A lot of these people drive to/from their jobs, and some even listen to music while they work...
so why not a radio ad?
We're way ahead of you, johnj.  Ad placement isn't my forte'. Anyone have any sway in radio advertising? It would be interesting to find out what sort of costs we are looking at in the top 25 DMAs. Another thought would be to cut a commercial in Spanish. I live in Dallas and there is a huge Mexican immigrant population here and other cities in border states like Houston, San Diego, Los Angeles and Phoenix. The spanish radio stations reach a very large market. Many of this audience is looking for better and more safe ways to send money back to relatives in Mexico. I like the idea of cutting the commercial into Spanish, I've been to LA myself and other areas you've listed and those could be a huge conversation starters for the Mexican community. I don't speak Spanish so we'll have to find a translator I think. I can help with the Spanish portion if needed. Great idea Xenland! |
|
|
|
looks legit. consistent writing style on several places. but still suspicious. change your profile photo, hold an apple on your left hand, shoe on head and a brick on right hand.  Send me a FB request if your man enough, but I will put BitcoinEXpress in the contact info LOL Sent you a request  Are you Brian? Starlight are you Arias? You know who I am . Writing patterns are identical to BTCEX on FB. |
|
|
|
looks legit. consistent writing style on several places. but still suspicious. change your profile photo, hold an apple on your left hand, shoe on head and a brick on right hand. Send me a FB request if your man enough, but I will put BitcoinEXpress in the contact info LOL Sent you a request |
|
|
|
q="rui+santos"]www.google.com/search?q="rui+santos"[/url] 2.000.000 results, and that's exact search, so, DOX at will... CLOWN!
Oh, BCX... IP: 99.30.226.39 | Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 5.1; rv:8.0) Gecko/20100101 Firefox/8.0 <-- Is that you? LOL sucker!
Yep, still sitting here at Starbucks in Santa Clara just down the street from Cupertino. I have zero doubt that's you and your reaction shows it. File all the complaints you want. You started it and just don't the results. Bulanula, you're CH, LOL.......... BTCX why are you "outing" people like they did something wrong by supporting Solidcoin? I dont get it... |
|
|
|
OK, I called 509-633-9722 and Started singing!!!! Turns out its not gregs birthday  Listen to the call lol: http://db.tt/AZlT7IT7 You can send my 1.25 BTC to 1FfBcWDBLibecwgPVQbafKKFc3qi5jnzsN I do birthdays, bar mitzvahs, weddings.... -Charlie LOL "WHO TOLD YOU TO CALL ME?" - "UHH I'M NOT REALLY SURE"! Sent you some coin for the laughs buddy thx ! |
|
|
|
2) Your king has made sure there will be no "real millionaire" for years if not decades. So the idea that it will suddenly be decentralized in near future is false.
This is very simple. The more people sign on to the SolidCoin network, the faster the coins will inflate, and the faster we will have our first millionare. Wrong. It doesn't matter how many people sign on to the network. There will be 5 coins generated every 2 minutes no matter how many people start using SolidCoin. A miner that maintains a massive 10% of the entire network hashpower will take 8 years to become a control node. It's highly unlikely that anyone will ever become a control node. No you're WRONG, like the many hundreds of mis-informed FUD postings in this stupid forum. "Another thing to remember is that with the difficulty modifier in place, it's not just "each block is worth 5SC" now. For each 100K of difficulty another 5SC is added. So at our current difficulty of 40000 an extra 40% of 5SC would be added, a block would be worth 7SC. With 5 blocks every 10 minutes, that means a total of 35SC would be generated in 10 minutes vs Bitcoins ideal of 50BTC. This is at current difficulty. As difficulty grows and we get more miners the amount of SolidCoins generated per hour will match that growth, whilst still maintaining a base cost of 10-30c of electricity to generate it." http://solidcointalk.org/topic/375-new-economic-changes-coming-to-solidcoin/ |
|
|
|
SC is pretty centralized right now, and I don't think anyone is denying that. What we are arguing is that this centralization of the trust wallets will disappear later on and be replaced by real trusted nodes (SC millionaires).
