I need a 0.25 BTC loan for a week or less, I can escrow Noble (1.3M). If anyone is interested PM me. I don't want to sell and have been buying with all BTC I mine but need to buy another coin for a week and coinbase takes me 4 days. I should get a good return to buy more Noble.  |
|
|
|
The list so far.. Lets see some more 0.00000001 Crypti = 1Cryptoshi
Cryptishi
Cryptite
Crypton
Cryptonit
Cryptoner
Cryptini
Cryptiny
Cryptino
Crypticron
Crypticle
Cryptin I like Cryptin as well!! short sounding but yeah Cryptini is one of my fav for now How about Cryptsy, because that is about what it's worth!  Or CRY, I only have 1 CRY !  Truley I think every V-coin's minimum unit should end with "oshi". The man deserves that legacy into the future. |
|
|
|
That is entirely possible...perhaps even likely... accordingly there are good arguments for and against. Focusing for the moment on arguments in favour, the photonic aspect appeals to me having been fascinated by photons and their relationship with matter for some time. It is this relationship between matter and light (analogously between the substance of matter (Fiat currencies) and the inchoate nature of light (Cryptocurrencies) that interests me. One may convert the one into the other by means of a relationship not entirely dissimilar to Einsteins wonderfully simplifying equation...E=MC2. It is this relationship between thing on the one hand (Fiat currency) and 'no thing' on the other (Cryptocurrency), matter and light, that bears comparison arising from their interchangeability. Cryptocurrencies create real substance, real value and remarkable utility even though they arise from the 'nothingness' of mathematical abstraction (ex nihilo totem fit - from nothing everything comes). Add the fact that the exceptional ideas underpinning Crypti orbit the seismically important idea of a currency that incentivises the movement and flow of the currency (just as photons have to keep trucking or end up with zero mass) and it may be that the word is a candidate alternative for micro-crypti. But your points are well made and better candidate names may be only moments away.
Edit: Samsmith16 pointed out the photonic resemblance, not I.
Quantum:
At the risk of thread drift, I must point out that you are 40 IQ points above most of the bloggers here.
Also, there was nothing wonderful about Einsteins equation E=MC2. The formula for computing the energy of a moving object was already old in the time of Caesar. Energy equals mass times the square of the velocity E=MV2.
All Einstein did was expand the velocity in the formula to the speed of light, and then propose, not prove, that such a mass then becomes pure energy.
Yes, I am a Mensa member.
You are slick, starting a post pointing out how smart someone is while deriding the rest and smoothly shifting to how above them you also are. You must do very well in social gatherings. |
|
|
|
Holy Mother of God!!! Dude .... stop food trolling this thread :DD:D:D but i have to admit! You have good tastes Bon Appetite Hey, SillkRoad started it!!!  ...
We plan to immediately give some steak (from puppets) before launch that support us and supported us all this time and will help us move in the right direction
What concerns Promotion Fund. will create a new page after the launch where everyone can take part in the promotion of ...
|
|
|
|
0.00000001 Crypti = ?
Cryptoshi? I think Cryptoshi sounds quite good. How about Cyrptite? I know why the "oshi" but it's just too copycat-ish 0.00000100 Crypti or 100 Cryptite I agree. Definitely not cryptoshi. Cryptite sounds a little better You must be kidding about "tit"  Well it's tite like kite so Cryptite Nope as in "tight" https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=UYxxgvA8rlM&feature=kp |
|
|
|
I like Steak and Potatoes.  |
|
|
|
...But if we aren't in the discussion for top 2 or 3 Crypto Currencies 12 months from now, we will be horribly disappointed.
Lofty aspirations, I like that. |
|
|
|
I moved all my coins off MP to my wallets as well. MP has lost alot of its credibility and I dont see them regaining it anytime soon. Will there ever be an exchange that is credible and transparent?....who knows, but for all investors, don't store your coins on exchanges. I still have .2 BTC worth of a few coins on other exchanges, but they are for not a concern. My MP wallet is now in my own possession, I dont think anyone should trust MP anymore with their money, especially if you hold large amounts of a coin.
