Bitcoin Forum
October 16, 2024, 03:51:20 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 28.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 178 »
1441  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The more you know... on: October 14, 2015, 01:39:53 PM
Firstly can you explain better what does it mean this sentence: "can absorb complete index of over 160 world's currencies (including IMF conversion notes), and do this four times."

Sorry but my knowledges don't allow me to understand the real meaning of this phrase and what mean (the importance of) this meaning for the bitcoin.

Then it will be better if you give the source of this news. This can give to much info about its importance. This list is an list made by you yourself, by an institution, it is a formal list published in some financial place or site, or is a list made from some organization which have to do with bitcoin? Or what? Then, even maybe everyone of us who are in this forum might not like this, this list doesn't mean that bitcoin is known or is used in all those countries. I bet in this. All the currencies are connected (changed) with each other and it is not hard to create a such lists and to publish those using the rates of the change between all those. I think that are other data those who can give an real and right idea about the importance and the power that bitcoin have in each of those countries.


Not really news - just some raw statistics.
If you convert each unit of all world's currencies to USD you will get around $56 in total which is around 1/4 - 1/5 of recent BTC exchange rate. 
I used XE currency data conversion here: http://www.xe.com/currencytables/?from=USD&date=2015-10-14

Good. Now everything is clear for me. Is a list made from you. A very good initiative which give an idea about the value of bitcoin in every world currency (or almost if not all). It is impressively the value of bitcoin even this is well known but every person which know bitcoin. The only thing that needed nor for the bitcoin it is its regulation and its value will have legality; this mean that its value can be increased more and more.
1442  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Everyone looses in the long run on: October 14, 2015, 01:24:34 PM
Let's be honest. Gambling should only be considered for entertainment purposes only. If you are in need of quick cash, doing hard dirty work is more often than not better than hitting up the casino sites. I see way too many people in this section try to justify their gambling habits by saying they have strategies to always win. Others on this forum will go as far as to say that they are professional gamblers, and they always win. You're fooling no one and you look stupid.

All the gambling addicts I knew in real life who claimed to win from casinos all the time had serious mental issues. I went gambling with that guy once, and he ended up blaming me for him loosing at Pai Gow poker, a game that's 100% chance.

And just to let you guys know, ALL the casinos in my jurisdiction say the same things in public advertising campaigns. So far, my sig campaign manager has not PM'ed me telling me to quit bashing gambling. Nobody wins gambling, so lets stop pretending anyone here makes a living gambling online.

As the community manager and signature campaign director for a gambling site, I cannot stress this enough.
I have seen people wager more than they can afford to lose many times and it always leads to ruin - win or lose.

Gambling is for entertainment only, and is not a way to make money quick!
The Gambler's Fallacy is just that - a logical fallacy. You cannot predict a table or a game!

Never wager more than you are willing to lose!

It is a very big surprise for me your post (its content). I cannot imagine that one person like you (in your position) make such posts with these words and with that design (bold and big letters for the important things). Congratulations for this.

But do you know that not all the people are equal (even, we can't find two the same; even if are twins) and most of the gamblers finish in addiction from this kind of "entertainment"? Why you did not put limits in overall amounts with which one person can gamble or better, if someone go over one limit in loss of money must stop to gamble (from the machine or from you) and sent at his home?

why would any gambling website do this?!!!
the more users bet and lose, the more they will earn. so if they put a stop on user's bets, amount lost, then they are harming their business. it is not a charity you know.

as stingleword said, people should stop themselves and have self control. it is not anybody else's responsibility to that for them.

You're wrong. To many people lose the control of itself for various reasons. Theoretically every human being named homo sapiens have this characteristic. But not all in the same field or way. Some more easy, some more hard and some other much much harder. If you find "the key" everyone can be addicted to something. Maybe a little, maybe to much and maybe so much that can classified as a disease. It is enough to find the field and to find the way. So your words are not correct. The above wrote from me are applied in a certain way and in only one direction by the hypnotist. They find the key that you, for a certain time, be addicted by him.

