Bitcoin Forum
May 31, 2024, 03:17:38 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
1421  Other / Beginners & Help / Re: Stolen Bitcoins on: October 22, 2012, 12:58:15 AM
Quote
I have heard that stolen bitcoins are not allowed to process further in the blockchain, i.e. they are rejected.
This is not true at all. Somebody made fun from You.
Quote
Are there bitcoin based businesses out there that reject stolen bitcoins?  Are they like blackmarked?
Some businesses are known in some time in past to keep and not release coins they consider "tainted". Mt.Gox are prime example on this. And there are nolifers who follow transactions down to blockchain wasting their time in a hope to catch the thief.

If You need assistance for properly laundering your coins so they will be accepted as clean by all exchanges then I will do it for very small fee.
1422  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google Blockchain Search? on: October 22, 2012, 12:44:34 AM
One thing is spider indexing blockexplorer.com but the Google coming up with google's own version of blockchain explorer will be whole new level. They have experience with finding relations where none sees them so the final product might be surprising. I prefer blockexplorer.com over blockchain.info but both have pros and cons and have something that other does not have.

But this will not happen anytime soon.
1423  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: Bitcoin download mirror on: October 21, 2012, 11:21:33 PM
When Bitcoin installers and files will have a digital signatures recognized by Windows file properties that will be the easy signature checking for dummies against dummies.

For smart people all that is needed to find file is checksum and helpfully also a file name. Bitcoin installers are spread all over P2P systems.

If government wanted to damage Bitcoin it will go not only after sites hosting official installers but also the seednodes in clean install and bootstrap IRC channel in hope it will prevent new people from coming in.
1424  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: [Rage quit] Blockchain.info on: October 21, 2012, 11:15:15 PM
Quote
[Rage quit] That page is so wrong that I think it gave me cancer.

Trollolololol!! Congratulations, at lest You made the best rage topic on Bitcointalk by great margin. I'm laughing now hard!

On-topic: Does not MtGox have similar API?
1425  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Technical Support / Re: What is the best client version so far? on: October 21, 2012, 11:06:30 PM
Quote
Don't forget the very easy netsplit exploit and who knows how many other unnoted vulnerabilities due to non-maintenance...
None actually does this exploit right now because of no profit from it and the lulz will be minimal too. Non use actually makes a little bit safer, none is looking for new vulnerabilities if he is not specifically targeting one computer or one person. But I consider this a security-trough-obscurity and I think it is a bad practice!
Quote
Well, that's your own fault for participating in a DDoS against Bitcoin.
The people who have written automatic scripts that play using Martingale system with very small starting bets like 0.001 are the ddosers! And they are losers also! I started to play Satoshi Dice with approx 4 bitcoins from spare wallet, I have won 3 digit number of bitcoins! With these coins I have purchased all necessary top-end components for my new desktop computer (except HD7970 crossfire and PSU that I already owned)! I will not tell how much it cost to me or how much bitcoins I won using Satoshi Dice because none will believe.

How much for me this gamble for new computer cost in transaction fees? Probably slightly less than 1BTC. I will calculate this exact number in spare time for my own reference. Are someone willing to get almost 1BTC extra if all they need to do is install different Bitcoin version without forced tx fees?
1426  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Google Blockchain Search? on: October 21, 2012, 10:07:30 PM
They will sooner or later realize that google checkout is inferior compared to Bitcoin technology.

And why someone will want for google to know and record you are looking up your secret ransom/drug money bitcoin address? Does not blockchain.info or blocexplorer.com work well enough?
1427  Other / Off-topic / Re: If the government did not exist bitcoin would not have been made. on: October 21, 2012, 08:46:26 PM
government helped in the creation of Tor? really?

Yep, and funded a lot of other open source projects/crypto look up DARPA funding.
If I remember correctly Tor was invented by the Navy for some reason
It was made for traitors of foreign nations to hide the fact that they talk to CIA while pretending they are browsing for child porn or whatever. Tor have many uses.
Quote
Yep, and funded a lot of other open source projects/crypto look up DARPA funding.
They probably have learned something from PGP back in 1990-ties. Knowledge and information cannot be controlled and contained like ammunition are. Classifying PGP software code as ammunition was schizophrenic. They better give money for development and be the first ones to get to use the newest technology and not to be second ones behind some overseas corporation or russians.
1428  Bitcoin / Armory / Re: Armory - Discussion Thread on: October 21, 2012, 08:33:28 PM
Quote
I recently started flagging addresses in the wallet properties that were created solely for change.
Hidden by default with checkbox to show/hide could be nice!
Quote
Addresses cannot be linked unless you know the chaincode, which is stored in both full wallets and watching-only wallets.  Without access to at least the watching-only wallet,  there is no way for anyone to associate two addresses or public keys.  The strength of this non-linkage is as strong as the inability for someone to derive your private key from your public key.
If generated address is not dependent on previously generated address in any way than it might be OK. Many so called "attacks" against crypto algorithms require related keys. Not a math expert myself I don't know if this is applicable to Armory generated address. But the blockchain transactions might be somewhat compromised if the addresses can be linked using this method. Basically then You cannot then just say "sorry officer, I sold all those Bitcoins I purchased from my MtGox account to someone else I don't personally know. I did not know he will be ordering drugs from you straight away!"

