We have now sent out the remaining 0.00075 BTC payment to reviewers who have completed the steps.
Out of 10 reviewers, 7 have completed the steps and got payment.
efialtis +0.00075 BTC bc1qlwmasdg5a38z4fa72u90w96jaufhn9cs24jgfc
riyadmozu19 +0.00075 BTC 32NmjKLQ7jeuvP9DetpMGoVfEovygYZ163
DiamondCardz +0.00075 BTC bc1qd0nateyalxs6ugd9f3uutsh4lfwvza0ns0tsm4
DireWolf +0.00075 BTC bc1q2nwf4njwkpeuyycx5a95nj6mf8m45djdk863xs
ChrisPop +0.00075 BTC 389VhPzFyKs2FufRyf1QQYPNQQVPUiBCV8
bellicose +0.00075 BTC 12jGN6Sk1kf7QfWDhyPiJzDPz2zDM2xucg
Bitcoin_Arena +0.00075 BTC bc1q49dzyw24n7fl2gds3gqkkmh075te7dx9svjr2u
For the remaining 3, if did complete the steps or we missed you, please private message us.
Only 1 review has been posted so far by efialtis and there are no views from rest of the members. Also i think you have failed to pick some reputable trusted members who have applied and instead chosen Jr. Members too. Even you did not chose on first come first serve basis. I do not know what was your criteria in choosing the members. Edit: 2 Reviews till now |
|
|
|
Congratulations to Contest Winners:
1. cryptokram 3902 - 1 btc
2. xBDT Script 3512 - 0.2 btc
3. Dimarrik 3191 - 0.2 btc
4. Кукуруза 3055 - 0.2 btc
5. Pyatka 2977 - 0.2 btc
6. Gorigor 2798 - 0.1 btc
7. okela 2548 - 0.1 btc
8. trader_999 2468 - 0.1 btc
9. kokoska 2412 - 0.1 btc
10. YoCoin 2299 - 0.1 btc
11. hexwin 2296 - 0.1 btc
Finally the spammers contest is over and cryptokram winning this by making 3902 posts in around a months time. That forum is a heaven for the spammers. |
|
|
|
How many posts do you typically make monthly?
Is there any guarantee on said amount
Do you know who he is ? He is a Global Moderator. Even his few posts are more worth than the tons of posts by the ordinary members. |
|
|
|
(I've done the same in the past with Legendary members instead of reporting, they usually understand and delete.)
This is something we need to do more often so that the other person know what mistake they have done and can be avoided in future. But unfortunately, some people do not listen or do not want to listen, hence there is only single option left is to Report the post. |
|
|
|
Considering that it started 1 month ago, that's 7970 posts per day and their is rate of 0.00001/post, so they paid an average of 0.0797 BTC per day or 2.391 BTC per month.
Just for a comparison how many posts are done here on bitcointalk daily ? LoyceV, as always will help us again on this stat.  |
|
|
|
the good posters have the right or wish to rank up quickly too. Agreed! Find me those good users and I'll merit them I see it entirely differently. Good users are always here and there and merit sources should help them because purpose is to rank up the good users and clear up the spammers. I will give you an example. If you merit a Member rank user and his current merits are 60-70 and he'e been around for a year in same rank, give him bulk 30 and make him full member. In this way he will not have to wait for another 5 months - 6 months to move up. Similarly you merit a Full member who has 200 Merits already, give him bulk 50 and make him Sr. Member if he's been around sometime and regular and make good posts. Ofcourse for this, you have to spend some time in going to the previous history, genuine merit history of the users and only merit sources can do this as they have larger portion amount of smerits. |
|
|
|
That's the point of the Merit system: it was far too easy to farm accounts, and that stopped now.
So it means the creation of new accounts would be very low now. If you have that data, it will be interesting to know how many new accounts are being made daily. I usually give only 1 Merit at a time, but it's not true that I could "easily" give more Merit per post. I've sent 6648 Merit in 4612 transactions, and currently have more than 500 sMerit left. I could at most have given less than 10% more per post with my total supply.
Then either the merit sources or the supply for the merit sources should increase. Merit abusers only send sMerit to a few users. I've merited 1315 different users. That explains the difference.
You do the right thing but the good posters have the right or wish to rank up quickly too. My example may not be relevant but consider you give 100 poor people a single bread for breakfast and they still remain hungry or feed 10 people the full breakfast. |
|
|
|
Honestly, this list to me just backs up my belief that the merit requirements are too high right now. We're going to have a pretty bad lack of people ranking up to Sr. Member/Hero Member/Legendary over the next few years if the requirements aren't decreased. That's got a few problems with it but the main one in my opinion is that it will make account selling even more lucrative for accounts that had high ranks prior to the merit requirement being introduced.
That's 16 low-ranked members earning 20 or more merit per month, most being around the 20 mark. If they consistently keep getting 20 a month, that's still 50 months to hit Legendary - so even for that small number of people who are doing well for themselves, it's still a very considerable amount of time.
