 1000 are using hetzner and 800 are using amazon

......
full node users are not 'miners' a miner is a separate device that is called an ASIC and an asic connects to a pool the individual who has a ASIC in their house gains nothing from 'solo mining' from his own node but does gain something from syndicating with others in a pool where the pool manager has a full node and manages which asic gets which work

no the block creators mempool just decides to keep the 1abc->1bcd->1cde->1def as active viable transactions and just puts the
1abc (10btc) -> 1bcd (9.99999900) into a block
then the next block(s) can then contain the other transaction decendants
they do not all need to be in the same block.

plus a block can only fit on average 2500tx so again dont worry about a chain of 50,000 decendant transactions needing to all fit into one block. as long as the first viable transaction thats has an unspent input gets confirmed the funds then are in that persons possession as he is then the only owner of the private key for 1bcd

satoshi was not that paranoid about being sniped by CIA rifle marksmen. his motives were more so about having multiple occassions where he realised he was becoming a central decider for what was supposedly meant to be a decentralised system
he made a few comments about how he personally didnt want to be reviewing other peoples code and such. and a few times mentioned his dislike for things like SR and also yea gavin doing a lecture infront of government guys.

but it wasnt the fear of the government guys that made him move on it was the realisation that he was becoming to much of a focal point of decision and so he backed off instead of becoming a tyrant on the code..

dark knight quote for short: you either die a hero or live long enough to become the villain

ok firstly most pools do 'first seen' and then ignore other transactions. this is why CPFP was invented to have a child transaction that spends it. thus making the linked parent be required,

what then happens is that you get a chain of transactions
which instead of RBF
1abc (10btc) -> 1bcd (9.99999900) (on person)
1abc (10btc) -> 1ghi (9.99999800) (competing person)

becomes CPFP
1abc (10btc) -> 1bcd (9.99999900) (one person)
                        1bcd(9.99999900) -> 1cde (9.99999700) (same person)
                                                         1cde (9.99999700) -> 1def (9.99999600) (same person)

where they try as fast as they can to make spending transactions hoping to get one tx more than a competitor to then get the confirm

ofcourse this can go on forever or until the guy sees the first transaction confirms then he know the funds are safe in his posession

ok. to get to the crux of what i think badecker is trying to forsee/desires
a country without government.

to completely dissolve a government is to not allow a new one to form.
which would be a no-vote turnout (i cant see that happen)

but lets say it did. ok no government, no assistance, no service. suddenly its a complete capitalist and no society
people fight each other to keep their border walls of their houses/gardens as 'theirs'

basically its the civil war and war on independance in reverse

then whn the dust settles and pools of blood dry
they argue about who maintains the roads and who pays for it. eventually neighbourhood associations form.
because neghbourhoods adjoining other neighbourhoods. to come to common ground on certain rules so that those moving long distance are not getting headaches following new rules each suburb they move through. townhall committees are formed.
towns link together and need to come to common ground on certain rules so state senators are formed.
then we are back to having a government.. after alot of bloodshed and property loss

all that literally changes is the brand name of who is the 'management' company that arbitrates things

how deep do you want to climb out of the rabbit hole you fell down..

i could go on for hours busting the flaws of the 'freeman' stuff

first of all, the basics of human vs civil. is if simplified down about 'illegal aliens' and 'tresspass'
if your not a legal citizen(not member of public)(not under government rule) then you are tresspassing and will be deported.

if you try using government services you will be denied. roads are a service. so without showing you have a licence(permit(permission)) to use their services then you should not be on the road.

legal acts of the road(government service) is that the public(citizens) should not walk on the road but use the pavement and crossings. roads are made for vehicles and laws of how those vehicles apply to how they should act on the roads

if you dont want to obide by those government legal acts. then become an illegal alien and hide off the grid.. or walk on land which you own or have permission to walk through..
but if you are found using government services accept to be charged for that service.

