They just corrected the typo  |
|
|
|
Warpy is stuck b/w 25-30K.
Give it a little more time.  Guys, I love the market. It's my thing. Easy to see when things are happening. Check both graphs below.   Add this to the growing interest, a 10 btc buy wall at YoBit, the VPN beta release and the probable Bittrex addition in the very near future Sure we'll see a lot of changing hands, dumps, but the buy support is increasing rapidly and higher. Add all this to the plans I haven't divulged yet: happy story! We are going to expand sooner than you think. Where is our surprise? : |
|
|
|
|
Warpy is stuck b/w 25-30K.
|
|
|
|
I came by to ask why the masternode reward all of a sudden jumped up to 83.33333333 DNET. Not that I am complaining about the extra coins.
And miners now have 166.66666 reward. Yep......it should be 175 DNET. |
|
|
|
VPN : 3000 sats with 400.000.000 VPN
Warp : 1200000 sats with 1.000.000 WARP..?? Agreee that??
Both coins have totally different approach. So, we cannot compare. |
|
|
|
When is the release?
Just adapt it for Mac too, and finish up fixing a few small bugs, and possibly introducing a surprise. So, a few days. Great! now we all will speculate about that surprise |
|
|
|
We just managed to make the VPN work in the windows wallet too!  When is the release? |
|
|
|
good point jc12345  but can we please stop this mental incontinence and get back to more important topics?   Some fun never hurts |
|
|
|
I would recommend not going for 'free' version in the first place. Version controls can be bypassed if a user has some coding know-how.
The source will be closed for now. Give me a few days, we can then set up more clear guidelines. For now priority is to make it work on all platforms. Sure man, take your time. One more thing, even if source is not public there are ways to bypass version controls (with just binaries). It all depends on how it is implemented. |
|
|
|
What if people continue to use v1.1? are you planning to control allowed version(s) through code?
Not sure what you mean. People can use current version or the upcoming one. That doesn't make a big difference. I mean since v1.1 will not require any WARP balance to use VPN service, and if your planning to add this requirement in future releases, people will simply stick to v1.1 to avoid WARP balance requirement. That's a good point. I'll carefully look upon future releases to make sure that kind of situation doesn't happen. I would recommend not going for 'free' version in the first place. Version controls can be bypassed if a user has some coding know-how. |
|
|
|
What if people continue to use v1.1? are you planning to control allowed version(s) through code?
Not sure what you mean. People can use current version or the upcoming one. That doesn't make a big difference. I mean since v1.1 will not require any WARP balance to use VPN service, and if your planning to add this requirement in future releases, people will simply stick to v1.1 to avoid WARP balance requirement. |
|
|
|
Net Hashrate: 8,983.92 MH/s
zpool added it so the hashrate from now on will sharply follow the price. Couple of days ago the hashrate was as low as 1.5 Ghs if I recall correctly. hashpower was already doing it for quite sometime. Suprnova has major share of hashrate ATM: Pool Hashrate: 7,811.10 MH/s Net Hashrate: 8,303.67 MH/s |
|
|
|
|
Net Hashrate: 8,983.92 MH/s
|
|
|
|
Looking better by the minute...
This could get huge once the new wallet is out.
Regards
Goldmaxx
A new wallet will come out (only binaries) for Win, Mac and Linux, with VPN function enabled - for free. As soon as all bugs are fixed. It should take a few days. That will be v1.1. No WARP balance requirements? Not yet, on first release. What if people continue to use v1.1? are you planning to control allowed version(s) through code? |
|
|
|
Looking better by the minute...
This could get huge once the new wallet is out.
Regards
Goldmaxx
A new wallet will come out (only binaries) for Win, Mac and Linux, with VPN function enabled - for free. As soon as all bugs are fixed. It should take a few days. That will be v1.1. No WARP balance requirements? |
|
|
|
We can have both i.e. open servers and premium/paid servers offered by WARP users |
|
|
|
@shapetwist can you shed some light on servers? will these be hard-coded? what if WARP users want to offer their own servers and get some WRAP reward in return.
The servers are not hardcoded. They will be read from an online API, that reads from an extensive server list. You will be able to connect to your own server too, if you can provide a working conf file. There are no plans at the moment to offer yourself as a server. I made a commitment about simple usage and simple features. Providing yourself as a server is - for now - inconsequent. But keep in mind this is the very very first beta. A lot of input will be considered. But anything that it is too complicated for the end user will not be part of the plan. So are you going to be controlling the VPN servers? Would it not make more sense to have a master node type service that people could set up and collect fees from, similar to darksend? This would make it distributed and presumably somewhat anonymous. I won't be controlling the servers. They belong to an open network of users. Let's go step by step, eventually more features will be added, yet always keeping in mind to make it simple enough for any user. Agreed on step by step - you're doing good work and things're looking very positive. Thoughts; If the network of servers is external to the coin; - The coin is not a tool to pay for VPN servers and they are not linked to the coin; the coin loses its intrinsic value as a means of payment for VPN service - The VPN function of the coin may not always exist as long as the coin does - having this function created by the network internalizes the service and creates user trust that it will exist as long as the coin/wallet does - Third parties lose the incentive to become involved in the coin by operating master nodes/servers and collecting fees - affects userbase incentive/interest I totally agree on making it easy/simple - that is powerful. If you could satisfy that objective while also creating the ability to make nodes/servers in an easy to setup fashion you'd really have something. Agree, plus what if these open servers go offline? It will be hassle for an end-user to try servers in the list one-by-one. We somehow should link VPN service to this coin. |
|
|
|
Hopefully on there soon Someone should tweet @richiela too. I think it's time. Should wait for working VPN client. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
