OR (most likely) he wont do anything and let them think that Nick is him.
That way nobody will bother with him again 

And the predictable cover-up attempts begin! Just more proof that I'm onto something they don't want people to know about.

That looks quite smart, very well put together. How does it look from a distribution standpoint, it seems to also be investor based but investment can often ruin a project if not done right.

SendChat Crowdfunding Campaign Goes Live on BlockTrust

Social messaging applications are playing an ever-increasing role in our daily lives, as we want to be in contact with the rest of the world at any given time. Most everyday consumers have a few different messaging apps on their devices. This growing prevalence of social messaging could be beneficial for Bitcoin adoption. SendChat wants to capitalize on this potential, and has launched a crowdfunding campaign to make its app available for both iOS and Android users.

A miner of a cryptographic currency, upon transferring ownership of the "mined" currency, would, presumably, be considered (at least, under the law being discussed) a "distributor" of the currency.

This is not fun stuff but hard to ignore.

For who's interested about regulation proposals in the US: this article is a bit dated (Feb 2015) but probably still relevant:

"Decentralized Currency Issuers May Still Require License - The first draft of the BitLicense stated that, “controlling, administering, or issuing a Virtual Currency” qualifies as Virtual Currency Business Activity subject to licensing. This remains unchanged in the new draft, and that’s unfortunate."
https://coincenter.org/2015/02/our-initial-thoughts-on-new-yorks-revised-bitlicense-proposal/

I'm not sure how things are going in Europe but I would guess regulation proposals will be fairly similar. From reading multiple articles it sounds like the biggest requirement to get legal will be "KYC" or Know Your Customer.

It's not a matter of "if", but "when" and if we can come up with a system that satisfies some of those requirements we can have a chance to play, otherwise it looks like much of the innovations will be pushed underground.

EDIT: here's the full text of the first New York proposed regulations: http://www.dfs.ny.gov/about/press2014/pr1407171-vc.pdf

Any thoughts?

My absolute favorite line is "you haven't lost until you've sold"

Don't want to offend you, but most of your discussions are pointless and they seem like you are trying to gather some activity here on the forum.
Can't blame you for that, but when someone express his opinion, you should actually read it before continuing like broken gramophone.
What others have said is clear. If governments decide to f* us - they will. You may then even believe that you can mine Californium with your PSU (yes, PSU.. not GPU or whatever), but it won't matter.

Nothing personal my friend.

DriveShare Test Group B Plan

Dear Storj Supporters,

Test Group B is the first time we will be rewarding DriveShare users for participating in the Storj network. Test Group A got us usable data on network latency, disconnects, uptime, and other factors. In this test group we will be specifically testing out reward mechanisms, and expanding the storage capacity of the network as a whole.