So your above words are not true always. Not everyone can stop themselves and not everyone have self control. Gambling is one of the fields of activity which is known that produce more addiction than almost all the other actions or activities. This people must be protected. And if the casinos or online gambling owners will be a little responsible must protect them by the destruction of themselves.
1443  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Bitcoin Exchange Gemini Approved for Launch in New York on: October 14, 2015, 01:12:33 PM
BTC being regulated (that means I have to provide my documents to "someone" in order to get verified), why would I use BTC while I already have a bank account, credit cards, debit cards and other traditional financial instruments?

I can do whatever I want by using a credit/debit card already and instantly with zero fees on my side. Smiley

It will the best thing you will (can) do. Do not use it and use all the others tool you mention in your post. Leave your bitcoin in your wallet. Theoretically the price of bitcoin can go very high. Only if regulated (otherwise with to much probability will be banned) and accepted legally as a normal currency in your country. That day you remember that you have bitcoin and again don't use those. Only do a change in your desired fiat money. You will have, using this way of action, much more profits than the actual use of it.
1444  Economy / Economics / Re: Bitcoin or gold? on: October 14, 2015, 01:03:40 PM
If you had to convert all your wealth to either Bitcoin or gold and keep it there for 10 years, which would you choose? Keep in mind the fact that Bitcoin has only been around for 5 years, and could be fundamentally different in any number of ways in 10 years.

For now, I would pick gold.  Gold has made a strong recovery over the past week.

You must see more than some weeks to find the real trend of the price of the gold. Below are the prices of gold the lasts 5 years. The trend is the decrease of price. I told 5 years. In the post above yours and quoted by you is written that bitcoin has only 5 years of life. Recall something in your mind this coincidence? I don't want to believe this because it could be an coincidence, but 5 years are even the amount of years in which the price of gold began and was decreased.  Huh

1445  Economy / Exchanges / Re: Bitcoin Exchange Gemini Approved for Launch in New York on: October 14, 2015, 12:49:00 PM
Bitcoin must be regulated. There is no other way if bitcoin will want to survive, to have the right to be and to have the same status as the other currencies. The anonymity of bitcoin can be used, or better misused, from the evildoers. This can cause only bad reputation and banning of it from every country. Everyone which love bitcoin must fight that it can be accepted through the regulations in its country.

Maybe while we're at it, we can set up some credit reference agencies to lose all our personal data.   Roll Eyes

Adding central points of failure doesn't make the system better.  Certain Bitcoin services should be regulated if they deal with fiat, but the network itself would only be weakened by adding authorities to hoard personal data or decide what should and shouldn't be allowed.


I don't understand what do you mean with "network" but if "the network" you wrote above mean blockchain (for you) you must know that blockchain and bitcoin are two different concepts and not the same thing. They have to do with each other and cannot exist without each other but are two different things.  The regulation of bitcoin have nothing to do with blockchain but only with bitcoin and its use as a currency.

Services that use Bitcoin, like exchanges, web wallets and merchants can be regulated if that's what the regions they operate in require.  But people will always have the option of using a service that's not regulated if that's what they prefer.  Any nation or jurisdiction can try to impose regulations on the general use of Bitcoin if they want, but they're not going to have much success with that.  For starters, not all jurisdictions will agree on how it should be regulated and, secondly, it's about as productive as trying to regulate peer-to-peer file-sharing.  It can't be done.  Bitcoin is self regulating.  The protocol determines what is and is not permissible, not regulators.  

Also, regulation in practice does very little to stop "the evildoers" as you call them, as we don't do regulation properly anymore.  Banks and investment firms are regulated, but they're still a bunch of lowlife, criminal scum.  This is because regulators tend to be as corrupt as the governments responsible for implementing them.  If it benefits the financial sector to only be subject to the occasional slap on the wrist when they've done something illegal, then the regulators won't be too harsh on them.  It's just another one of the many frauds that Bitcoin is better equipped to fight without so-called regulation.  To hell with the bean counters, the middlemen and the other useless third party intermediary puppets that do little else but bog down the system in red tape and bureaucracy.

Something enforced in code is far more powerful and robust than something supposedly enforced in law.

But people will always have the option of using a service that's not regulated if that's what they prefer.

