Bitcoin Forum
July 14, 2024, 10:03:14 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 1373 »
14061  Other / Meta / Re: The future of Bitcointalk: Low Ranking Top Merit earners in the past 30 days on: August 15, 2020, 09:39:15 AM
Update:
     1. Newbie Favelj (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 52 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     2. Newbie billdrummond (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 50 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     3. Newbie M1chlCZ (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 29 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     4. Newbie Eppo Leemburg (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 24 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     5. Newbie coinforensics (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 15 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     6. Newbie Poker Player (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 12 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     7. Newbie LuchoPoletti (Trust: +1 / =0 / -0) earned 11 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     8. Newbie jungle (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 11 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     9. Newbie JuleAdka (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    10. Newbie dearBTC (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    11. Newbie kurgak (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    12. Newbie TheVeryBigBean (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    13. Newbie octomon (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    14. Newbie valentin.raich (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    15. Newbie anom-crypto-case (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    16. Newbie willstnKeks (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)

     1. Jr. Member Paperweight (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 30 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     2. Jr. Member PawGo (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 24 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     3. Jr. Member Folio (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     4. Jr. Member Dorodha (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)

     1. Member danieleither (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 58 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     2. Member GeorgeJohn (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 48 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     3. Member Smartvirus (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 34 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     4. Member Krubster (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 32 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     5. Member DougM (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 31 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     6. Member Yogee (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 31 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     7. Member SatsLife (Trust: +4 / =0 / -0) earned 29 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     8. Member Oshosondy (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 23 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
     9. Member Mor254 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 22 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    10. Member jademaxsuy (Trust: +0 / =1 / -0) earned 22 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    11. Member Unbunplease (Trust: +0 / =2 / -0) earned 20 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    12. Member holmes70 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 20 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    13. Member Shimmiry (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 20 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    14. Member JL0 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 19 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    15. Member MamaSan (Trust: +0 / =1 / -0) earned 15 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    16. Member Lasky366 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 14 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    17. Member pakhitheboss (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 14 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    18. Member gagux123 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 14 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    19. Member Cadaver20 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 12 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    20. Member Apocalipsa (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 11 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    21. Member jdmcg (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 11 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    22. Member conceptinion (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    23. Member kemoglo (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    24. Member Coinsbee.com (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    25. Member obm_dan (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    26. Member ataArt (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    27. Member Flangler (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 10 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    28. Member zenrog (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    29. Member WLtoys V912 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    30. Member FinneysTrueVision (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    31. Member Crypto Carabao Group (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    32. Member basicnecromancycr (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    33. Member stoos (Trust: +0 / =0 / -1) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    34. Member Timmzzy (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 9 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    35. Member RabbiTANK (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    36. Member Eco_111 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    37. Member Phoenix_PROG (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    38. Member Alucard1 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    39. Member DoubleEdgeEX (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    40. Member Alobo Realer (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    41. Member commandera (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    42. Member Durdenkingtyler (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    43. Member karagun125 (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
    44. Member hardjo (Trust: +0 / =0 / -0) earned 8 Merit in 30 days (BPIP)
14062  Other / Meta / Re: LoyceV's Weekly Trust list overview in Human Readable Format on: August 15, 2020, 09:27:19 AM
Update:
Starting point to avoid loading the large index file: Trust list for: hilariousandco (Trust: +22 / =2 / -0) (DT1! (37) 810 Merit earned) (Trust list) (BPIP)
The top-navigation-bar is working on the latest weeks, the rest will be updated within several hours. Or use BPIP for navigation.



Sorry for the delay, forgot about it while working on my latest project.
14063  Other / Meta / Re: Free Advertising, YES or NO on: August 15, 2020, 08:42:01 AM
It's a free market: the campaign manager can ask anything, and the participant can choose whether or not to join.

