You are so smart, tell me how I was conducting business in the state of Missouri. Also by the way you have not disclosed where your BTC Trading Corp is registered, because in my
opinion it is most likely not registrated.
Honestly, I don't really think I am all that smart. I'm actually very average. Ordering online as Virtual Mining, INC... from Missouri, for delivery in Missouri, and operation in Missouri = conducting business in Missouri. no? No, just looked up the legal definition of a business, which is to do some activity to make a profit. Ordering something online to be able to use, is not conducting business. |
|
|
|
BitFunder is way too awesome to let harebrained schemes like AMC ruin its reputation.  Ukyo, please pay DT, deprived, MPOE-PR, and TF to act as gatekeepers/benevolent dictators for you WRT new listings. I'm with you on this one. I'm not so sure all those people would actually help, but I do think a team/consultant/soft-release process is due. ThickAsThieves, and you want to be on the team or be the consultant. I agreed with iCEBREAKER because, yes, I am putting out the feelers to get a consulting group together. Yes, and thank you for all of your help. You really know what you are talking about. |
|
|
|
burnside, not twice, I was just providing proof of my orders which I like to have a company name on. Yes, the Virtual Mining, Inc. lapsed, because I was working with Achronix on their 22nm FPGA which turned out to be to slow and cost to much, so I did not need the corporation any more. How ever I am going to register it again. If you really want me to I can pay the $10 for a fictitious name if that would make you happy.
I said twice because I couldn't find your cooperative registration in the db. Have you read the dissolution notices they mailed you? It's illegal for you to conduct business under a dissolved name in the state of Missouri. Make yourself happy and spend the $10. Edit: and make Ukyo happy while you're at it and start a new thread.  You are so smart, tell me how I was conducting business in the state of Missouri. Also by the way you have not disclosed where your BTC Trading Corp is registered, because in my opinion it is most likely not registrated. I'd suggest looking at the website for it before making a fool of yourself more. I don't feel like trying to run down his business, cause I don't really care. |
|
|
|
burnside, not twice, I was just providing proof of my orders which I like to have a company name on. Yes, the Virtual Mining, Inc. lapsed, because I was working with Achronix on their 22nm FPGA which turned out to be to slow and cost to much, so I did not need the corporation any more. How ever I am going to register it again. If you really want me to I can pay the $10 for a fictitious name if that would make you happy.
I said twice because I couldn't find your cooperative registration in the db. Have you read the dissolution notices they mailed you? It's illegal for you to conduct business under a dissolved name in the state of Missouri. Make yourself happy and spend the $10. Edit: and make Ukyo happy while you're at it and start a new thread. You are so smart, tell me how I was conducting business in the state of Missouri. Also by the way you have not disclosed where your BTC Trading Corp is registered, because in my opinion it is most likely not registrated. |
|
|
|
BitFunder is way too awesome to let harebrained schemes like AMC ruin its reputation. Ukyo, please pay DT, deprived, MPOE-PR, and TF to act as gatekeepers/benevolent dictators for you WRT new listings. I'm with you on this one. I'm not so sure all those people would actually help, but I do think a team/consultant/soft-release process is due. ThickAsThieves, and you want to be on the team or be the consultant. |
|
|
|
BitFunder is way too awesome to let harebrained schemes like AMC ruin its reputation. Ukyo, please pay DT, deprived, MPOE-PR, and TF to act as gatekeepers/benevolent dictators for you WRT new listings. Why is it a harebrained scheme? |
|
|
|
What happened to your former venture and why was it administratively dissolved?
They do that when you do not send in your annual report which is due 45 days after you incorporate. I did not need the corporation at that time so there was no need to send in the report. So why file the incorporation in the first place? And why use the trade name when it's invalid if you don't need it? Well, I was dealing with a big semiconductor company that was getting their chips made by Intel, so I just didn't want to look like the little guy. So I incorporated the company to look bigger to them, and I was able to get their software to check out the speed of their chip. I would have needed the company if the Achronix chips had worked out. I don't know why I put in on the Avalon order. So what is the big deal about this anyway? Do you know why the state would administratively dissolve a company? |
|
|
|
What happened to your former venture and why was it administratively dissolved?
