I give my vote to Bytecoin. It’s not a mere BTC fork, BCN’s code is completely new (unlike Monero’s). BCN dev team really rocks by implementing cool innovative features and besides, their philosophy sounds right to me. What the XMR crowd did is steal the coin right from the founding father’s arms (thankful-for-today), and they seem to keep stealing the code from BCN team as they're unable to write their own code that works.
BCN's devs recently screwed up Bytecoin and lost users a lot of coins, when they copy/pasted code from Monero and BoolBerry... BCN's codebase is buggy and crappy as hell. I don't know what planet you're living on, they didnt even have a working Miner till monero devs made one For them Lmfao.... Not to mention, their 82% premine in the hands of a few individuals...
|
|
|
Strange, that only new accounts are hyping Bytecoin. ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Only New accounts hype Bytecoin, why? because their sockpuppet accounts from 1 or 2 Bytecoin bagholders....Sad.
|
|
|
All these idiots selling cheap Razor right now hahaha. Or maybe I am the idiot scooping up RZR now when it drops to 50k 1 satoshi tomorrow FUCK.
|
|
|
Is it technically possible to side-embed monero to bitcoin?
Yes. Politically possible? Very doubtful. The interesting question is whether it is possible to side-embed with a 2-way peg. I think it would be enormously beneficial to bitcoin, as fungibility would be resolved. XMR would be sacrificing most of its upside value risk in the process, however. side embed monero to bitcoin would be the worst idea you can think off. Bitcoin isnt going to be the main currency in a few years, that you can kind of be sure about... crypto coins are made to improve upon bitcoin, not piggyback on it.
|
|
|
Isn't it better to invest in different coins? As no one know what will happen to any of them? I am really interested in Fantom coin - it's incomprehensible if MM is good or not?
btw, why did Honey Penny changed their name?
And why there is BitMonero and Monero ?
What's the point to change the name? it seems to be so devs wasted the time - better to spend time to improve the code
I'm not sure if you're trolling or naturally...you know. A name change takes about 5 1/2 seconds to do....It doesnt effect spending time to improve code. If the bitcoin devs wanted, they could literally spend 5 seconds, and change the bitcoin name in the QT Wallet and files, and wala, name change.
|
|
|
I don't know whats your guys obsession with "NXT" but I'm not concerned with this. Go to your shitty NXT and scam again with that or what? Have you bribed Bill Still or Max Keiser again or did they look through your motivations this time with your nxt shit?
You are too full of yourself - it's hurting.
and thank you for the suggestion Kolin, I checked the Cryptsy deposit history. here's my old QRK address:
QU2JE1jtdXrXzJFQ3Zfr1rwFqJQdiTYNZr
I demand back what you stole.
Me too, I demand back every bad trade in shit alts I ever made. Me as well, I think I might sue Satoshi because I lost 400 bitcoin. I might also sue the maker of Litecoin cause I lost 2 litecoin I might also sue the U.S treasury because I lost my wallet which had contained $40. -sarcasm-
|
|
|
Who doesn't love IPOs.
Where the developers take all the money and spend it on booze.
Where the developers smash all the hunnies cause they got nothing to lose
When the developers have to choose between developing the coin further or running away, the latter is what they always choose.
|
|
|
Litecoin is officially dead, why you may ask?
What Litecoin used to offer:
ASIC Resistance 2.5minute blocktime
What Litecoin now offers: 2.5minute blocktime
Don't forget Litecoin used to offer 'GPU resistance'. You can't polish a turd Haha.
|
|
|
stress less guys until i can get detail he's nearly 100% a NXT scammer sock puppet they are pissed at me for exposing their awesome (and now famous) IPO scam ( sure, like know one already knew??) (what a discovery) Whether they're scammers or not, they sure have a fuck of a lot more integrity than you have. You've been directly addressed on these forums by both original stakeholders AND current developers, in a dignified manner, and yet you continue to malign them without basis in the name of a deluded sense of self-important ethical pompousness. You've been unable to address any serious philosophical or ethical challenge put to you and your ambigious "scam" claims, while you deceive your readers by dressing up what is basically an opinionated rant as an "educational blog". What's probably the saddest aspect of all though is that nobody can identify on who's behalf you're promoting this agenda - i.e. "the scammed". That's possibly because that particular group of people does not exist otherwise they'd be complaining a whole lot more than you are. You're speaking for yourself. IMO you're damn lucky you haven't had more of a sh*t campaign waged against you. If I was someone like Wesley, or Damelon, working my butt off for very little reward and coming up with great products, I'd be sorely tempted, but it's a tribute to their integrity that they haven't, so it's left to minions like me who'll be only too happy to oblige. You're not exposing anything but your own myopic problems with history. Stick a sock in it, get a life and let those with something constructive to contribute do so in peace. OOOOOOOOHH, Tokyo just hit a NERVE, you got SERVEDAre you gonna take that digitalindustry??
|
|
|
Isn't "stealth addresses" essentially what CryptoNotes coins like Monero have already by default? It's what the whitepaper refers to as "unlinkable payments" and part of the reason why CryptoNote addresses are twice as long as Bitcoin addresses.