I'm liking the way Poloniex Handles themselves. Dear Users of Poloniex, As you may have heard, a hacker recently used an exploit to steal 12.3% of the Bitcoins on Poloniex. Details on how this happened can be found in this announcement post: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=499580.0In order to keep Poloniex solvent, all BTC balances were deducted yesterday by 12.3%. No further deductions will occur. As soon as I have time to put it up, you will be able to view exactly how much BTC you are missing on your Balances page. I deeply regret that this happened, and am committed to repaying the debt and making Poloniex absolutely secure. Any exchange fees collected since the incident will be used to pay back the debt at regular intervals. Exchange fees will not be raised. Additionally, shares of Poloniex may be issued, the profits from which would be used to repay the debt and hire highly qualified security experts. The timing and details of this, and indeed whether it will occur, have not been decided. I invite you all to give your input on these decisions by voting in the following poll and, if desired, leaving a comment: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=500578.0Since the incident occurred, the way withdrawals and order creation are handled has been redesigned so that all such requests are added to a global command queue, then processed sequentially. More automated checks for consistency of balances have been added. Larger percentages of coins have been moved into cold storage. And as of today, I am searching for additional developers to bolster the security of Poloniex as much as possible, and as soon as possible. Here are some specific details about the hacker. BTC addresses used to withdraw stolen funds to: 1ABnAg2nK3M6YKmaYtL5EBgdp1VQGyTbjL 18sdMt7ENfU3Weq7vy1Qdqr3skgd47WEbe 1Ktq7TE3J5vZ3c99M5weqKfFcNkHQdqPrq 1C1acLbFh3KaKgdFUBuCV8oD7ucqUaLLLY IP addresses used to place the withdrawals: 61.161.143.175 126.11.105.45 122.143.3.144 60.10.69.65 Email addresses used to log in: 373287211@qq.comgasthalter@qq.comgroup_124@qq.comjohnimmi_234@qq.comliuxiaohong_819@qq.compeabody_129@qq.comstevencohen_998@qq.comwangweida_123@qq.comThe total BTC stolen was about 97. The addresses will add up to more than that; this is because the hacker needed to deposit BTC several times in order to use the exploit. Finally, I would like to extend my deepest gratitude toward the many people who have shown their support, who have vouched for my character, and who have offered help. In this time of extreme and continual stress and worry, I truly appreciate it. I will do everything in my power to return your funds to you as soon as possible, and I am grateful for your patience in the meantime. Sincerely, Tristan This On I had to prompt them for. Dear Users of Poloniex,
As you may have heard, an attempt to hack into Poloniex's hot wallet server via social engineering was made several weeks ago on May 3rd. The attack was successfully repelled and no funds were taken, but as a precaution, the old BTC hot wallet had to be considered compromised. This means that any BTC or XCP addresses generated on or before May 3rd should NOT be used for deposits.
This email is notify anyone still using such addresses that funds deposited there will soon no longer be recoverable. Future deposits to such addresses may be LOST. Please do NOT send any more BTC or XCP to any deposit address generated on or before May 3rd. Any BTC or XCP address currently appearing on your Balances page is valid.
Thanks,
Tristan D'Agosta
Poloniex, LLC I am sure they are doing their best and have my trust, for what that is worth. I only use exchanges to buy or sell coins the withdraw immediately. As someone mentioned above keep your coins in your wallet, there have been far so many cases of exchange hacking and they won't stop anytime soon.
Tough to do If you want to place walls.
Vericoin is the only alt that's not a scam.
Everything else is crap. They're all shady.
While VRC has talented devs that made themselves public. And they're being pragmatic.
