Hello. It is difficult to me to present, than we will be able to convince dear Colorblind that the sensitivity of the device really allows to catch and record structure of a gas admixture of the exhaled air in a look, clear for a visual perception.
At the moment time, the device isn't positioned as the medical equipment. It is a spectral gas analyzer.
And on the basis of its data we won't tell "You have cancer or a viral hepatitis". We will recommend to visit the doctor and to tell that at a research on Health Monitor such composition of the exhaled air was taped. And practices concerning markers of pulmonary illnesses already are also them much. It from articles:
http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1586/14737140.2013.866044In the same way and about Diabetum: the device will just show the high level of an acetone in the exhaled air. It is a some theory here:
https://breathtecbiomedical.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/Diabetes_1.pdfAnd the doctor on the basis of a glycated hemoglobin establishes the diagnosis.
The similar principle is realized in use of Health Monitor for monitoring of current state of health at people with already established diagnosis.
If these arguments aren't convincing, then I ask to describe more in detail what demands you makes to evidential base of efficiency of the gas analyzer in early detection of different illnesses.
I think it's good explanation. But for some people this is not enough.
Even when someone does magnetic resonance imaging MRI doctors don't write the diagnosis in the results.
They make a description what is on the film. And only attending doctor can make a diagnosis and prescribe treatment.
Show Posts
every day.