Disagree. If the Authorities will want and will decide that the people should not use a non regulated service the people cannot use it. Authorities will not allow this and only the people which normally break the lows will use it. I don't like this and I don't agree with this. The people must follow the rules which regulate the society. So don't break the laws. Otherwise it will be anarchy. This is bad for everyone. Only for the evildoers not.

Any nation or jurisdiction can try to impose regulations on the general use of Bitcoin if they want, but they're not going to have much success with that.

Disagree. Regulation will make bitcoin free, legal and known by everyone in every country. Regulation it will be always better that ignoring bitcoins as it was now in most of the world countries. Regulation will give at bitcoin the right to stay in the same status as the other currencies used in every country. Leaving it without regulations mean ignoring it. This will undervalue it always.

Bitcoin is self regulating.

Disagree your meaning. Bitcoin is self-regulated as an informatic product but not as an currency. The right and the possibility to regulate an currency (the money) can be exercised only by a Central Bank of one country or an similar Authority. If bitcoin will want to be accepted and used as a currency there are not other way to be such, except its regulation from such Authorities in collaboration with the various governmental agencies which have as object of their work money laundering.

Also, regulation in practice does very little to stop "the evildoers" as you call them, as we don't do regulation properly anymore.

Disagree totally. In my country is not so. And we are a medium developed country. I think even in your country your words are not true. It is not imaginable that a Central Bank don't do the right regulation and the right management of regulation. This kind of behavior will bankrupt immediately the state of that country and will cause an economic collapse. The regulation of money in one country is the most economic important thing. Not coincidentally the Authorities which regulate it (normally Central Banks) are independent from everything (even from the Government). They are selfgoverned. They want every day to stop the evildoers with the various regulations and even their evolution. Everything evolve. Evildoers maybe firsts. The Central Bank do new rules to stop them. This is the normal fight between the right and the wrong, the good and the bad. Until today the right and the good have won. As for me, it will be so forever.

All the rest of your post can find answer (according to me) in the above explanations.

1446  Economy / Economics / Re: Why You Should Never Sell Your Bitcoins Ever on: October 14, 2015, 12:14:52 PM
So basically you are saving if Bitcoin reaches 10,000 dollars it would be a bad idea to sell.  I disagree with that.  I am not saying sell every coin you have but it would be worth it to sell some of the coins.  What if Bitcoin stays at $240 dollars for the rest of time, and you have 10,000BTC.  It might not be a bad idea to sell some of those coins and make some actual fiat cash as well.  What if Bitcoin crashes, then the best time to sell them would be now.  There are plenty of times you should sell.

This reasoning may have value if you have big quantity of bitcoins. If you have few (for example 10 or 20 bitcoins) this kind of behavior is not possible. If i sell some of those with the actual price they don't give me to much. On  the other hand I "lose" my bitcoins which I think could have much higher price in the future. I write "think" because are qualities of it which make me to hope that bitcoin might have a much higher price in the future).

I think it still works in small amounts.  If I have 5 Bitcoins and the value reaches 10,000 dollars, I sell 2 of them for 20,000 dollars.  I still have 3 in the bank technically.  I don't think that is the worst thing in the world you could do, also could try investing those to make more or something like that.

You did not understood what I had written. Your reasoning it is my an example of a part of my advice. To wait the high price and then to sell. While him wanted to sell some in these days when the price is about 240-250 us dollar one bitcoin and to save some others for the days to come when the price is waited to be much higher. Your example show what it will happen if the previous author of the post will follow my advice. So to wait and to sell when the price will go high (as you have shown).

Then I tell that his choice make sense to be applied if he had big quantities of bitcoins. In this case he can sell some of his bitcoins and this don't "hurt" to much him because he have to many others which can be sold when the price will go high. But even because the amount of money that he will have from the bitcoins which can be sold will be relevant because the bitcoins sold there were be not few. He have to many bitcoins and will sell part of those which are not few (he have a big quantity of those and "few" from those are not few indeed).

But if its quantity of bitcoins is low doesn't make sense to do this because he can sell only few of those (in this case the meaning the few is real; because he has indeed few bitcoins in total) and will not have to many money from those (are few bitcoins). While if don't sell those but save all his few bitcoins in its wallet one day will have from those much more.

