|
Okay you do not need .5 to "refill your faucets"
|
|
|
|
And who the fuck are you poor ass nigger?
Google me and you will understand with who the fuck you are talking with you autist fuck.
When you want to talk with me,firstly talk with sir you begging starving poor ass nigger
I think this post is going to prove beyond a doubt that you are right in this case /s |
|
|
|
If I were Blazedout I would by taking the BTC to an expert appraiser to determine if it is pink ivory. $14k is definitely worth suing someone over, especially if it's a relatively simple case of fraud that only peripherally involves Bitcoin.
I was the guy woodcollecter was going to hire to build the Tor hidden service. Woodcollector told me in a PM he always uses Tor and is "anonymous", so I assume getting his real identity may be somewhat difficult. Could be. I'd hope he would have gotten more information on the guy before ponying over $14k, but who knows. According to the trust WC sent blazedout419, he shipped the piece to him and blazedout419 paid him after it was received. Since he got what he thought he paid for there was no reason to withhold payment. If it wasn't very well carved and all. Why didn't blaze get the wood quality verified and atleast get some wood worker to review the piece before paying him out. It might just be local tree log wood. You would have to ask him that. My understanding that the wood was very well carved. Pictures were released to the community prior to him receiving the piece and the overall community reaction was very positive. If I were personally in his position I would probably not get the wood tested. |
|
|
|
If I were Blazedout I would by taking the BTC to an expert appraiser to determine if it is pink ivory. $14k is definitely worth suing someone over, especially if it's a relatively simple case of fraud that only peripherally involves Bitcoin.
I was the guy woodcollecter was going to hire to build the Tor hidden service. Woodcollector told me in a PM he always uses Tor and is "anonymous", so I assume getting his real identity may be somewhat difficult. Could be. I'd hope he would have gotten more information on the guy before ponying over $14k, but who knows. According to the trust WC sent blazedout419, he shipped the piece to him and blazedout419 paid him after it was received. Since he got what he thought he paid for there was no reason to withhold payment. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, It seems i have been able to find the answer to all my other problems through Bitcoin and its community so here goes another attempt. I am looking to have a laser engraver engineered that does not suffer from the "straight line" problem. The straight line problem can be better understood by watching this videoBuying and off the shelf laser engraver means i could only engrave things that are round which have a perfectly straight line to write on, So something like a vase which has curves cannot be engraved as the laser is out of focus on any part of the vase that is not on the focus line. I would be willing to offer a negotiable fee or bounty to anyone who could solve this engineering problem. You would not need to build the actual machine. Just provide engineering documents and a parts list so i could build it DIY style. Thanks I don't understand why no one was able to find this post when everything he was posting was being put through so much scrutiny. Regardless, I am fairly certain that this more or less confirms that he was scamming the entire time. I admit that I was somewhat doubting this would be the end result, unfortunately I ended up being wrong on this one. I would say that his scam was very unique and he did a very good job of fooling a lot of people. Leaving negative trust I agree... his work was/is really cool. alot of people would buy stuff......Listen folks....I can do this same work at a much cheaper price...I can find any vector stock you want and I have proven it.......really I can , I will buy a laser engraver.. but insted of high$$$$ rare exotic endangered hard wood... I will buy OAK from home depot Any one want to help start a laser engraved, internet vector art, locally found wood at the home depot... I would love to start a small business...nothing fancy.... just round pieces of oak with a laser engraved image.....PM me to help out.....LOL LOL LOL... I honestly know very little about wood, this is probably why I was not buying nubbins claims, and is probably why so many people fell for his scam. The wood he was using was apparently very expensive which would somewhat add to it's value, although this may or may not be a lie and his customers likely did/do not have any way to detainee which kind of wood was used. |
|
|
|
Hi guys, It seems i have been able to find the answer to all my other problems through Bitcoin and its community so here goes another attempt. I am looking to have a laser engraver engineered that does not suffer from the "straight line" problem. The straight line problem can be better understood by watching this videoBuying and off the shelf laser engraver means i could only engrave things that are round which have a perfectly straight line to write on, So something like a vase which has curves cannot be engraved as the laser is out of focus on any part of the vase that is not on the focus line. I would be willing to offer a negotiable fee or bounty to anyone who could solve this engineering problem. You would not need to build the actual machine. Just provide engineering documents and a parts list so i could build it DIY style. Thanks I don't understand why no one was able to find this post when everything he was posting was being put through so much scrutiny. Regardless, I am fairly certain that this more or less confirms that he was scamming the entire time. I admit that I was somewhat doubting this would be the end result, unfortunately I ended up being wrong on this one. I would say that his scam was very unique and he did a very good job of fooling a lot of people. Leaving negative trust |
|
|
|
Quickseller
01/23/2015
I have regained control of my account and changed my password. IJ4TzVvuWEQ9mkaOxzRemakqUK6tueBQTUd4ktJAP/2SBfDM+ffYTjBGxcyOE/Yc+NN+6TdkJClACRZGHdnbYAw= Verified, however it looks like the hacker was able to scam Bitcoin_BOy$ for .048 BTC. You would need to repay him to his satisfaction (especially considering your account was "hacked" under very suspicious conditions). I will not as I was not the one who scammed. My apologies to anyone I affected, however if it was not me that scammed, I do not feel responsible to repay. Especially if it's only like $10. I would not be able to remove my negative trust as a result. Anyone could simply claim "hack" anytime they take out a loan. Like I said, the timing of you being able to recover the account is very suspicious, plus the fact that you claim the hacker did not change the password, however according to the security log, you reset your password via email (how would you know the password was not changed, yet were not able to log in with your password?). I will later tonight as I am on my iPhone right now.
