Bitcoin Forum
August 04, 2024, 01:46:11 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.1 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 [698] 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 ... 753 »
13941  Economy / Lending / Re: new NEED: 0.01 of btc i have the collaterals on: January 08, 2015, 08:39:52 PM
if you use escrow then you know he won't take your ltc then run away
13942  Economy / Lending / Re: new NEED: 0.01 of btc i have the collaterals on: January 08, 2015, 08:35:28 PM
If you are interested you can post in my lending thread and I will do this for you (if it doesn't work out with the above guy)
13943  Other / Meta / Re: Congrats to Bitcoininformation on: January 08, 2015, 08:22:05 PM
So I'm curious to know why he provide advertisement of 'Quickseller' (a user that sell bitcointalk account) on the overview of Sig. ad. Campaign : 
wouldnt you think that would be a logical business to advertise there? My target market is people who want to participate in signature deals so anyone who is looking at the summary of all the deals can see how much they can make if they buy an account.
13944  Other / Meta / Re: How long does it take to become a Legendary Member? on: January 08, 2015, 08:04:08 PM
How long and how many posts?

I guess it's time for me to officially list my Legendary Member account for sale in Marketplace/Digital goods: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24792
Not sure if you are serious about this or not. Either way this is technically a way to "become" a legendary member faster then any of the above calculations
13945  Other / Meta / Re: Remove VOD from the Default Trust List - clear case of neg for calling out abuse on: January 08, 2015, 07:28:34 PM
From my own experience, Vod reacts fast when I message some of the trusted members to mark some defaulter or potential scammer. There was one instance when there was a delay in marking SuperDay, and he scammed Blazedout419 and was attempting more before finally getting marked. That was a rare case when Vod was late, and it also demonstrated the need to have someone like Vod who is usually very fast in marking them.

I am not saying Vod is right in this as I assume it would feel terrible to be at the receiving end of a wrong mark. But if Vod is removed then I can see a big problem, unless a few of the others step up publicly and say they are going to act on reports without delay.

Removing may be to much, but we are more concerned about the way it's done. He has used the system to state someone has lied.
hell he just called me a pathological liar. And a child. With out reference.
And accused another of having a hacked account

If we use the system as a joke it becomes a joke.
The account he "accused" of being hacked was actually proven to be hacked, the person who hacked the account admitted to hacking the account, and theymos confirmed it was hacked.
13946  Economy / Lending / Re: Offering loans on: January 08, 2015, 06:46:51 PM
Quoted for reference
u ofer  ?

0.00200000 BTC fr 30 dayes %30 1DxoZNVPjwYrAN6BQpKszmjazAjr3UosA4

[ payes: 0.00200000 + 0.00060000 = 0.00260000 BTC ]

references:

Copyright © 2014 BitLendingClub.

chooseb

Investments
Interest Earned: 0.00000000 ฿
Invested: 0.00190000 ฿
Repaid: 0.00000000 ฿
Late: 0.0000 % (0.00000000 ฿)
Default Rate: 0.0000 % (0.00000000 ฿)
ROI: 0.0000 %
Potential ROI: 0.0000 %
13947  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: Trying to clean up my account on: January 08, 2015, 06:22:12 PM
I would start by repaying your loan
13948  Economy / Lending / Re: 85btc Loan 125 in return 3 days -- Collateral 1M shares Ltcgear on: January 08, 2015, 03:54:38 PM
Well it has been 3 days since you requested your loan so it should no longer be needed. Just saved you 40 btc in interest. Your welcome
13949  Economy / Lending / Re: LocalBitcoins Account on: January 08, 2015, 03:38:17 PM
No. Lbc accounts do not appear to be heavily traded so it would be difficult to sell.

They are also difficult to prove ownership so the lender could be taking a hacked account.
13950  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 03:05:08 PM
I told him that I would not make an offer without him confirming that he owns the account. His response was that he doesn't need to provide any kind of verification and that he would send the information (password) to me first prior to me paying.

I specifically asked if he can prove ownership and he specifically made an offer that lacks proving ownership

It does not prove the account was hacked but it is essentially spoderman saying the account is hacked. The message was previously reported to badbear and he can confirm the authenticity of the PM.
13951  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 02:55:06 PM
it is probably the spekulatius account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37537

data matches. is spekulatius confirmed to have been taken?

spoderman offered to sell it to me very shortly after its password was reset via email (see PM dump on page two of this thread) even though it hadn't posted in months. Someone also logged in to it yesterday but made no posts.