They do that when you do not send in your annual report which is due 45 days after you incorporate. I did not need the corporation at that time so there was no need to send in the report. |
|
|
|
The early-adopter shares will be sold for no less that .01, we are going to need capital for development of the 45nm chip, so we
will be selling a lot more at .01 if we can make a deal with the Major Semiconductor Company we are talking with.
Yes, if we need to sell them to raise capital for development.
How about you see here instead. Thanks, WOT? Web Of Trust? Ken |
|
|
|
Not sure if its a scam or its just a misguided security. The numbers were reworked. He still expects to have more than 51% of the hashing power. Est Gross(less power) Revenue 12 Months 708,686.98 BTC If he is serious, then the best thing for him to do is rework the IPO for 6 Avalon units only - what he has already pre-ordered. And then fund his growth from there AFTER showing that he can successfully mine. Well, Yes if I buy or develop that many machines I would have that much power. Our 45nm chips are expected to 6GH/s each. Cool, wanna do a 100 BTC bet (pirateat40 style) that you'll ship me a 45nm ASIC mining device before the end of the year? Better returns than the "70%" you mentioned. Or that you'll get over 50% of the bitcoin network hashpower? I know the answer already and you're going to say no. Well, I won't say no yet. Will you escrow it? Are you serious? You are willing to bet 100 BTC on your ability to own over 50% of total hashing power? Whats the timeline for the bet? End of the year? I would love to get in on it too. We can use escrow. Yes, when I am 100% sure I can deliver a 45nm, 6GH/s mining unit. |
|
|
|
He still expects to have more than 51% of the network hashpower?  TradeFortress, Not really, I know everyone does not want one person to have over 50% of the hashing power. I think the same way. Yes, I would like to build a big mining and development company, but by the time I have that much hashing power the network will be 200TH-400TH who knows with all these ASIC machines coming out. Ken |
|
|
|
Not sure if its a scam or its just a misguided security. The numbers were reworked. He still expects to have more than 51% of the hashing power. Est Gross(less power) Revenue 12 Months 708,686.98 BTC If he is serious, then the best thing for him to do is rework the IPO for 6 Avalon units only - what he has already pre-ordered. And then fund his growth from there AFTER showing that he can successfully mine. Wisard, Yes, I would agree with you, so I just reworked the offer. It is not posted yet, should be sometime today. Ken |
|
|
|
This thread is not self moderated, so people can actually express their opinions! AMC is selling shares for at least 1 BTC with a 0.01 btc early bird special. Net Estimated Revenue/Year/Share 0.00708687 BTC That is 0.7% a year if you buy it for 1 BTC. Developing their own "Fast-Hash-240" miners Asset issuer ran a company that has being administratively dissolved Topic is self moderated Didn't not need it any more. Thinking about re registering it. What really nails this as a scam is not the ridiculous share pricing and the lack of contact info, although thats 90% of it right there, it's the fact that the issuer screwed up the contract so badly prior to listing that he had to freeze his security and re-do the contract. What, he didn't think it thru before listing? I don't get it. Think Ukyo probably froze it. The first contract was so bad he was actually claiming he'd have over 100% of total hashpower - and would mine more bitcoins than would be mined in total during the year by all miners. After that it's hard to take it at all seriously. The current contract is still laughingly bad too. I've no intention of wasting time reading it. I find it impossible to take seriously anyone who claims to be developing ASICs but will happily post a contract as creative (putting it politely) as the original one he had up. If someone is so confident they'll post a contract and start selling shares without any public discussion first then they'd better get it right first time. Deprive, You are right again, so do not read it and no Ukto did not freeze it. |
|
|
|
This thread is not self moderated, so people can actually express their opinions! AMC is selling shares for at least 1 BTC with a 0.01 btc early bird special. Net Estimated Revenue/Year/Share 0.00708687 BTC That is 0.7% a year if you buy it for 1 BTC. Developing their own "Fast-Hash-240" miners Asset issuer ran a company that has being administratively dissolved Topic is self moderated Didn't not need it any more. Thinking about re registering it. What really nails this as a scam is not the ridiculous share pricing and the lack of contact info, although thats 90% of it right there, it's the fact that the issuer screwed up the contract so badly prior to listing that he had to freeze his security and re-do the contract. What, he didn't think it thru before listing? I don't get it. Think Ukyo probably froze it. The first contract was so bad he was actually claiming he'd have over 100% of total hashpower - and would mine more bitcoins than would be mined in total during the year by all miners. After that it's hard to take it at all seriously. No, I froze it, no Ukto did not freeze it. Also all the money from the sales of shares is still in the account and will stay there until I get this fixed today or tommorow. Ken |