Do you think it shouldn't be a requirement (mostly it isn't anyway) to wear an avatar/sig until you are accepted?
This is better though.
14064  Economy / Reputation / Re: Scam Business Betcoin.ag Running signature campaign on: August 15, 2020, 07:12:00 AM
Those scam accusations are from 2016. Things might have changed.

did they change their team too?
It looks like it, judging by DarkStar_'s feedback:
Quote
They seem okay under new ownership (whether you believe that or not)

Double standard Bitcointalk Community!
You too can leave feedback if you think it's appropriate. See LoyceV's Beginners guide to correct use of the Trust system.
14065  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Transaction Fee Clarification on: August 15, 2020, 04:20:48 AM
the minimum transaction fee that we can use in order for our transaction to be mined in the few blocks
You can never be sure: the estimate is based on past blocks and transactions, while the reality is based on future blocks. In this case it would probably be okay, but if you're unlucky, and the next block takes much longer to be found, fees will spiral up. The same happens when more new transactions are created.
In that case the minimum fee will quickly be above your fee, and it can stay high for a long time.

In the rare case that I want to be very sure my transaction gets included in the next block, I pay a much higher fee than recommended (for instance when ordering dinner). In any other case, I go as low as possible.
You can of course go low, and use RBF in case fees go up unexpectedly.
14066  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: The Lightning Network FAQ on: August 14, 2020, 07:10:24 PM
People in 3rd world countries will use alts not LN.
Because LN still has the deposit and withdrawal transaction fees of BTC, which for some of those people $5 is a month's wages.
You can use LN without going back on-chain. I feel like I'm mentioning my favourite mobile LN wallets too much already (BlueWallet and Phoenix), but it just works well. The former is custodial, the latter creates a channel for you. With both, you can receive and send LN funds without worrying about on-chain transactions by yourself. So $5 will be 42,000 sats, and transactions will cost (much) less than 1% in fees.

Afaik the idea Satoshi had was 1 Satoshi being $1.
I'm pretty sure the idea was that 1 satoshi would never be worth more than a penny
14067  Economy / Reputation / Re: Is Lauda still on DT? (taking requests!) Update: added Changelog! on: August 14, 2020, 06:22:12 PM
Lauda, I dunno, banned for plagiarism?
That's right, I forgot about that whole drama.  But isn't there a way to tell?
A permanent ban removes the signature, Lauda still wears one. A temporary ban for plagiarism usually replaces the signature with a statement like: "banned from wearing a signature until 2023". I don't think Lauda was banned recently.
Besides, the cat posted twice this month.
14068  Economy / Reputation / Re: @rorschach1 trying to sell his account on: August 14, 2020, 05:02:19 PM
This reminds me of this case:
I do think it is unethical to tell him that you will trade with him after he provides information, and after receiving information, you do not trade with him "prove the second, then we can do it", and to say that you will pay for something, and subsequently not pay "I pay 350 if it's good" "I pay 550 for green trust legendary ok". It also looks like you entered into a contract with the person, but it does not appear you followed through: "Ok send me message from this acc and we have deal", responding to https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=167659 that is a "green trust hero member" to which you agreed to pay 550 for. I don't see evidence you paid him.

If this person were to open up a written contract flag against you, it would be valid.

@Coolcryptovator, you should be very careful with these "telegram chats"
You beat me by 2 minutes. I'll leave my posts to highlight the enlarged chats.
14069  Economy / Reputation / Re: @rorschach1 trying to sell his account on: August 14, 2020, 02:52:57 PM
Anyone can post that, unless it actually gets confirmed via the Telegram username.
14070  Economy / Reputation / Re: LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion on: August 14, 2020, 08:24:33 AM
I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM.
If you let yourself be manipulated by PM on an internet forum, you really have to work on your priorities! Who cares what someone on the internet thinks about you/them/someone?
I'm totally fine with being persuaded with arguments though.