Just curious, how did you regain control of your account from an iPhone? Don't you have to sign a message for that? Or didn't the hacker change the password? Hacker didn't change the password. I was able to log in with the same password as the hacker never changed it. I only noticed something weird was going on after my gmail blew up with 20 notifications about PMs for loans. That still does not explain the fact that you reset our password via email. What do you mean? I see someone had my password so I reset it so I can change it. You don't need to reset your password to change it. You change it on profile -> Account Related Settings.
I find it hard to believe that someone would be able to determine your actual password and would not change your password/email. |
|
|
|
|
I also wouldn't say they are all neural third parties to this dispute.
Most of the negatives are from people who have relied on questionable (to say it nicely) evidence against him. A good number of the feedback ratings also stipulate that they are willing to remove their feedback at a later date if/when they see evidence that shows WC is not creating his art with lasers.
I am personally on the fence as to if he is actually lying or not. I do think there is a lot of damming evidence against him, however there is also evidence in his favor. I would say at the very least it is not clear cut that he is scamming.
|
|
|
|
Quickseller
01/23/2015
I have regained control of my account and changed my password. IJ4TzVvuWEQ9mkaOxzRemakqUK6tueBQTUd4ktJAP/2SBfDM+ffYTjBGxcyOE/Yc+NN+6TdkJClACRZGHdnbYAw= Verified, however it looks like the hacker was able to scam Bitcoin_BOy$ for .048 BTC. You would need to repay him to his satisfaction (especially considering your account was "hacked" under very suspicious conditions). I will not as I was not the one who scammed. My apologies to anyone I affected, however if it was not me that scammed, I do not feel responsible to repay. Especially if it's only like $10. I would not be able to remove my negative trust as a result. Anyone could simply claim "hack" anytime they take out a loan. Like I said, the timing of you being able to recover the account is very suspicious, plus the fact that you claim the hacker did not change the password, however according to the security log, you reset your password via email (how would you know the password was not changed, yet were not able to log in with your password?). I will later tonight as I am on my iPhone right now.
Just curious, how did you regain control of your account from an iPhone? Don't you have to sign a message for that? Or didn't the hacker change the password? Hacker didn't change the password. I was able to log in with the same password as the hacker never changed it. I only noticed something weird was going on after my gmail blew up with 20 notifications about PMs for loans. That still does not explain the fact that you reset our password via email. |
|
|
|
Quickseller
01/23/2015
I have regained control of my account and changed my password. IJ4TzVvuWEQ9mkaOxzRemakqUK6tueBQTUd4ktJAP/2SBfDM+ffYTjBGxcyOE/Yc+NN+6TdkJClACRZGHdnbYAw= Verified, however it looks like the hacker was able to scam Bitcoin_BOy$ for .048 BTC. You would need to repay him to his satisfaction (especially considering your account was "hacked" under very suspicious conditions). I will not as I was not the one who scammed. My apologies to anyone I affected, however if it was not me that scammed, I do not feel responsible to repay. Especially if it's only like $10. I would not be able to remove my negative trust as a result. Anyone could simply claim "hack" anytime they take out a loan. Like I said, the timing of you being able to recover the account is very suspicious, plus the fact that you claim the hacker did not change the password, however according to the security log, you reset your password via email (how would you know the password was not changed, yet were not able to log in with your password?). I will later tonight as I am on my iPhone right now.
Just curious, how did you regain control of your account from an iPhone? Don't you have to sign a message for that? Or didn't the hacker change the password? Hacker didn't change the password. |
|
|
|
Quickseller
01/23/2015
I have regained control of my account and changed my password. IJ4TzVvuWEQ9mkaOxzRemakqUK6tueBQTUd4ktJAP/2SBfDM+ffYTjBGxcyOE/Yc+NN+6TdkJClACRZGHdnbYAw= Verified, however it looks like the hacker was able to scam Bitcoin_BOy$ for .048 BTC. You would need to repay him to his satisfaction (especially considering your account was "hacked" under very suspicious conditions). |
|
|
|
Why would he leave feedback on his own account? There are a couple members here who have several accounts. Just seen you updated your post. So you're not claiming that is quickseller's account? Hello All ,
tacoman71 just pm'd me that he want a loan from me 0.048 and after 5 min quicksellers send him negg trust saying
that the account is hacked , i don't think so I think quicksellers is the owner of tacoman71 because he got a lot of accounts
Undecided
I'm not sure he is for quickseller The drop in value between the amount you sent him and the drop in value as a result of the negative trust the account now has is much more then the amount scammed. I received a similar PM, but asking for a lot more then .05 (he asked me for .5 BTC). I asked him for a signed message to prove ownership and was unable to provide one. I then proceeded to add neutral trust to his account to warn others. Upon him admitting to having his account hacked, I added negative trust to his account. This is why you should make all loans public and require signed messages whenever you are considering lending to someone without collateral.