FlipPro, a perfect name for changing your stance. Viper Lemon Bitch is still railing against this admission claiming it is only 5% centrally controlled. It really doesn't matter if the block chain is controlled by RealSoild (since he has all Control Nodes) or the theoretical true SC millionaires, it's still central control.You guys fought the central control claim tooth and nail, attacked, created many threads against it and now, once the partial source code is released, you are basically saying "Oh well, you got us"Now let's move on the issue of intercepting and invalidating any transaction at will. Your just an idiot BTCEX. The Solidcoin community isn't denying that Solidcoin *in it's infancy* is run and developed by just a few individuals (causing centralization). Same with Bitcoin when it was first started, it was pretty damn centralized to just a few individuals as well. The idea is that as the network grows, decentralization will naturally occur (same as with Bitcoin). We have a pretty good base built, and I think with time improvements and active development will make this stuff even better. EDIT: And btw we can always fork the latest version if any "Reckless Decision Making" is exhibited from the "trusted individuals". That's why I am not worried,and why my number one priority was to get the source out. |
|
|
|
You obviously don't follow me then. I have said in the past that right now the control nodes are centralized to the solidcoin developers. I have repeatedly said thats a problem, and that they need to figure out more ways to decentralize the network as much as possible, without putting cross hairs on those who hold the "trusted nodes". Perhaps by allowing anyone who wants to secure the network to do so, but only give them power based on proven economic activity, like Encoin.  I like Encoin . |
|
|
|
SC is pretty centralized right now, and I don't think anyone is denying that. What we are arguing is that this centralization of the trust wallets will disappear later on and be replaced by real trusted nodes (SC millionaires). You haven't been arguing that in the past. I guess you just got tired of trying to lie when source code is available. I am glad you admit that ScamCoin is centralized however even here you aren't being honest (you know the truth, the WHOLE truth, and nothing but the truth). 1) It isn't "pretty centralized". It is absolutely centralized. It is a crypto-currency monarchy. Now you may argue the "King is good" but that doesn't change the fact that ScamCoin exist under complete and absolute control. 2) Your king has made sure there will be no "real millionaire" for years if not decades. So the idea that it will suddenly be decentralized in near future is false. 3) Since 51% control of the control money = 100% ability to enforce changes on the network the first millionaire is meaningless as they still won't have any real control. With 51%+ of control money King RealScam could: a) prevent any other node from EVER becoming a control node b) end block rewards (hell he already cut them 87%) c) increase Kings tax from 10% to 30% or more. d) block transactions & blocks he deems unfit. e) halt block block chain, fork it, and reboot it f) ANYTHING ELSE HE DAMN WELL FEELS LIKE You are inaccurate when you say that there was a 12 Million coin pre-mine and that these coins are spendable throughout the network. These wallets are temporary/unspendable, and most importantly PUBLIC, so if there ever is foul play everyone will know.
No it is accurate. While the control wallets are unspendable they can be transfered to very spendable wallet owned by King RealScam. All block chains are public. Knowledge is somewhat useless in a pseudo-anonymous irrevocable environment. You have no proof that the 12M coins can't be spent right now. Just more fallible trust in a King with complete control of the network.You obviously don't follow me then. I have said in the past that right now the control nodes are centralized to the solidcoin developers. I have repeatedly said thats a problem, and that they need to figure out more ways to decentralize the network as much as possible, without putting cross hairs on those who hold the "trusted nodes". 2) Your king has made sure there will be no "real millionaire" for years if not decades. So the idea that it will suddenly be decentralized in near future is false.This is very simple. The more people sign on to the SolidCoin network, the faster the coins will inflate, and the faster we will have our first millionare. |
|
|
|
You think they should ban senior members like me, because some stupid clown like you comes along and says so? In a word ... yes. You do nothing but lie, obfuscate, and damage the reputation of crypto-currency community. Funny those are all the same exact traits I see in you sir. All you do is spew FUD and lies about SC on a daily basis and never own up to any of them. Name one. The 12M can be transfered to King RealScam wallet? Which you said was impossible and code proves is possible. That the person who has control of 51% of control money controls the network? Which you said was false and not only does code say otherwise you King has said otherwise. From what I hear there was a line in question in the last version which allowed trusted nodes to send sc to the CPF (PUBLIC WALLET FUND FOR SC) ("if( x < y)" where it should have been a "if(x != y)"). This only allowed trusted nodes to send money to the CPF, but the CPF account is public and if any foul play was detected everyone would know instantly. Since then the trusted nodes have been patched with the latest version, and they are preparing it for public release soon. That is one of the advantages of having everything open source (which I always advocated for), problems like this become detected and get solved. To "take over the network" you need both a trusted node with more money than any of the other trusted nodes on the network and 51% of the network hash power. I don't know where you are