He refused to confirm that he was able to confirm ownership which leads me to believe that he cannot do so.

His last post  was done the 07th of october , what do you think ? Is it an hacked  account (after sold it to another person)? Or just coincidences ?
You can make your own conclusions however I think it is hacked and for sale. I haven't received confirmation though.
13952  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 02:40:44 PM
it is probably the spekulatius account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37537

data matches. is spekulatius confirmed to have been taken?

spoderman offered to sell it to me very shortly after its password was reset via email (see PM dump on page two of this thread) even though it hadn't posted in months. Someone also logged in to it yesterday but made no posts.

He refused to confirm that he was able to confirm ownership which leads me to believe that he cannot do so.
13953  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 02:16:29 PM
here...



someone selling a legendary bitcointalk account

it is probably the spekulatius account https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37537
13954  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: WTB 2 BTC @ $560 -- Escrow or LocalBitcoins on: January 08, 2015, 12:48:09 PM
That is fine. People are allowed to make mistakes. When they do they should admit to making as such.

https://www.rbcroyalbank.com/onlinebanking/bankingusertips/payments/payclient.html

Maybe you should call Royal Bank, since you're so concerned, and tell them their website contains multiple errors of fact?
I probably will, thanks for the tip.
13955  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: WTB 2 BTC @ $560 -- Escrow or LocalBitcoins on: January 08, 2015, 06:52:22 AM
I could of done that yes, I'd do a $50 or $100 trade for that matter, it would allow us to both build up trust.

Ok, please PM me your account number and I'll transfer over $50. Seems like a happy median.

When you feel comfortable, you can transfer the bitcoins to 1FSY17fTVgFSsdgv821wzgCtmNnHeWZqPL which is the well-known public address for BearMining. Let's set the time at 30 days. If you don't transfer the bitcoins to that address within 30 days you will need to send the $50 back to me. Deal?

If you are willing to wait 30 days to receive bitcoin then I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I was spreading FUD about the reversibility of your payment methods, as it is an essential admission that they can be reversed 

The op was quoting the website, which states this.
He was not aware of the fact, that if he were using a stollen account. it could be recovered etc.

One can not simply pull funds as easy as with paypal
That is fine. People are allowed to make mistakes. When they do they should admit to making as such.
13956  Economy / Lending / Re: Need loan 0.001 without collateral (1 months, will pay double or 100% interest) on: January 08, 2015, 06:43:47 AM

I'm not sure I understand why you did that. Just so you can trust him after? Seems kind of pointless?
He has been here long enough to know that newbie scammers are not going to repay any loan they get.

There has been a significant uptick in confidence loans being taken out recently
13957  Economy / Currency exchange / Re: WTB 2 BTC @ $560 -- Escrow or LocalBitcoins on: January 08, 2015, 06:31:44 AM
I could of done that yes, I'd do a $50 or $100 trade for that matter, it would allow us to both build up trust.

Ok, please PM me your account number and I'll transfer over $50. Seems like a happy median.

When you feel comfortable, you can transfer the bitcoins to 1FSY17fTVgFSsdgv821wzgCtmNnHeWZqPL which is the well-known public address for BearMining. Let's set the time at 30 days. If you don't transfer the bitcoins to that address within 30 days you will need to send the $50 back to me. Deal?

If you are willing to wait 30 days to receive bitcoin then I think you owe me an apology for claiming that I was spreading FUD about the reversibility of your payment methods, as it is an essential admission that they can be reversed 
13958  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 05:35:08 AM
PM's with spoderman:
Hello,

I am sorry if I have the incorrect person, however I do not want to do business of the forum so I do not want to contact you elsewhere.

I have reason to believe that you are selling a hero member on default trust for 4 BTC and a hero member with neutral trust for .25 BTC.

Can you confirm if you are in fact selling them, if they are still available, if these are the lowest you are willing to sell them for and if they are hacked accounts.

I apologize if I have the incorrect person.

Thank you for your attention.
Wow, you really get around don't you.
How'd you find out it was me?
I wouldn't budge from 4BTC at the current bitcoin rates.
The hero memeber was negative, and i sold it
I'd rather not reveal my sources or my methods.

