How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down?
Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price. So? 0.0001 TIT is still 0.0001 TIT... the same can be said for any altcoin. just replace the coin symbol. Not exactly a selling point. Yeah but bsv has a system of miners backing the project (literally working by mining - this is called proof of work). I don’t think anyone’s mining titties. This is the whole economic model that the LN wishes to destroy. |
|
|
|
BSV is the real Bitcoin and has the real value of it. So it is money and has best store of value as such.
Well, its lost 50% of its value in the past 2 months. That's quite a feat, given that most other coins were flat in that time period. If that's your idea of a "store of value", you must really hate money. Ur mixing up price and value. Grow up.  How can it be a store of value when its price keeps going down? Because 0.1 BSV is still 0.1 BSV regardless of trading price. |
|
|
|
His mother also said he liked to dress up as a Japanese ninjas as a child. |
|
|
|
Mmm Hmm... Meanwhile, the average BTC block size has been creeping up again. We may already be on the edge of the next blockalypse.
The first blockalypse never happened. What has happened since December 2017? BCH's market share has plummeted and bitcoin has survived just fine. Un Hunh. And what happened to all that adoption that was building - right up until the point that BTC could not handle the demand? Which of course will be accompanied by ever-lengthening confirmation times, and soaring fees. Once BTC returns to its eventual equilibrium of unusability, where do you think the tx demand is going to go?
Well that's easy: Lightning Network. No. LN cannot onboard enough people fast enough to be a contender. Not to mention all the evil that will be unleashed when the chain does not have the capacity to handle renewals or cashouts. Even if it had the value capacity for meaningful commerce. Or even if it had simple clients. Or the ability to route in a malleable environment of channels coming and going, with users wanting trustless, permissionless, decentralized operation. Wow... I know enough about you to know you, more than the average person, have the skills to do simple deductive reasoning... If lightning doesn't have the ability to onboard people fast enough for OFF CHAIN... then how will BSV be able to confirm that may payments ON CHAIN without centralizing? It takes ONE TX to go off chain and then to do do millions of transactions using that SINGLE off chain TX. Doing everything on chain is an interesting future goal... but it is decades out. (key words "on chain") You seem to be missing the fact that everyone who wants to employ LN needs to perform at least one onchain tx. Only then can they engage in gajillions of off chain channel txs. No room on the chain, no room for more LN adopters. How many Bitcoin txs have you done in the last year? What percentage of those were opening, closing, or maintaining LN channels? Until a cabal of subverters decided to cripple BTC, doing everything on chain was just The Way Bitcoin Worked. Fortunately, in the cases of SV and BCH, doing everything on chain is still just the way Bitcoin works. And apparently shrinking the blocksize is a solution now  |
|
|
|
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them. Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from. Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't. Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant. There is no tangible evidence that Craig is Satoshi. None. Not one tiny bit. Every time he's tried to convince people he was Satoshi he was shortly thereafter exposed as a fraud. This has been going on for over 4 years now. You're trying to shill a coin based on fraud. https://www.abc.net.au/news/2016-05-02/bitcoin-creator-craig-wright-publicly-identified/7377554"He said he had "a couple of doctorates" and a masters in law and statistics." Looks like he has at least 5 masters, he forsure has 1 completed PhD and he’s currently at Leicester doing a PhD in law. But that’s okay, take this video for example, you provide proof and your still a scammer according to 180 dislikes. https://youtu.be/QiK34QicusIWould you be more satisfied with 11 masters instead of 10? |
|
|
|
Did you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests?
