Anyone knows what these mean that I see in my wallet?
Old top block hash New top block hash Disconnecting block Reorganization detected
Was scrolling through wallet and seen these.
|
|
|
ccminer -a decred -o stratum+tcp://yiimp.ccminer.org:4252 -u DECRED_WALLET_ADDRESS -p xx
your wallet adress must be a decred adress. (yiimp doesn't support autoexchange to BTC)
for autoexchange you can use:
ccminer -a decred -o stratum+tcp://mine.zpool.ca:5744 -u BTC_ADDRESS -p xx
But the hashrate on the pool is low. (longer time to find a block to get payed)
good i'm doing 1450, thanks, but why the fee is 5% too damn high, there are other pool with better fee? 5% too high. Really? If it was not for his work then that miner from Crypto Blog would not be out. There is a reason that djm, wolf has not released something publicly in a while and probably will not. And it looks like sp has not had much recently. If you are using it how much have you donated to him for it? Looks like some just don't see the writing on the wall. When Pascal gets released are you waiting to see who will code for it? Why don't everyone who is using it got to yiimp and just mine through the weekend on DCR. That way you can donate to Epsylon3 for his work. And not too call you out Bensam but this is a way of doing the dev fee. Only you are supporting him through his pool. It's only 4 days of mining. Support him for his work then if you decide to go back to Super or PoolMn or wherever you are at then at least you gave a "donation". EDIT: I left out Genoil and his ETH miner. I know he mentioned he has not received much for all the work he put into ETH.
|
|
|
Why doesn't Decred show up on coinmarketcap?
SPELL IT OUT-- It shows up if you spell it out: ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs10.postimg.org%2F3nsgybert%2Fdecred.png&t=663&c=gypqNCgv6bAvgw) Decred on CoinMarketCap. The Decred (DCR) coin, and others, might not show with just the abbreviation. --scryptr Yeah, I know you can search for it, but it isn't displayed with the rest of the coins when sorting them. It was always there. You did not look deep down enough. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs12.postimg.org%2Fpsftchkbx%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=rtKd2ynyj3NJnQ) It is now in the 30's. It takes a few days for the true stats to show.
|
|
|
What is the algo 3s please....is it for deep? thx
As far as I know there is only 1 coin using it.
|
|
|
Just getting home and seen this on the screen. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2F5wz9lfp7v%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=KZHvI9giods3hg) How much Ram do you have? And how much where you using to mine with.. Looks like you ran out of Ram 16Gb of ram and using the setgenerate command. Not using the ram parameter. That is strange.. This is the first I have seen of this.. As far as I have seen we have no reported memory leaks.. I will keep an eye on it. Just restarted it this time with the mining button. using the latest wallet on Windows 7 64bit. I use win7 64 Professional, 4GB ram, and no error happend. Could u set virtual memory? Will try later. Off to work but when I woke up this morning the wallet had completely forced closed.
|
|
|
Just getting home and seen this on the screen. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2F5wz9lfp7v%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=KZHvI9giods3hg) How much Ram do you have? And how much where you using to mine with.. Looks like you ran out of Ram 16Gb of ram and using the setgenerate command. Not using the ram parameter. That is strange.. This is the first I have seen of this.. As far as I have seen we have no reported memory leaks.. I will keep an eye on it. Just restarted it this time with the mining button. using the latest wallet on Windows 7 64bit.
|
|
|
Just getting home and seen this on the screen. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2F5wz9lfp7v%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=KZHvI9giods3hg) How much Ram do you have? And how much where you using to mine with.. Looks like you ran out of Ram 16Gb of ram and using the setgenerate command. Not using the ram parameter.
|
|
|
Just getting home and seen this on the screen. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs15.postimg.org%2F5wz9lfp7v%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=KZHvI9giods3hg)
|
|
|
Just sent 0.1
Transaction ID: a655f4db64f097c5454ce37b6930f726d63f7d8b1fac27b49f8a156002d3da0f-000
I have no real issues with BitTrex. Use them a lot but I hope we as a community look at the exchanges that charged nothing to do this and send our support to those that did this for no cost.