getting at with 51% of control money gets you the network? You need money + hashpower to even think of a successful attack on SC. The devs have told me that in the future they are planning to change that so that so that it would effectively need two trusted nodes, eventually leading to a system where you need a majority of trusted nodes (voting system). Just so we are clear, in the "Every other" scheme, a trusted node cannot sign two trust blocks in a row. This would require an attacker to have two trusted nodes whose total balance between the two was higher than the good trusted nodes who signed the blocks. Except in the past you called me a liar, and spreading FUD, and full of shit for stating what you now admit is true. You have no way to verify what the control nodes are running. BTW ScamCoin isn't OpenSource. You might want to read up on the definition of OpenSource. You don't need 51% hashing power to control the network. Did King RealScam had 51% hashing power when he "forked" the blockchain and changed rewards from 32 SC to 5 SC? No. The control nodes enforce control of the network. If someone didn't upgrade then their blocks were rejected by the control nodes. 51% control of control money = 100% control over the network. Just so we are clear, in the "Every other" scheme, a trusted node cannot sign two trust blocks in a row Who cares. If I had 51% of the control node money and single miner. Eventually that single miner will sign an even block and then my control nodes can sign the odd block. I can also veto any attempt for the 49% of control nodes (by balance) to sign any other block. Thus you either need to upgrade to my changes OR your blocks never become part of the block chain. Someday that will happen ... ER WAIT ... IT ALREADY HAPPENED. King RealScam issued a royal edict that block reward was cut to 5 SC and you either were blocked out of the network or you upgraded. Miner's had no power at all. No way to block that change, no way to enforce their collective will. The network wasn't designed to let them. 51% of control money = 100% control over the network. SC is pretty centralized right now, and I don't think anyone is denying that. What we are arguing is that this centralization of the trust wallets will disappear later on and be replaced by real trusted nodes (SC millionaires). You are inaccurate when you say that there was a 12 Million coin pre-mine and that these coins are spendable throughout the network. These wallets are temporary/unspendable, and most importantly PUBLIC, so if there ever is foul play everyone will know. |
|
|
|
You think they should ban senior members like me, because some stupid clown like you comes along and says so? In a word ... yes. You do nothing but lie, obfuscate, and damage the reputation of crypto-currency community. Funny those are all the same exact traits I see in you sir. All you do is spew FUD and lies about SC on a daily basis and never own up to any of them. Name one. The 12M can be transfered to King RealScam wallet? Which you said was impossible and code proves is possible. That the person who has control of 51% of control money controls the network? Which you said was false and not only does code say otherwise you King has said otherwise. From what I hear there was a line in question in the last version which allowed trusted nodes to send sc to the CPF (PUBLIC WALLET FUND FOR SC) ("if( x < y)" where it should have been a "if(x != y)"). This only allowed trusted nodes to send money to the CPF, but the CPF account is public and if any foul play was detected everyone would know instantly. Since then the trusted nodes have been patched with the latest version, and they are preparing it for public release soon. That is one of the advantages of having everything open source (which I always advocated for), problems like this become detected and get solved. To "take over the network" you need both a trusted node with more money than any of the other trusted nodes on the network and 51% of the network hash power. I don't know where you are getting at with 51% of control money gets you the network? You need money + hashpower to even think of a successful attack on SC. The devs have told me that in the future they are planning to change that so that it would effectively need two trusted nodes, eventually leading to a system where you need a majority of trusted nodes (voting system). Just so we are clear, in the "Every other" scheme, a trusted node cannot sign two trust blocks in a row. This would require an attacker to have two trusted nodes whose total balance between the two was higher than the good trusted nodes who signed the blocks. |
|
|
|
You think they should ban senior members like me, because some stupid clown like you comes along and says so? In a word ... yes. You do nothing but lie, obfuscate, and damage the reputation of crypto-currency community. Funny those are all the same exact traits I see in you sir. All you do is spew FUD and lies about SC on a daily basis and never own up to any of them. |
|
|
|
Because he has lot of LTC now, and missed to sell at peak Spacy, please just kill yourself, or just stop posting here entirely and return to solidcointalk where you belong. You don't add anything to these forums, and every time you post, you make yourself, and SolidCoin, look worse and worse. Please just fuck off already. I'm begging you. Just... die... and spare us all your mind-numbing stupidity. Mods, please, just out-right ban all these SC zealots. I'll PAY YOU IN BTC to ban these people if that's what it takes to start reducing the shit that's clogging this place. You sound angry as hell dude. You think they should ban senior members like me, because some stupid clown like you comes along and says so? "SC Zealots" are part of this community just as much as all the other alternative currency supporters. P.S. You shouldn't be wishing death upon anyone.. Especially other forum members. Wtf is wrong with you? |
|
|
|
It is your imagination ...