LMAO! If vericoin is the only alt that is not a scam then cryptos are doomed. I was more diplomatic in my response! |
|
|
|
|
Or, Add the extra BTC as BTER BUY orders for coin launch in order received if purchasers wish. That way they will not lose their place in line and will be first in line for buy orders at initial price.
|
|
|
|
Diff goes up! No. Diff goes UP!  50 - 90 UPD: aaaaand back to ~20 Multipool or Rented rig? 51 attack? It's been bouncing like that since the Scrypt ASIC's hit. Pretty soon it won't matter. |
|
|
|
|
Rig went down during lightning storm last night, why didn't I receive an alert that rental was down?
|
|
|
|
Yeah, I think HTTPS before anything else. Anyone that uses this realize your password is not safe. |
|
|
|
Vericoin is the only alt that's not a scam.
Everything else is crap. They're all shady.
While VRC has talented devs that made themselves public. And they're being pragmatic.
You choose your words poorly. |
|
|
|
Sounds like you're going to keep IPO open 25 more days.
The announced period of this pre-sale is 30 days (ending August 10th, 00:00 UTC), and while we are very happy that the cap was reached so soon, we still will stand by the original terms. I don't see the point, if the cap was reached. But, neither do I have a problem with it. I see this as a twofold win, One it shows the devs are standing by their word and not running with the funds and two it gives them the time they had originally planned on to do the work they had slated in their timeline for this month. I've got a suggestion. If other investors don't mind how about letting those people over 750 BTC keep their stakes? It's just 761 BTC instead of 750, so not a big difference for majority but we'll have more initial stakeholders and some of them might be helpful.
Although someone still could refund 11 BTC until August 10th and they'll got stakes automatically.
Changing terms after a sale is bad business and should always be avoided. There are many reasons for this that I'm to many coffee's short right now to point out.  Pardon me for speaking frankly，if the ipo reach your object for 750BTCs,what means do the ipo stand by the original terms? let guys buy and be refunded,it is good game? we all konw there is no change to join IPO,but still open the trading?why?
It only possible to refund CRSALE at the moment, otherwise trading on CRSALE purchase tokens themselves will be not possible. no ,I do not point it .What I want to say is why do not close the ipo when reach the 750BTCs. Do to it being a market in flux which will remain so for the 30 days originally announced. Add someone in IL just because he has sense of humor?
NO... I had also replied to one of his posts earlier... TRUST ME... when you see me make that post... FOLLOW MY LEAD & NEVER LOOK BACK... your life on bitcointalk will become much better... I can even send you the full list of ~200... just let me know! It is you prerogative and loss. I've got a suggestion. If other investors don't mind how about letting those people over 750 BTC keep their stakes? It's just 761 BTC instead of 750, so not a big difference for majority but we'll have more initial stakeholders and some of them might be helpful.
Although someone still could refund 11 BTC until August 10th and they'll got stakes automatically.
We prefer to stick to the original terms, however as you correctly said, in case someone refunds his stake, they will get the refunded amount together with the 24% bonus (prioritized by the time of their purchase). Swaying with the BitcoinTalk crowd breeze is a path to destruction you do not want to follow. Stick to you word. that is all you really have in this world and once it's lost ... |
|
|
|
I think Camo's scenario is only an issue if everyone is using the exact same mixing depth. Differences in user-selected mixing depth create more or less randomized exit points, no? With volume, I'm not sure how you can provably link a sum entering the anon phase with a sum exiting.
Even he agrees there's no mathematical proof to it, but that's not really the point. I do agree that it's not absolute proof that A sent X to B. But it's damn close enough for government work... If they find that much, they'll find a way to take that money you're not giving them when they change the laws to give themselves more of what's your's again... It may not be a crime to save money today, but as we see from the EU, it's on the menu... I think your missing the point with the EU thing. Currency like the Euro are going to collapse. Bitcoin Darkcoin will replace these relics once the reset comes. Governments will have to beg us for money, as they can't just take it anymore. (Optimistic) maybe, but perfectly plausible Can I have some of what your taking? |
|
|
|
Recieved Immediately. Thx Dev holding. |
|
|
|
I dont think I 've ever mentioned this, but my favourite fruit is the banana.