The solution might be a non-deterministic wallet possibility. It might be available under "Advanced" options where currently crypto options are located with appropriate warnings that paper backup is not possible with such type of wallets. The deterministic type must be the default type of wallet because users who use Armory over other clients and front-ends are probably because they need the deterministic property and paper backup functionality.

And Thank You for creating Armory! It is a great job, it functions well enough and offline wallets and offline signing are easy to use and probably only way to not lose precious Bitcoins to hacking.
1429  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Reminder: you can and should abort in-person currency trades at any time on: October 21, 2012, 07:59:00 PM
Quote
Today I met up for an in person trade and I aborted it. The reason is that the guy almost immediately told me he was a drug dealer and used Bitcoin to sell drugs into the USA from Europe. This was based on almost no prompting at all, he just came out with it. In fact he was very talkative for a self-confessed criminal who just met a total stranger and said many things that simply did not add up, or which contradicted each other. Even if I was the type to do currency trades with drug dealers (I'm not), I was left with the distinct impression that he might not be a real dealer at all but rather some kind of investigator.
It very well might be a trap. Or the other person might be high on coke or some other "look Mom I'm Chuck Norris" drug. Or he just wanted to look tough and in reality he is going to spend the coins on bittit.info

Don't ask don't tell is best approach. Personally for me it is not a problem to deal with such persons even if I know what he is going to do with the coins or I know from where the other person got his coins.
1430  Other / Off-topic / Re: DEA agent discusses Bitcoin in class today on: October 21, 2012, 07:48:10 PM

It still could be nothing more than a government honey-pot. I can’t believe all that is easier than just buying drugs from friends at school like we did when I was a kid. Everyone used to know who the stoner kids were. lol


Yeah now that stoner kid buys his dope off SR and sells locally Smiley

Exactly!
1431  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Iran can't print paper, guy tells them to use BitCoin on: October 21, 2012, 07:47:32 PM
The sanctions against Iran are more of a speculation and political pressure anyway. World needs Iranian oil and other products. For some countries it is like going to hunger strike to make a shop owner lose customers lol. When Iran will get the nukes the attitude will be wholly different. Take a example of Russia doing all kinds of evil things in home and abroad. No sanctions against Russia at all.
1432  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Writing analysis on Satoshi Nakamoto. on: October 21, 2012, 04:18:54 PM
I am Latvian.

It still doesn't give an answer regarding the language. Latvia is an ex-USSR country, so it can be Russian or Latvian.
Latvians speak in latvian language. Russians speak in russian language. Almost no russian living in Latvia identifies himself as a latvian. The cultural, linguistic and mental differences are huge and largely incompatible. Russians were migrated in Latvia after WW2 as a USSR planed to destroy ethnic latvians and make a Latvia a permanent part of Russia. Probably no nation lost more people by percentage of population in 20th century wars than latvians did. We have one of best climates in world, plenty of usable land and strategic military and trade seaports, it is no surprise russians and others are after us.
1433  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: SERIOUS: Gavin Andresen and Co might introduce a serious change to the protocol. on: October 21, 2012, 04:10:35 PM
If we change how blocks are verified and mined, and that is done with a bug included, it could lead to massive damage for the Bitcoin network as a whole since verification is everything.

Why are you using the pronoun WE? What part of the Bitcoin code have you contributed?
Everyone who runs a Bitcoin node contributes. You don't need to write a code to contribute in a P2P system.
Quote
The only difference is a) the database technology changed and b) we use a set of unspent transaction outputs instead of an index into the block chain that holds the same data.
This is answer that can put a lock on this thread. Change in database engine or structure is not going to change the results produced. It is like going from blockchain stored in plaintext databases to MySQL databases. All it can change is a performance. This is how far my knowledge in databases goes.

P.S. I also did not know that 0.3.xx have a hardcoded 4GB database limit. This probably means my 0.3.xx clients will stop functioning sometime in future. Is this explicitly written in code or something to do with BerkleyDB database engine or 32-bit limitation?
1434  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DANGER: Gavin Andresen and Co might introduce a serious change to the Blockchain on: October 21, 2012, 03:04:46 PM
One more question - will the new database discard spent addresses? Some places says it will, some says it will not. I am confused. What will happen to clients that rely on downloading the complete transaction history and verify all blocks and transactions in them on-the-way, like 0.3.xx does?

