Hallo BitCharlie,
ja ich hatte ein Electrum - Wallet insatalliert. offenbar habe ich keine Sicherung gemacht, weil ich auf keinem meiner Datenträger eine gefunden habe . Es ist schon ziemlch lange her, dass ich das eingerichtet habe.
Mal 12 Wörter (auch als "Seed" bekannt) in diesem Zusammenhang aufgeschrieben? Windows? Dann: #1 Windows Taste + R drücken, "ausführen" öffnet sich #2 dort %APPDATA%\Electrum eingeben und mit OK bestätigen, es sollte sich ein Ordner öffnen. #3 Im unterordner "wallets" nachschauen ob die Wallet Datei dort zu finden ist #4 ggf. auf einem anderen Rechner öfnen #5 ggf. Kaspersky eine sehr böse Mail schicken |
|
|
|
I created a wallet and gave it a password. Now when I click on Electrum on my Mac it allows me to open the wallet without entering a password. What if someone just walks over to my computer and does the same? Is there a way I can password protect the wallet from being opened?
No, not with build in methods. Put the wallet file in an encrypted container. Honestly though, lock your screen, set a user password. If someone can just walk by your computer and see your bitcoin balance, they can also install software, maybe even with enough rights to read your password and send it to their mail the next time you enter it. |
|
|
|
-snip-
i beg to disagree in this part of your statement. supporting ponzi is not scamming.. because some user here gamble in ponzi and if they experience some payment on that ponzi maybe they may have a good feedback on that ponzi site.
Thus supporting someone else to possibly get scammed. everyone knows that all ponzi is scam.. but you can profit on them in right strategy in investing.
No, not everyone. Some still believe its some form of gambling or investement. That has anything to do with luck or strategy. They completly ignore that its gambling where a single person can decide when the game is over and who is accepted to participate in which order. A ponzi operator has no way to proof that they dont play as 3rd when they know (e.g. because of already incoming TX) that a 4th and 5th is coming and they will "win". i will agree that supporting ponzi is scam if you are a co-owner and you really promoting others to invest on it. but for giving positive feedback base on your payout experience is another story.. i see on marketplace on investment section that all user that gave positive feedback on ponzi received a red trust by cryptodevil even if they not recruiting others to invest. by the way i hate ponzi ..  |
|
|
|
-snip-
So by what I read I came to understanding that you are saying - Not enforcing rules JUST because people can get around it is the same as not having them at all? Well then, why have any rules at all, about anything, right?
Hence my brace yourself. Lets talk about this specific rule and dont derive nonsense from it. Laws against rape do not prevent it. That does not mean rape should not be outlawed. Not having a rule how to eat breakfast does not equal absence of any rules. And yes, it most definitely CAN be enforced. I'm sure there would be still people who will be selling their accounts, of course that's for sure. I didn't say people will just stop selling their accounts altogether. But if there were rules against it they will have to put the risk in mind before doing so, thus not everyone would be doing it.
There are risks invovled right now. (Cause your braced yourself) Have you seen The Purge? When no rules, everyones doing killing, when rules, theres still killing, but not as much. You get the point
No I dont, its a movie and a bad one. Its a bad plot to justify some violence and mild distress. And by the way, tell me a reason why would one buy an account?
An account has value due to the way ranks and acitivty works. Thus it can be used as security for a loan. The lender will have no use for the account, but essentially bought one. Another reason are signature campaigns or simply the benefits that come with higher ranks. Its a shortcut for those unwilling to wait, but willing to pay. There was a nice argument by one of the global mods that signature campaigns in combination with account trades make it more difficult for scammers to ROI on a bought account. As signature campaigns raise account prices, scammers would need to scam more in order to ROI. If you trust a hero member (one you never encountered before) more than a newbie account your perception of things is wrong. This does not change whether sales are allowed or not. What changes when its public knowledge that account sales are allowed but discouraged is that its easier for newbies to understand this. You assume that somehow high ranked accounts would gain legitimacy when sales would be against the rules. This is not true, it would only appear that way, which is more dangerous than the current solution.
