I did ask you to sign a message with an old address on the above loan request however you were unable to do so. Below is one PM that I got from the eloquent account:

---

Would you be able to sign a message from 1Marco8hLDhk3ZK77PEB75KUWaFKLBDbVx which is the address you requested to have the loan funded to? If so then please sign the following message:

In order to actually recover your account you will need to sign a message and send it to theymos with the information here

Are you sure your account was hacked? I am showing the password was only changed ~3 hours ago (did you not simply forget what you changed your password to?).

Can you sign a message with 1NGQQ6cZdiztZoDeBrjr4hAjZS5bPFPRko which you posted here?

If you are referring to anything illegal then no.

Is your bitcoin already leveraged? If not then I can give you a USD denominated loan with 120% bitcoin as collateral. I can accept 1.5% interest per day.

It would work like this:
Assuming that the price is $227.5 when you get the loan (we will use the actual exchange rate when the loan is funded) then you would provide .6 BTC as collateral and would receive $113.75 worth of bitcoin (.5 BTC). Then, in 7 days when you repay the loan you would owe $125.69375 worth of bitcoin, based on the exchange rate at the time of repayment; so if the price rose to $250 at the time you repay then you would owe me 0.502775 BTC, conversely if the price were to fall to $200 when you repay me then you would owe 0.62846875* BTC.

Alternatively you would give .1 BTC as collateral and could have a synthetic long position with 5:1 leverage with me. Using the same starting price of $227.5, you would receive a $113.75 worth of bitcoin set aside (.5 BTC), then if the price were to rise to $250 when you wish to close the loan then I would owe you 0.097225 BTC and the rest would be mine, if the price were to rise to $300 then I would owe you 0.18102083 BTC, and if the price of bitcoin were to fall to $200 then I would owe you nothing*

*if the price of bitcoin were to fall to $193.5 at any time then the loan would be called and I would use the entire amount of collateral to satisfy the loan (I would keep the entire amount of the collateral).

EDIT: it looks like lihuajkl offered to fill the loan so most likely never mind

The altcoin section is a mess (although it has improved since mprep took over but it is really more then what just one person can handle) and has been for a long time. Any report likely will take a long time to get handled.

He claims to give a 7 day warranty on the cards, however he will likely be gone by the time the warranty is up. He is a confirmed alt of Mrbutter and SBdealer both of which had similar fates

no I don't need them anymore, I was able to find the profiles and references although it did take a while. (In the future please have this available to make it easier to verify your claims).

From the looks of it you had a rule to lend no more then .1 to people without collateral however you violated that rule when lending to the second person. Keeping with that rule will likely prevent you from loosing large amounts of money.

Prople are free to express their opinion about what he is paying. Anyone enrolling in the campaign is unlikely to get paid regardless.

The OP is most likely trolling.

Most of this is very old "news" that is when it is actually news.

The rest is just people twisting facts in order to spin their agenda.

Although this thread is useless I doubt it will be deleted.

You are clearly trying to profit off of this exploit. The difference between my suggest and what you are asking is for the community to pay you up front to reveal the exploit verses you likely having to reveal the exploit first to the exchange (or whoever you are selling it to).

He said he was going to compensate you. (see below)

This guy is a scammer. If he actually had the exploit that he claims to have, he could easily sell it to an exchange who would potentially stand to lose hundreds of millions of dollars if the exploit were to be used against them.

The same is true for mining pools although they do not have quite as much money at stake.

Again the same is true for casino operators. Oh wait this guy scammed Casinobitcoin out of 5 BTC to provide evidence of such exploit (see his trust). Additionally this person was trying to get people to pay him for another "exploit" several months ago.

He is offering to show the "media" evidence of such an exploit however the media does not have a technical background and would  not be capable of questioning if this would actually work or not.

Can you sign a message with the current date with the address you requested the loan to be funded to?

you didn't actually think it would be safe to give your password to candy did you?

profile link and refrence?

why don't you post who sent the offer

Asking price?

Yea I am pretty sure that people are not stupid enough to send anything up front to someone with no reputation. Additionally if you really got any physical goods then the seller would have your address where law enforcement would serve you with an arrest warrant

Identification is not going to protect you from someone defaults.  It will however allow you to steal their identity

It would be a starting point in linking potential accounts together. You are right to say that just because someone mentions a TXID does not mean they are behind it however if you had the ability to read the post that mentioned the TXID then you could get a better idea as to if they were just discussing a particular transaction or if they were the one who signed such transaction.

Additionally many people tend to use the same address more then once, including across accounts. The use of a single account has been used in the past to help catch scammers