I just didn't expect it, it turns out that there are still people who expect Manchester United to win the title. lol! In fact, when previously Manchester United was still in good shape and performance, I personally could not judge that Manchester United had a chance to win the title. Because throughout this season, only Arsenal and Manchester City have good consistency.
Therefore, even though Manchester United are in the top four in the Premier League standings, but that does not mean Manchester United has a chance to win the title. What's more, lately Manchester United's performance has decreased and also, Manchester United's position will begin to be threatened by Liverpool, if Manchester United cannot fix the problems that occur then of course Liverpool will be ready to take over.
I agree. The only difference is that Arsenal has stumbled in the end of the season. It's a shame because they had a great opportunity to win the title after twenty years. I guess they will have to wait for the next one because I don't see them capable of winning the title in front of Man City. But let's be honest - City showed more than Arsenal this season. |
|
|
|
Manchester United is fourth in the points table. But relatively weaker than Manchester United, the team in Newcastle is number three in the points table. In fact, currently Manchester United is not able to perform very well. I do not see any possibility of this team to secure the title of Premier League.
What are you talking about Man Unites winning the title? The possibility of Man United winning the Premier League title this season ended several weeks ago. Have you seen the table? Arsenal has three and Man City has four more games to play. And the difference between them and the rest of the clubs in the league is too big. The only question that remains is can Man City keep the advantage they have in front of Arsenal to win the title. |
|
|
|
Manji je i broj nepotvrđenih tranksacija. Prije par dana je bilo preko 450.000 a sad smo evo blizu brojke od 300.000. Mempool space pokazuje da mineri i malo brže pronalaze nove blokove. Prosječno vrijeme je bilo 10.6 minuta, pa je spalo na 10.2 zadnji put kad sam gledao i sad je okruglo 10. Nadati se je da će ovi sa Ordinalsima što prije izgubiti novac i odustati.  Ajde baš me zanima tvoje mišljenje jer vidim da si protiv ordinalsa. Za što je napravljen taproot koji je omogućio da se na BTC naprave ordinalsi? Pitam jer me baš zanima koji je bio povod budući da sam na par mjesta već čuo da se razmišlja o BTC forku koji bi poništio taproot nadogradnju. |
|
|
|
Ako se ne varam, Amerika je najavila da će zabraniti sve decentralizirane stablecoine u koje spada i DAI. Nisam siguran je li EU što najavila po tom pitanju. Ah, ok. Onda sam pomješao te najave koje dolaze iz Amerije sa spekulacijama koje izlaze u vezi EU tržišta. Amerika planira dozvoliti samo centralizirane stablecoine jer tu ipak imaju neku vrstu kontrole. Na primjer, mogu zamrznuti sredstva u nečijem walletu što se već prije događalo samo što to tada nije napravila Amerika nego Circle koji stoji iza USTC stablecoina. Decentralizirane ne možeš kontrolirati a centralizirane možeš. Jasno je onda s kim će sklapati partnerstva i njegovati dobre odnose. Uz odgovarajuću dokumentaciju, USDC, USDT i slični stablecoini mogu biti zaključani na bilo kojoj adresi. Mislim da su nedavno jednom našem trgovcu sa Balkana iz Tethera blokirali adresu sa ogromnom lovom nakon što je kupio veći iznos od nepoznate osobe. Neko je o tome pisao. Centralizirani stablecoini nisu ništa bolji od klasičnih banaka. OK, USDT ili USDC imaš kod sebe u walletu ali nitko ti ne garantira da ćeš ih uvijek moći potrošiti zbog mogućnost blokiranja. Što se tiče trgovca, nije mi jasno kakve veze ima što je kupio veći iznos od nepoznate osobe. Pa ne znači to automatski da je napravio neki prekršaj. To je baš sranje kad postoji takva mogućnost. I što ti na kraju ostaje? Gdje držati lovu ako decentralizirani stablecoini i nisu tako stabilni kako je povijest pokazala, a centralizirani imaju mogućnost blokade pa opet ostaneš bez svega. |
|
|
|
Baš me zanima što nam to EU sprema u pogledu kripto regulacije?  Ako se dobro sjećam kad je o tome bilo riječi u prošlosti, bitcoin nije obuhvaćen novim regulacijama. Odnosno, tu se neće puno toga mijenjati. Vjerujem da će stablecoini biti podložni puno strogijim regulacijama i kontrolama a možda će neke i zabraniti u EU. Jel se ovom regulacijom ili nekom drugom spekuliše da će DAI biti zabranjen? Također se sjećam da fokus neće biti na DeFi sektoru iako je mjesto svakakvih prevara i namjernih i nenamjernih propusta. Ako se ne varam, Amerika je najavila da će zabraniti sve decentralizirane stablecoine u koje spada i DAI. Nisam siguran je li EU što najavila po tom pitanju. Amerika planira dozvoliti samo centralizirane stablecoine jer tu ipak imaju neku vrstu kontrole. Na primjer, mogu zamrznuti sredstva u nečijem walletu što se već prije događalo samo što to tada nije napravila Amerika nego Circle koji stoji iza USTC stablecoina. |
|
|
|
/snip
Tema ti ne odgovara sadržaju diskusije jel nije ovdje riječ o ovom ili onom novčaniku, niti Wasabi ima išta sa trenutnom situacijom.