Yes or no?
Will you fuck off if somebody answers?
That's a tricky one, as I have the troll on ignore and don't want to read the context. So I'm taking a guess, but I'm feeling positive today, so I'm going with "yes".
Now please all ignore the troll, he's had his 5 minutes of fame again by creating yet another account.
14071  Economy / Services / Re: 10 BTC BOUNTY on: August 13, 2020, 06:20:24 PM
If you bought that wallet, you got scammed. This happens quite a lot lately.
14072  Other / Meta / Re: [CLUB] The SpamBusters! Busting rule-breakers constantly. on: August 13, 2020, 03:40:57 PM
How about the keyword "sir" ?
This is the result for the past ~50k posts: https://loyce.club/other/sir.html (this file is scheduled for removal in 7 days).
Far too many hits, and most of them aren't worth reporting.
14073  Other / Meta / Re: [CLUB] The SpamBusters! Busting rule-breakers constantly. on: August 13, 2020, 02:46:51 PM
I have an idea, you could maybe add a link to the report to the mods option after each listed post.
It will give a person the possibility to quickly report the posts. Or maybe add a link to the original post in the bitcointalk so we can report them from there, there are too many clicks now to go trough to report each one of the posts.
I hope you don't hate that much for keeping you busy so often with all my ideas...
I'll come up with something, see Work in progress: finding spam and scams by keyword.
Feel free to post there!
14074  Economy / Reputation / Re: Work in progress: finding spam and scams by keyword on: August 13, 2020, 02:44:12 PM
Code:
scam:trustcoin.exchange
other:www.bitcointalk.org
spam:>good project
scam:bitcointaIk
spam:coinidol.com
scam:Seems to be lower fee
scam:provides a free bonus of
advertising:dailyhodl.com
advertising:europeangaming.eu
advertising:crypto-news-flash.com
advertising:theblockcrypto.com
advertising:newsbtc.com
advertising:cryptoglobe.com
advertising:decrypt.co
advertising:financemagnates.cmo
advertising:thecurrencyanalytics.com
advertising:coinjournal.net
advertising:ambcrypto.com
advertising:ethereumworldnews.com
advertising:nairametrics.com
advertising:ghacks.net
advertising:Download The Decrypt App.
spam:AnonymousMask.Finance
spam:dabbyfinance
spam:mediastudies.as.virginia
spam:scholastic.com
spam:lcluc.umd.edu
scam:gun-bot.com
other:1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN
spam:satoshihill
spam:dissertation-service.org
spam:WTS account PAYPAL with huge balance
spam:50k paypal exchange 5k btc
spam:t.me/Paypal_Seller_Account
spam:articles.whalesheaven.com
spam:A new standard in mining resource management! - goodhash.io
spam:https://t.me/CryptoGeneration_official
spam:Features: 1. Auto shilling, more than 1,999 groups
spam:>Thank You<
spam:coingabbar.com
spam:unipayofficial.com
spam:bitcoingold.me
spam:As an AI language model
spam:As of my last knowledge update in
spam:my learning base is limited to information until
spam:neonlink
spam:neon link
scam:Binarium
spam:Magic Square
spam:martelgold.com
spam:Bitget
I'm testing with ">" in front of "good project", so it only matches something like the beginning of a line.

Feel free to explain the reason why you add a certain phrase in your post
Just don't put it inside the code-tag.

Explanation
provides a free bonus of
For advertising, see this user's post history.
For 1HZwkjkeaoZfTSaJxDw6aKkxp45agDiEzN, see this topic.
Binarium, see this post.

Removed from my list:
Quote
advertising:cointelegraph.com/news
advertising:coindesk.com
14075  Economy / Reputation / [Active] Finding spam and scams by keyword on: August 13, 2020, 02:42:47 PM
The data
See loyce.club/badposts
All categories / spam / scam / other / advertising / email
Most recent posts are shown first.

Whitelisted users
Code:
LoyceV
LoyceMobile
TheBeardedBaby
Lafu
Rizzrack
Timelord2067
marlboroza
morvillz7z
NotATether
actmyname
nutildah
hosseinimr93
Mitchell
Bthd
light_warrior

Post keywords
Whitelisted users can post keywords. Please don't use very common words (such as "scam") that trigger too many false positives. And please keep all keywords in one code tag in one post: edit it to add/remove keywords.
Other users can also post, with 2 possible outcomes:
  • I whitelist you and process your keywords
  • I remove your post
Please don't quote code-tags.

Tips
Leave out "https" from scam links.