Please just read the thread in the dev forum about it.

I think it was this one https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=119525.0
Quote
It still keeps all blocks around for serving them to other nodes, for rescanning, and for reorganisations.
By all blocks this means all full block contents or headers of all blocks?
Quote
The idea behind ultraprune is to use an ultra-pruned copy (only unspent transaction outputs in a custom compact format) of the block chain for validation (as opposed to a transaction index into the block chain)
So the validation code but not validation rules is changed? Atlas concern about hidden bug might hold some water then. Also how will the new validating client behave when validating double-spend when the double-spends are with large time spread like few months?
1435  Other / Off-topic / Re: Windows 8 Server 2012 Windows Phone Halo 4 on: October 21, 2012, 02:55:00 PM
Quote
I cannot stand server 2012!  It's like playing with a tablet built for 8 year olds!
Windows 8 is optimized for touch screen devices. With Server 2012 You can have sql database server running on tablet! What a brainfart from Microsoft!
Quote
Windows 8 is like Millennium Edition
Windows Millenium actually was not that bad, it only offered no real advantages over Windows98 and had a namely few serious flaws. Other than that it was better than initial WindowsXP release against Windows2000. Vista was catastrophe for users but a profit for techies like me who were replacing with WinXP on ALL new computers with Vista preinstalled.
1436  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Writing analysis on Satoshi Nakamoto. on: October 21, 2012, 02:41:24 PM
I am Latvian.
1437  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DANGER: Gavin Andresen and Co might introduce a serious change to the Blockchain on: October 21, 2012, 02:38:34 PM
Will the new 0.8 client be able to communicate with 0.3.xx properly? If Yes, then it is OK because no protocol is changed. Then please not upgrade all at once and give diversity and time to test it large scale.

Yes.

From the P2P side of things, you can't even observe to what kind of node you are talking (except for the version number being announced, and assuming no bugs that give it away).

Then the "blockchain reordering" and "protocol change" concerns of Atlas are void.

One more question - will the new database discard spent addresses? Some places says it will, some says it will not. I am confused. What will happen to clients that rely on downloading the complete transaction history and verify all blocks and transactions in them on-the-way, like 0.3.xx does?
1438  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: DANGER: Gavin Andresen and Co might introduce a serious change to the Blockchain on: October 21, 2012, 02:28:10 PM
As I understand the biggest change is to a higher performance database engine and logical layout of blockchain storage on local node. To ease the mind - some alternate clients like Ufasoft Coin use custom database already that is more compact size and someone might have mined a block using Ufasoft Coin.

Will the new 0.8 client be able to communicate with 0.3.xx properly? If Yes, then it is OK because no protocol is changed. Then please not upgrade all at once and give diversity and time to test it large scale.

Are bugs dangerous? Of course they are, we must have a plan what to do when something breaks. Testing, more testing and code reviews are the way to rule out any bugs.
Quote
Wouldn't bad data being verified into the blockchain mistakenly be a problem?
There was a serious bug back in 2010 that caused blockchain rollback. Look up Wiki for this.

Still the ASCII Bernanke would be there forever!
1439  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Why ASIC's Should Not Be The Future Of Crypto Currencies on: October 21, 2012, 06:01:54 AM
Quote
Please act professional since you're representing BFL.  What a joke.
BFL itself is a joke. Scam to be more exact. And he is acting fully professional - rebutting criticism to ASIC technology to get every single ASIC preorder until they reveal that no ASIC miner is made.
Quote
Try presenting rational arguments instead of reposting the same thing over and over again. You both look like stupid children.
Take some smoke and read the texts where the CPU technology is criticized over older pencil and paper technology. The trolling shows the OP concerns as completely invalid. All that was done is automatic replacing words containing previous technology with technology generation before that.
Quote
CPU's are not a natural technological generation leap like going from rocks-and-seashells to pencil-and-paper was. CPU's are simply specialized processing units made specifically for Bitcoin.
I spilled my beer on the floor when I started to read after finishing Find And Replace in Notepad++
1440  Bitcoin / Development & Technical Discussion / Re: Decoding Block Index 0 on: October 21, 2012, 05:45:11 AM
(but this did not prevent some well meaning halfbrains from sending additional coins to that address).
_Those_ coins, however, are spendable.

Does not they have been "fused" to 1A1zP1eP5QGefi2DMPTfTL5SLmv7DivfNa address and is spendable only with private key matching this receiving address? And since none can send 51 BTC (coinbase + Your "spendable" coins) out of this address they all are lost?
Pages: « 1 ... 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 [72] 73 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!