Ma nije ovo ni prva ni zadnja tema koja je otišla malo u OT. Evo situacija se lagano popravlja. Nakon što je fee jučer ili prekjučer bio preko 200 sats, danas je na koliko-toliko podnošljivih 40-50 sats. Nije baš idealno ali opet puno bolje. |
|
|
|
/snip It usually comes to nothing in hockey, I guess we are preconditioned by futsal where playing without goalkeeper almost always results with goals.
I cannot support this enough. The keeper, even if small, covers so much of the goal in futsal that leaving it open is like giving away a penalty kick without keeper moving. Despite learning this lesson several times, our team kept doing that to chase draws, and ended up under a minute giving away free goal. Have you seen how it looks in ice hockey when a goalie stands in front of a goal? You have a feeling that there's no place for a puck to go into the goal. But ice hockey is a different sport than futsal. In ice hockey when a team has one extra player, they spend 90% of the time in the opponent's part of the field. That's why coaches tend to pull a goalie out and attack in the last two minutes. But the problem is when a defender loses control of the puck. Then it's easy for the opponent to score an empty net goal. |
|
|
|
That was kinda a trick question. It does happen often that a team loses with 1 goal advantage, but when they are losing with 1 goal difference with a minute or 2 to go, they play with an extra player that replaces the goalkeeper. It's quite common to see empty net goals being scored, therefore I would have gone either with Finland with a bigger difference or USA not to lose. You can still win, ofc - but the odds here are against you Yeah, I watched quite a few ice hockey games 10 years ago so I know about pulling a goalie out to bring out one more player. We will see... I know that Finland winning with more than 1 goal would be an easier pick, but this round doesn't count for me so I decided to try my luck  |
|
|
|
Actually I fully intended to put my answers in and then... forgot. Looks like you actually got a point right, and Cro2 rep got 2/2. All semifinalists are tied at 0-0 haha.
My players have nothing to fight for this season except higher prizes, so I let them holiday in Saudi to watch Ronaldo have another bad day... I even gave my coaching staff time off to place losing bets.
Yeah, as if the pressure of playing in the semi-final was not enough, then they saw their names in Sportsbet and I guess it was too much for them. I see that I got one question right so I'm happy so far. I hope that the USA will give Finland a hard time so I can laugh at your faces when I am the only one that answered correctly |
|
|
|
|
I'm a little bit shocked that only three of us gave the answers. I'm not counting the semi-finalists, of course. Even Trofo didn't give his answers this time. I guess you all need a break. I wanted to stay in the game so I answered out of my head. I'm not expecting good result for me...
|
|
|
|
Iskreno, isplata preko platforme ima smisla. To je neka kompanija sa kojom saradjujes i trebalo bi postojati obostrano poverenje. Isto tako, ako vec promovises nekog, zasto suzdrzavanje od koriscenja njihovog servisa? Licno, ako bih upravljao kampanjom za kazino, mozda bih bez obzira na trenutno ludilo sa fee, ipak isplacivao preko platforme.
