Bitcoin Forum
June 25, 2024, 08:31:45 AM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 ... 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 [732] 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 »
14621  Economy / Lending / Re: Alexunited's BTC Loans on: November 16, 2014, 01:10:39 AM
-snip-
Collateral will be required, And if your not happy giving me the collateral directly then I am more than happy to use an Escrow.
-snip-
When dealing with new users all collateral should always be held by a trusted third party.
14622  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: WILL BUY BTT ACCOUNT (Member of Full member) on: November 16, 2014, 12:25:59 AM
I just sent you a PM.
14623  Other / Meta / Re: TheButterZone Removed From Default Trust on: November 15, 2014, 10:16:27 PM
Butterzone, I think where we agree is that not all critical posts in the marketplace or other areas where people are engaged in professional activities here are accurate or warranted. People who engage in such activity should not be free to do so without repercussion. Being critical of a user for engaging in actual fraudulent or dishonest activity is one thing, and users are free to bring light to anyone engaged in these acts pretty much on the entire forum. For the rest of the dedicated users operating here professionally and obeying posting guidelines, allowing this kind of activity or furthermore punishing users for acting against it is a slap in the face. Letting some one control their own marketplace thread does not some how silence critics because they have the ENTIRE FORUM to be critical of users. Not letting some one take a crap all over your storefront is not equivalent to silencing free speech.
Unless you own the property that someone is making speaking on, then you do not have any right to "punish" them for what they say. You do not own the thread in which you are selling your goods, and therefore you do not have any right to punish anyone who says anything in your thread (provided they are not attempting to scam).

It is a valid question to ask why you are charging a certain price when others are charging a lower price. If you feel your price is appropriate then you should respond to then why they are appropriate and any potential customer can see both of your arguments in a transparent way.
14624  Other / Meta / Re: Major Flaw in Security on: November 15, 2014, 08:08:19 PM
All the hacker has to do is guess the right PW or answer security question correctly and it's game over.

The chances of that are very low

Only if its coupled with email verification though
Just to put it into perspective as to how easy it is to guess someone's password:

There are 26 potential english letters and 10 potential numbers that can be used in your password (we can ignore all the special characters that someone could potentially use as well as capital letters).

If an attacker knew that a specific account's password was exactly 6 digits (I don't even think the forum allows for passwords to be this short) then the number of potential passwords would be 36^6 or written in base 10 scientific form 2176782336 ~2.17 * 10^9 or 2,176,782,336 or ~2.1 billion possibilities. Considering that an attacker can only attempt to "guess" a password once every 45 seconds, it would take 816,293,376 hours (34,012,224 days) to guess a password if the attacker has 100% luck (the attacker correctly guessed the correct password exactly half way though all the potential passwords).

tl;dr it is not realistically possible to guess someone's password without some kind of social engineering and/or exploiting some kind of weakness of the person who owns the account (the owner somehow being at fault).
14625  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: [WTB] forum accounts VIP/Donator only on: November 15, 2014, 06:13:19 PM
Thanks for the info. It's probably a good idea to take advantage of the market and low prices right now as I'm sure it's only a matter of time before more campaigns start popping up. I know of two or three potential ones that are looking at starting or re-starting but they could fall through.
I know that PD is one of them. What are the other two?

Do you have any idea as to what the rates will be like?
14626  Other / Meta / Re: Possible BitcoinTalk Forum Spoof? on: November 15, 2014, 04:24:09 PM
what are the extra features?

Reload and look the pic again. Roll Eyes

   ~~MZ~~
All I see is some weird toolbar at the bottom.
14627  Other / Meta / Re: Possible BitcoinTalk Forum Spoof? on: November 15, 2014, 04:21:45 PM

Indeed, it is! Smiley Bitcointalk with some extra features. Cheesy



   ~~MZ~~
what are the extra features?
14628  Other / Meta / Re: Why was I banned for ten days for posting articles in politics and society? on: November 15, 2014, 04:19:55 PM
Has squall indicated that he would be willing to accept a smaller amount in order to settle his debts?
There really is no point. Dank has made it more than clear he doesn't intend to pay anymore back. Spending money on drugs is more important to him.
There is no point dank still being a member of this forum.
If I had to repay $10,000 from a $800 loan then I would most likely not attempt to repay, and I think most people are the same way. This is especially true considering that dank probably sold the bitcoin he borrowed and did not plan on earning in terms of bitcoin but in terms of fiat.