All the suppositions are made with the idea that one day the price of bitcoin will go very high. Event this that it is not sure.
1447  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: International Games Prediction Thread on: October 14, 2015, 11:55:09 AM

More Eurocup games today:

Austria vs Liechtenstein
Russia vs Montenegro
Sweden vs Moldova
Belarus vs Macedonia
Luxembourg   vs Slovakia
Ukraine vs Spain
Estonia vs Switzerland
Lithuania   vs England
San Marino vs Slovenia


Below my suppositions for the above matches. With blue the draw. With red the winners. I am sure that I will have wrong not more that two results.

Austria vs Liechtenstein
Russia vs Montenegro
Sweden vs Moldova
Belarus vs Macedonia
Luxembourg vs Slovakia
Ukraine vs Spain
Estonia vs Switzerland
Lithuania   vs England
San Marino vs Slovenia

Wrong "predictions": three matches.  Cry    Right "predictions": six matches.  Grin

I am the One. Even I have not maintained my main "prediction". To have only two errors in my "predictions". But yet definitely I am the One. Who knows how much money I will had if I had made a real bet.  Cool
1448  Economy / Trading Discussion / Re: I quit trading on: October 14, 2015, 11:42:28 AM
7 BTC is a huge amount and I'm sorry for your loss. Pay your bills or buy gift cards with the BTC you've earned as investing it would be a bad option since you've been trading all this while and have incurred a loss. If you wish, you can start your own website by buying a domain name and then advertisers could pay you per month which could earn you a good amount of profit.

As it will be for me leave those in your wallet and forget about those. One day, when the price will (can, may) go high, remember and change those. Maybe, that day, you can buy an expensive car with those. But even the price will not go high for sure will not go down. So, their value, at least will remain the same.
1449  Economy / Gambling discussion / Re: Everyone looses in the long run on: October 14, 2015, 11:36:35 AM
Let's be honest. Gambling should only be considered for entertainment purposes only. If you are in need of quick cash, doing hard dirty work is more often than not better than hitting up the casino sites. I see way too many people in this section try to justify their gambling habits by saying they have strategies to always win. Others on this forum will go as far as to say that they are professional gamblers, and they always win. You're fooling no one and you look stupid.

All the gambling addicts I knew in real life who claimed to win from casinos all the time had serious mental issues. I went gambling with that guy once, and he ended up blaming me for him loosing at Pai Gow poker, a game that's 100% chance.

And just to let you guys know, ALL the casinos in my jurisdiction say the same things in public advertising campaigns. So far, my sig campaign manager has not PM'ed me telling me to quit bashing gambling. Nobody wins gambling, so lets stop pretending anyone here makes a living gambling online.

As the community manager and signature campaign director for a gambling site, I cannot stress this enough.
I have seen people wager more than they can afford to lose many times and it always leads to ruin - win or lose.

Gambling is for entertainment only, and is not a way to make money quick!
The Gambler's Fallacy is just that - a logical fallacy. You cannot predict a table or a game!

Never wager more than you are willing to lose!

It is a very big surprise for me your post (its content). I cannot imagine that one person like you (in your position) make such posts with these words and with that design (bold and big letters for the important things). Congratulations for this.

But do you know that not all the people are equal (even, we can't find two the same; even if are twins) and most of the gamblers finish in addiction from this kind of "entertainment"? Why you did not put limits in overall amounts with which one person can gamble or better, if someone go over one limit in loss of money must stop to gamble (from the machine or from you) and sent at his home?
1450  Economy / Economics / Re: Best way to turn 2BTC into 4BTC on: October 14, 2015, 11:23:43 AM
you can try my doubler ( Refund in 10 days without new investors ! )

Oh no , what a shameless self advertising of a potential scam doubler/ponzi. Just let that kind of stuffs stay on investor based games section and do not spread it all over the forum as it may lure innocent people that will thought that was a legit one, which is not.

I hope no one here will fall on this BS, beware.

Sorry sir but it's not a scam ! I'm paying but for now i'm waiting for new investors Smiley

why does my investment depends on other people's investment ? are you paying me from other peoples deposits ?
or you dont have any mining equipment etc.. to pay the investors.?

