Nice, doing your own exchange is awesome. I'm taking you'll do a proper api for it. And tbh all the other wannabe exchanges really lets us 'customers' trade blind because there's not enough time resolution in the graphs, and no historical data. Waiting 15-45minutes for 'candles' to update is ludicrous  Throw a graph system similar to bitcoinwisdoms in there, and you got a winner. Anyway I threw in a tiny bit of my btc and ltc into it and bought up 28000 coins. A friend and I are using our Klondikes to hash on the network too. (~50Ghash worth) API is no where close to being done, and will most likely be unavailable at launch. We are highly covered against ddos attacks. We are a withdrawal engine away from launch. Real time Charting and Graphing backend is in place, however our projections indicate 33% loss of performance with realtime charting active, meaning Charts will continue to be disabled indefinitely until we can afford to acquire an additional server. With the already active ajax resources on the server, we have acquired a backup/slave server to serve database reads, house the trade engine, and serve ajax requests should the main server crumble under the immense load it will likely be under at launch time. |
|
|
|
feel free to bump my posts. OSC seems to have disappeared from coinwarz... anyone have any info?  it's still there. probably don't see it on the profitability charts because: a)the price crashed from .00005 -> .000025 b)they manually update coins listed on coinex, so most of the time the market price is out of date. http://www.coinwarz.com/cryptocurrency/coins/opensourcecoinWait what? They run a website they manually update, when it's run on programmable hardware? Why not code that in ffs Anyway, been missing the updates on OSC too Sorry my friend, i've been pretty busy on this: http://dev3.openex.pwAs far as "updates" on OSC, the coin is stable and doing good, which is the way i like it. I'm sorry i don't have a huge ass budget and 30 sockpuppets to promote it with. It'll grow over time as these pump and dumps continue to die and fade out. One thing i've been thinking of, is to possible shorten the name to OScoin, since OpenSourcecoin is a bit of a tongue twister. thoughts? |
|
|
|
It's time again for another update. here she is  http://dev3.openex.pwgithub https://github.com/r3wt/openexTrade Engine fixed, now with DB transactions and trade history tables. modern database driven configuration engine improved moderator and administrator features option to block tor access option to redirect mobile users option disable: -logins -registrations -deposits -withdrawals -markets -debug navigation -maintenance option to force ssl. new gui. improved access violations system. patched server level vulnerability. optimized code for speed. site performance is legendary. ajax updates on trade page. fixed bug in chat. high security json calls. deposits/withdrawals fully functional todo: api account history transaction history audit system bot detection csrf protection, investigate the need for and if necessary, implement a formkey system to protect against forged requests. patch session time out bug, logged out users are still able to send messages while logged in. implement rpcssl withdrawal authorization queue system maintenance daemon. wallet maintenance schedule. i'll push the changes to git tomorrow from my *nix machine. |
|
|
|
ok, i installed memorycoin on my server, and it's gone rogue. no way to terminate the process. i really don't wanna reboot after i've already started 20 wallets... any work around for this rogue process? using Ubuntu 12.04
erm...kill it? i've tried kill -9 <pid>, killall memorycoind kill `pidof memorycoind` and nothing stops it. its gone all out rogue. franko did the same thing yesterday, and goldcoin does on occasion. Edit: NVM. the process was a zombie. after waiting a bit, it finally went away. Memorycoin has been initialized at OpenEx. we will have a launch thread as soon as we finish testing and are sure the system is stable enough. |
|
|
|
|
ok, i installed memorycoin on my server, and it's gone rogue. no way to terminate the process. i really don't wanna reboot after i've already started 20 wallets... any work around for this rogue process? using Ubuntu 12.04
|
|
|
|
|
i wish you chinese people would find a new way to make money.
|
|
|
|
botnets would immediately have the advantage, right? i see the point you are making, but i'm not conceding it. where there is a will there is a way.
I hope one day someone will devise a way to launch a 100% PoS currency without distributing all coins in the genesis block... On that day I'll sell all my NXTs and buy new coins. agreed. for now though, NXT is about as good as it gets for 100% POS currnecy. its like a prototype really. |
|
|
|
seed all addresses with .001 coin, and restrict to `1 coin per client.
This won't work. Do u believe me or should we conduct an experiment? botnets would immediately have the advantage, right? i see the point you are making, but i'm not conceding it. where there is a will there is a way. |
|
|
|
Well at least your coin got listed My coin was ignored / not just here on this list by many people I contacted. This is a mans club , no women welcome Fuck you all Just a clone these nuts nigga, fuck you xorxor
Is this bitcointalk? says a lot of you as person your on ingnore with me pall you'll be sorely missed you really gotta bug the crap out of xorxor if you want him to add your coin to this list. i wouldn't pay it much mind. OSC is ignored largely and is doing just fine. a coin can survive without these pumper biased fools if its worthy. I'm sure cinnamon coin will do fine. |
|
|
|
|
start mining altcoins. there is a fair amount of profit in the right coins.
|
|
|
|
Ok i tried, but there seems to be a problem when all the mined coins go back to owners of premined coins, and we get similar situation as with NxT.. So you were more or less right right after all:) Apart from a messy solution i see nothing else to solve PoS intial distribution problem at the moment.
Here is how it happens with PoS mining.