Though Satoshi's country of origin is still unknown, it's likely only a taxable event if he sells them. Regardless, it would only prove that he owns however many coins are at the address he is signing the message from. Wright isn't signing a message from one of Satoshi's addresses because he can't. Australia, and I don’t think Craig has returned since. Pretty relevant. |
|
|
|
Already read that in great detail. Foul play alleged from all sides. CSW claims to be Satoshi and yet has still not Signed any block as definitive proof. I'm certainly not a troll, I used to communicate with Satoshi (on this very forum). Unlike Craig, I have verified myself ... - https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=4630066.0Craig (currently) being unable or unwilling to (legitimately) Sign anything has caused 2 major problems for BSV / nchain. 1) Not signing a stated claim is a false pretence. 2) The continuing duration of this false pretence has impacted on the entire crypto space, including the market. ... If folks actually digested my own posts you would likely discover that I have not referred to Craig as a ' Faketoshi' or otherwise. Innocent until proven guilty. However ... Why does Craig avoid Bitcoin 'old timers' like the plague and/or not just come back to this forum to set the record straight? According to Craig's own story he had moved on to other things ... whilst leaving the Bitcoin community to both establish, maintain and build the project in his absence (and off their own backs!). Do you think it is OK to retain the (metaphorical) last piece of the puzzle, to place the final piece and to proclaim wholeheartedly "I built all this" and "You are all wrong!" etc., ... People in the world Do not doubt It is teaching Which is the beginning of doubt. - Zen poem ... Again, this is Financial Cryptography, so do not trust. Sign and Verify. Simply, Put up, or Shut up.- https://idioms.thefreedictionary.com/put+up+or+shut+upDid you ever consider the fact Satoshi doesn’t want to pay his billion dollar tax bill and that’s why he shows proof only to those who matter and not the retarded general public who can’t understand what is best for Satoshi s personal and financial interests? |
|
|
|
Probably because ETH is moving from a POW (proof of work) to a PoS (proof of stake) consensus algorithm with a minimum of 32 ETH required to stake, and a lot of people are buying it at these low prices so that they can start staking soon
This has been said for forever, still nothing. I doubt anything will change. LOL. POW is where workers rule. POS is where rent seekers rule. You can never create sustainable economy where rent seekers rule! Ethereum was created as a coin of the people that don't understand monetary theory by the people that don't understand monetary theory for the people that don't understand monetary theory! I have to agree, who needs another oligarchy when we have the central banking system? Plus you realize the big Ethereum stakers are all ERC20 ICO Poop Coin issuers. |
|
|
|
get ready for the blast, we have seen the same scenario earlier, whenever BTC stablized after the pump, BCH will bust...
Don't count on it. This faketoshi is dying ‘Faketoshi’ has more attention then ever right now. Look at how many people are trying to descredit him right now through name calling and unbacked arguments. The fear right now is greater then ever. You have an account dedicated solely for the purpose. No one does that unless they are scared or paid because of the importance of desueding retards that mining is not relevant to the whole bitcoin economic model. |
|
|
|
In addition to BTC and BCH, there is no sense in altcoins, any option can be added to BTC, and BCH has something that BTC will not have - large blocks
BTI is going to fasttrack up beyond the top of the crypto food chain ~ the bcash tards can't even debate this fact in real life!!  weeeee Wow, you’re at -16 trust now! You really are a worthless piece of shit. |
|
|
|
I bet you could |
|
|
|
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Great question. For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker. This is because the 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work. BTC and BSV are two completely different expierents, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin. Hope that helps! You didn't prove anything through reliable sources. You stated your shill case to promote a coin developed by a fraud, which I have to say contains an impressive amount of misinformation. Pretty much everything you just said is incorrect. I could dissect your claims point by point, but they are irrelevant because you're not a reliable source. I really do believe the bitcoin white paper is a reliable source. |
|
|
|
May i ask how can we be sure that the bitcoin sv is an original Satoshi Vision of Bitcoin?
I will appreciate anyone who proves through reliable sources to confirm this information.
Great question. For myself, what constitutes Bitcoin is the Whitepaper NOT the BTC ticker. This is because the last 2 sentences in the Bitcoin Whitepaper introduction correlate ONLY to the economic model associated with BSV. Off chain lightning trsactions have no relevance to hash power and therefore POW. Miners become irrelevant with lightning as they are not incentivized to work. BTC and BSV are two completely different experiments, but BTC has zero correlation to the economic model of Bitcoin. For this reason, some believe BSV is Bitcoin. Hope that helps! https://twitter.com/bigredmurphy/status/1096109140865437696?s=21 |
|
|
|
nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.
It was a good post. It was more informative and useful than your combined entirety of postings. You, on the other hand, should probably be given a red trust for furthering the b.s. of a proven con artist. You know CSW is a liar, yet you're going to continue to shill for his coin... why? Because you are also dishonest. This is the Bitcoin SV thread. |
|
|
|
|
nutildah handing out merit poop points left right and center for shitposts.
|
|
|
|
That’s because he created it dumbass. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
