Bitcoin Forum
May 26, 2024, 09:58:00 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
141  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon will ship 290 units by tomorrow, correct? on: March 02, 2013, 02:37:48 AM
Starting from next Monday, units will be en route to their country of destination and tracking numbers will follow maybe 2~3 days after (it is at this point onward which you can expect an email from us with the tracking information), we expect this process to continue to the 10th of March until all the units have been shipped out, if all is well people will get their units in-hand in the middle of March.

Claimed ship date: January
Real ship date: March
142  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Advertising on BFL website is very misleading to NEW CUSTOMERS on: February 20, 2013, 10:30:56 AM
What cockamamey BS story you wrote up above is hardly the reason bASIC collapsed.

I guess you missed the HERP DERP DRUNKEN WALL OF TEXT ASIAN BENEFACTORS

I guess you missed the people saying "omg people are refunding? I BETTER GET REFUND!!!111"
143  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Advertising on BFL website is very misleading to NEW CUSTOMERS on: February 20, 2013, 10:22:05 AM
Think back to what happened with bASIC.

Yes, there you go, they collapsed because of delays

Wrong. They collapsed because Tom either scammed them or fucked up badly, leading to people refunding because people were refunding.
Idiot.

bASIC collapsed because everyone lost confidence and pulled their money out. Tom didn't show up to meetings and didn't provide enough details about where he was at any point.

You just...you just repeated my points and called me an idiot for them....cannot....comprehend....the stupid...
144  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: Contest: New name for BFGMiner! (0.33 - 1 BTC prize) on: February 20, 2013, 02:21:49 AM
BFGMiner (St. Barbara's FPGA/GPU Miner) 3.0 will be featuring and refocussing on ASICs.
Therefore, the original name no longer really fits anymore.

Quote
There is no reference to her in the authentic early Christian writings, nor in the original recension of Saint Jerome's martyrology.

Did it ever fit?

The normal definition of BFG is fine.
145  Bitcoin / Pools / Re: [ANN] Stratum mining protocol - ASIC ready on: February 19, 2013, 10:54:10 PM
Quote
cgminer's implementation is

This unjustified assertion has no place in this thread.

Quote
Sadly, I've also found I cannot simply disable it based on client.get_version response - apparently requesting this information before initialization has completed breaks

It's normal for things to break if you hammer them with requests before initialization is finished.

Quote
The only solution I can think of to deal with this bug is to have newer clients send their version unsolicited before trying to subscribe.

This is surprisingly not a bad idea.

Quote
Another feature request (which I have to note has been specified in GBT for a year now)

There's no need to beat a dead horse here.

Quote
is the ability for miners to send a default difficulty/target to the server.

It should be up to the server to decide what rate of shares it can accept, but if an unsolicited client version is to be added, then perhaps a "suggested minimum difficulty" could be added as well.
146  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Advertising on BFL website is very misleading to NEW CUSTOMERS on: February 19, 2013, 09:11:30 AM
Think back to what happened with bASIC.

Yes, there you go, they collapsed because of delays

Wrong. They collapsed because Tom either scammed them or fucked up badly, leading to people refunding because people were refunding.

If delays were sufficient to cause a collapse, then BFL should logically have collapsed as well.
147  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Advertising on BFL website is very misleading to NEW CUSTOMERS on: February 19, 2013, 09:07:58 AM
Honesty is better than bullshit

By this logic, it's better to murder someone and confess than to pretend to murder someone.
148  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Advertising on BFL website is very misleading to NEW CUSTOMERS on: February 18, 2013, 09:19:05 AM
Firstly, much of BFL's ads don't say pre-order to start:



secondly, they are at the very, very least guilty of using pre-order money to fund R&D.

Take a look at their competitor. They flat out refuse to offer any refunds; they seem to be using pre order money for pretty much everything. BFL is the slightly lesser evil since they have, at the very least, honored every refund to date.

I have long said that I may in fact lose my bets if BFL gambles hard with btc-community pre-order money and wins

It's interesting how you set it up so they either "lose" and it's a scam, or they "win" and ship yet it's still wrong because gambling.

- but I have this feeling that they are not close to winning, and they are making the final money-grabs before too many ASICs are out there from legitimate suppliers.

Going by the above criteria, they aren't really any legitimate suppliers.
149  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon ASIC users thread on: February 18, 2013, 02:14:42 AM
Upgrade was successful using standard web-based OpenWRT firmware upgrade procedure.

New image...
Is Avalon not using opkg and a jffs2-capable firmware? O.o

Does it matter? It's easier to guarantee a complete update if you just image the whole flash; the unit should then exactly match fresh production units.
150  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Avalon batch#2 Re-open tomorrow 2/18 on: February 17, 2013, 11:43:07 PM
Does anyone want to take bets on whether the sale actually goes as planned this time?
151  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 16, 2013, 07:59:45 AM
And Kano just lost

Huh

I think everyone wanted this to be released. We all won.
152  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 16, 2013, 07:57:24 AM
It's the weekend as promised, CNY is ending and shipping is going to resume shortly after, in the mean time before this we got organized ( not really organizing source code but things like how we didn't initially have the repos on github so there was other misc related work. )

Here are the source codes

https://github.com/BitSyncom/cgminer
https://github.com/BitSyncom/cgminer-openwrt-package
https://github.com/BitSyncom/avalon-extras
https://github.com/BitSyncom/luci

Thanks. I did give Avalon a lot of shit about this, but the source release is much appreciated.
153  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 15, 2013, 10:41:33 AM
You are a rude unpleasant and entitled person, I felt the summary portrayed you in a humorous light very well while being truthful.