It's a ponzi. -----> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ponzi_scheme

Nice you admit its ponzi but you denied it's scam. FYI ponzi = scam so there's no reason to deny it. Just look at the definition of ponzi -
 " A Ponzi scheme is a fraudulent investment operation where the operator, an individual or organization, pays returns to its investors from new capital paid to the operators by new investors, rather than from profit earned by the operator.  " - wikipedia

@master sato : Do you have an investment on that scammer's program ? You should bid farewell to your investment Roll Eyes

I'm not scammer! I will pay every investor ( And refund is ok )

Where do you find the money to refund after 10 days if you have no new "investors" and no activity declared? You double the money of the "investors". In which way? What is your "business" which give you such profit to double the bitcoin of the "investors"? If I invest 100 bitcoins will be able your "business" to double this amount? How is possible to be doubled this amount in such few days?

For now is max amount to deposit 10 BTC Smiley
Check my thread for payments proofs or just click in my first post on bitcoin adress --> blockchain.info --> many proofs.
I have no investors in plan 1 BTC, 5 BTC,10 BTC, 1 LTC, 1000 DOGE and also 100 $ payeer.com plan.

Leave the proof. You have not answered to most of my questions. Why? Except the facts that it was possible to invest 100 bitcoin. Ask to other questions and, if the answers will be correct, I will invest in your "business".
Refund is avaibaile only for first investor or if the plan have a "1 BTC" on wallet i can refund it..
Btw TrueHari ( his profil on this forum ) want refund and i sent him 0.013 BTC back. I have a transaction proof and in previous thread he posted the txid and wanted refund.
If you invest 0.001 BTC or 1 BTC ( or higher ) plan you will be probably first investor and i can refund you the money after 10 days without investors..
I have a plans for Litecoin,Dogecoin and payeer too.
I got many -ve trust ratings and i'm still here and i want to be trusted ( escrow service+ doubler ) and honest.
BTW website update ( v1.1 ) is coming soon ( Max 14 days. )

IN WHICH WAY YOU "PRODUCE" THE PROFITS? FROM NOTHING? WHICH IS YOUR BUSINESS WHO GIVE YOU SUCH PROFITS TO DOUBLE THE MONEY SENT TO YOU BY THE OTHERS? THE MONEY CANNOT BE CREATED FROM NOTHING. WHERE DO YOU FIND YOU THOSE? ANSWER TO THESE QUESTIONS.
1451  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Satoshi is back ? on: October 14, 2015, 08:26:59 AM
Very good news if it will be true. Bitcoin will have always need for Satoshi. Then every other bitcoiner need to know more (in terms of written thoughts) and to have more from him. But I think that there are only words. The movements of old bitcoins doesn't mean that are from him. Maybe he has given the password of one of its wallets to another person like he has made with the source code repository and network alert key which he had given to Gavin Andersen.
1452  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Digital currencies to solve problems on: October 14, 2015, 08:13:52 AM
Hey guys, what type of problems do you think the use of digital currencies could help to solve?

Check the following article:
http://bravenewcoin.com/news/de-banking-is-spreading-commonwealth-investigates-using-digital-currencies-to-solve-problems/

According to article: "The discussion quickly focused on the use of digital currencies for remittances, a classic scenario that highlights bitcoin as a cost-effective alternative to current international money transfer channels." So the discussion were only for the remittances. This is to few according to my meaning about the role of a cryptocurruencies in the economy of a country. And this meaning is not mine originally. But even me had this idea within myself without knowing. I saw this thing written by one my friend here in this forum in one of my threads.

I think that the mission of the digital currencies is way more big. They can (if it will be possible and if it will be agreed by the scientists of the economics science) replace the national currency of every country. There are are to many question mark to be resolved before about this initiative and the Authority of the country which will execute this option will have to many things to decide and to resolve (because it will be an hard experiment) but I think that this option have a future. And if it will be executed it will be the best possible (or at least better than the actual) one for the economy of that country.
1453  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Silk Road Founder Ross Ulbricht Sentenced to Life in Prison on: October 14, 2015, 07:49:53 AM
Ross William Ulbricht, legendary creator of the original darknet market The Silk Road, has been sentenced today in federal prison to Life in Prison.