I dont think that there is too kuch freedom in bitcointalk forum I think that there is too small freedom here so I would suggest more freedom for everybody like allow referral links.
They used to be allowed, then people started to spam the links.
-snip-
I agree there should be limit of one account per ip.That will make it difficult for people to have multiple account to some extent.Although I dont think that will bring down scams as most scammers know ways to get around the system
You are funny. Most mobile phone users share an IP address with 1000s of other users. Every larger household would be limited to a single account(?). Whats with those that have changing IP addresses (probably the majority of users here), do they create a new account per IP and have to give up the old one? |
|
|
|
|
Mixers have their place and serve their purpose, but bitcoin was never designed to be anonymous. You can put your money to services that do not require your information or only minimal. When you buy milk in the store, do they ask for your address? Would you buy milk at a store that does? So why is it ok to give out your address when buying digital goods?
|
|
|
|
Thanks man. I honestly got scared when it said that my Etherium wallet used a word combination seed.
What is the strength of the seed rated ad? Is it possible to hack the word key?
The seed is 128 bit, so its perfectly fine. Not sure what you mean with hack here, but a brute force attack is not possible no. A bruteforce attack is possible on the seed. You would have to write a script that downloads a list of words from a dictionary, and tries every combination. It would also check to see if it leads to a wallet with funds. Would be very very hard, and very unlikely that there would be a match. I believe there is 12 (16?) words needed in the seed, and over 10k words that could be used for the seed. Let me rephrase that: Yes a brute force attack is possible, but not feasible. Using any dictionary wouldnt make any sense, the dictionary used by electrum is known[1]. With 2048 possible words and 12 selected from that list there are 2048 12 possible seeds, which is actually more than 128 bit (log_2(2048^12) = 132) [1] https://github.com/spesmilo/electrum/blob/master/lib/wordlist/english.txt |
|
|
|
I am new to Blockchain! Can someone guide me to the correct tutorial/or give pointers to get started with hands on experience on blockchain?
What color should your blockchain have? More serious: be more specific. |
|
|
|
Bitcoin is about freedom but that is separate from having an account here that deals with bitcoin.
You have to decipher the difference of the two or you will be looking at some trouble here in the near future.
You would also need to get your priorities straight or you will be having a rough time here.
Just a fair warning to you.
Thanks for the warning, my life is so much better now. I know bitcoin is all about freedom and stuff, but what that has to do with how the forum and its security system work? It was just a thought how fraudulent exchanges would drop to less if you couldn't just walk in and buy an account. Its an exchanging forum for gods sake. You shouldn't be sharing your account even with your mom, let alone sell it. You decide who to trade with based and their profile, and the fact that accounts are openly sold and bought on the forum itself, it just defeats the purpose of account trust and activity. Just my thought. I personally appreciate the mature approach. Making it against the rules will not change that accounts are sold, if you believe that you have a problem. Do you think all facebook accounts are legit and never traded just because its against their ToS? Does everyone there use their real name as they agreed to they would? No, its the internet. Some rules can not be enforced, so why bother creating them in the first place? If you think this is a trading place first and a forum second you are wrong again. Trading is a part of this forum, but its not its main focus. The fact that these things are done openly make it harder for someone to fall for an account. Verify who you are dealing with or make it irrelevant. brace yourself rape (or violent crime) comparisons are coming. |
|
|
|
Maybe its not the correct seed. How much do you two remember about the password? If you can narrow it down to a few billion possible passwords I could try them with a script. If you are tech savvy and have a somewhat powerfull CPU you can do it yourself[1]. [1] https://github.com/gurnec/btcrecover |
|
|
|
Bisher habe ich Bitcoin nicht benutzt. Ich schicke Geld regelmäßig an Verwandte in USA/Mexico mit Western Union. Lässt sich Bitcoin dafür verwenden?