Format
Within code-tags, post either "scam:thiswebsiteisascam" or "spam:Ikeeppostingthesamecrapeverywhere". One phrase per line. See this example.
Remove the line to exclude the keyword in the next update.
Only use a space after "scam:" if you want to include a space in your search.
Keyword "other:" is meant for text that isn't necessarily spam or a scam, but needs highlighting nonetheless.
Keyword "advertising" is meant for sites that are often used to copy an article and create a backlink.
Keyword categories:
  • spam:
  • scam:
  • other:
  • advertising:
  • email:

Features
I search the last ~200,000 posts for new keywords. This covers approximately 1 month.
I update all keywords every 20 minutes.
I show all matches for all usernames and ranks. No exceptions. Not all of them are bad.
Whitelisted users are shown in green.

Limitations
There's a maximum of 60 keywords per post (if you add more those will be ignored). I can increase this if needed.
There's a maximum of 4000 matches per category. If there are more, the oldest are removed.
The minimum keyword length is 4 (for other) or 5 (for spam/scam) characters.
I also search quotes.

Report posts!
This list is only useful if someone actually reports the bad posts Smiley

Post removal
I want to keep this topic compact (so I can quickly scrape it many times). That means I'll delete almost all posts that don't contain a list from a Whitelisted user. I would say "I hope I'm not offending anyone", but really, I'm okay with that Tongue



Q&A
What are you trying to accomplish with this thread?
See around here Smiley

Will this look into titles?
Some types of scams involve posting very little content in the OP body but then go on to include important keywords in the title.
For now: nope Sad
I don't keep track of titles with this data.

This could be cross-checked with your list of banned accounts.
Thanks, I've added it.

Can I use it for searching for alts? Like links to twitter, facebook, telegram usernames, etc?
Can I use it for catching plagiarism, like searching for a whole sentence or this will clogged the server, or maybe only a phrases and not so common words like we did in the SpamBuster club with suchmoon?
My plan was to only look back about 100k posts (currently just over 2 weeks), so it won't really help you here. But it would (near) instantly add new posts, and that's what I'm aiming for here.
Searching all my data without database takes too long to do on a regular basis. You should try TryNinja's database though!

would it catch spoofed urls? www.bitcointalk.org
Without "www", the url turns into 9gag.com. I think theymos should give "www.bitcointalk.org" the same treatment.
I've added category "other" for things like "www.bitcointalk.org".

It shows every word which has keyword "moron" or "moran" inside:
umoran
Is it supposed to work like this?
I search for the exact phrase (case insensitive), so it matches anything. You can add a space in front of it (as you did already), but that might miss some matches too. It's more or less as intended, if I change this, it might overlook other matches.

Quote
I search my deleted posts, I can't search live posts this way.

Can we also include the reasoning behind why something is a scam? Perhaps a link to a thread that explains it?
It can be explained in the post in this topic. I don't want to add repetitive explanations to my badposts page.

It would be great if you can add this to your earlier post Smiley



Please don't quote code-tags.

Please don't quote code-tags.
You should write that on the first row of the OP.
It's a tad higher now. Don't worry about overlooking it: I only added it today. I don't think it's much of a problem though: only the first code tag in each post is processed, and I now remove duplicate keywords to reduce search time.

Each 15 minute update takes about 1 second to process.
Each new keyword takes a few minutes to process, reading all 200,000 posts is slow. Processing several new keywords at once is more efficient, so feel free to add them Smiley

spam:minepi.com/
scam:github.com/pillforeth/
I'm trying to improve searching for whole words only. I now remove the trailing slash ("/") from the keyword before searching. I don't think it matters for your keywords, but it can improve other strings.

other: moran
other: moron
other: moron
Try without the spaces now Smiley

I've tried with space in front and the end, it didn't find anything. I have also tried with space in front it also didn't find anything.
You were trying to adjust for my old search, right while I was adjusting it to improve matching complete words only.

Quote
This is too much for me...I am going to drink a beer and think about "drink another beer  finding " "ej" space in the back" for another beer.
Enjoy!

scam:https://github.com/pillforethereum/ETHpillAN/
There's many of those altcoin pills nowadays.
You should probably omit the "https://"-part, a scammer can do the same.

How far back does your search go?
See:
I search the last ~200,000 posts for new keywords. This covers approximately 1 month.
This search takes about 2 minutes for new keywords. It's mainly meant to catch new posts, older posts can be found through other means.