Yes the 52 BTC that was lent would be worth a lot more then $10,000 now but asking for that much back is simply not realistic. I think he would make an attempt to pay him back if squall were to make a reasonable settlement offer.
14629  Other / Meta / Re: Possible BitcoinTalk Forum Spoof? on: November 15, 2014, 04:14:24 PM
I wouldn't click on the link as it appears to be a malicious site according to

https://www.virustotal.com/en/url/b1d0e2ab7dbdfb1d9bc166df3419578dd597182d450769f1ffab49e26495f389/analysis/1416066890/
14630  Economy / Invites & Accounts / Re: [WTB] forum accounts VIP/Donator only on: November 15, 2014, 04:09:21 PM
Out of interest, have you sold many accounts recently? If so, what are roughly the accounts going for? I guess with the lack of campaigns they must've lost quite a bit of value.
Account sales have been very slow recently. I have sold maybe between 10 and 20 over the last two weeks but only to a few repeat customers and at large discounts that I would not normally give; I only gave the discounts because they were buying accounts at once.

Recent prices:
  • Potential member account but needing ~10 posts to get member status - .03 - .04 range
  • Actual member accounts - .07 - .08 range
  • Full member accounts - .12 - .13 range
  • Haven't been able to sell any senior or hero accounts recently :/

I also sold them that low because most of my inventory is unproductive right now and posting is so slow that it is difficult to make non-spam posts with my lower level accounts so they can have enough posts to even potentially participate in a signature campaign.

I do believe that we will see higher paying signature campaigns in the future and account values will rebound. I have spent ~2.5 buying up senior and full member accounts at prices that would be considered a steal 5 months ago. The current environment is probably actually good for me because sellers will abandon their accounts by either forgetting their password(s), simply not checking back here to see that prices have increased so supply will hopefully decrease or increase less then it otherwise would. Also a lot of farmers are getting banned for spamming and BadBear seems to be getting better at weeding out spammers who spam across multiple accounts.
14631  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 07:20:16 AM
I guess that 60 seconds might be a little high, but I think that 10 seconds is probably low as well. My calculation does leave out the "cost" of shit that the staff/mods take, especially the very efficient ones (just looks at how many threads that mprep has about him). Also buying a donator account would guarantee that you have access to donator forums, while reporting lots of posts would only increase the chances of becoming staff.

I would say that the "cost" of reporting enough posts to become staff would eventually decline to zero if you stay staff long enough as you would get a portion of 25% of ad revenue plus the ability to participate in PD

If you're a person that takes stuff to heart and has a thin skin then being a mod here really isn't for them, but the btc would be worth putting up with occasional shit for me anyway (plus it usually only comes from scolded crybabies which I have zero respect for).
True, however I would think it would get somewhat annoying after a while. Although the forum seems to have a policy of responding with satire when invalid/crazy claims are made.
Becoming staff guarantees you access to the donator forum as well (unless that's changed in the future), but being a donator doesn't get you access to the staff forum.
I don't see how the donator forum would be able to be moderated if the staff does not have access. I don't think the donator forum is active enough to warrant a dedicated moderator and the global mods are probably too busy to keep an eye on the donator forum without help.
I recently had the opportunity to buy a donator account for <.5 BTC but couldn't because I didn't accept the sellers offer before he sold the account to someone else, so it may be cheaper to buy a donator account, but then again earning a staff account would result in some level of income from their work.

Are you sure it was a legit sale? And you would earn that btc back in a few months if you're very active.
Not 100% sure, however I did check all the VIP and donator accounts and did find several that had their passwords changed during the subject time frame, including two that matched the description of what the seller was offering, so I would say there was a good chance the account was actually sold.
14632  Other / Meta / Re: Why was I banned? on: November 15, 2014, 06:53:29 AM
Only if someone posts a request with the reasons publicly in the admin forum which is what usually happens, but regular mods can't see banned on their profile or anything.
It might as well be there as someone could easily check the modlog and search their "U#" and could find out they are banned.
14633  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 06:28:28 AM
91% is perfectly fine and you don't need to report as many posts as I did as I'm probably an extreme case. Most of the other mods only seem to have had a few hundred reports before they got asked. I also think your calculations are way off as well. Reporting a post takes probably less than ten seconds. If you spend a decent amount of time at this site (which you seem to do) then it's pretty easy to just report posts as you come across them via your normal active browsing and you don't exactly have to 'hunt' them out.
I guess that 60 seconds might be a little high, but I think that 10 seconds is probably low as well. My calculation does leave out the "cost" of shit that the staff/mods take, especially the very efficient ones (just looks at how many threads that mprep has about him). Also buying a donator account would guarantee that you have access to donator forums, while reporting lots of posts would only increase the chances of becoming staff.