Tako bi promoteri ipak bar na neki nacin upoznali sta to promovisu. Nije retko da sam video kako clanovi signature kampanje ni ne znaju sta oni to reklamiraju, niti se nesto interesuju. Trebalo bi svima biti u interesu uspesna kampanja i da vlasnik ima nekakav benefit od svega.
Slažem se s dijelom da ako promoviramo neki projekt, mogli bi se barem malo upoznati s time o čemu se radi. Ali ne slažem se da bi se zarada trebala dijeliti preko te platforme. Zarada je moj BTC koji sam zaradio promovirajući projekt na forumu i želim taj BTC u svom walletu. Ne želim pola zarade trošiti na fee da bi BTC imao u svom walletu Ako vlasnik projekta želi animirati ljude da koriste platformu, neka napravi review kampanju kao što smo nedavno radili review kampanju za casino. ^^^
interesantno je da niko ni ovde, a ni u diskusiji koja se vodi u Livecasino kampanji, nije uopste pomenuo mogucnost prelaska na L2 (Liquid ili Lightning, mozda ima jos neka opcija)
nisam ljubitelj BTC L2, ali to bi moglo biti jedno od resenja
da li ima redovnih korisnika L2 ovde, i kako tamo trenutno stvari stoje, znam da je Lightning povecavao broj korisnika i cvorova jedno vreme, ali sam prestao da pratim
ne znam zasto, ali izgleda da se preferiraju kao resenja centralizovani servisi ili menjacnice u odnosu na L2
Iskreno, do pojave ordinalsa nisam puno koristio Bitcoin mrežu. Jedino za primanje BTC-a od kampanje. Pojava ordinalsa me natjerala na to i drago mi je zbog toga. Isto tako nikad nisam koristio L2 na Bitcoinu (za Liquid nikad nisam ni čuo) ali svakako pozdravljam bilo kakvu promjenu koja će me natjerati da proučim kako se koristi. |
|
|
|
Slažem se, ni meni se ne sviđa ta ideja isplate preko platforme ali mislim da manageri vjerojatno neće pristati na ideju o isplatama svaka dva tjedna ili jednom mjesečno.
U zadnje vrijeme gotovo svaki tjedan mijenjaju se članovi kampanje pa bi manager koji vodi puno kampanja, poput Hhampuza, morao jako paziti za koliko tjedana kome plaća i kad je tko došao u kampanju što bi još zakompliciralo posao managera.
Valjda će se ova situacija sa trenutnim vrlo skupim slanjem Bitcoina uskoro riješiti.
Iskreno... Nisam siguran hoće li se riješiti. Tako je bilo i kod Ethereuma kad je broj transakcija eksplodirao pa je i gas poskupio. Svi su govorili "ma brzo će se to riješiti" ali se nije riješilo nego su se krenula razvijati L2 rješenja. Nisam siguran koliko je to moguće kod Bitcoina. |
|
|
|
Bit će zanimljivo vidjeti kako će bounty manageri reagirati na isplate signature kampanja budući da je Bitcoin blockchain prilično zagušen. Hhampuz je jutros poslao BTC za moju kampanju s fee rate od 200 sats/vB i transakcija još uvijek nije potvrđena. Osim toga, transakcija je užasno skupa - skoro 200 dolara!
Iskreno - totalno je sranje. To nije trošak koji je predviđen unutar budžeta, značajan je i zapravo nema izbora nego platiti ga. Sve ti je jasno ako znaš da je jedan Binance bio stopirao BTC withdrawale zbog feeja. Ovo je generalno jako loše i za sam Bitcoin. Ako se ovako nastavi, osobno ne bih imao nikakav problem da se kampanje prebace na dvotjednu isplatu, što bi automatski prepolovilo troškove transakcija. To bi bilo bolje nego da se odluče na prebacivanje isplate unutar pojedinih platformi, što bi značilo da će korisnici morati sami snositi trošak transakcije u svoje privatne novčanike. Čini mi se da sam već vidio da je nešto slično najavljeno u Whirlwind kampanji. Ne, ne... To uplaćivanje na platforme ja isto ne bi. Not your keys - not your Bitcoin Radije da prorijede isplate pa isplaćuju jednom u dva tjedna. Za duge kampanje kao što je moja ne bi imao ništa protiv niti da isplaćuju jednom mjesečno. Ionako skupljam taj BTC u walletu pa mi je svejedno jel dolazi jednom mjesečno ili jednom tjedno. |
|
|
|
|
Bit će zanimljivo vidjeti kako će bounty manageri reagirati na isplate signature kampanja budući da je Bitcoin blockchain prilično zagušen. Hhampuz je jutros poslao BTC za moju kampanju s fee rate od 200 sats/vB i transakcija još uvijek nije potvrđena. Osim toga, transakcija je užasno skupa - skoro 200 dolara!