We've always been at war with Eastasia
I was in the process of replying to Psy, one of RealSolid's prime proxies when I came back and both of his post were gone. A new name to this entertaining microcosm, although not to the boards. Welcome. As an aside, if you look at Psy's posts, they are anti Bitcoinexpress rather than pro-solidcoin. They (Psy) made that point a week or so ago, thought I would add it back. Working out the change from Bulanula is harder (there was a shift, but I never worked out quite what happened), but Spacy is a die-hard. Simples. I sold all my SC at 0.0126 peak ! No more SC trolling now. I am LTC supporter now  Why people support a chain that can be taken down at any second by anyone with minuscule hashing power is beyond me. In your case why not just support BTC 100%? |
|
|
|
I am searching for a good Ruby On Rails developor to start working on a very special project with me. Please PM me with your rates (In BTC), Thanks . |
|
|
|
Steelie-
This is becoming almost laughable! You continue to post the most fractured, inane fantasies about what you WANT or are TRYING TO HAVE HAPPEN. Merge two dead coins that were created as pump and dump satirical digs at shortbus coin? Reduce block rewards to 1? Why stop there? If 1 is good, .00000000000001 would be even better!! Let's have the entire network mine for one whole coin for the next decade!!
You want an altcoin that traditional merchants will accept- that's commendable. You want to do so by adopting the most toxic altcoin as you favorite, and then careen off on some twisted tangent about resurrecting necrocoins simply because you own a few thousand of them? Rational businesspeople would read your thoughts, and quietly dismiss you as one of those special people who they tend to prefer don't do business with them. You want to be a bazillionjillionaire because you mined tens of thousands of coins that were an intentional middle finger to the market? It isn't going to happen. Value is established by trading, necrocoins don't trade and altcoins in general are, with the possible exceptions of nmc and ltc, nothing more than elaborate jokes to test out theories about just how truly monumentally foolish some people are.
Dude- you wasted that electricity. No matter how passionate your pleading, you were baboozled, conned, swindled, taken to the cleaners, ripped off and had your gentle soul and good nature taken advantage of. You make yourself look a prize ass to continue to flog these silly schemes, and it is high time one of the adults took you aside and suggested you stop.
How many Litecoins do you own? |
|
|
|
|
All the Litecoin fanboys are furious at the latest pump and dump. I wonder how many of them bought in at 0.01BTC :p.
|
|
|
|
At this stage anyone who gets involved in SolidCoin is either too dumb to read or is just looking for someone to rip them off. I don't know, I figure there has to be some excellent scammers out there that could see the whole SolidCoin situation as it is currently and figure a way to rip more people off. Someone should make a thread about that as not to derail this thread that has topics never brought up ever. Solidcoin may be alot of things BTCP, but a Scam is not one of them. All the FUD put out by all of the litecoin/tenebrix fan boys has been nauseating. The fact of the matter is that these people haven't changed shit, their chains haven't improved a single thing from the original Bitcoin client. Solidcoin fundamentally changes things, and while the majority of people on this forum are "against" what that change represents, that doesn't make it a "scam". The code is released, and everything that has been said can be reviewed by independent analysis. You don't need a single dime to invest in Solidcoin since you can easily mine with any laptop thanks to it's CPU friendly algorithm. If you are looking to invest real money you should watch out with ANY online crypto-currency INCLUDING Bitcoin... |
|
|
|
A pool in a nice forum is not representative, only the market shows the real demand. I agree and the market is showing a complete lack of demand for scam/piracy/fiat/tax coin. The market is showing complete lack of demand for all the current "alt currencies". |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
