Luke, can you describe more clearly what the patch does?
in particular:
- one reuse of any given address per block, or one address reuse per block?
- does it concern only  inputs, outputs, or both?  for example, an address
that has several inputs and tries to spend them all is deprioritized or not ?

right now the  [rationale/code] and  [reasoning/action] ratios are really too low.

electricity bill is also on their list, separately. So it must be something else.

sorry for an English post: I thought I'd find the target audience for it here.
You can reply in Spanish if you like (I'm learning Spanish)
So the question is:

is  there a stable bitcoin market in Chile ?

I'll be moving there for a year, and I'm considering using btc for money transfer:
buy with my european bank account, sell there. For this I'd need a  "stable" exchange in Chile. By "stable" I mean
low spreads and that it's  not going to disappear tomorrow; we all know the price is not stable.


thanks

alright, done !
mojo-monkey-620

thanks

oops. the browser lost my cookie. now I can't access that account.
I guess I had to register properly, rather than rely on
it to remember my cookie

felicitous-tortoise-807

thanks

new statement

"residency registration certificate"

what does that even mean.
poor English becomes incomprehensible when it's about legal documents

Anyway for now you can't upload documents anywhere

according to the devs, the "default" client is no longer bitcoin-qt but Multibit

It takes less than a minute to be fully connected after downloading the client (it's an SPV client,
it doesn't download the blockchain). It'd be somewhat longer if you have to import
old private keys (the older they are, the longer it takes to synchronise) but it's still incomparable to downloading
the whole blockchain.

you can go to bitaddress.org and just save that page.

Then you don't need internet connection to open it, you just
need the file with the page and you can generate new addresses anytime
without internet.  All the needed javascript code is inside that one page:
it's designed to be client-side, usable offline.

login:    u52honfraj8

UID 74917
thx

those many-to-many tx's look like blockchain.info's new mixer.

after deciding that we want a refund (I'm not sure we have a majority yet), the main
question is getting the btc back from HF. This may not be trivial.
What to do with the funds next (invest in other GBs,
bet on horses, spend on blow...)  is a different and I'd say an unrelated question. 

a slightly different question:

how would we detect if such an attack is taking place?

As far as I understand, the attacking miner would have a slightly higher
ratio of blocks broadcast in pairs. That is, normally if his block rate  is alpha
then  rate for pairs should be alpha^2,  but if he is running the attack this value would
be slightly but significantly higher, and depends on gamma (how successful he is with
his sybil attack). It'd take a long time to detect though

would the refund be in BTC (at the time of purchase) or USD?

My vote is: if in BTC then yes, if in USD then no

Definitely not. The original Gavin's faucet used to pay 5BTC to anyone who solves a captcha.

(yes, it was quite a few price rallies back in time...)

that's a bad news... and just as I was about to spend half a day creating and editing those raw transactions.


yes, I'm interested. Provided it's  secure and trust-free

yep, pretty good break down.
But there's no contradiction in offering both offchain and onchain-
I suppose all it takes is the demand for it and of course the time.

one difficult-to-measure parameter of a brain wallet is how well you are able to remember
the pass phrase. May be you are "pretty sure" to have it right now, but you memory
may not be as good in a year, in 10 years ... Do you remember your passwords from 10 years ago right now?
Of course it's not as much of a problem if it's for a short time.

launder, sorry. it was a typo.
I mean, running them through some collective wallet