Ja. Da es ja fast keine Gebühren gibt, klingt es erstmal gut. Aber mir ist nicht ganz klar wie schnell der Verkauf der BC geht bzw. wie lange es dauert bis die BC wieder als Dollar/Pesos auf dem Konto sind.
Der Transfer kostet fast keine Gebühren. An-/Verkäufer von Bitcoin wollen in der Regel Gebühren. Du kannst mit BTC überhaupt niemandem Dollar oder Pesos aufs Konto schicken, Du kannst lediglich jemandem Bitcoin schicken. Die Person kann diese dann wieder verkaufen und dafür Dollar oder Pesos erhalten. Für EUR/BTC kannst Du dir ja mal die Preise auf bitcoin.de oder Kraken ansehen. Bei Pesos weiß ich gerade keinen lokalen Markt (außer localbitcoins), für Dollar sind Bitstamp und BTC-e die großen Börsen. Ich vermute mal wenn es schnell gehen soll machen es die Gebühren der Börsen unrentabel. Wenn Zeit keine Rollen spielt kann man vermutlich noch ein bisschen Gewinn machen. |
|
|
|
Thanks man. I honestly got scared when it said that my Etherium wallet used a word combination seed.
What is the strength of the seed rated ad? Is it possible to hack the word key?
The seed is 128 bit, so its perfectly fine. Not sure what you mean with hack here, but a brute force attack is not possible no. |
|
|
|
-snip-
With the exception of brainwallets, generating a random address and checking the totalReceived or balance the odds are not favorable, at all.
So why do I do it? For fun, duh. And I am a persistent fuck, lol.
Just out of curiosity, is that still the java I hacked together for you? |
|
|
|
Okay, I am curious... how much would it cost for ' 1LexiBits'? I am sure quite a 'bit', but a customized address sounds really cool! I could settle for: 1lexibits (if that even differs in cost from the above), 1Lexiatel
1lexiatel
1LexiHope it doesn't take too much time to check... I am very interested, if I get a decent quote 1LexiBits (exact case): 0.2321 btc 1LexiBits (any case): 0.0076 btc 1lexibits (exact case): not possible due to the 'l', if I replace it with a 'L' its the same as the 1st 1LexiateL (exact case): 0.2321 btc 1LexiateL (any case): 0.0076 btc 1Lexi (exact case): free with any other or for a donation Awesome, I'll definitely purchase one in the near future then! Thanks so much for the quote! Oh... one more... how much is minimum donation amount? I only need one address, so if I can get the free one for a little less, I'll do it But I don't mind paying the 0.0076 either. Minimum donation is 0.0001, anything below that will just make it more difficult to use the coins one day. |
|
|
|
It shouldn't take years. At approx. 600 Kkey/s I can find 34 addresses with nine digit runs using vanitygen64 -k -r -o filename.txt 1[\d]{8}
Maybe you can use those numbers to figure out your time. I'm running at 3.1Kkey/s, like I said, I'm using a very old PC, I will probably run it on a different machine and see how that goes. So it should take you about 5 and a half minutes per address with a 9 digit run. That's not terrible. Just let it run and walk away for a while. Drop it back to searching for 8 digits and you should be able to find about 1 every minute. I have left it for the past half an hour now and there is no file, do I have to create it first for the address to be stored in or will it be made when an address is found? So far it says I have searched 10 million addresses @ 10million, you should have found 7 or 8 by now. That's odd. There is no need to create the file as it will be created as required. You don't see anything else on the screen? I see nothing on the screen, I will try search for 4 numbers just to see if I get an address EDIT: I have just searched for 2 numbers and it comes up on the screen but no file is created Works fine for me: vanitygen64.exe -k -o SAMKUSH -r ^[\d]{11}
