There is a problem with the pool and not sure why slush is not here to correct any issues.
What makes you say that? (Besides the chance that you may be Lucko's alter ego ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) ) Well from 8th of May my daily reward dropped from 0.101 to 0.052 and no I'm not anyones alter ego. Luck has been pretty bad recently like 3-4 days in a row. Last 1/2 day was good crossing fingers it continues (already on 14th block). Isn't it obvious what is happening? Our share of the Pie is shrinking: http://blockchain.info/poolsAs the other pools increase in Hashing power, our Luck will get worse. Blocks will take longer to find. I suspect that the other pools are attracting more ASIC miners that ours. The way i see it, the only way to improve our returns is to increase our mining power. oh, btw, does anyone know why are hash rate varies from about 9.6 Ths to 10. almost daily? People mining here only part of the day?
|
|
|
so we can't consolidate a bunch of dust from free sites? What would it take to do that?
|
|
|
Hi why is this block showing as invalid? I have not received any reward from this block... ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) 18050 2013-05-16 00:59:30 0:25:24 3347302 8696 0.07037942 236382 25.49110000 invalid Invalid blocks appear because finding blocks is kind of a race and someone else found and registered this block, probably seconds, before we did. It is an orphan block.
|
|
|
I don't think that the pool found a new block, but rather that the new block showed up on the chain so the hashing has to start on new data for the next block.
|
|
|
heh, I call my mining a Hobby. Hobbies are notorious money pits. No profit expectations. heh.
|
|
|
Say I'm a greedy bastid with multiple miners. I want to connect them all to my own private pool so they work together and not against each other. Is there open source pool software available to do this? Not P2Pool.
|
|
|
If nothing else, it was probably off topic.
|
|
|
This is getting crazy. If you don't trust this pool's stability, go try another. Sooner or later Slush will show up and look into things. Right now all you guys are doing is feeding each other's uncertainty and discomfort. There is nothing anyone can do except Slush. If he needs input from the users, i'm sure that he'll ask us for it. Constantly posting about this server, or that server, or this calculation, or that, isn't going to accomplish anything until we here from Slush.
Yeah, we'd all like to help and figure out what is going on, but none of us can see the whole picture. We can't look behind the curtains and see what is going on.
I'm only a little miner, about 130MHs, but i've been getting exactly what i expect from each block we find.
|
|
|
Also, my namecoin is staying as 0. I entered a wallet address but nothing is happening.
Namecoin rewards are very infrequent here. expect days apart.
|
|
|
I use Slush's Pool. One of the things it reports is how many blocks you have found. I've found none. I'm running about 100 Mhs. If i wasn't in a pool, i wouldn't have nuttin', and probably wouldn't live long enough to get anything. I'm old. So yeah, with a pool i at least got something other than just Electric bills.
|
|
|
Where is this Bitcoin on Facebook of which you speak? ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif)
|
|
|
Trongersoll: I've done some research about the network propagation map on blockchain.info. As far as I can tell it simply shows the first node in the network which confirms the new block. It has nothing to do with the mining pool or the miner who found the block then. (Sorry but for some reason I cannot quote anything from this thread. It works in others but not here.)
Oh, guess i was off on that. Now i know something that i didn't before. thanks.
|
|
|
... heh, we are talking bitcoin GPU mining. If a good video card can give 600+Mhs ( like a 7850), then a small rig churning 10Mhs isn't all that impressive. I'm not sure what you consider "low megahashes". everything is relative.
Wow - that's overclocked ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Apparently you can get ~370MH/s out of a 7850 but I'd wonder how long it would last ... my bad, that's a 100Mhs card, i got confused. I haven't had the chance to memorize the entire Hardware comparison chart yet. i occasionally get things mixed up.
|
|
|
<cut off> well, the intensity was set a -1 on the little machine that i am playing with. moving it to 5 raised the hash rate from 6Mhash to 10Mhash. moving it to 6 looked like it caused the rate to drop a little, so 5 it is.
10 Mhash/s? how do you get the Mhash ? ty Did i mislabel? isn't Mhs, Mega Hashes? I've only been into this for about 2 weeks so it would be easy for me to mispeak. eee, stop and reload.. you are talking litecoin? you are talking GPU mining? may i ask how a tiny rig gives you Mega Hash/s? the top listed here is 7970(x2) in low megashas/s... // i'm obviously missing something obvious. sorry about it. heh, we are talking bitcoin GPU mining. If a good video card can give 600+Mhs ( like a 7850), then a small rig churning 10Mhs isn't all that impressive. I'm not sure what you consider "low megahashes". everything is relative.
|
|
|
I've been mining on Slush for a couple of days and I like what I'm seeing.
Despite reading about the scorebase system thoroughly, I still have some questions.
Even though I mine 24/7, I'm mining on my gaming rig. Therefore I have to adjust the aggression level all the time to get the most out of my GPUs and the only way to do that is to make a quick disconnect, change the agg lvl and reconnect immediately.
It takes about 3 seconds. From what I read, uptime is important in Slush's pool. What I'm wondering is, does this rapid dc/rc affect my score? Or should I just keep my aggression level midrange so I can keep my uptime as long as possible but at the same time, losing some hashrates.
I'm currently choosing between Slush and 50BTC. I'm leaning towards Slush but I'm not sure if PPS is a better way for me.
Mining at 300MH/s
I don't think that your short disconnect will affect your results. I'm pretty sure how often results are sent back is what is being tracked, not the actual time your miner is running. But, i could be wrong. I'm no expert.
|
|
|
But blocks listed as relayed by a server in Germany means that's where the pool server or single miner is located, not where the miner pool member who found the block is located? Or am I wrong?
EDIT: I mean, if the miner in Germany is not a pool member it wouldn't affect our rewards.
now i'm confused. When you look at the Statistics page and click on the block number, don't you see where the member of the pool is located? ie: http://blockchain.info/block/000000000000009b2d787db18f0b7967e4944d0b6796835c1e6e2f51b3e99e76?site=slush
|
|
|
i would guess $75 - $100. more than that and they have no business being in business. Their development costs need to be figured in as well as production costs. hmmm $75 might even be high, maybe more like $50-$60.
|
|
|
hmmm... I was just looking at my results for the last 12 hours and decided to come and see if people were yelling about problems. And, as i suspected, they are. Yesterday, i was looking at blocks and the maps where they were found. I noticed a number of them were found in a certain section of germany. It kind of implied that the same person was finding a disproportionate number of blocks. I asked my self how this could be and decided that it is either a large mining complex, or an ASIC miner. I'm leaning towards ASIC at the moment. I'm not pointing fingers or making accusations, just observing and taking a WAG at it.
As ASIC are bursting on to the scene, we are going to see that we nonASIC users are getting smaller shares. or no shares of some blocks. This will continue until the difficulty adjusts for the speed of the ASICs. Once the difficulty is adjusted it will be obvious why we are getting little. But, in the mean time i suspect what we see will appear to resemble anomalies.
|
|
|
<cut off> well, the intensity was set a -1 on the little machine that i am playing with. moving it to 5 raised the hash rate from 6Mhash to 10Mhash. moving it to 6 looked like it caused the rate to drop a little, so 5 it is.
10 Mhash/s? how do you get the Mhash ? ty Did i mislabel? isn't Mhs, Mega Hashes? I've only been into this for about 2 weeks so it would be easy for me to mispeak.
|
|
|
|