Hello,
here is my answer.

Your potential investors should understand the difference between “known” and “in commercial operation”, because you are not.

So called LENR, as anomaly heat emission, is known (mostly between marginals, but however). But the “synthesis of precious metals” you are talking about is not. Even the phenomenon will be confirmed by several independent researchers, it does not mean that it can be scaled and bring any profit. But you are promising dividends in two years, as if you already have an economically justified technology!

If you do not know something, this does not mean that others do not know that. Yasuhiro Iwamura obtained platinum from tungsten, here is his report: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OzZl9l8nn1c
Domenico Cirillo also obtained platinum group metals http://lenr-canr.org/acrobat/CirilloDtransmutat.pdf
H. Nagaoka obtained gold and platinum group metals in the 20’s, you can read his article at: https://www.nature.com/articles/116095a0
You can also read about him in the presentation of Lattice Energy LLC p.54: https://www.slideshare.net/lewisglarsen/lattice-energy-llc-lenr-transmutation-as-source-of-key-scarce-elements-dec-13-2013
And this is just a small amount of sources, there is a lot more materials in different languages.

You’re mentioning NASA and CERN researches – but were are the links?

NASA Experiments review: https://synthestech.com/NASA_Presentation.pdf
NASA patent: http://e-catworld.com/wp-content/uploads/2017/09/2017.09.14-Published-Application-1663.0002PCT3.pdf
CERN review: https://synthestech.com/CERN-Report.pdf

As you can see, you have classified NASA as marginals. But there is also SRI, Kurchatov Institute (Urutskoev and Savvatimova), Japanese NEDO, and thousands of others, google them.


Moreover, several people have contacted us, who observed such phenomena, and they have even sent us a couple of sample. And these people are NOT scientists and they don’t get published anywhere.

Even the phenomenon will be confirmed by several independent researchers, it does not mean that it can be scaled and bring any profit. But you are promising dividends in two years, as if you already have an economically justified technology!

So, do you suggest to wait until everybody starts doing this and begin commercialization later, when the competition is high. You do not understand the very fundamentals of business, all the profit receives the one who stands at the cradle of business.
Two years are enough, we are not an institution that eats up grants from the state, lingering for decades over "Influence of moonlight on telegraph wires". Commercial research is like a sprint run and not a marathon. And we are confident that we will achieve success.

If you are working with “leading labs” – where’s the name of at least one of them? Where are their contacts?

1. Vyatka State University: https://www.vyatsu.ru/nash-universitet/informatsiya-o-nauchnyih-laboratoriyah-vyatgu.html
Our advisor, Denis Kosulin, works there.  Tests were carried out on the energy dispersive XRFA (See our WP)
2. Center for Collective Use St. Petersburg State University, in Petergof, wave-length dispersive XRFA was carried out on Simatzu XRF1800. (See our WP)
3. We have an advisor in a Saint-Petersburg mining university http://spmi.ru/
We have carried out the wave-length dispersive XRFA there as well and ICP-MS of some samples.

4. We have carried out the isotopic analysis of some samples in Hidrometall analytical laboratory: http://www.gidrometall.ru/analytics (Not specified in our WP, because the results are hard to understand)
5. At Kasan Federal University we have carried out a series of analyses using there ICP-MS

I will not give people's contacts here, since not everyone knew what topic we worked on during our analyzes.

If you have “well equipped” lab — why do you use photoshopped pictures of someone else's equipment?

Your accusation is as always groundless and false, photos of our current laboratory are on the synthestech landing at: https://ico.synthestech.com/#photos
The pictures we have posted there are not „sugarcoated“ and photoshopped at all.  

Saying “Real guys” I do not mean big companies. I mean real engineers, not political bloggers. What projects did you participate in? Where are your CVs? Only your “bla-bla” is colossal.

As I can see, you are not apt to a constructive criticism, your comments are an uncovered trolling, no one is interested in.
You are not able to understand the simplest things, that in any business the organization is the main thing. And our head V. Karabanov, is a very highly qualified manager and organizer with a unique vision. He was one of the first people in the world to see the perspectives of obtaining valuable metals and isotopes through LENR, and he was also the first who focused his efforts on this experimental research.
And we also have a whole group of engineers with a wide variety of experiences.