Would you be willing to divulge the identity of the default trust account? I could agree that I will not share it's identity.
I'd rather not reveal my resources
fair enough. Are you able to prove ownership of the account via a signed message from an old, unedited post? Of course you would not need to provide such message until immediately prior to any transaction taking place
Pretty sure that would reveal my resources would it not?
I'm not interested in selling to a member who already owns tons of accounts and sells them for extremely high amounts, and then buys at low-ball offers. I know it's your business, but I rather be fair and sell to someone genuinely interested
Like I said it would not need to be provided until an agreement could be reached. If you are not interested in selling to me then that is fair enough
I'm not, thanks for the offer though.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=37537 - how much would you pay for this account?
Don't low ball me. Im not doing any negotiating either.
I'll go first so keep that in consideration when you offer your price
Thanks
Before I would be willing to make any kind of offer I would need confirmation that you can prove ownership of the account. This would mean a signed bitcoin message. If you only have a signed message transferring ownership to another account then that would be fine, however you would need to do the same with the 2nd account (either on or off the forum).
Don't worry about it then, either way you are getting the account, all this verification nonsense isn't required for an offer.
If you give me a valid offer, i'll give you the account FIRST. That's my offer.
Even if I have the account first I have no way to prove ownership unless you let me have control of the account for 3+ months prior to me sending payment so I can establish an address to associate with the account and confirm there are no ownership disputes.

I am not interested in buying a hacked account, nor am I interested in dealing in any accusations of selling/using a hacked account. I do not want to associate my reputation with such activity



I am Regular Guy on HF and I am NOT selling this account. I can confirm via PM that I am not selling it and that I am the owner of that account.

why was that thread posted? I was simply seeing how much these accounts would go for. Quickseller messaged me asking for a price on this account, and has now given me neg trust because I would not cooperate with him

Why wouldn't I cooperate? Blatant simple. I didn't even have access to any default trust accounts and if I did I would not have sold it but rather keep it to myself.

This thread is a load of garbage, anyone on HF can vouch that I've never sold an account that has been HACKED but rather built up on my own.

If I was the scammer, why would i come here and open up that i'm selling the account (which I am not)?

It's a stupid move, I'm here to be honest and that is what I am doing and I HOPE quickseller respects that.

This is utter bullshit, and I hope my neg trust rating is removed for something I am NOT responsible for.
I am not going to say how I know however there is evidence that linked you to every account being advertised in that screen shot except the default trust list account.

You sent me a pm with a specific account asking for an offer and when I asked if you could prove ownership (not for proof, but if you would be able to produce it) and your response was that you would allow me access to the account first and then you would have me pay you
I didn't show a link to soul on HF. i did sell a few newbie to Full member accounts as that's what I actually had access to, the default trust one was simply reselling from you

the method:
-- Sell for 4BTC on HF
-- Pay you 3.5BTC
-- Profit .5BTC

I'm sure you were selling a default trust account a while ago, right?
If you really bought that account then why don't you post from it, or at the very least PM me from it, or even tell me what you told me you were going to do with it



No, that is not what happened
This:
-- Person from HF pays 4BTC
-- I pay you 3.5BTC for the account
-- Give the HF person the account

No one bought the account hence you never heard from me
How do you explain the hero member, 7,000 post, 500 activity account that you are selling for .3 btc? That is significantly less then what I am selling any hero account for and significantly less then what I have ever seen a hero account sell for?

How do you explain offering to sell Spekulatius while implying that it was hacked? (it was really more of an admission)



No, that is not what happened
This:
-- Person from HF pays 4BTC
-- I pay you 3.5BTC for the account
-- Give the HF person the account

No one bought the account hence you never heard from me
How do you explain the hero member, 7,000 post, 500 activity account that you are selling for .3 btc? That is significantly less then what I am selling any hero account for and significantly less then what I have ever seen a hero account sell for?

How do you explain offering to sell Spekulatius while implying that it was hacked? (it was really more of an admission)
My friend combo'd it, i highly recommend you flag that acct btw.
I was only looking for a price offering so he could sell it.
Also, the hero member was a friends with neg trust and it was given to me for free if i could sell it give him a cut. i wasn't expecting anything more than .1 for it.
You essentially admitted the account was hacked.

Then it just so happens that a hacked account pop's up that was on default trust list? I find your explanation regarding the default trust account hard to believe. Either way that isn't why I gave you the negative trust, I gave it to you because you were offering to sell a hacked account.



No, that is not what happened
This:
-- Person from HF pays 4BTC
-- I pay you 3.5BTC for the account
-- Give the HF person the account

No one bought the account hence you never heard from me
How do you explain the hero member, 7,000 post, 500 activity account that you are selling for .3 btc? That is significantly less then what I am selling any hero account for and significantly less then what I have ever seen a hero account sell for?

