Allow me to add some steps (off the top of my head), depending on your level of paranoia, not necessarily in this order:
1. Close the curtains.
2. Disable swapping on your Live CD:
2. Disconnect your PC speakers.
3. Disconnect your hard drive (read why).
4. Turn off all other electronic devices, remove batteries from listening devices (such as phones).
5. Don't rely on software to create a random seed, use coin tosses.
6. When you get a new address from your master public key, verify if you can actually recreate it from your seed. Kinda like how you verify a new address created by Electrum by connecting your hardware wallet.
7. Verify the address using different pieces of software, all offline and air gapped, so you don't have to rely on (for instance) Electrum being honest.

Flat bricks don't really look like Lego. If you want something flat, Ministeck is cheaper, smaller and lighter (for shipping):


I The kids have this stuff:

They haven't used the black and the white. It would be quite good for QR-codes because it hardens, but especially the black foam is terribly sticky.

Looks like he has no real arguments but wants to leave "retaliation neutral feedback". Fine by me, see my personal text

Welcome back, I guess

I have only one suggestion: always be honest!

Copyright is a better word indeed.

Agreed.

Most of this drama is solved by now: Gyrsur removed the signature, he lost his DT2-position, he removed most of his abusive negative feedback, he lost the negative feedback from DT on his own account. I'd say case (almost) closed, other than the few remaining negatives left by Gyrsur.

If you're going to tag theymos, don't forget to tag satoshi too, he's the one who put theymos in charge

Yes, but he's not in my Trust network so I didn't get a heart attack.

I've seen his name pop up more often, I'll think about it.

See:

Don't worry about it, I'm shooting with blanks, following my Beginners Guide (from your signature) so that negative feedback doesn't lose it's meaning. And that's why my feedback means something, while you'll be at DT2 Strength (-10) or lower if you keep abusing the Trust system. Have it your way.

Update:
This guy has been leaving fake negative feedback to several users. He's currently on DT2, but doesn't belong there:

Now I have to leave him neutral feedback for Trust abuse:


He's not in my Trust network, but it turns out willi9974 put Gyrsur on DT2:
I'll also exclude him from my Trust list, and I recommend others to do the same:
Maybe I should wait a bit, he's still on a negative feedback spree. He'll earn way more exclusions if he leaves fake negative feedback while on DT2.

@Gyrsur: if you want to tag all ChipMixer signature campaign participants, let me help you:

This seems off-topic (and in need of evidence) to me, so no, I won't comment on it here. But I think you missed my point: if you want to argue against negative feedback, at least use the right arguments.
It could be as simple as: "I've removed the fake signature, please consider removing the negative feedback".

---

---

I like seeing my Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system in your signature

None of this has anything to do with the negative feedback you received. Bitcointalk has never supported plagiarism.

Let's see: https://loyce.club/archive/details/topic_5229417.html

For what it's worth: that's how I use it.

Or just wait: (Voting closes: December 02, 2020, 08:24:12 PM)
I had to vote too to see the results.

Deleted posts isn't that much data. Editing I'm not sure, but I doubt it'll even double the amount. All Merit data is just 20 MB.

So far for decentralization

I searched your txid on blockchair.com:

I'd love to, but that would be way too serious.

So you're saying you want less freedom. Or only less freedom for others?

That was the direct reason to create this topic, but it's been stewing for a while seeing topics asking to bring back Newbie jail, ban Newbies from creating topics or banning alt accounts.

Don't vote

It sounds pretty authoritarian to want to stamp out pro authoritarian peeps.

It annoys me too, but it's part of the forum's mission to be as free as possible.
Users who write ALL CAPS are worse though.

Go ahead, nobody is stopping you

Lol, I don't think Bitcointalk is a democracy at all. I'm okay with that.

I'd say those 15 (44%) out of 34 voters (I'm not counting myself) get why I created this topic.
I'm just stirring the pot a bit

I notice it in the news too: many people want more government and more regulations, even though we have a large government with large taxes and more laws than anyone can read already. They always want to force other people to do what they believe is right.

Don't count votes, count voters. It gives a higher percentage.

You think?

Isn't that the basis of all restrictions? People cherry pick which rules they follow, whether it's spamming a forum, traffic rules, or murder.

Apart from the popular opinion that I'm an AI, I'd love to have a posting bot again. I can think of many good uses for it.

Currently, 100 GB is enough. I'd love to see what happens to a truely decentralized forum, and I've seen interesting posts from theymos about it, something like: a system similar to the custrom Trust list could be used to decide who's posts you get to see and filter out the spam.

Try YoBit, they're into this shit