As far as I understand, due to your narrow-mindedness, it is difficult for you to understand the perspectives that low-energy transmutation is opening to the world, but for hundreds of people who have already become our investors it is obvious.
Our project is much more promising than most leading ICOs. We will change the world in a more significant way than the bitcoin did. We will open the LENR for the investment market and this will inevitably lead to the replacement of hydrocarbon fuels with safe cold fusion. Have a great day.

We have never claimed to obtain gold from lead. We obtain platinum group metals from cheap raw metals through low-energy nuclrear reactions. It has nothing to do with alchemy.

Yes, we do have the referral program. Click the link, fill out the form and you will get the referral link https://my.synthestech.com
You will get 5% STT tokens as a reward from each purchase.

"By the time GE bought this patent, paid electric lighting in New York City had been in operation for 24 years. Before detailed explanation, the possibility and the method of the process did not raise questions among scientists (not your case)."    So I don't understend your point, LENR has been known for more than 30 years. There are questions on physics behind it, but not the phenomenon itself. By now it is mainstream research, NASA, CERN recognize it and work in this field.

"I can't find neither any published projects of your "engineers".   -  In your statement there is a contradiction. It is scientists who publish articles, not engineers. We don’t need publications, as we don’t do science, everything is already done befor us. We study the possibility of commercialization, it is applied research with biggest potential ever!

"Poor equipment and lack of skills"
Your statement is unfounded and false. Our current laboratory was visited by the most famous scientists in the world working in the field of LENR and found it to be very modern and technologically well-equipped. Parkhomov once mentioned our laboratory at one of his seminars calling it vey technologically advanced. At the initial stage of our work, we were able to repeat all the experiments described in the LENR field, so our experimental experience is colossal.
We worked in the field of analytical chemistry with the leading laboratories in Russia, leading experts advise us. If the analytical equipment of leading laboratories, which costs a fortune, is poor equipment for you, then show me your equipment.

"Real guys would repeat them very quickly. You have no chance."   -  You think like a loser, that is the reason why you find it impossible for you. Do you think that there are some special people in big companies? Iwamura from Mitsubishi Heavy Industries received his first results in 2003, and in 2014 received a patent https://patents.google.com/patent/EP1202290B1/un
But even such a large company has not yet managed to commercialize its developments. Real guys are us, and large corporations will start to be seriously engaged in this only after we launch the serial production and make money doing this.  

 
"But since there is nothing here but lies, I see you have no plans to compete with anyone." - Your statement is again groundless. You did not bother to ask questions and now are accusing us of lying. Your posts are shallow and the comments are dilettantistic.

Breakthroughs are made by people like us, who are not afraid to go against a common opinion, they believe in their experiments and in their strength.
Our project to date is the most promising in the world and people understand this and invest in us.

The Roadmap you can find at https://ico.synthestech.com  scroll all the way down.

Pages 25 through 31 cover only our results. (See the attached a photo of the spectrogram)
As you say, about the theoretical part, your statement says that you have a very weak idea of science in the whole. Example: In 1906, General Electric bought a patent for an incandescent lamp and started serial production. They earned billions, but they had no idea about the quantum nature of the electron shells of the tungsten core, as well as about much more, but this did not stop them from making money on this invention.

Fundamental science requires a completely different level of investment, that is the reason why we are not interested in this.

"The project is research-oriented?" Ok, but then what dividends are you talking about? How will you get money for it? "
Dividends we can receive from:
 1. Own production
2. Sales of license,
3. sales of technology
4. Sales of reactors, etc.

The period of time which we have stated is really short, but our preliminary results give a high degree of confidence in success. If we do not succeed, we will understand this quite soon.

"And since there is only 3 months (!) allocated in your schedule to establish both serial production and profitable sales — you are living in the land of fairies or you just planning to escape with the money."

This time is enough to organize pilot production and receive profit, no one talks about payback or operating profit, but profit is our goal. You can create large-scale production only if you know how to make a profit. This is also necessary to obtain further investment in the project.

You say that it is possible to escape somewhere in this world with other people's money - you are a very naive person, since this is impossible.

You have read the WP very inattentively, your accusations are groundless.
We are ready to answer all questions.

You can read about our team memebres and advisors at https://ico.synthestech.com (scroll all the way down). You will see that they have all the required expertise to deliver the project and make it a great success.