How do you explain offering to sell Spekulatius while implying that it was hacked? (it was really more of an admission)
My friend combo'd it, i highly recommend you flag that acct btw.
I was only looking for a price offering so he could sell it.
Also, the hero member was a friends with neg trust and it was given to me for free if i could sell it give him a cut. i wasn't expecting anything more than .1 for it.
You essentially admitted the account was hacked.

Then it just so happens that a hacked account pop's up that was on default trust list? I find your explanation regarding the default trust account hard to believe. Either way that isn't why I gave you the negative trust, I gave it to you because you were offering to sell a hacked account.
Yes it does, that's why i've explained because that was not me. I know it's hard to believe (just my luck right?) but the specifications don't match the hacked account.
I just wanted to see how much it would go for. Not my problem the guy got hacked, I didn't do it so why do i incur the neg trust.
How's that my fault
Like I said the fact that the hacked account popped up today does not have any impact on me giving you negative trust, it only has an impact on my timing. I was hoping to get more confirmation about the legendary account you said was for sale and the hero account you were claiming to be selling (that you now claim to not be actually selling).

Of course you are going to retract your story once you are called out.



He wanted a price before he wanted to make any verification, you wouldn't give me the price so how was I supposed to verify it.
I couldn't
I'm not retracting anything I'm just disappointed i'm involved in this mess when I have nothing to do with the OP nor do I want to harm bitcointalk. I never knew selling hacked accounts weren't allowed... I don't even know how to hack accounts.
I just wanted a quick buck that's it so i offered to sell the account my friend had. and now that's resulted into a -6 which imo is bullshit
I did not ask for actual verification, I asked if you were able to provide such verification. There is a big difference.

Don't worry about your -6, it will eventually turn into a -4



He wanted a price before he wanted to make any verification, you wouldn't give me the price so how was I supposed to verify it.
I couldn't
I'm not retracting anything I'm just disappointed i'm involved in this mess when I have nothing to do with the OP nor do I want to harm bitcointalk. I never knew selling hacked accounts weren't allowed... I don't even know how to hack accounts.
I just wanted a quick buck that's it so i offered to sell the account my friend had. and now that's resulted into a -6 which imo is bullshit
I did not ask for actual verification, I asked if you were able to provide such verification. There is a big difference.

Don't worry about your -6, it will eventually turn into a -4
I still don't see why I suffer the consequences. I didn't intend on harming anyone. Someone asked if I could sell his account, I came to your for an appraisal because you asked me about the account that was yours earlier on.
This is just a mis understanding, I don't think even a -4 is necessary. That mark is going to be on my name for a situation that didn't occur.
If you want, I can switch to your side and prove that legendary is hacked, to assist and prevent people from being hacked. I just want my trust removed.
You are kidding right? You want to prove the account that you tried to sell me is hacked?



Okay prove it is hacked.
13959  Other / Meta / Re: Akka - Default trust account hacked! - confirmed 2x on: January 08, 2015, 05:23:26 AM
I am Regular Guy on HF and I am NOT selling this account. I can confirm via PM that I am not selling it and that I am the owner of that account.

why was that thread posted? I was simply seeing how much these accounts would go for. Quickseller messaged me asking for a price on this account, and has now given me neg trust because I would not cooperate with him

Why wouldn't I cooperate? Blatant simple. I didn't even have access to any default trust accounts and if I did I would not have sold it but rather keep it to myself.

This thread is a load of garbage, anyone on HF can vouch that I've never sold an account that has been HACKED but rather built up on my own.

If I was the scammer, why would i come here and open up that i'm selling the account (which I am not)?

It's a stupid move, I'm here to be honest and that is what I am doing and I HOPE quickseller respects that.

This is utter bullshit, and I hope my neg trust rating is removed for something I am NOT responsible for.
I am not going to say how I know however there is evidence that linked you to every account being advertised in that screen shot except the default trust list account.

You sent me a pm with a specific account asking for an offer and when I asked if you could prove ownership (not for proof, but if you would be able to produce it) and your response was that you would allow me access to the account first and then you would have me pay you
13960  Other / Meta / Re: View threads by OP chronological order on: January 08, 2015, 03:30:56 AM
What's the column to sort on if we want to sort by OP?

Sort by OP name? You can't do that.
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?board=24.0;sort=subject
It sorts by the name of the thread
Pages: « 1 ... 648 649 650 651 652 653 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 [698] 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 ... 753 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!