We might all have to buy a bit here  Greets Hank I like your attitude Hank. Viva la Via! |
|
|
|
0.2BTC
anonymousminer with the current high bid quoted above! |
|
|
|
|
Did you miss my bid for the Berkeley Coin?
Good to see you back slinging coins again KY, it has been a while.
|
|
|
|
|
Lot 13: 0.002 btc
Lot 15: 0.001 btc
|
|
|
|
If someone steals your bank account information or credit card you can actually retrieve your money back!!! crypto is complete shit."
Not if it is your government that stole (seized) your monies.... |
|
|
|
|
Beautiful coins as always fattcatt! Best of luck with your sale.
|
|
|
|
|
That was quick!
Congratulation both!
|
|
|
|
Hello Everyone!Up for Auction I have the 1 x 2013 Lealana 10 Litecoin, 999 Fine Silver, Black First Bits, original funding of 10 LTC. Also included is the snazzy blue leatherette case and COA. All shown in photos below. Verify funding: https://chainz.cryptoid.info/ltc/address.dws?Lh2LzwtuihfCTJeYqqec9ki4UEVTGotf3Q.htmPhotos below (click for more bigger)    Auction Terms:Bid Format: Bids only in BTC however LTC and XMR always welcome. Starting Bid: 0 BTC Bid Incremeents: 0.001 BTC Auction Ends: Thursday, 17 January 2019 @ 1900 New York Sniping: No, each bid in the final 15 minutes adds 15 minutes until no bid has been made for 15 minutes Excluded from Bidding: I may exclude/disqualify bidders, or require a deposit, for any bidders at my sole discretion. If you are a brand new account, or have issues in your trust feedback, please PM prior to bidding. Forum downtime: If the forum goes offline in the final 4 hours of the auction I may extend the auction at my discretion Shipping: At cost in addition to the winning bid. Ships from USA. Buyer responsible for any local customs/duties. BTC payments only to this address: 3K1X1iFWRooP7uxw7tR57ANrAXnVRfjBao LTC payment only to this address: LM6P7TNhjkf7jYZX8QPaUYEZh4bWssqbguXMR address available upon requestLet me know if you have any questions.
|
|
|
|
I suggest a give away!  |
|
|
|
|
OP updated to reflect the sale of the 2011 v1 Casascius. Congratulations to the new owner!
|
|
|
|
10BTC silver/gilt Casascius coin hands down.
this, does any other physical coin command such a high premium over funded value? I agree, though I prefer the all silvers but I am in a very small minority on that opinion. Casascius 10 btc #1 |
|
|
|
Now that the auction is over, I have a noobish question... This is the ~3rd or so "VIA" auction I've seen. What's up with that? Outside of these forums, hardly anyone I know trades or discusses VIA. Plus its a coin with ~$120,000 traded daily (which is nothing)  . So yea, just confused over the obsession. I can only speak for myself, but I began using Viacoin for transactions here in collectibles during the log jam in the mempool back when the bitcoin blockchain was being spammed. This was around the !bcash! fork. Transaction fees on bitcoin network were getting quite high, making smaller trades not feasible with btc due to the fees. A group of us just started using Viacoin for the fast confirms and low fees and it worked well. Viacoin has a solid team behind it and it solved a need for low fee quick transactions. Viva la Via! |
|
|
|
|
Cool Idea billgator!
Best of luck!
|
|
|
|
Can anyone explain please:
- Why do we have DT2?
- Why are we encouraged to set trust depth: 2 ?
- Why is maximum trust depth 4? DT2 is just part of the entire trust system, it's the default choice, and if you don't like it you can choose anywhere from DT1 to DT4. I've tried DT4 before, and it was slow already. The amount of data increases exponentially with depth, I haven't tested how long it takes to load now. DT5 and deeper would become very large. If you don't trust someone's judgement, you shouldn't include him in your trust list.
I don't think technically it's correct. Let me give you a hypothetical example. I can trust Loyce: - with data analysis - with money. I may not trust Loyce: - views he has about religion. So overall what should be my stand for Loyce? When I said "someone's judgement", I meant on judging others. If I tag users based on their religion, you should probably not trust my judgement (and thus not add me to your trust list). If you trust me with money, you can say so in my trust feedback, but it's still not a reason to add me to your trust list. If, however, you trust my ability to judge others, and agree with the majority of feedback I left, you could add me to your trust list. (and until recently I didn't know this also includes my ability to add users to my own trust list, so I'm still experimenting with the right users there) DT2 is a derivative of DT1, if you don't like it, you can change your Trust depth to 1 instead of the default 2. Or exclude specific users. My interpretation of trust depth system is trust dept 1 and seems it's working although default trust with dept 2 is conflicting my rating. It's a mess now, I add one person and due to their trust list, it changes how I see trust ratings. Let's just see how this works out over time, as more and more users create and adjust their own trust list. Correct me if I am wrong here fellas, but if everyone creates their own custom trust lists Default Trust will have little to no meaning....
You can (and probably should) keep DefaultTrust on your own trust list, so you have the full force of DT1 and DT2 to add to your own trust ratings. Interesting. I have ~DefaultTrust and just use my list of inclusions and exclusions. |
|
|
|
If any Times readers are shipping to US already...I'd be interested 2 or 3.  . Thanks. Hi greenplastic! I have an extra copy headed to US I can forward along to you. Hello,friend I also want the newspapaer for the celebrate the 10th birthday for Bitcoin.May i have a chance to get two or three newspapaers together with you  Thanks a lot. Best, jack I got you, Jack. Ordered a few extras so if anyone else needs one feel free to let me know nice job, Frank! jackpotato is good people. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
