Next week, we are opening a company in the USA, Silicon Valley. This will allow us to partner with local players easily.
Those are good news. I think there are a lot of opportunities right there. Good. Finally, you guys are intruding in the high-tech world. New friends, new opportunities, new scales - this is right direction. |
|
|
|
he has his reason why he invested with hugh amount. but, why he must declare his contribution? is he want to attract other people by him self to join this program? I think that must be the case. There are many marketing strategies and this may be a motivation to many of the new investors. Also Laneaxis is good for early investors. Do they already have big ones? I am not sure if they have them, does anybody know this? |
|
|
|
It’s a very long ico with many phase. It’s not a bad thing I think, it can be a good way to raise okey over the time, the team can continue to improve the visbility of the project and incentive new investors during a longer period.
But it's hard to keep the audience's attention for such a long time, so they need to do something with it. |
|
|
|
is there any plan to release more in depth technical white paper in near term? First version is good but simple explanation of all tech. I see more adviser joining team which is good.
I'm not sure if we'll release an updated whitepaper. If there are any changes in the future- we will of course update the whitepaper. For people who want to see even more in-depth explanations we are releasing a developer blog each month, as well as make parts of our private Github repository public after each section passes a security audit. Any significant changes in the project have to be written in the WP, about minor changes it's not that necessary I guess. |
|
|
|
|
According to their roadmap, ICO round 1 starts in November, in a month. At that time, we will see who is who in this project.
|
|
|
|
|
Apparently, the blockchain technology may do real good to the industry of transportation, the only question is if the devs would manage to utilize it to a greater extent in this market.
|
|
|
|
|
At the moment, I think this project is the most promising one. I just hope it will remain the same at the later stages.
|
|
|
|
How many people do you think are needed to get Dusk to mainnet? Because this seems quite a large undertaking, while the tech team is not that large. In comparison Cardano has 91 contributors on their Github and their are 26 people affiliated with Input Output.
The current team will be able to deliver the mainnet in time. Quality over Quantity  Besides that, there will also be a public development group. Dusk R&DDusk R&D is a research consortium where the primary goal is to iterate and improve on the Dusk Network white paper, and various research compendia. It will not only ensure a top notch technical system, but also the best talent in Europe working on improving Dusk Network. This research branch will feed directly into the two development teams and create a top-down adoption effect due to its academic and formalized validity. There are three top notch research partner collaborations explored and/or confirmed and we will announce these as soon as we are able. Dusk CoreDusk Core is the development team directly led by Dusk’s own technical leads Emanuele Francioni, Fulvio Venturelli and others to be announced. They are responsible for the implementation of all the core aspects of the Dusk Network, such as our unique SBA* consensus mechanism, and our Secure Tunnel Switching methodology. They are complemented by our strategic partner, and award winning blockchain development team, Kryha. Dawn Public DevelopmentA community-driven development group. Dawn will concentrate on the user experience of Dusk Network, different language libraries, standardization, improvement proposals, Dusk wallet implementations, Dusk block explorer, and many more things. We look forward to announcing our Dawn community leads soon. They have extensive experience in blockchain and leading public development communities, and we are glad to have them onboard. Some projects are paying public devs via bounties, the more you contribute, the more chance you have to win the bounty. You will follow this model with Dawn public development? It is an interesting idea to have the community participate in development but I assume the good coders want more than winning a bounty. Yes, but this step is ok, maybe some developers are hard believers in this project and are ok with working for it at the devs' terms and conditions. |
|
|
|
So how about funding free electricity and fuel, something that will contribute society I bet there are many researcher around the world who needs funding.
Providers of electricity and fuel won't like this so i don't think we will see this in the near future Yeah, such patents immediately buy up and do not give consent for the production of such engines, I don't think anything can change at least until the oil and gas reserves run out. low-cost electricity (solar panels, wind), fuel produced by organic waste, electrical machines are all scientific projects that bring our society towards to a greener future and should be funded, but the big companies that earn with the the sale of oil will certainly be contrary, i hope scientificcoin make their own choices based on the validity of the projects and not under the various pressures of the others I hate that artificial containment of the technical development from different commercial whales. If not them, we would be living already on Mars... |
|
|
|
Bonuses also can be useful, it really depends on the project.
In the long term it doesnt matter which method you choose I think.
In short term, bonuses are very crucial. But looking for the long term, the project itself and how it will be executed is the only important thing. agreed, my opinion is that there is a place for bonuses and bounties to promote the projects. In the current state of the market I don't think bounties mean that much. It makes more sense now to target institutional investors. Bonuses probably should be considered, but bounties...I don't know. They have a bounty program with a small budget, it seems to me that this will not make big affect of token price in the first listing. I love projects with no bounty or little bounty. Otherwise, it causes a big dump. Lane Axis's bounty budget is really nothing to fear about. You are right, big bounty budget always results in a bigger dump. I think they should balance amount raised and decide bounty later ? Most projects allocate 1% of the sold tokens to the bounty campaign. this is not much but it is still enough to cause dumps. Because there are not just bounty hunters, there are also some investors that buy with huge bonus and sell quickly to have fast profit. Yes, I think this is a good point. presale whales will also dump. The best thing would be no bonusses and only a small bounty campaign but most projects need the advertisement from bounty hunters and the presale money. The point is that rampant rewards campaigns, although in the long run bring in some investors, also cause big dumps and maybe even faster, the bonus is more efficient if applied intensive marketing, and attracts more investments in the short term, but also need control and caution the bounty campaigns are used to better advertise the project, the various bonuses are used to encourage investors to invest more, to avoid the dumps team could block the token for a few months after the end of the ico (impossibility of moving once distributed) This artificial stopping is letting me down sometimes as all dumps and falls are the inevitable things to happen in the market... |
|
|
|
Ehealth seems to be present in a lot of event, it’s very nice that the team has that visbility and continue to work on it. I think in long term the project can really have a nice potential, if the team has the ability to manage it and deliver something.