@vergedev
I hope you let us know which exchanges did not charge.
|
|
|
Hash is too high for me now.
Was finding 2-4 blocks a day.
None since the 14th now.
|
|
|
Would it be or is it already possible to create a wallet that has a mature date or that can't be accessed until a certain block.
This would be another interesting feature if possible and it would also mean that as a community we could give away VERGE to get people interested without worrying they'll immediately dump.
There is a cpu coin that is that now.
|
|
|
Now let me make sure I get this correct. I can just copy my Doged .dat to the Verge appdata folder?
|
|
|
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X. Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance. For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason. R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess). Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock. On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf). Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research. I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started. 970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet. ACCORDING TO GENOIL-- The 750ti cards did well untill the DAG file became too large, and 7-8Mh/s was possible early last Spring and Summer. There was a miner on his thread that kept claiming 8-10Mh/s even last Fall, but he likely was trolling. --scryptr Yep scryptr I meant currently. Someone posted yesterday that they are still getting 8 Mh/s on a 750ti but I find it hard to believe.
|
|
|
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X. Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance. For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason. R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess). Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock. On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf). Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research. I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started. 970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet. Like what? Ohhh... You wont say, but you'll tell us that you know of much better coins. Quite helpful. You'd be hard pressed to find better profits then mining Eth right now. It's giving me about .0086 BTC per 970 per day. Next up would be Vanilla coin as it seems to be rising too, but it's much more volatile. Decred is up there too, but also quite volatile as it's brand new and untested. I have my own private coins I mine when things get rough, but I don't expect anyone else to find them.I'll tell you mine if you tell me yours. See how you contradicted yourself. Your last statement makes you quite helpful as well. The key statement on mine was "just a little research."
|
|
|
i need quick response for these question
how much is one 970 doing in hashrate for ETH? and what is the argument to run ETH with it?
a quick search lead me to 980ti doing less hash than a 280x? why this?
Yes a GTX 980 ti has barely more hashrate than a GTX 980 and far lower than a R9 290X. Eth mining is highly dependant on memory : timings, controler, bandwith, cache... and as genoil discovered of TLB (buffer for memory adress translation) capacity/performance. For amd, hynix > elpida due to some timings. For nvidia samsung > hynix probably for the same reason. R9 290X with hynix mem and 1150 gpu is doing about 30Mh/s. R9 390X a small bit more (better memory I guess). Fury is aroung R9 290X/ R9 390X depending on the overclock. On nvidia side, GTX 970 seems to be the sweet spot with a good oc around 280X perf with lower power usage (the 280x used to be better but due to increase dag size, it has lost a bit more than 10% perf). Eth is a good coin to mine if you think the future will hold or be better but there are other coins out now that you can do better right now with. Just a little research. I mined with 7 cards about 78 Mh/s and was getting about 2.2 coins per day. Probably less than that now since more people have started. 970 should get you 15-17 Mh/s depending on you set up. 960 about 10-12 Mh/s. 750ti about 2-4 Mh/s but I would not try with that. I seen someone post they got 8 mh/s per 750ti but I have never seen anyone confirm that while actually mining except on the testnet.
|
|
|
Create a bat and point it at the coins. Don't use their software.
|
|
|
Seems maybe BitTrex might just be waiting for the right time to launch. Been in maintenance for some hours now. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs21.postimg.org%2F7yx4w5cbr%2FCapture.png&t=663&c=qNP50Xa7y7kAlw)
|
|
|
Should be hitting BitTrex real soon.
|
|
|
Like tanoury said make sure your worker is set up.
This worked for my Gaw's (not mining anymore as my PSU went out on me). I was using cgminer 4.3.5 also. Also make sure you installed the CDM drivers if you have not yet. I use Windows 7 64 bit.
cgminer.exe --scrypt -o stratum+tcp://POOL:PORT -u WORKER -p PASSWORD --zeus-chips 6 --zeus-clock 328
|
|
|
@ocminer @poolmn @multicoinpool
Will your pool go live on same link and port now or will something change from the testnet pool?
Reason I am curious is I will be at work and want to have everything set up so I can remote login and just click the bats to start mining.
Thanks
|
|
|
|