Maybe I'm crazy but I'm expecting something like this:  This made me laugh.  I don't know why, until now it's 100% accurate Isn't this obvious? The longer MA is trailing the shorter one  |
|
|
|
What is the deal with btcchina.com? Entering that as a url does't load. The first google hit looks loads https://vip.btcchina.com. Wtf? hack? DDOS? charts keep updating correctly. |
|
|
|
That was a totally normal retrace....L4 = 61.8%....actually it is very healthy, good to see some people taking profit.
As you predicted correctly many pages back  |
|
|
|
fuck, bought back in @330  |
|
|
|
|
How long does it take to become registered with btcchina?
|
|
|
|
Remember that arbitrage opportunity when Stamp was like $5 OVER Gox?
So sick brah.
Nowadays it's goxbux, so I heard... |
|
|
|
fuck sleep, gonna dawn in a hour anyway. time for a coffee!
Now you know my week... |
|
|
|
Bitstamp walled off and only few buyers: Single ask positions over 20BTC among the first 1000: [['347.92', '87.43659903'], ['347.95', '134.06194029'], ['347.99', '26.47985881'], ['348.00', '430.00000000'], ['348.84', '25.00000000'], ['348.85', '25.00000000'], ['349.01', '25.00000000'], ['349.45', '65.87504488'], ['349.49', '25.00000000'], ['349.50', '2000.00000000'], ['350.00', '50.00000000'], ['350.00', '100.00000000'], ['350.12', '50.00000000'], ['354.68', '135.00000000'], ['359.01', '25.00000000'], ['360.00', '50.00000000'], ['365.00', '27.55000000'], ['365.00', '40.00000000'], ['372.41', '135.00000000'], ['374.40', '46.75418729'], ['374.45', '100.00000000'], ['374.49', '200.00061116'], ['374.80', '1141.92241336'], ['375.00', '117.00000000'], ['380.00', '1000.00000000'], ['388.00', '100.00000000'], ['396.75', '41.06320000'], ['399.97', '50.00000000'], ['400.00', '61.78000000'], ['400.00', '73.28033641'], ['402.00', '49.00000000'], ['404.00', '191.82501788'], ['410.00', '39.69804719'], ['411.84', '27.00000000'], ['439.20', '30.00000000'], ['448.00', '30.00000000'], ['450.00', '31.22425221'], ['480.00', '50.00000000'], ['498.00', '198.93400000'], ['502.00', '1000.00000000'], ['650.00', '46.50000000'], ['1000.00', '96.00000000'], ['1045.00', '25.00000000'], ['1347.00', '25.00000000'], ['1785.00', '25.00000000'], ['1840.00', '25.00000000'], ['2146.00', '25.00000000']] |
|
|
|
|
Walls on bitstamp are just being pulled back a little.
|
|
|
|
Single ask positions over 20 BTC first 1000 trades on bitstamp: [['342.87', '31.27000000'], ['346.00', '33.89701764'], ['348.00', '430.00000000'], ['348.84', '25.00000000'], ['348.85', '25.00000000'], ['349.01', '25.00000000'], ['349.40', '42.24239569'], ['349.45', '65.87504488'], ['349.49', '25.00000000'], ['349.49', '42.65254549'], ['349.50', '2000.00000000'], ['349.60', '46.24102156'], ['349.89', '46.75418729'], ['350.00', '50.00000000'], ['350.00', '32.00000000'], ['350.12', '50.00000000'], ['354.68', '135.00000000'], ['359.01', '25.00000000'], ['360.00', '50.00000000'], ['365.00', '27.55000000'], ['365.00', '40.00000000'], ['372.41', '135.00000000'], ['374.45', '100.00000000'], ['374.80', '1141.92241336'], ['375.00', '117.00000000'], ['375.00', '134.06194029'], ['380.00', '1000.00000000'], ['396.75', '41.06320000'], ['398.00', '25.73871357'], ['398.00', '20.19296502'], ['399.97', '50.00000000'], ['400.00', '61.78000000'], ['402.00', '49.00000000'], ['404.00', '191.82501788'], ['410.00', '39.69804719'], ['411.84', '27.00000000'], ['439.20', '30.00000000'], ['448.00', '30.00000000'], ['450.00', '31.22425221'], ['480.00', '50.00000000'], ['502.00', '1000.00000000'], ['650.00', '46.50000000'], ['1000.00', '96.00000000'], ['1045.00', '25.00000000'], ['1347.00', '25.00000000'], ['1785.00', '25.00000000'], ['1840.00', '25.00000000'], ['2146.00', '25.00000000']] |
|
|
|
This looks a lot like a pump and dump.
told ya |
|
|
|
No it isn't...it's like listening to a bunch of kids chatter about the boogeyman.
And BTCChina isn't showing any thing like a "tanking pattern"....btw there is no such thing as a "tanking pattern" in tech analysis....this is little children making up their own terminology to describe things they don't understand.
It has flattened out because China is hitting the 2000 psych barrier and it will take some momentum to get past that number....no one is dumping as of yet. It is actually positive imo that it hasn't retraced a significant amount into this weeks rally.
It would have been way more impressive to read this when I asked about it. But I do like the explanation. |
|
|
|
btcchina shows tanking pattern?
Ask me for financial advice - always. Then do the exact opposite  |
|
|
|
|
np, interesting anyways. Thank you.
|
|
|
|
In bitstamp price has rised as follows:
24h: 10%
3d: 34%
7d: 55%
30d: 150%
This is nothing. We have plenty of fuel left, don't be a stupid bear and try to make few bucks from shorting this now, high risk and low reward. Wait for low risk and high reward.
I was interested in the pattern |
|
|
|
|
btcchina shows tanking pattern?
|
|
|
|
I never got any resolution at all. Only a broken English reply from BTC-e with IP logs for me to do exactly nothing with. Definitely not equipped to handle mainstream traffic and would not recommend. I don't think they even formally acknowledged any sort of account breaches. I filed police reports and all sorts of other formalities with the proper authorities.
Working knowledge of Russian seems to be a prerequisite for successful use of this exchange... Might I ask how LE investigations are coming along, please? If I had to guess btc-e would be the next exchange to be closed. |
|
|
|
I swear my theory is they match off the best ones for themselves and slow down the queue. Thats what I suspected in April, best way to obsfiscate it is with lag.
Goxxed again, classic.
That's a lot of work in Excel |
|
|
|
|
Someone pulled 10 out yesterday w/o trouble. Afaik there is an own thread on this matter on BT.
|
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
