Does it have any referrals? If so can you provide proof

Could you make this proof public? And/or PM the proof to me as well?

Devthedev handled escrow for a standard transaction for me today, and as always was extremely professional and prompt.

I would (and probably will) use again.

PM sent

.06 is too high for a full member. There are no open signature campaigns that are using escrow. If you were to half your opening bid then I would consider bidding (we would need to use escrow of course)

If you want to avoid getting scammed then yes. This post being in meta....there are no forum requirements that you need to check every post prior to sending payment. It is my understanding that there is a lower threshold to ban users with a paid signature (I do not have a reference for this) so if participants of your campaign start to spam they will more likely get banned.

This is why auctions of accounts will never work. It is impossible to tell when a bid is actually being made due to people only bidding with shill accounts

The leaky queue was not about restoring accounts, it was about something else. IIRC the "leaky queue" was regarding people wanting to change their usernames.

I don't know 100% for sure what your intentions are, I do think you intend to scam at one point, although I do not know how, regardless of your intentions it is really none of my business as I have not done business with you (nor do I intend to).

With that being said I would strongly recommend familiarizing yourself with the forum rules. I have posted a link to an unofficial list of the official rules of the forum below (created by mrep). It appears that the mods are cracking down on the rules aggressively (look at all the threads in meta about people getting banned - although I think a good number of them are from account farmers), especially with spam.

My prediction is that if you repeatedly break the forum rules (intentionally or not) you will eventually get perm banned (how many 'warnings' you will get, IDK, but probably more then 1). In regards to whatever your ultimate loan term goal is (scam or not), being achieved - only time will tell........

EDIT: added link to above promised thread
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=703657.0

If you click on watchlist, you should see threads that have new replies to them that you have not looked at yet. When you click on your watchlist and see something you no longer want to see copy the thread name, click on edit, then use the "find" feature on your browser to find the thread and delete it.

I believe you would need to delete your post if you insisted on using this specific feature.

An alternative is to use the 'watch-list' feature (which is right below the new replies to your posts link) and you can easily remove threads you no longer wish to "watch" by clicking on 'edit watchlist' and deleting the threads that no longer interest you. I believe that all threads you post on will, by default be added to your watchlist

Did he not just get banned (30 day ban just expired) for doing this exact thing?

I am not making an offer, but I would estimate that such an option would fetch a premium of somewhere between .18 and .25 per BTC you wanted to buy (between 1.8 and 2.5 for 10 BTC), this is based on a strike price of 600 and you paying any fees associated with sending the funds to the seller upon exercising of the option.

Using escrow would substantially complicate things because you would need to find someone that will be reputable in six months today and it would be very difficult to know who will continue to be reputable (escrow member 'x' could run away with someone's money in 3 months). If you only agreed to find an escrow when the option is exercised then one of you could potentially "not want to use" any of the escrow members that are available.

I enjoy reading these threads. They allow me to make good use of my large inventory of popcorn.

Your account was likely "nuked" meaning all your posts were deleted and account banned. Likely because you were doing something especially bad (against the rules). I would say more likely then not the ban/nuking is appropriate (also even if your posts were not delated your account would likely gotten banned making the fact that your posts were deleted a moot point).

Please don't hate on me just because I am delivering the bad news.

The correct thread is actually https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=497545.0

The post you quoted is actually what happens when you sell your account and try to steal it back

This account is probably worth no more then .005 BTC if you are able to sell it.

I am no longer buying accounts

Here is where you lose credibility. Logic would dictate that you either think that I am the one who hacked your account (or someone associated with someone that hacked your account) and a liar and a con or you could think that I bought your account from someone and is essentially caught in the middle of all this. It would be illogical to have doubts that I hacked your account but still am a liar and a con.

Additionally if you have any idea as to who had "hacked" your account then your beef would be with that person, not with me, nor the person who bought it from me.

The most likely scenario is that you actually did not have your account hacked at all.

@TF that kind of logic is not the logic used in the US court system and the logic does nothing to prove guilt. You are saying that because I presented evidence that points to my innocence but does not prove beyond a reasonable doubt that I am innocent that I am therefore guilty.  

Again, loosing credibility. You previously said that you would be willing to pay me what was paid for the account, but now you say that you will not pay anything. You also had people leave trust saying that you are willing to pay me what was paid for the account. If you were lying about that then who is to say that you are not lying about having your account hacked?

Also you are doubting that I was the one who "hacked" your account but you somehow expect me to give it back to you for free. I am pretty sure I am not the only one who sees the disconnect here.

Also you are doubting the way that TF suggested the account was stolen and how to account for the PMs three days before the account was sold to me. If you have an idea as to how the account was hacked then you would have had the opportunity to stop it.

Like I said above the most likely explanation is that you did not have your account hacked, but rather sold the account to me at below market value with the intention of stealing it back from me later.

PM sent, however I am no longer buying accountsIf you want an avatar you would need to purchase an account that has an avatar as the changing of avatars is not allowed (including adding one)

I just typed in "alcohol" and only got one result for anti hangover pills.

I didn't say it would be a bad or immoral thing. I was actually implying that it would be a very cleaver thing to do.

I don't think cryptothrift has any auctions for "alcohol" right now. Either way I hope you find someone to help you with your specific drinking desires.