Ulbricht became a hero to many in the darknet community, as well as the broader Bitcoin and libertarian movements, after his arrest in November 2013 revealed him to be the ‘Dread Pirate Roberts’, the pseudonymous creator and operator of the Silk Road. His arrest came after a months long investigation by multiple law enforcement departments in the United States.

https://darknetmarkets.org/news/silk-road-founder-ross-ulbricht-sentenced/

It is time that this thread is created so this news is not more new. But I want to tell the mine. It is a wonderful news. One of the best decisions that court have declared since the time I have heard for the first time for bitcoin (about three years ago). This has removed in a big measure the bad name that bitcoins had when Silk Road flowered. Hope that him remain in prison all his life and that no one be able to repeat its story (even I have heard that were Silk Road 2 or even more but not with the same extension and importance of the first). Those kind of activities impedes the spread of bitcoin, its regulation and its legalization in every country in a fastest and without problems.

From the news during its arrest and judgement I have read that him has paid people to kill people when it was in risk its Silk Road. This is the emblematic sign which give an idea that where can go someone which have as the activity of its life the dirty things.
1454  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: The more you know... on: October 14, 2015, 07:33:09 AM
Firstly can you explain better what does it mean this sentence: "can absorb complete index of over 160 world's currencies (including IMF conversion notes), and do this four times."

Sorry but my knowledges don't allow me to understand the real meaning of this phrase and what mean (the importance of) this meaning for the bitcoin.

Then it will be better if you give the source of this news. This can give to much info about its importance. This list is an list made by you yourself, by an institution, it is a formal list published in some financial place or site, or is a list made from some organization which have to do with bitcoin? Or what? Then, even maybe everyone of us who are in this forum might not like this, this list doesn't mean that bitcoin is known or is used in all those countries. I bet in this. All the currencies are connected (changed) with each other and it is not hard to create a such lists and to publish those using the rates of the change between all those. I think that are other data those who can give an real and right idea about the importance and the power that bitcoin have in each of those countries.
1455  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Is Mark Karpeles in jail now? on: October 14, 2015, 07:16:23 AM
Is the fat boy still in jail - or did he bail out?

I think you can have news about this in the last row of this presentation in Wikipedia (named "Arrest and prosecution") : https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mark_Karpel%C3%A8s

Even more here: http://www.scmp.com/news/asia/east-asia/article/1857199/french-mtgox-ceo-japan-charged-embezzlement-amid-bitcoin-fraud

Maybe are the last. At least are the last (official) I have found.
1456  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Discussions about digital currencies in some countries. What future for bitcoin? on: October 14, 2015, 06:46:15 AM

If you ban Bitcoin, then Bitcoin will become forbidden fruit and people will want it even more in my opinion. This will just give a sign to the world that we are doing the right thing.


Not that I think a ban will ever happen, but who would want a form of money that can't be spent or accepted? Bitcoin isn't drugs. It's not fun or addictive or profitable regardless of legality. It serves a purpose. Banning it stifles that purpose and people will move on. They're not short of alternatives right now.  


I don't think Bitcoin will be banned as well, in any country. I was just speaking figuratively, what if...!!! If they would ban Bitcoin, they could have as well banned Internet 20 years ago!

In essence Bitcoin was 'banned' already before it became more well accepted and adopted by others.

Makes more sense for governments to introduce their own alternatives to undermine Bitcoin.



The ultra-advanced, superior technology of the digital currency Bitcoin and it's Blockchain public ledger system are in danger of being co-opted.

Taking a quote from your post, a true bitcoiner will be able to differentiate between a real crypto and something which is not, so I don't think in any way these cryptos (whatever they decide to name it) controlled by a central banks will ever become a threat. If centralization means anything, it has to be the first priority on why we chose to move away from fiat going to cryptocurrencies.

Yes but mainstream people who are not tech savvy can't tell the difference between bitcoin a government issued cryptocurrency.

Thanks for your intervention DeepMix and Ashour.