Quote
My examples come up multiple times in the BTC search box, but not via this thread's search?
It might also be because I search unedited posts.

Any thoughts why this post and User wasnt catched today
The post was edited, see the unedited post.
Unfortunately, I can't know which posts have been edited, so this is a loophole to escape my badposts list.

I think you should just make another link/html file that contains all cointelegraph spammers.
I did already, see loyce.club/badposts/advertising.html.

Quote
I don't know if it would be a hard tas to migrate or create another file
I can easily add new categories.

Quote
Or should I suggest that each spam website should had its own html file
That's too much work to check, I now just quickly check a page once in a while, and report a few posts.

@Loyce can you please remove one of these keywords :
github_com/ProjectEthereumPill
github_com/ProjectEthereumPill/EthereumPill/
Thanks, done:
The following overlapping keywords have been removed:
github.com/ProjectEthereumPill/EthereumPill
github.com/pillforethereum/ETHpillAN (because of github.com/pillforeth)

I also noticed the "Banned" notification is only useful for new keywords, because my banned list is only updated once a day. I ran a one-time update from scratch, searching the last ~800,000 posts, this updates the banned-status on older posts.

Hope I did it right.
HYIP and MLM are too short, the minimum word length is 5 for scams.

@LoyceV did you delete the old info ? The scam link displays only 22 archived posts.
I do have logs, but it's too many lines to search now. I think someone must have entered a keyword with many hits, then removed the keyword again. My "badposts" only shows the latest 4000 posts each time I update it, but when a keyword is removed, all those entries are removed too.
I've manually reset it to re-check all keywords in the last ~200k posts. This restored a longer list again.

Is ETC officially a scam? I see it in the blacklist words as a scam.
That is debatable...
However the "scam : ETChash" keyword just helps catch posts like this one that have malware download links

I think the keyword "PhoenixMiner" is too general and gives out a lot of fake positives...



I made a new toy:
[Newbie scrutiny instead of jail] Every new user's first post: loyce.club/patrol:
See loyce.club/patrol/

Please Report (or Merit) the posts when needed Wink

It's updated once a minute.

Sample:
Image loading...
14076  Bitcoin / Project Development / Re: [BPIP] Bitcointalk Public Information Project [Back in Action] on: August 13, 2020, 02:36:18 PM
Maximum words per minute.
You are scaring me... with this "maximum words per minute" mindset.
I already know I'd trigger this all the time Sad
14077  Economy / Games and rounds / Re: 🔍 Roobet.com | Guess Total Wagers #27 $50 Prize | Progressive Jackpot inside 🔍 on: August 13, 2020, 02:20:38 PM
LoyceV: 376,893,600
14078  Economy / Reputation / Re: LFC_bitcoin sending PMs to his friends to oppose flag and bribing DT inclusion on: August 13, 2020, 02:18:26 PM
If someone that has some high reputation/is your friend/etc, explicitely asks you to do something, it definitely is manipulation.
I would disagree that all requests are inherently manipulative simply because they come from a friend or a person with a good reputation.
I'd say it's entirely up to you if you let yourself be manipulated from a PM. I think theymos had less than 10% success rate when he asked DT1 to exclude Lauda, which makes me believe many users don't just do anything they're asked.
14079  Other / Meta / Re: [CLUB] The SpamBusters! Busting rule-breakers constantly. on: August 13, 2020, 08:23:27 AM
Can't you make a list with keywords/links to check or it takes a lot of resources to check every single post?
It takes some scripting. Currently, I do a "search all" in the last 10,000 to 20,000. That's quite resource intensive (I now do it 3 times every 5 minutes), but it should be okay if I spend some more time on it and only search new posts.
14080  Other / Meta / Re: Will I be banned if I deleted too many posts at once? on: August 13, 2020, 05:26:55 AM
But I wouldn't delete it, it's just a waste of time and it can be useful for various things to not delete submitted posts. It's part of the history of your account, so why delete it?
Cleaning up past spam isn't a bad thing Smiley
Pages: « 1 ... 654 655 656 657 658 659 660 661 662 663 664 665 666 667 668 669 670 671 672 673 674 675 676 677 678 679 680 681 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 [704] 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 732 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 753 754 ... 1373 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!