But Monero also has "untraceable transactions", using one-time ring signatures, which other coins are trying to use coinjoin to get the "same" effect.
Yes, Cryptonote's(Monero) already offer all of that.
|
|
|
How the hell did OP ever get the idea that putting 20 K lifesavings into Quark was a good idea? ![Huh](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/huh.gif) Drugs can be a hell of a thing...
|
|
|
banned on a technical forum for having the world geek in your name! ![Cheesy](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/cheesy.gif) LOL. How about, banned for having an obscure reference to Lord of the Rings in your username. Banned by having a paid signature and made a post in off-topic Banned ofr banning someone with a paid signature when you have one. Banned for being Mark Karpeles sockpuppet account.
|
|
|
Any relation to all this miner talk and the recent sells (now down to 0.00038)?
Highly irrelevant imo (maybe Claymores pissed) Polo Troll Box : "fonzie: Terrible weeks lay in front of altcoinhodlers, alts seem not ready to rise with BTC, everything will go down the tubes. i sold 70% of my alt holdings fonzie: quasi, alts are not ready to rise with BTC as it seems, they have decoupled and therefore most likely will go down the next 2-3 weeks quasi: fonzie, gotcha. lets hope not.. shojayxt: fonzie, I did the same a couple days ago fonzie: i destroyed the the 40000 XMR buy wall in here btw, at least 60% of it :-D" fonzie is lying. I don't know why people pretend to understand how these markets work. Bitcoin rising does not effect alt-coins in a negative way. It helps the alt-coins rise in price as well, as many traders do arbitrage between bitcoin, altcoins, and exchanges. The good altcoins(Monero, Cryptonotes) will go up in price, the bad ones will stay neutral or fall in price.
|
|
|
Banned for having an activity level higher than mine.
Banned for having an activity level lower than mine.
|
|
|
Banned for starting a banning thread and encouraging others to ban each other.
Banned for saying, " Banned for starting a banning thread and encouraging others to ban each other."
|
|
|
Yes, same scam as Neutrino.
100million premine out of 101million. Asset value is $85 Billion at todays prices backed up with a geologist report. This is not Neutrino or like any other valueless crytpto its totally different. You may not like it, But it is real and solidly backed with a multi Billion dollar asset and commodity stream. Posted from Bitcointa.lk - #R81Lp2R7RueLX0lqYes I read it. But I only see it one way, you don't own multi billion assets. So the coin is not backed by anything. Exactly, unless the dev of this coin is Bill Gates, this whole "multi billion dollar asset and commodity steam" is complete and utter bullshit.
|
|
|
With each BTC rally , LTC price is dropping , nothing much happening for LTC these days other than price drop again and again.
Yea, LTC is like any other alt-coin. No innovation, no active dev team, no adoption.
|
|
|
i hope risto p. did not hit his hands on full load of shit this time. still time to sell. seems like we are ending to monopoly xmr, one person collecting soon 5% of daily mined coins. yep, and only because of close source miner, claymore, he kills the coin.
Are you trolling.... GPU doesnt earn more coins than a high end CPU. I've tried mining with a GPU using Claymore's miner and got LESS than I did with my CPU and EC2 instances. Claymore miner is horrible...and doesnt earn anywhere near 5% lmao. ec2 is expensive.. i can run now 2.6khs on my gpus, its 30x cheaper than ec2 this costs me 1000w, count that and see that when gpu miner came out, hash went from 3mhs to 12 mhs Hashrate went up because there are lot more bitcoiners who have GPU's from mining previous coins. But as shown..The GPU miners for monero are not as good as even a high end cpu. you are so late, no single cpu will over take gpu speeds anymore ok, some high end cpu upto 800khs, but gpus do that too Are you kidding....-facepalm-, please Read the claymore miner thread. High end CPU's are more effective than a GPU for monero at this point. show me cpu running 1khs+ speeds? Show me the GPU miner your using at 1ks+ then please. Anyone can use a gpu to mine monero with the claymore miner...its not closed source.
|
|
|
i hope risto p. did not hit his hands on full load of shit this time. still time to sell. seems like we are ending to monopoly xmr, one person collecting soon 5% of daily mined coins. yep, and only because of close source miner, claymore, he kills the coin.
Are you trolling.... GPU doesnt earn more coins than a high end CPU. I've tried mining with a GPU using Claymore's miner and got LESS than I did with my CPU and EC2 instances. Claymore miner is horrible...and doesnt earn anywhere near 5% lmao. ec2 is expensive.. i can run now 2.6khs on my gpus, its 30x cheaper than ec2 this costs me 1000w, count that and see that when gpu miner came out, hash went from 3mhs to 12 mhs Hashrate went up because there are lot more bitcoiners who have GPU's from mining previous coins. But as shown..The GPU miners for monero are not as good as even a high end cpu. you are so late, no single cpu will over take gpu speeds anymore ok, some high end cpu upto 800khs, but gpus do that too Are you kidding....-facepalm-, please Read the claymore miner thread. High end CPU's are more effective than a GPU for monero at this point. BTW: anyone can use the claymore miner.....not 1 person...its open to everyone lmao.
|
|
|
|