Bah! It was a bath-house scene and there was no sex. All tease and no payoff. Boring.

As an aside, what the hell is an "entitled person"? Is this a Google Translate fail, or else what exactly is it to which kano is entitled?


Self Entitled means He/ She feels something is owed to him, all the time from everyone.

In this context I was referring to his not very subtle demands
Quote
Give me an ASIC for free because I code cgminer !
No ? fine I will throw an e-tantrum and slander you.

No misrepresentation at all!
154  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 15, 2013, 09:08:30 AM
You are a rude unpleasant and entitled person, I felt the summary portrayed you in a humorous light very well while being truthful.

I found it very misleading and only a little bit amusing.
155  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 15, 2013, 09:04:53 AM
No, the deadline is March 1st and we are in the middle of February. 

In other words, they shift the goalposts back and forth when it's convenient for them. If you can't ship your fucking units in January, don't fucking say you're shipping in January. That was a hugely misleading move on their part.

They have not refused, they stated that they are not going too  and "no news is good news".

In other words, they have refused, and think refusing is a good thing.

"They" did not purposefully mess up their own pre-order.  Obviously things could of been better and there were bugs in the ecommerce process.   

What the fuck? Nobody purposefully messes up their own pre-orders. I'm only saying that they were incompetent because they somehow managed to fuck it up. And yes, it's their fault. They had multiple options for payment providers and they picked one which has apparently never handled anything close to this level of demand. If they did their research, they would have picked a provider that had actually done load testing. Online shop fronts should be a solved problem by now...

Again, they are choosing to spend their time resources on building and shipping unit over customer service with a self-admitted "small team"

I'm not suggesting that they should have spent hours upon hours talking to every customer. They must have a system for tracking orders (although it could be pen and paper, I guess. Technology is hard to use right?). It's not hard to have automatic email updates to customers when an order is in build, shipped etc. If they haven't gotten that far then they're fucking liars for suggesting that are building a dozen units per day. Maybe have a quick post every few days on here to keep track of overall progress. This wouldn't take even 1% of one team member's time; they could even do it while taking a shit.

Of course, they've taken the high level of demand as a license for shitting on the face of their customers instead. They know that even if they do that, many are still going to order. Yet, if BFL hasn't fucked up their chips, Avalon will be competing which a company that doesn't leave dark brown stains and a bad smell whenever you deal with them. Unless you troll them over boxes of fans.

Yes, there is no date and they have alluded to this in the newsletter.

Nice of them to be honest about their incompetence.

Anymore mis-representations for us?  Just because you are not happy doesn't mean you can make stuff up.   Be honest.

I don't think anyone really cares what I post about, but it's fun to aggressively take sides. There are enough with blind faith in Avalon (or paid off by them) on the other side to balance it out. Going by the thread title, you're basically expected to take a side.
156  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 14, 2013, 01:16:36 AM
If only we could get you to tone down the sodomy comments. That would be almost respectable.

Why? Modern societies are very accepting of that kind of thing these days.

Because it's off topic. This is the "Kano vs Bitsyncom" thread, not the "Those by Whom I will not be Sodomised" thread.

A fair point.
157  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 14, 2013, 01:08:46 AM
All Avalon bashers will end up with no source code at all. And what will you do then? I guess - nothing, but whine here. Fuck off and return when they miss their deadline for release.

They missed their deadline for a demo. They missed their deadline for an image release (which should have included source). They missed their deadline for 298 out of 300 units (sorry, shipping less than 1% of orders does not count). They refuse to keep those customers up to date. They claim to be open source but they keep delaying the source with poor excuses. They completely fucked up the batch #2 ordering. Again, they're not keeping batch #2 customers up to date. They don't even know when they will open batch #2 again for orders.

I think it's pretty reasonable for people to be annoyed at Avalon right now, and it's also pretty reasonable to be asking for them to release the source when they claim to be open source and use GPL software.

If you're a troll, I'm actually going to give you 4/10 because you managed to quite accurately imitate an Avalon fanboi.
158  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 14, 2013, 12:14:31 AM
Read back and you'll see there is no "leaps in logic".

No, if you want to claim that he is demanding free hardware, then you should prove it.
159  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 14, 2013, 12:12:08 AM
If only we could get you to tone down the sodomy comments. That would be almost respectable.

Why? Modern societies are very accepting of that kind of thing these days.
160  Bitcoin / Hardware / Re: Kano vs Bitsyncom on: February 13, 2013, 11:21:26 PM
The irony,
Kano won't support code if he doesn't get entitled to "free" hardware. Yet he bashes someone else who did fork over money to support hardware.

Very Ironic, don't you think?

I've noticed a few leaps of logic in this thread. In particular:

"I'll support it if I get hardware" -> "I won't support it if I don't get hardware" -> "I expect to be expected to support it" -> "I expect to receive hardware"

Every leap is logically fallacious.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 [8] 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!