Right now Full/Sr/Hero/Legendary is 100/250/500/1000, and as I've stated before I think it should be 50/200/400/750 personally, or something around that.
No, the reality is different. These numbers are not difficult to achieve but the problem is that everyone becomes miser when it comes to give merits. You see a good posts and give 1 merit to it. (Most of them give just 1 or 2 merits). They could easily give more merits to good posts. As an example above by a newbie who received 20 merits for a single post, its only the merit abusers who give merit generously to their alts for bad posts. All this is bitter truth but who cares. |
|
|
|
Chrome is literally spyware and sends everything you do online back to Google for collection, analysis, and sale to third parties.
When you say that chrome send the data back to google, does this means it also sends our passwords for gmail, facebook, bitcointalk etc to google ? |
|
|
|
|
So it means that firefox stands out from all the browsers and is the best ?
If i open 20 tabs on google chrome and firefox, which browser which be less resourse hungry and by how much percentage the one is better than the other ?
Also where will you rate Edge browser ?
|
|
|
|
[Achivement]Finally I am a self-made senior member! Congratulations but aren't you a Hero Member ? 3. There are many sections in this forum where we see less activity. Keep an eye on them, but you also need to read before you post there.
Can you specify some of these sections. It may be helpful for all. |
|
|
|
Did you forget to remove your own signature before making this post?
He is not wearing any paid signature. Its just a plagiarism signature for the chip mixer. You should have seen this before posting ? |
|
|
|
|
Why is everyone comparing the Yobits rates with the OP rates ? Yobit rates are no standard and everyone has the right to demand any amount as per his liking.
Burst posting has a wide definition and it is only bad if it is mixed with spam posting, but not many understand this.
I think If you are active in forum, i am sure you will get the company to advertise.
|
|
|
|
You guys need to chill. Did 15 of you really need to post that the send btc button is not working? Don't ya think sending me a pm would have been the smarter option? Or would that kill a post for you?
The campaign had a 10btc budget for the 1st month, i've been checking the withdraws daily and knew the balance would run out today. I'm sure they will refill the balance by Monday, no need for every single participant to post their button isn't working.
That's how every user here is, IMPATIENT. I had been facing the same issue since 8 hours already but didn't complain because we know that sometimes the pot becomes empty so we need to get it filled to drink the water again but these people were not patient enough that they showed their eagerness and some even had the intentions to start blaming Yobit again that they ran away without paying their participants again. I didn't visit the forum but after coming and seeing these 15 replies, it clearly defines how users of this campaign leave no chance behind to disgracefully insult Yobit and even expect payments for the same. /s So there is no difference between you and the above 15 posters who posted about this Yobit button. The good thing about them is that they did not posts after manager told them and you have posted the same thing even when the manager told NOT TO POST. P.S.: Yahoo, please ask the Yobit Management to give you the authority at least to choose the boards and threads where posts will not be counted even if we post there, so we may continue to post there in our sole interest without getting worried about how it'd affect the campaign and funds as those will not be counted. And if possible, please don't count this post of mine to be paid as I've posted in a signature campaign thread.
You already know that this post will be counted.  and you might have already got the amount for it too in your balance. You should have not posted this ,if you do not want it to be counted. |
|
|
|
Now it's only a matter of time until cryptohunter and his posse of multiple pathological personalities starts ranting again.
No, We do not want another Pandora box to be opened. Already have enough of these from them and now they have got another point to start trolling again. |
|
|
|
I agree with gentlemand. They are not going to report to anyone unless they are obligated, i.e., if they find something very illegal in your activity/transactions.
Unless you did something criminal with your BTC, I believe there isn't much to worry about.
How they know if they anyone have done any criminal activities with bitcoin ? Do they track the source ? I remember the XAPO uses to close the account if they find that the bitcoin are received from gambling site. Do coinbase follow the same guidelines ? |
|
|
|
Just a wild guess since I have no idea about the technical aspects in counting-systems: May it be that excluding specific boards are hard to implement to the automated counting performed through the Yobit-website?
Why would it be hard to implement? They'd just have to count how many times specific boards are mentioned by specific table rows. That's fairy simple provided the Yobit developers have any interest or eagerness in this. There are other proposals too like merit introduction etc but it all depends upon the yobit devs. |
|
|
|
Would this prevent campaign spam? Obviously not. But it's a relatively small and simple change that would encourage some vigilance and perhaps serve as a reminder to managers that they're responsible for their campaigns.
I'm sure there is plenty of negatives that I'm not thinking of so bring it on.
I think this will not work the way we wanted it to work. If suppose we have 8 - 10 Managers here, then for sure it will be a great way to get them notified about the spam there users might be creating but we are talking about 100+ Managers as every 2nd altcoins campaigns are managed by its own Newbie Managers and this list is never ending. Those Managers will not pay any attention no matter what comes to their inboxes and the good ones are already taking care of everything with their own responsibility. |
|
|
|
Poor Theymos for having to filter through all of these bountyhunting entries.
LoyceV has made things easy for Theymos  |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