(1) - Small premine, than for a first block instead of using P2P client do forum/email based selling of initial premine for a fixed/agreed upon price(in BTC, EUR,...), basicly exactly what NxT did, but with a very small amount, for example 10k coins.
(2) - So basicly now we have a NxT blockchain with for example 72 people having coins, but instead of milions of coins, there is only 10k coins.
(3) - We than make a system online, together with a first exchange, and that 72 people make their nodes online and start mining coins with for example 1 coin per block, and increasing over the first 2 weaks(so people have the chance to be first adopters) to lets say 25 coin per block. After that, we use whatever algoritem we want, we can just copy bitcoin halving revard every x blocks, or use whatever we want
(4) - Mined coin gets distributed the same way as transaction fees do in current NxT system(a bigger stakeholder gets more) so a stake holder with 20% of all money would also get 20% of all the new mined coins, meaning we have the same problem as with NxT, initial stakeholder never lose their big share of all money(if they have nodes online, which they do if they smart).
A messy solution: destroying BTC:) or any other cryptocurrency(can be/must be temporary just for initial distribution over few months)
--- a coin that is bought with BTC from a "system" has a bigger cut from mining, acording to date(number of blockchain) it was bought.
--- we use destroying BTC/LTC,.. as a means of creating coins from thin air, we prove destroying and get coins in exchange.
PM me if one day u manage to find a good solution of "premine" problem, please. seed all addresses with .001 coin, and restrict to `1 coin per client. |
|
|
|
coming along very nicely Sir. Burrito!  |
|
|
|
Just a clone these nuts nigga, fuck you xorxor
Is this bitcointalk? says a lot of you as person your on ingnore with me pall you'll be sorely missed |
|
|
|
Some stuff that should be changed, in my opinion: - you have to add that NXT was premined. It's noted for pretty much all other premined coins but NXT and that's simply misleading. The fact it's only traded on its own exchange should be noted as well, in my opinion. As far as I know, MasterCoin also never was mined and isn't traded on any exchange besides its own.
- please remove MasterCoin from being on the same level as NameCoin and PeerCoin. That's just bull. The trade volume is closer to IFC, DOGE, etc. than NameCoin and PeerCoin by a LONG shot and the market cap cannot be compared to either. I'm not too deep into mastercoin, but as far as I'm aware of, there also hasn't been any notable media coverage either to justify it being placed on the same level as PeerCoin and NameCoin. Personally I'd also remove NXT from there for the same reasons, but it's at least somewhat debatable. MasterCoin is not, though, and simply doesn't belong there.
- StableCoin should definitely not be "Purgatory", with all the innovation and development it received since its revival.
- Doge should be at least a "Major Alternative", in my opinion (as of now) even on the same level as NameCoin and PeerCoin. The market is huge, despite being a "joke coin". It also received major media coverage in the past weeks.
two things: Dogecoin isn't a major alternative. we've already seen a timetravel attack on the coin less than 48 hours ago. Stablecoin is not innovative by any stretch of the word. |
|
|
|
|
this is horrible. voted option 2
|
|
|
|
What is this: [17:02:07] HTTP request failed: necessary data rewind wasn't possible
[17:02:07] submit_upstream_work json_rpc_call failed
[17:02:07] ...retry after 10 seconds I am getting this error very frequently. Is it to be expected as part of normal mining? Or is it pool side issue or miner-side issue? I am using the http://mmcpool.com/ windows x64 miner. I'm far from an expert, but it would seem to me that: 1) a hardware error(exception) occured, while trying to confirm previous work. 2) the rpc call failed because the work was lost in the exception 3) the process slept for 10 seconds while waiting on work. |
|
|
|
|
Hmm what are the positions available? i may or may not be qualified.
|
|
|
|
can somebody tell me what it is that makes this coin so special? I honestly don't see anything too great about this coin.
this coin is actually pretty special, and i'm one to knock on new coins and am a harsh critic of coins with "new features". for starters, this coin has a very unique algorithm. we've seen this algorithm grow and become refined since the early days of Memorycoin, into its reincarnation as Protoshares, until finally this latest offering Memorycoin 2.0 I was a very harsh critic of Memorycoin, and even more vocal when it came to protoshares. But in Memorycoin 2.0, Free Trade has found a winning formula. It isn't perfect by no means, but if there is any dev around here who knows his stuff its Free Trade. On top of this, Memorycoin has a grant/voting system, used to award grants for projects. In a nutshell, Memorycoin is an Asic resistant, Intelligent and community driven version of Devcoin. It's what devcoin set out to do initially, and it does it in a decentralized manner. I'm starting to become a big fan of this coin, not because i see a huge oppurtunity to profit, as i haven't mined any Memorycoins myself, but because i see the potential of this project and how out of all the coins released lately, i think this just might be the coin that has a chance to leave a lasting legacy both in the Alt Scene and in The real world. The potential uses of the voting system are limitless. Take for instance charities, community fund raisers, and development projects. all are real possibilities with the voting/grant system, and the big difference between this and non profit charitable organizations is that it is decentralized, IE no one person can influence the voting, and no one person is able to control what grants are awarded. Synopsis: It's not perfect by any means, but has the potential to become something you read about in the Wall Street Journal or Popular Science. That's my take on it anyway, take it with a grain of salt. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
