+1 on the domain names. Also can you provide some kind of independent valualation as to how you came to the conclusion as to their worth

^^no even if dealing with a legendary you should still use escrow. The lesion is that you should start with smaller amounts, deal in tranches and always use escrow

it isn't a guarantee that you will be able to scam for that much. Most scams that I have seen were for much less. Plus people are generally less willing to do business with people they haven't don't business with before without escrow. If the other person wants escrow and you won't use escrow then you will almost automatically will be called a scammer and lose your entire investment. If you do go through with your transaction then you are doing a deal that you probably didn't really want to do

Your prices are much too low. You can make .035 per week with a full member account so there is no reason why someone would sell for this little

you are right that people with a lot of trust should have their trust removed prior to selling their account however the trust does add value to the account so any buyer would need to pay a preimum for trust and would need to risk being called out as a scammer if they try to scam and if they are called out they would lose their entire investment

Actually selling accounts improves the safety of accounts. If someone needs money they can sell their account instead of throwing their account by trying to scam (and potentially resolving their need for money)

Is BitMiningInvestments an alt of RiverBoat's hacker? I got three random negative trusts from RiverBoatBTChacked (for supposedly getting Riverboat banned), from syscoin-videopr (for using my alts to scam - which is not true - he is clearly an alt of the hacker because he posted in the scam accusation thread saying that BitPop scammed) and from BitMiningInvestments (for selling a supposedly hacked account - which is not true - I have never even dealt with him).

My message serves as a warning to anyone potentially wanting to buy your account that the ownership may be put into question sometime in the future.

If badbears logic is correct then the real owners computer is probably infected with password (and probably Bitcoin) stealing malware so even a signed message would probably not be sufficient to prove ownership

I told him no because of the potential liability that it could have gotten banned from his trolling spree

He asked me to buy his account.

It is good that everything worked out for all parties involved. I was honestly somewhat doubtful that this loan was going to be repaid, but it is good I was proven wrong.

Now that the loan has been repaid, is it okay to say what the collateral was or does the OP still want that to be kept secret?

While I do agree with vod's posts in the lending section (calling out scammers) I do think he does play a role in the derailing of threads that dank posts in by brining up the fact that he has not repaid squall his 52 BTC; when he brings this up dank replies and the thread is derailed from there. The threads that I have seen have not gotten derailed from dank's first post alone.

I would dispute the fact that dank scammed for over $10,000.00. I forget the exact amount, but the value of the bitcoin he borrowed at the time he borrowed it was only a few hundred dollars. I have said this before and will say it again that I will agree to pay dank's debt if squall can make a reasonable settlement offer based on the fiat value of the bitcoin loaned as of when it was loaned, if it means that dank stops getting harassed by Vod (and others) about his debt.

While I do not post in the same sections that dank tends to post in, I would support an unbanning of dank, especially if he would agree to not reply to posts addressed to him that are not about the OP of a thread.

hahaha. Well I will put 1 BTC in escrow with bitpop if he wants to agree that he will release it to you if you can hack my account.

I would change it to that he was trolling and claimed that his account was hacked when it was clearly not hacked

I am going to put my money where my mouth is.

Post an address and if I cannot get it back and if you can hack my account I will send you 1 BTC

LOL

#FAIL

edit: why would the "hacker" change your password but not your security question?

Also if your email was hacked why would your password show up as being changed via password instead of via email?

nope. you are probably right....actually you are almost certainly right. the security log shows the password changing twice and when vod's account was recovered (the only account I know to ever to be recovered) it showed the password being reset via email address

Geez what did you do to piss off bitpop? He left you like 5 negatives, one of which is your dox. Was it the fact that you called him a scammer (I highly doubt he actually scammed you).

Although I highly doubt your account was actually hacked, it looks like whoever was using your account did so to troll. Either way you deserve the end result because you either trolled someone or were careless with your account security

I also see very little reason for someone to hack an account just to troll. Someone can make their own newbie account to do just the same

不，我不再购买帐户。我将更新原帖
你在找什么级别的帐户购买？我可以和你的价格工作。

It might have been deleted because the OP does not have enough "history" here. As per below you need to have (trading?) history or have (trading?) history on a reputable trading forum.
This is somewhat of an argument to have an official list of broad rules that people can reference to find the most up to date forum rules, as old "rule" posts may or may not be updated/changed when a new rules is put into effect.

I am not sure if you are serious, but I sent you a PM