I would say that the "cost" of reporting enough posts to become staff would eventually decline to zero if you stay staff long enough as you would get a portion of 25% of ad revenue plus the ability to participate in PD
14634  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 06:06:44 AM
Told you it would probably be easier that way than just trying to buy a donator account  Cheesy.
IIRC you had ~1500 reported posts with a 97% accuracy rate when you were promoted verses the ~190 posts with a 91% accuracy rate (although a good number of my "bad" reports was the result of someone else's misunderstanding of when certain posts should be deleted). Assuming that a staff position is guaranteed after 1500 reports (it is not) and that it takes 60 seconds to find and make a report then it would take ~1200 minutes, or ~20 hours. Assuming my time is worth ~$20 per hour then this would "cost" ~$400 or ~1 BTC.

I recently had the opportunity to buy a donator account for <.5 BTC but couldn't because I didn't accept the sellers offer before he sold the account to someone else, so it may be cheaper to buy a donator account, but then again earning a staff account would result in some level of income from their work.
14635  Other / Meta / Re: Why was I banned? on: November 15, 2014, 05:57:10 AM
Could a moderator please review my account and hopefully unban me? If a mod replies, I will send them my account profile. Thanks!

Post your name here. People can make their own minds up whether you were spamming or not. Was it Iamyourdad by any chance?
If this was the case then he has a good number of two sentence posts (hence his claim of having more "useful" posts then he did before) on the first page of his post history; although there are also a good number of less then one sentence posts as well.
14636  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 05:51:43 AM
Global moderators can change their own name and title.
Staff (moderators, patrollers) can change their own name, but not title.
So there are ways to change your name without shelling out 50 BTC (plus staff apparently has access to the donator section as well). Maybe I should try to step up my reporting "game" a little bit
14637  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 05:14:13 AM

(I did notice that you added a custom title)

I'm new and improved.
Can only administrators create a custom title or can lower level mods/staff do so as well? (I know that VIPs also have this ability)
14638  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 05:10:21 AM
I'm just waiting to see how many more posts we get before people notice I changed it. Tongue

I don't typically do it but it's the same name, just capitalization that changed, no biggie.
I guess another way to change your username is to become an administrator.

(I did notice that you added a custom title)

EDIT: According to this thread your username was capitalized the same back in August. 
14639  Other / Meta / Re: Change of username on: November 15, 2014, 04:30:15 AM
afaik donator status allows you to change your username?
but i dont know how much you'll have to pay for it these days - used to be 50btc
Donator status does not allow you to change your username, and the price to become a donator is 10 BTC.

If you were to donate 50 BTC to the forum then you would become a VIP and could change his username.

If the username is already taken then even a VIP account would not be able to help the OP
14640  Other / Meta / Re: Why was I banned for ten days for posting articles in politics and society? on: November 15, 2014, 04:27:05 AM
Dank, did you know someone made a tool to track how much you've paid back? lol

http://65.26.252.225/hdpsby/
The amount that dank owes to squall is so great because squall made a bitcoin loan to Dank when the price was very low, and the price eventually skyrocketed. The fiat value of the bitcoin that dank borrowed from squall at the time the bitcoin was originally sent to him was ~$800.

Has squall indicated that he would be willing to accept a smaller amount in order to settle his debts?
Pages: « 1 ... 682 683 684 685 686 687 688 689 690 691 692 693 694 695 696 697 698 699 700 701 702 703 704 705 706 707 708 709 710 711 712 713 714 715 716 717 718 719 720 721 722 723 724 725 726 727 728 729 730 731 [732] 733 734 735 736 737 738 739 740 741 742 743 744 745 746 747 748 749 750 751 752 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!