Perhaps there is no direct connection, rather the rise in price was caused by expectations. The speed at which the market reacted is too fast for this money to actually come to the market. But this is most likely good for the market, since the arrival of this money is ahead of us and it is likely that the target levels you specified will be achieved.

On the one hand, this is so, on the other hand, the United States is one of the leading economies in the world and its influence on any processes is much greater than any country from the second hundred, isn't it?

As for the questions of the author of the topic about supply and demand, it must be clarified that we are always talking about effective demand. And everything immediately becomes clear 

If we take it globally and for a long time, then corruption hurts everyone, even those who profit from it now. Another thing is that not everyone thinks globally (and sometimes this is correct, since circumstances are in most cases stronger than individuals), therefore, many athletes are involved in corruption in one way or another.
As far as your question about a draw is concerned, there is no corruption here (if there was no direct agreement), this is just an economy of effort. By the way, there are a lot of such examples in chess in recent years.

If we consider this issue from the point of view of fixing profits, then I would do it on levels of more than 60k. The probability that bitcoin will do + 100% (will double) is much less likely that it will do -66% (will fall three times). If we talk about long-term investment, then you should not pay attention to today's price at all.

Such news is already beginning to annoy me greatly - the government has banned that, the government has forbidden it. I'm wondering how these ideas come about? Where did they come from? A parasite official sits and thinks - what should be further prohibited? Or is it a covert struggle of competitors and officials are used as a tool in it? I wish I knew the answers to the questions, but most of all I would like the government to meddle less in the private affairs of people and in private business.

He did not lose his money, he spent it on a luxurious life - cocaine, prostitutes, expensive cars and so on. This is what attracted the writers who decided to make a film about this, I do not think that anyone would be interested in a film about an ordinary story - first a big win, then a big loss.

Ну раз вы такой оптимист то может быть набросаете хотя бы тезисно роадмап? Время идет, по фактам я вижу что проект все покинули, а ваша риторика не меняется.


То что вы перечислили я наблюдал еще давно, так что не было смысла перечислять  
Я как бы тоже вопросы в свое время задавал, пытался разобраться а  в ответ вместо конкретики получал разные "полезные" советы  

На самом деле печально. Не могу сказать что проект хоть чем-то объективно хорош, но в жирные времена взлетали и на пару порядков худшие, в общем автор скорее всего упустил шансы, не думаю что сейчас в индустрии какая-либо кустарщина на что-то сможет претендовать.

Ну то что на эфире дно согласен, мне более интересен вопрос если даже уменьшить комсу до нуля не дно ли это?
Не вижу кейса в котором бы это реально работало (кроме хайпа). Ну есть у кого-то уникальная нфт-шка картинки. Дальше что? Выглядит она полностью как такая же неуникальная цифровая копия картинки и вряд ли будут выстраиваться очереди чтобы посмотреть именно на уникальную.

I think that from the side of streamers this is a deception (if they did not warn their viewers), but from the side of the casino it is not. The casino can give even a million dollars for the game - this is an ordinary promotion, any attentive viewer will see how much money was lost before the planned win and draw conclusions.
Quite recently, by the way, Poker Stars handed out free tickets to the tournament to the top streamers of the twitch (for an ordinary participant, tickets would cost around $ 500) and the streamer had to show his participation in the tournament. Was this a scam? I think no.

Strange situation. I can assume that your country is economically undeveloped. If economic processes are proceeding as they should, then corruption (and hence the destruction of sports) is simply unprofitable for those who are engaged in this.

I would like to draw your attention to another point - sport is very often associated with politics. And politics is the main environment for corruption. Therefore, I think the less participation of the state in such matters, the better for everyone. Sport is commerce and a businessman will not be acting to make a loss to his firm (unlike a corrupt politician).

Особенность этого цикла жалоб на высокую комсу битка, то что всем уже похуй так как фантазеров про "средство платежа и бла-бла-бла" просто не осталось. А для "инвестирования" и прочих фантазий никаких помех высокая комиссия не создает, скорее наоборот.


Картинку то продали? В чем идея вообще была ее создания?

Одно время интересовался проектом и даже пытался собрать воедино в голове эти крупицы инфы раскиданные хаотично там-сям, но потом забил. И вижу что забили практически все кто хоть что-то тут делал/как-то участвовал.

neiros скажите объективно, сами верите что ваш проект скажем дипломатично еще имеет шанс на жизнь? Раньше помню гонора у вас было прям ооочень много.

If I'm not mistaken, one of these lucky/losers sold the rights to film his case in the cinema. The situation is standard - won something like $ 100 million, quickly spent it and returned to work as a loader. I don't know if the movie helped him to start moving forward again or not 

Ну в этом плане согласен (сам карту жены использую например), но фактически я это не рассматриваю как карту "другого лица" так как любой кто ваши денежные потоки будет разматывать (хоть законно хоть незаконно) тоже родственников за "разных лиц" не посчитает и грубо говоря тут ничего не спрятать, все как на ладони.

Taking into account the fact that the entire market (especially the stock market) shows abnormal indicators (against the backdrop of the crisis) and recently there has already been a slight correction (for example, with Tesla shares), one can expect a sharp movement in both directions. Personally, I will not be surprised at either 100k or 10k in a week 

Where there is a state, there is corruption (in civilized countries it just looks more decent). So if we want to get to the root causes and eliminate them, then we must reduce the power of the state and officials. I see no reason why the state should decide for me (an adult and capable) whether I can gamble or not.

It is unreasonable to trust third parties not only with your money, but also listen to their advice (for money or for free). There is such a type of fraud - a "forecaster" sells (or simply gives for a promise to share future profits) forecasts for an event. He gives opposite predictions to different people, therefore, by deceiving one person, he makes a profit from another.

Yes, when the government intervenes in the relations of adults, it always only hurts. If a person is considered mentally healthy, then he is free to decide where and how to spend his money. All these regulations and prohibitions waste taxpayers' resources and squeeze honest citizens into semi-criminal and criminal spheres.

Chess becomes especially gambling when played with a short time control. For example, I play well when the whole game is given 3 minutes, and if the time control is 2 minutes, then pure adrenaline begins. Therefore, I do not play such games before bedtime - after that it is very difficult to fall asleep 

Even if they are not caught cheating, it will be an unprofitable undertaking. The point of bonuses is that in fact, they buy the loyalty of the player, and these bonuses are aimed specifically at the top players. If casino have not "bought" a player, then another casino will buy him, since a large player is a tasty morsel for any establishment. I read stories about how offline casinos paid the (top) players for flights and hotels and made a lot of profit because these gamblers lost much more than these costs.