They are capable of managing and delivering project they claimed. they have a loooot of time to do it also, so i have no doubts at this point from ehealth besides lack of comms. Lack of communication is not a thing you doubt, it is a certain thing it seems  But it is not bad for the project it is just frustrating for us. it's frustrating because we're used to the fast way of doing things in the crypto space. that's not the way it's done in regular investments. they stretch their timeline so far and moving in a very slow pace. Reminds me of the "slow and steady wins the race" is it true that those who go slowly and cautiously win the race, but maybe with most frequent news and dates with a regular cadence us all would be a little quieter, news on mvp? Well. only those with great potential, strength, and confidence in self not just slow and cautious. Here, this is not the case, because they have already lost many supporters because of their inactivity in this thread, in tg, in twitter, youtube, etc. |
|
|
|
|
Anyways, they started from ETH, right? What is the point to start based on ETH and then claim for independence? It'd be better to start everything aside from others, am I right?
|
|
|
|
|
According to this video, they are in front of non-crypto audience as they explain everything in layman terms.
|
|
|
|
I want to understand what else is unique about LaneAxis project, besides allowing customers and manufacturers to track the transported goods in real time using GPS?
Well, many things, but they are all connected with transporting goods. These are cheaper costs, no intermediaries, faster and more convenient services, etc. |
|
|
|
Got it. Scientificcoin, Support science projects!
wow aren't you a brilliant one? without making ico i think they are trusting their customer database maybe from health monitor project. Well I guess we all should have faith in the team's decision over fundraising schemes and trust them completely. Last time I trusted somebody completely, I lost all my money. But joking aside, yes without trust nothing works, not even in crypto. Let's take something in between: a little faith, a little caution. Confidence is better than faith, attention is better than caution. |
|
|
|
Definetely, if this projects get to release it can be an interesting point of view on privacy and anonimicity. For the first time one of this projects is released with public team, but still need to be seen how it goes, I don't like ETH tokens at all.
Some interesting points are on their whitepaper, but at the same time im not sure it can be implemented as they want on a ETH blockchain layer.
It is the hope of the community that this project will solve the shortcomings of previous projects that are focused on privacy and that will be great if it will be delivered effective at the soonest time possible. Maybe I'm wrong but Dusk won't be a layer on top of Ethereum but a new blockchain built from scratch, you don't have to worry about the fact of if you like or not ethereum's tokens Ethereum had occupied its niche a long time ago, and DUSK doesn't seem to me as any of the competitors to ETH. Moreover, this project is more about data transmitting, not about pure crypto, tokens/coins and blockchain. |
|
|
|
They told that they will give more details about Boinc algorithm. Did they already do and i missed it, or still waiting?
I'm also waiting for it, don't think they published anything about the algorithm just yet, however hope they will soon. Yeah, as a technical person I am also waiting for more information on this topic. I agree that they should give some details about how it would work. That info should be easy to understand for non-expert people in the field since most of the potential investors will not be experts. I am sure they will give us such thing as soon as possible. This project has a community manager that will help us to make things clearer. which we are not seeing in these days, from the start of the bear season, community managers are having hard time getting a job but sn coin team is showing difference in this area too. As for me, many projects are nowadays like dead worms, and only a few of them are still trying to move around. |
|
|
|
their claim is to remove freight intermediaries and decrease costs around %30 in total
Many companies were thinking of that idea, yet no one has managed to succeed. Maybe this one will? |
|
|
|
"... wait for the market to recover..."
Anyone can explain this? Why it is bad to enter some project when the market is low?
For example, i have lets say 10.000 USD.
At the low price i can buy ETH, and for this ETH i can buy more project's tokens.
When the market is up, i can buy less ETH, and after that i can buy less tokens for that ETH.
So what's the piont of waiting for the market to recover?
During the bearish market situation, you probably won't be seeing any positive eXes of the tokens becoming coins. For the short-term profit, such market is undesirable. |
|
|
|
Really glad you are removing the bonuses. I have raised the issue with bonuses before. Besides hindering decentralization, they distort the market in such a way much of the risk is transferred from private sale investors to public sale investors. I hope other projects follow this fair practice of equal risk and opportunity.
they must be really confident to do that. and raising the cap is an interesting move. Yes, this is something I have never seen before. It raises the hardcap as you mentioned and in times like this such decision means they are very confident in the project. There has been some ico projects without bonuses in the past. The one thing they had in common that people invested just in the last minutes, or on the last day, not before They were not private sales though. Well, I hope they are not just pretending to be THAT sure in their creation, and there are definite reasons for their confidence. Do you think what they already have private investors with whom this project anyway will be launched? I also think that they should have reasons for such confidence in success. I think they don't have any investors now, otherwise we would be informed. What for to hide good news from the public.. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