Both the taste, texture and the sound... banana! Its lovely!! banana banana banana... try it!!
(no funny sexual jokes please)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l924olE7ZJU |
|
|
|
OK you mean they changed the value's of "0" and "7" ? Sounds like alot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB3HcPgm_FI That actually sounds pretty scary consider they cannot get the distribution equation correct. You are welcome to read this presentation about Ed25519 advantages over older implementations: http://cryptojedi.org/peter/data/nancy-20120320.pdfhttp://ed25519.cr.yp.to/The distribution formula was posted also so the community could review it (and it helped already to catch one mistake). If you have any additional suggestions regarding the formula, we will be happy to hear them. Good info here, thx Oh and we are so pumped that finally have a team go with a lighter elliptic curve algorithm!! To my knowledge you guys are the first to build ground up and change the elliptic curve since the original Bitcoin code. Some one far more researched then me could prove me wrong, and we are not talking changing the hash algo here (x11, x15 or NIST5 are all just hash algo) we are talking the elliptic curve algo... Just brilliant cant wait to dive into the code once it's posted!!!
OK you mean they changed the value's of "0" and "7" ? Sounds like alot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB3HcPgm_FI That actually sounds pretty scary consider they cannot get the distribution equation correct. Well I could see how an uneducated person in this field could draw a conclusion of fear, as well as somehow relate two separate things. I think your fears could be lifted from a little more research Partially correct, Educated guesses are more than acceptable when questioning a "Investment Opportunity" the burden is on the Investee to quell those fears. Very Very true!! one must be as educated an investor as they can be, Not sure if you caught my links a few pages back but if you feel like really going down the rabbit hole let me know... Yeah, I saw them thx. I got a sniff of that hole and shrank away. 20 years ago I woulda jumped in. how long is a piece of string
You must supply the POV magnitude to answer that question. |
|
|
|
OK you mean they changed the value's of "0" and "7" ? Sounds like alot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB3HcPgm_FI That actually sounds pretty scary consider they cannot get the distribution equation correct. You are welcome to read this presentation about Ed25519 advantages over older implementations: http://cryptojedi.org/peter/data/nancy-20120320.pdfhttp://ed25519.cr.yp.to/The distribution formula was posted also so the community could review it (and it helped already to catch one mistake). If you have any additional suggestions regarding the formula, we will be happy to hear them. Good info here, thx Oh and we are so pumped that finally have a team go with a lighter elliptic curve algorithm!! To my knowledge you guys are the first to build ground up and change the elliptic curve since the original Bitcoin code. Some one far more researched then me could prove me wrong, and we are not talking changing the hash algo here (x11, x15 or NIST5 are all just hash algo) we are talking the elliptic curve algo... Just brilliant cant wait to dive into the code once it's posted!!!
OK you mean they changed the value's of "0" and "7" ? Sounds like alot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB3HcPgm_FI That actually sounds pretty scary consider they cannot get the distribution equation correct. Well I could see how an uneducated person in this field could draw a conclusion of fear, as well as somehow relate two separate things. I think your fears could be lifted from a little more research Partially correct, Educated guesses are more than acceptable when questioning a "Investment Opportunity" the burden is on the Investee to quell those fears. |
|
|
|
Oh and we are so pumped that finally have a team go with a lighter elliptic curve algorithm!! To my knowledge you guys are the first to build ground up and change the elliptic curve since the original Bitcoin code. Some one far more researched then me could prove me wrong, and we are not talking changing the hash algo here (x11, x15 or NIST5 are all just hash algo) we are talking the elliptic curve algo... Just brilliant cant wait to dive into the code once it's posted!!!
OK you mean they changed the value's of "0" and "7" ? Sounds like alot of work. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iB3HcPgm_FI That actually sounds pretty scary consider they cannot get the distribution equation correct. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