I highly doubt that the account was actually hacked. Unless the hacker hacked the account, waited 30 days for the password change to drop off the security log, tried to scam then the real owner resets his password via email within minutes of him posting in lending.
If you sent money to him then please post the TXID(s) txid : f3d484d52078b098f6021cf2c240ceb7d31f7bdfff995410ccdfe7a45348b610 I controll all my wallet and can signed every message with them to proove i sent him all my btc  I have updated my trust to reflect that he scammed you. I would consider it his responsibility to repay any loans (or at least settle them) if his account gets hacked. Although i somewhat doubt he will care enough to repair his reputation as he has not been active for a loan time. |
|
|
|
Why would he leave feedback on his own account? There are a couple members here who have several accounts. Just seen you updated your post. So you're not claiming that is quickseller's account? Hello All ,
tacoman71 just pm'd me that he want a loan from me 0.048 and after 5 min quicksellers send him negg trust saying
that the account is hacked , i don't think so I think quicksellers is the owner of tacoman71 because he got a lot of accounts
Undecided
I'm not sure he is for quickseller The drop in value between the amount you sent him and the drop in value as a result of the negative trust the account now has is much more then the amount scammed. I received a similar PM, but asking for a lot more then .05 (he asked me for .5 BTC). I asked him for a signed message to prove ownership and was unable to provide one. I then proceeded to add neutral trust to his account to warn others. Upon him admitting to having his account hacked, I added negative trust to his account. This is why you should make all loans public and require signed messages whenever you are considering lending to someone without collateral.
I highly doubt that the account was actually hacked. Unless the hacker hacked the account, waited 30 days for the password change to drop off the security log, tried to scam then the real owner resets his password via email within minutes of him posting in lending.
If you sent money to him then please post the TXID(s) |
|
|
|
Amount Requested: 0.20 btc
Date repayment is to be made: 7 days
Repayment Amount: 0.30 btc
Collateral: have none just my account
BTC address to fund the loan to: 1Fz6xXind3Kovsw4ArW6u7oMXRZTUSBj1G
denied. Unable to sign a message from an old post to prove account not hacked (also no posts in almost 3 months). Thank you for not lending I will show I have regained my account by signing today's date later tonight. no problem. I mainly wanted to avoid getting scammed though
What is the maximum loan a full member can get using his account as collateral?
It is on a case by case basis. I am not trying to buy account via my lending. |
|
|
|
Account was hacked do not send any money. Excuse my unprofessional language but fuck you to whoever hacked my account.
can you sign a message from the above address to prove you are the real owner of the account? |
|
|
|
can you sign a message from 16JFF55gv56wiRz7e6wFTnc4gfCY5h6bpj ?
sign a message with todays date and your username
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=273120.msg2927002#msg2927002I asked him to find an old post with an address on it for him to sign from however he said he "changed wallets" recently (he also mentioned that he has not posted any addresses in the past ) |
|
|
|
Wow bitcointalk.org was down. Just reading over this thread and found that the message from my partners alt saying that he did it got deleted...
What your partner said did not reduce that fact that you are responsible. As I mentioned to you via PM, it was your fault for giving moreia access to the private keys to the wallet that contained customer/investor funds Again, I did it  Btw, he didn't give me access, I gave myself access. I never intended on scamming, other situations played a role in my decisions... NextPonzi had potential, but the potential wasn't large enough to deal with my problems outside of the interwebz I'm still waiting on that scam detector report sir! I look forward to you exposing "my" identity to the world of bitcointalk The other situation that played a role in you scamming was your over 9 BTC loss at bitdice. You probably ended up loosing money at some other casino. Incorrect it was a 5.6 loss not a 9BTC loss. Assume what you may "Mr Detective" your total loss at the account in question at bitdice is >9btc. Wrong, mr detective My statistics on that specific account at the time of deposit was -2.5btc My deposit was 5.6~ BTC My total profit down after loss is -8~ This is not to mention all of my Alts who are in sure profit, which come to more than 8btc As well as all of my pd accounts which are all 0.01 - 3BTC in profit each thanks to the donators @ NextPonzi If you say so. |
|
|
|
|
I can vouch that tomatocage is very fair. If you have a valid arguement then he will remove his rating. If you are refusing escrow then you are 99.9% scamming (there is a very small chance you are not but I doubt it). Even the most trusted members of the forum are willing to use escrow.
Your trade with caution is likely permanent due to your attempt to purchase negative trust.
|
|
|
|
it is 200+ maybe 201, maybe 230, who knows  I don't know, offer please. it isn't any of those. If it has 200+ activity and 600+ posts then it either has 210, 224 or 238 activity. It is probably best to leave it at that. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
?
