Why can't you give us the site's actual name? You're confusing people with having bitly in the topic name, most people are going to think you're talking about the link shortener, rather than the darknet website.

Looks like the bot isn't working... My stats aren't showing up, and I tried inputting a couple other user ID's in the campaign as well and nothing shows up when searching for them. Is anybody else having similar issues?

Would you be purchasing it mainly for reviewing, or to actually try and turn a profit? If you're looking for a profit, wouldn't purchasing an S7 make more sense? Right now you can purchase a 4.05 TH/s Antminer S7 for 4 BTC (higher hashrate, less cost than the Avalon 6) which would be arriving probably around Christmas time. The site you linked to has no mention of shipping dates. Plus, the S7 is more efficient than the Avalon 6, it seems like an S7 would be a better investment if you're looking to make some money.

Looks like you have 56 potential activity, since you've posted during 4 activity periods ( 4 x 14 = 56) . Once you hit that activity, your activity will stop increasing until the next activity change (which I believe is due on the 9th of November). Then on the 9th you will get another 14 potential activity points, allowing you to achieve member rank with another four posts (since member rank is achieved at 60 activity).

Look into purchasing a molex to PCI-e adapter to get that extra PCI-e connector for powering the controller. I'm using a couple of those adapters with an EVGA 1300W G2 and everything has been working just fine. Small piece of advice, if you've purchased a new GPU recently they often come with one or two of these adapters, so you could use that instead of purchasing another for $4.

I've noticed the same thing. Take this user for example. The majority of his positive feedbacks (trusted and untrusted)  are for deals under 0.1 BTC, and in the end he ripped someone off for 0.065 BTC.

Not sure why someone would do that though, he would have made way more than 0.065 BTC by just selling his account.

I wouldn't be so sure of them adding a rank higher than Legendary, it already takes over two years of being active on the site to become Legendary. Only ranks really higher than that are for Donors and Staff members, and I don't see that changing.

As for the animated avatar bit, I know myself as well as others would prefer not to have any animated avatars on the site. Some avatars can be annoying already, I don't really want to see any animated ones. Plus, IIRC last time animated avatars were allowed, it opened up an exploit in the site.

Looks like they're all 1300W G2 PSU's. If you look closely you can see the 1300 part on the PSUs on the lower racks.

 

Have any proof of your claims?

Exactly this. I'm really happy when I see DT members saying specifically on their profile that they don't leave feedback for trades under x BTC. Giving positive feedback for microtrades can really give users a false sense of security, similar to what Blazed mentioned. tspacepilot only has one positive DT feedback for an actual trade, and has 5 more positive ratings that aren't relevant to trades at all. He'll have a +50 trust score soon enough for doing one trade, and getting caught up in some drama on the site a few months ago, that doesn't seem right.

That might be the place to start then. If the bot is buggy as mentioned then I wouldn't be putting my faith in it following the 1 page per second rule. There are a few other bots on the forum that have been around for quite awhile without ever having ban issues, so I think the bot coding should probably be looked at and refined to make sure it won't get banned again in the future (if the IP is ever unbanned).

He'll probably want a signed message from you as well, just in case you default on the loan, but that's basically how most account collateral loans go down.

Adding onto what Abdussamad said, basically how Tails works (to my understanding) is that it all runs in memory and no information is saved to the USB, unless you explicitly tell Tails to save data (persistent volume).

So if you were to use Electrum with Tails with all default settings, what you'd initially have to do is generate a new Electrum wallet, and save the master public key for later use (when you request payments and such). You wouldn't put your bitcoins at risk by storing your master public key on an infected computer, as all you can do with that file is generate public keys for the private keys that Electrum generates.

Then, if you wanted to spend bitcoin, you'd have to boot up Tails, recover your Electrum wallet by entering your seed and send the coins.

tl;dr: Tails and Electrum should be a safe combination. You'll need to remember your Electrum seed to send bitcoin if you're using a completely live version of Tails since the USB won't save any data.

I find that if you have a long quote such as:

And then finally your reply here.


Often the early messages (original, second, maybe even third) aren't even relevant anymore. When quoting a long group of quotes to me it would make sense to remove the early messages, and leave only the messages that my post is responding to. It goes from the above example to something like this:

And then finally your reply here.

---

Much easier to work with when you're typing up a message, plus the post is easier to read.

I'm missing the old site as well.. the new site is definitely much better overall, but having the old site option was still pretty neat to go back and check out every once and awhile.

To my understanding the forum allows stuff like that to be posted because they believe in free speech, and releasing a user's public info falls under that, as long as the information was legally obtained and is/was publicly accessible.

But in lots of the doxxing cases I'm not so sure that all the information was obtained in legal ways, however I don't think those posts are ever removed either.

Okay yeah I knew he was looking for a way, didn't realize you were kidding. 

But I'd be supportive of something like this too, if you could mention them by saying @username. I've seen it implemented on other sites and it's definitely useful to bring a user's attention to a thread.

How do you monitor where your name is mentioned in postings here?

The problem with having all trust ratings equal would be trust spamming. Although a user may be very reputable, if all trust ratings from all accounts were worth the same amount, someone could ruin their reputation with just a few, brand new accounts. Having all trust ratings equal doesn't make sense to me, I think the system works fairly well right now but obviously there will always be some problems with whatever trust system is implemented.

People would be more willing to believe you if you could provide some proof that you shipped the gold back to Amazon... Right now it's just your word saying that you shipped it back, when Amazon uses trackable parcels for their shipments. You should have a tracking number and receipt from dropping it off at the post office. I've mailed plenty of packages through pre-paid Canada Post and I've always received a receipt confirming the drop off when I give it to the post office worker. Even though I'm in Canada, I suspect things work similarly in the States with USPS.

If you don't have a tracking number then you should have an email conversation with Amazon discussing the returning of the gold, from what I see you haven't posted any proof of that either. If for some reason you don't have that, you could always let a trusted escrow into your Amazon account to prove that the status of your gold order is returned, or similar to that. But like I said, it's difficult to believe you with no solid proof that you returned the gold purchased from Amazon.