Pattern: [\d]{11}
Address: 17YTH2Q71386649479wnWtTEF3NJ3aK9a2
Privkey: 5Hw1HhRJFo47ezcy5EzxTLAZhGktHsCQwjdeS1E6XvWE3eERXkm
The '^' doesnt seem to work for me either though. Edit: '^^' works though: vanitygen64.exe -k -o SAMKUSH.txt -r ^^[\d]{8} Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 17768269jh3giLrpozKvjCosu98X12gJRB
Privkey: 5JNpEAKq3mx2vc57LcBZysPuTzCofdCg7K1U1JgXX74bEpVabqv
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 14884368bPewmgWABDFn8XNHXKN4b2ErRL
Privkey: 5JNpyHYmBuHaKXUCUmAEWhkn2M2SSFa213bxhPiiiMDDhA24NBg
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 182744784WEpk23dBW7jB1By5J4ywxoyD7
Privkey: 5JkzTuFzE3Dw59hWA1EVQGRApJ17Vr4qJLipSwCGavDef9rxsuA
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 19648434yhgpeNXqPT8NHN97YFKYnvMvNx
Privkey: 5JBKiXBbSkEj9kQydEG6wZEtVSA95eZWREkAekVKFdztG9vXcQ8
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 123234866Md6NmLDJXKzfnTa6a93Z1iFme
Privkey: 5JJF3PjnsB6ru7BwGx5cFtSgDnP2pFTRceDPKHZrYpmmTnjp8hC
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 155474437b2vQLxZB7QKThJFtDgac2Xt9b
Privkey: 5KBe4nmTVxCUGeiQ6EgxMggikg2kukJMK8xajyqLxi5xTXP8SFs
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 19319424xeUUaZ2SRNFghEXYx7HojoM82D
Privkey: 5Jthzx6hUUbBkfBhtNSEynFjsgM5TrKb8mFamjsZ1PajCxS5YD7
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 14113546V8nkhKPorjYkXH2mi8ShTDJMGq
Privkey: 5KLhQZB3984gz49bjo7aDXg89UNtRAQqjuoD55JqSJuRbQpKEw3
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 17753763cNwBUN19CaRRMBr8DPtm2ynNWB
Privkey: 5JNAB9AHF3d7cbSyegTBVr61UHFh8zehH3s3xzHjHPhkeEb3kk8
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 13193477rRmjucC52er48h4SNPrDdHM7yU
Privkey: 5JPpRDrCBMj8CAWuqaP8F5mhDS3BzMLjn8FnqdPuYcw43XV5mz8
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 19157632AA1rCGz8cNkknifwGD3QV5zoJ8
Privkey: 5Jr5bVc9wwKg14TuoKNAPw1XrncrfMvM5mm98g9evXHmCBTQEaV
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 188271261kvAWWr9KSo6uDkRh1GtcCW2cZ
Privkey: 5JaXLizxjepBiWsT9ogzpjp7Etm6UKHPiZAsLSPwQj35kmjjR2i
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 14717433Gahhx26sqNnWAZ5NsdoDC9T1QY
Privkey: 5JyRA8oHC31XEAQEBZxpqzntJaP2Hp4nNRWx3ytHDDYa2uZZPvZ
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 16837797dMkXdQtT2y4WUm26pwYY8TDGvE
Privkey: 5Kj58fDAsoJcmKfzK1fhTttEGQCGH8kTnNCpPX9bcKzt4Fx7ZXX
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 14494425oPiknGgqwnxUFthmu1JbXbDrce
Privkey: 5JgqXnUAZNUqFSy1hHnyYnT6iLRYTMoYDKNXQuzaJiCdG8yRvTM
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 15413522higAeR14Z1PGSUWkoPCxGjenQN
Privkey: 5K79BXg9Mfptx1DrbjroBiexVpN2QA7fgvFpbfwtKt1BUUS6VeR
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 19388867fv5wp3wvf1iGgq2H952keVnDeZ
Privkey: 5KYrnxR4sKgJM4hRin4aDtYQcQPAT4TDQzECDGLn53wpgCk7uof
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 16689965d1kSTTn8sNcKuq5Uq8qD1VFVxW
Privkey: 5JMeVHfA4Qn759YHmfMwtbv8qnyYqS95DTHnRunjhgvq6waqzcZ
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 16542812WPi8LrR6u2jJUR3yfRUCg3xMDC
Privkey: 5JpZH97tbec5iPfTimgkW6KQWBwcZUwRBrJU8qJYb4Y2AbSZJPN
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 113443722b7cyAern4Mz5BV9mUguPnLVFY
Privkey: 5J6MuzVf51AKgjeEGRoULM7fnenAqpJcSACHcyFeh7JzkPC86nJ
Pattern: ^[\d]{8}
Address: 13966562vhqeFKp8sCcGBa1equqCAPMAdN
Privkey: 5KXrubhMNqXm2Gx3eswuVeaHUkdGxpxpcNFb6f5qTNEm7iKUssS
|
|
|
|
I haven't been using my Miltibit client for a few months. Today I opened my client and see 0 balance. I know for sure that I have a few bitcoins in my wallet. I'm new in bitcions world and I'm not sure if I opened the right wallet. Can anybody help me with advice how can i find my bitcoins. Thank you very much.