Can you comment more about what it will be the future of bitcoin if it will be banned from most or the majority of the countries because of introduction (if it will be so) of their national digital coin currency? Naturally if you want or have something to write .  Smiley  

This is the main aim of this thread. It is written even in its title.
1457  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Discussions about digital currencies in some countries. What future for bitcoin? on: October 14, 2015, 06:37:48 AM

If you ban Bitcoin, then Bitcoin will become forbidden fruit and people will want it even more in my opinion. This will just give a sign to the world that we are doing the right thing.


Not that I think a ban will ever happen, but who would want a form of money that can't be spent or accepted? Bitcoin isn't drugs. It's not fun or addictive or profitable regardless of legality. It serves a purpose. Banning it stifles that purpose and people will move on. They're not short of alternatives right now.  


Agreed. The real issue is trying to really fight the case for  Bitcoin being a serious alternative.




If you ban Bitcoin, then Bitcoin will become forbidden fruit and people will want it even more in my opinion. This will just give a sign to the world that we are doing the right thing.


Not that I think a ban will ever happen, but who would want a form of money that can't be spent or accepted? Bitcoin isn't drugs. It's not fun or addictive or profitable regardless of legality. It serves a purpose. Banning it stifles that purpose and people will move on. They're not short of alternatives right now.  


I don't think Bitcoin will be banned as well, in any country. I was just speaking figuratively, what if...!!! If they would ban Bitcoin, they could have as well banned Internet 20 years ago!


Well. For all you three I have a bad news. One of the countries about which is written in the main post has already banned bitcoin. This is Russia, which, without waiting for the creation of its bitruble has banned our coin. What are your comments about this news which is in opposite with your convictions?

For more not only Russia but even other 7 other countries has banned as well bitcoin. Those are: Bangladesh, Bolivia, Ecuador, Indonesia, Kyrgyzstan, Thailand and Vietnam. And its status is "restricted" in other three countries (on of them with the same importance as Russia). Those are China, Taiwan and Iceland. If every country will follow those (especially later and when they probably will or can have its national digital coin currency) what will happen with bitcoin? Give me your opinions.

There are signs that even China is prompted to regulate it. There is a thread in this section about this: For more: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1207161.0

For more about the legal status of bitcoin in some other countries (the countries where is allowed) everyone can read here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Legality_of_bitcoin_by_country

It is supposed that the other countries which are not in the list of above link ignore bitcoin. Are absolutely the majority of the world countries. Only other 31 country have and give data about it. In those country bitcoin is allowed and is regulated. This situation can give an idea in which points is the known (and the real "power") of bitcoin in all the world.
1458  Bitcoin / Bitcoin Discussion / Re: Discussions about digital currencies in some countries. What future for bitcoin? on: October 13, 2015, 05:10:36 PM
Are there coins (if created) a risk for bitcoin? Can compete bitcoin with these coins which will be supported by the most important Authorities of every country?

They'll be about as much of a threat as Mintchip was.  We already use digital currencies supported by the authorities of every country, it's called having a bank account.  Whatever they end up creating will have literally no perceivable benefit to anyone beyond what we've already got today.  No system with an unlimited monetary supply, central points of failure, and inherent shortcomings with fungibility and censorship (which is exactly what they'll come up with) will look like it's worth anything compared to Bitcoin.  All they can do is create a pale and crippled imitation.  There's no contest.

I completely agree with you. Let me add that banksters and governments are a bunch of greedy idiots. They will not stop. They will realize that their digital tokens give them much more possibility of control than paper money as we know it at the moment. When they realize this, they will go all in and they will make people complete slaves. If ever, people will realize at this moment that their governments are there only to rip the skin off of their backs.

MikeyB thank for your comments.

Before asking something to you I want to tell that I don't see the world such "black" as you.  Smiley Even I live in a country which is not to much developed. Our level of corruption here is very high and our politicians (according to me and with few exclusions) are probably the most irresponsible and corrupted people in the world. But I think again that there is good that our money are regulated by our Central Bank and the control of money exist, is managed and controlled by the Central Bank and with other Governmental Agencies. Otherwise all the "black" money will destroy everything here.

Anyhow, I wanted to know from you the answer of the main aim of this thread. What it would be the future of bitcoin if the countries of the main post (and other ones which might follow those in the future) will adopt as a national currency a digital based coin currency and will ban bitcoin to protect their new digital based coin money?