|
|
|
He still expects to have more than 51% of the network hashpower? Either he has some crazy NSA resources on tap, or someone's a little detached from reality. Your good burnside. Still would like to know where your corp is registered or if it is registered. I am good. I maintain my corporate registrations and registered trademarks. So.... crazy NSA resources then?  Working on it.  ) |
|
|
|
Not sure if its a scam or its just a misguided security. The numbers were reworked. He still expects to have more than 51% of the hashing power. Est Gross(less power) Revenue 12 Months 708,686.98 BTC If he is serious, then the best thing for him to do is rework the IPO for 6 Avalon units only - what he has already pre-ordered. And then fund his growth from there AFTER showing that he can successfully mine. Well, Yes if I buy or develop that many machines I would have that much power. Our 45nm chips are expected to 6GH/s each. Cool, wanna do a 100 BTC bet (pirateat40 style) that you'll ship me a 45nm ASIC mining device before the end of the year? Better returns than the "70%" you mentioned. Or that you'll get over 50% of the bitcoin network hashpower? I know the answer already and you're going to say no. Well, I won't say no yet. Will you escrow it? Are you serious? You are willing to bet 100 BTC on your ability to own over 50% of total hashing power? Whats the timeline for the bet? End of the year? I would love to get in on it too. We can use escrow. No, not over 50% there is an or in there, delivering a 45nm chip/ASIC mining device. |
|
|
|
He still expects to have more than 51% of the network hashpower? Either he has some crazy NSA resources on tap, or someone's a little detached from reality. Your good burnside. Still would like to know where your corp is registered or if it is registered. |
|
|
|
Do you have a timeline for your chip development? What makes your chip different and competitive to what is available? Are there plans in place if there are delays? You're coming late into the ASIC gen, delays mean significantly lower returns to investors. How will you account for that?
Franktank, if thing go right we can have prototype chips is 5-10 weeks after we finish the RTL, our chips will be on the 45nm process at bout 6-9 GH/s each. Our plan is a hybrid plan which give Investors dividends as soon as be start getting income from our 6 ordered Avalon's. Our chips will be much faster and lower power. We will moving to the 28nm process soon also for even more hashing power and lower power. |
|
|
|
Not sure if its a scam or its just a misguided security. The numbers were reworked. He still expects to have more than 51% of the hashing power. Est Gross(less power) Revenue 12 Months 708,686.98 BTC If he is serious, then the best thing for him to do is rework the IPO for 6 Avalon units only - what he has already pre-ordered. And then fund his growth from there AFTER showing that he can successfully mine. Well, Yes if I buy or develop that many machines I would have that much power. Our 45nm chips are expected to 6GH/s each. Cool, wanna do a 100 BTC bet (pirateat40 style) that you'll ship me a 45nm ASIC mining device before the end of the year? Better returns than the "70%" you mentioned. Or that you'll get over 50% of the bitcoin network hashpower? I know the answer already and you're going to say no. Getting ready to fix that 70% return, I screwed up trying to hurry when Avalon announced it 4X price increase and 3 day notice to batch 3. |
|
|
|
Not sure if its a scam or its just a misguided security. The numbers were reworked. He still expects to have more than 51% of the hashing power. Est Gross(less power) Revenue 12 Months 708,686.98 BTC If he is serious, then the best thing for him to do is rework the IPO for 6 Avalon units only - what he has already pre-ordered. And then fund his growth from there AFTER showing that he can successfully mine. Well, Yes if I buy or develop that many machines I would have that much power. Our 45nm chips are expected to 6GH/s each. Cool, wanna do a 100 BTC bet (pirateat40 style) that you'll ship me a 45nm ASIC mining device before the end of the year? Better returns than the "70%" you mentioned. Or that you'll get over 50% of the bitcoin network hashpower? I know the answer already and you're going to say no. Well, I won't say no yet. Will you escrow it? |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