|
|
|
|
|
Trofo and cryptofrka this is great! You can already see from the comment how great the guys in the cup are feeling about it. If I'm ow mistaken, we already had the opportunity to bet on ourselves, didn't we? Or was that in the World Cup competition? I can't remember, but I'm pretty sure that something like this was organized by Sportsbet already.
|
|
|
|
Još bi samo dodao da se jučer prvi put u povijesti dogodilo da je fee za jedan potvrđeni BTC blok bio veći od nagrade koju je miner dobio za potvrđivanje bloka:  Nagrada minerima za potvrđivanje bloka je 6.5 BTC, a na transakcije u tom bloku je potrošeno čak 6.7 BTC. Nevjerojatno... |
|
|
|
I was horrible at the beginning of the season. However after figuring out the system slowly I managed to get a few striking results. First the semi finals in the cup and now my defeating cryptofrka who was the unbeaten leader. I wouldn't have believed if someone told me 2-3 weeks before that these things were going to happen. You can check this post for the calendar. Thanks. It looks like I was a little early in my celebration. vd309 can still catch me if I lose the last game against darxiaomi and he wins his with two points or better difference. That brings me to another question (sorry Trofo and cryptofrka, but I like asking a lot of questions ) - what will happen if I lose my last game and vd309 wins his game with 2 points difference? Then both of us will have the same number of points, the same h2h result (it was a draw) and the same score difference. Maybe then the winner will be the one who scored more points? |
|
|
|
|
Wow! Am I seeing this right? Now that cryptofrka lost his game I am the only one who managed to remain undefeated the entire season! I don't know what to say... I was thinking of taking a break this week and not answering the cup questions but now I have a feeling I have to answer them so I don't lose momentum for the final week. I'm not sure who I will be up against. I know that it was posted somewhere in the thread but there's 80 pages and I don't feel like browsing all of them.
|
|
|
|
Jos se trazi pravi model za kripto igricu ali nikako da naprave odrziv sistem koji bi mogao da funkcionise. Nesto najblize tome je bila ona Tethan Arena ali i to je brzo propalo zbog tokenomics koji je bio neodrziv za sve veci broj igraca. Bas izazovno podrucje sa ogromnim potencijalom.
Upravo tako. Tržište ima ogromni potencijal jer dosta igara ima neku svoju valutu koja se koristi za in-game items. Sjećam se da je World of Warcraft imao svoju valutu i iteme koji su se prodavali za stvarni novac. Kad bi netko uspio napraviti odličnu igru i u nju ukomponirati crypto ali na način da je jednostavno za korištenje i ljudima koji nisu crypto entuzijasti, mislim da bi to bio pun pogodak. Ali problem je što je sve vezano uz crypto najčešće samo traženje načina kako da se ljudi na brzinu obogate. |
|
|
|
In my opinion, Hajduk is a club with a great history, with great fans, but amateurish management, without a clear strategy and plan. That's why they haven't been champions for almost 20 years and won't be champions for the next 20 years either.
The club's coaches probably don't have the courage to go against the expectations of the club's management and especially the fans, which means that the game has to go through the fans' idol Livaja, and everyone else is just his assistants.
Dinamo also has its own problems because of the Mamić brothers, but that will soon be resolved, and the club is already professionally managed and therefore at a much higher organizational and financial level compared to the rest of the Croatian league, including Hajduk.
Rijeka and Osijek are slowly rising as the end of the season approaches, so it seems that there will be no surprises in the Croatian league this season.
It will be interesting to see who will leave Dinamo and who will they sign because this season some important players already left (I'm mainly talking about the captain Ademi) and other big names are announced to be leaving the club too. I hope they will bring some good new players so they don't end their European season too early. As for other teams that will compete in Europe, I don't have high expectations so every positive result will surprise me. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