You need to ask Cyprus people is it good when you government takes care of your money. More than half of their money gone. Also you might ask Greek people (the hard working Greek people that have worked over 40 years and woke up one day with half of their savings gone or heavily controlled by their government and unavailable to access to them).

Now your second question. I don't think these governments will ever ban Bitcoin even if they develop their own centralized tokens. Why? This is not how it's done in the real world. If you ban Bitcoin, then Bitcoin will become forbidden fruit and people will want it even more in my opinion. This will just give a sign to the world that we are doing the right thing. What they will do in my opinion is that they will try and beat us with their centralized solutions. And they will have an advantage in my opinion until their whole debt system doesn't fall apart, which is inevitable!

I don't want to deviate the aim of this thread so I will be very short about this theme. But I cannot stay without writing something about it because it is an clear case of corruption and cheating that merit some words.

I don't know the Cyprus case but I know very well the Greek case. You are in big wrong about the crisis in Greece. The money of the Greeks are all money have from Europe and not money of the Greeks. They have live for the years you mention not with their hard work but with the credits taken from the Europe. They cheat (giving false financial data) to enter in Eurozone only to have the possibility to have credits without limits and without conditions. And so it was. They entered in Eurozone and had money without end as credits. Their level of life was increased with those money. No one person in Europe (maybe even in the world) have the retirement at 57 years like the Greeks. No one have 14 or 15 monthly salaries in one year. No one church in Europe have such privileges and money that have the orthodox church from the Greek state. I can continue with to many privileges that the Greeks benefited with the money of the others. The only resource of Greece is tourism and with tourism no one can have such life. And at the end this is a long story. It is not the first time that Greeks are in such situation. During their story are other stories like this. Read here for more:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/a-brief-history-of-financial-crises-in-greece-214114194.html

And the shameful problem they have is that they don't want to give back the money to the owners. For this has voted more than 60% of those. This is the maximum. Then accepted (after the referendum) a plan much more severe than the previous one for which has voted to not pay. Why? Because were in wrong and no one forgive its money. Europe want its money given to them.

I can find other sources more detailed about the Greeks crisis and their habits but as I told in the beginning this thread has another aim. So I will not answer more about this problem here. You can learn more if you have the patience to do a search in my posts. Or create another thread yourself about this topic.

1459  Economy / Economics / Re: Why Satoshi Nakamoto WON'T win a Nobel Prize on: October 13, 2015, 04:13:28 PM
There is no Nobel Prize in economics, just a prize founded by the Swedish central bank who successfully piggybanked on Nobel's name.

It is true but is true even the fact that is treated and awarded in the same way like the other Nobel prizes. From the Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Nobel_Memorial_Prize_in_Economic_Sciences

"The Nobel Memorial Prize in Economic Sciences (officially Swedish: Sveriges riksbanks pris i ekonomisk vetenskap till Alfred Nobels minne, or the Sveriges Riksbank Prize in Economic Sciences in Memory of Alfred Nobel), commonly referred to as the Nobel Prize in Economics, and as a "category of the Nobel Prize" by the Nobel Foundation itself, which owns the name Nobel Prize, is an award for outstanding contributions to the field of economics, and generally regarded as the most prestigious award for that field. It is not one of the prizes that Alfred Nobel established in his will in 1895, but instead was established 73 years later by a donation to the foundation from Sweden's central bank, the Sveriges Riksbank, on the bank's 300th anniversary. Winners are announced with the Nobel Prize winners, and receive the award at the same ceremony."
1460  Economy / Services / Re: [BIT-X.com] Earn Bitcoins by Posting | Signature Campaign on: October 13, 2015, 04:03:00 PM
Bot is down. At least since about 15 minutes.
Pages: « 1 ... 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 58 59 60 61 62 63 64 65 66 67 68 69 70 71 72 [73] 74 75 76 77 78 79 80 81 82 83 84 85 86 87 88 89 90 91 92 93 94 95 96 97 98 99 100 101 102 103 104 105 106 107 108 109 110 111 112 113 114 115 116 117 118 119 120 121 122 123 ... 178 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!