ok its ben a few years. so lets dig in
https://www.youarelaw.org/common-law-discussion-karl-lentz-billy-thornton/
mp3. #1 time0:00-15:00
guy goes to court and say he doesnt recognise the courts the case lasts 7 minutes and is ended.
it clearly says in the mp3 the liability order was still active. after the case
all that happened was just wasting the courts time.
the liability order was no quashed
the guy then went to say to those he was liable to that he went to court. but didnt say that those he was liable to just went away.
what half of this freemason crap is about is not lawfully dismissing liability. but actually trying to waste everyones time soo much that they just give up after their accountant works out that its more expensive to keep trying and to just write it off as acceptable loss of revenue.

things like this are done all the time. if you have a credit card/loan owing £500 but know it costs a credit card company £500 to pay to a financial omburdsmen to make a decision. and then £1000 to go to court, and court of appeals. the freemasons would try making credit card companies aware of the costs its costing them to keep fighting for their funds, and mentioning after that the person can just claim bankruptcy meaning the credit card company wont get anything back. thats not the person winning because of human rights. but just getting a company to make a loss and move on.
but the fremasons hide all that tactic in lots of half truths and ploys to make it sound ik its about human rights

mp3. #1 time15:00-30:00
ok this segment is about what authority a court has.
basically anyone can choose any fair venue to argue their case. many contracts can b formed whereby if a person has a problem with thier telephone service. they can first go to their telephone regulator, then tribubal, mitigation, then court.

people can form their own court. but if one party such as  government that feels you have tresspassed or broke one of the rules of the use of their property they can ask you to attend their court.

if someone stands on your land then you can escort them to your barn and get them to defend their actions or suffer the consequences.
EG at a drinking bar/pub, but customer dosnt have money for the drink. you can take them into the kitchen and mak them wash dishes/glasses as payment/punishment/reimbursment of lost costs
but be careful.. your punishment may not be lawful or legal which means you could get in trouble for the punishment you give out.

the whole going to court and saying you dont recognise their authority is not declaring your innocence its just wasting the courts time. if its related to a government service which you broke the rules of then the government courts have procedures for that. they simply add a warrent to get you to turn up later. you actually can end up getting in worse trouble than just admitting you as a human did make a mistake by driving unlicenced

EG by claiming your not a citizen of government you could end up in a detention centre until they can identify a country you are a citizen of to deport you to. rather than just paying a fine for being unlicenced on the road

i went though the whole freeman rabbit hole like 7 years ago. but i actually went into the details and researched beyond the hype, i went through it all and found the flaws.

if people actually demanded their rights and stopped accepting the services of the governments. guess what
first. you end up walking to work. nxt you realise you dont have time/ability to dispose of the trash piling up on your back lawn because local governments stopped servicing you. next you learn to barter because the government/bank money becomes obsolete. then your grand children when they grow up revolutionals your dvolved state into forming a cartel of 'public' service offerings. and thus they end up re-establishing a governemtn, but under a different brand

you do not have the right to travel in a vehicle unhindered. you do not have the right to have garbage disposed of or even water supplid to your house for fre via pipes.

but if you want to go off grid and walk to the nearest river/stream to collet buckets of water and walk to work. fair play. but atleast know what your rights actually are.
your rights to travel end at your little toe not at the front bumper of a vehicle

heres some small little tip-bits
 'civil' right is not a 'human' right.
once you realise the difference you start to learn how not being a civilian/citizen changes how you should expect life to be

you have the right to walk, dance, talk, wiggle your ass.. all the natural biological abilities
but to use something that is not your biology that can be considered dangerous and able to be used maliciously is not a free right

sorry but a lambo was not around in the days of the constitution.. nowhere does it say you have the right to drive a lambo
if you want to travel. fine. use your feet

i think you forget that the funds put into government are from the people too
meaning if you want £20 in your bank for updating a licence. it will cost the tax payer(people) £40
£20 to you and £20 for the labour and admin to produce the documents

think about it its only ~3 hours of labour. but to open the post type in your details. validate your driving test certificate is real. produce document, print the plastic card, double check all details are correct and post it back is not a simple 2 second task

so if you want to receive £20 be prepared to have paid more than £20 for that privelige

and please please please stop watching them freemason stuff and just believing it on face value.. atleast do some research
especially if you start believing the tripe about secret 'credit' accounts in peoples 'N'ames.. just dont even bother to believe that tripe. its all been busted and laughed at years ago