Which version of multibit do you use? When was the last time you did a backup? Do you have your wallet words (Mulitbit HD only)? Version is 0.5.17 I've never done any backup, it's on my private computer and nobody has access to it but me. I don't have Multibit words. You should make a backup now, just in case. Once you did that try updating to 0.5.19. It might help. -> https://multibit.org/release-info/classic/v0.5.19.html |
|
|
|
|
Unconfirmed TX should be gone if you restore from seed.
|
|
|
|
But that's the thing I don't think the transaction was confirmed
Do you have a transaction id? |
|
|
|
Yeah, see my edit above. Maybe I should put a disclaimer or remove old prices.
I think disclaimer that that was the going rate when the price was $ nnn per BitCoin. I would have to look up the dates for the addresses. I have just updated the price examples and added a date now. |
|
|
|
Can you quote me a price for DebitMe both case sensitive and not?
Thank you
Case sensitive: Difficulty: 873388193410 - BTC 0.0098 Case insensitive: Difficulty: 26838491360 - BTC <0.00016 Shorena offered 0.0043 BTC for 1DarkStr, which has the same difficulty as 1DebitMe, so that is probably how much sho will charge you as well. I am going off of the prices that Shorena has on their front page. As always, if you want a job done send it to shorena, they will advise if they can do the job or not. Yeah, see my edit above. Maybe I should put a disclaimer or remove old prices. |
|
|
|
What I can offer you is any of the first 4 (difficulty: 429,292,501,846 (4 prefixes)), whichever is found first for 0.0021 btc. Keep in mind that the results will most likely be one of the easier ones.
That was what I was looking for, with my discussion with Timelord. Guess my wording wasn't great. I will take that offer, and I get that it will probably be one of the easier ones. Should I send it to your small amount address? No you get your own address, because I have some open request atm and dont want them to get mixed up. Please send 0.0021 btc to 19tdaniXizbQkZpJWH5EMELnfhgfqt8YVVand send me one public key via PM. Sorry for the delay, I didn't know what u meant by step 1.5, but i figured it out already and sent you the piblic key for my vanity address. So basically I will be melting two private keys into one? Yes, The final private key will be the combination of the one you created and the one I found with your public key. Ill get to it as soon as I found the one for DarkStar_, should be in the morning. Can you quote me a price for DebitMe both case sensitive and not?
Thank you
exact case: 0.0043 btc any case: 0.000175 btc
Can you quote me a price for DebitMe both case sensitive and not?
Thank you
Case sensitive: Difficulty: 873388193410 - BTC 0.0098 Case insensitive: Difficulty: 26838491360 - BTC <0.00016 Shorena offered 0.0043 BTC for 1DarkStr, which has the same difficulty as 1DebitMe, so that is probably how much sho will charge you as well. Many of the prices on the 2nd post are no longer valid because the bitcoin price changed so much. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
