It's effective if you play it right since after all, the game is not just a luck-based game. Just do your best on every round especially if your losing streak is now growing continuously to the point that it will reach already x5 and your bet at stake is now higher.

If you lose here for about over 5x streak, and it is always what happened, then don't play Blackjack anymore lol.

Choose other games instead as you don't have any skills in that game. Imagine losing over 5x several times in a row in strategy-based games. That's worst.

As far as my wild analysis is concerned, Matthew Wright's talent will not use much on Ginebra. They are already a complete team.

Tim Cone is the type of coach that doesn't make things mixed up. If he thinks that the current players on the floor are already good, he won't hesitate to bench a player even if that's a good player to start with.

Wright will also have limited minutes of playing time on Ginebra and I'm sure he already knows it.

I'm sure Wright won't sign to Ginebra but maybe on their sister teams like Magnolia. And maybe he is just waiting for the right moment that he will now sign to play overseas as imports are having good playing time there plus a wonderful big contract.

Just for clarification, that rule depends on the campaign manager.

It's not that users need to post in the gambling section although it is just reasonable to do it for a gambling-related casino and company.


Regardless, that number will still grow no matter what.

Even before, gambling discussion is already active.


Obviously, the numbers won't be the same but surely, this section will still be one of the most active here compare to other section

The reason is, that the number of real gamblers here is decent and they need a one-stop pit-stop place for a discussion related to their activity.

Profitable? The cashout amount should be lowered than your bet if you are losing that bet or am I missing something here? That said amount is even lowered to the point that you won't have any interest to cash it out but rather go straight to the final result.

There's no such thing as betting sites that will give you a profit once you cash out while your team is close to losing that game.

It's just minimizing your possible losses and they are giving you a chance to do it.

As I pointed out, just be on our usual. If we force ourselves to gamble moderately, it will just make us feel not contented. Learn how to control the emotion as much as we can as that's a problem if we allow ourselves to be slaves to gambling.

Even if we turned into gambling addicts, it doesn't mean we are at doom. Just be responsible. I know some people who don't gamble moderately and lose a decent amount regularly but still, they are the people who are still in control of themselves.

In other words, gambling moderately is not the solution but rather being responsible even how addicted we are.

Abusing? Who's the one that controls the officiating? Who's the one to blame that players leads on taking advantage of it?

His move was clean and since that was effective, then he will keep on doing it. The same goes for other players. That wasn't new in the first place.

Anyways, what is the rule related to that recently changed? Can you share it here?

I don't think it that way. If Spence is not willing to risk his records, then why does he plan on moving up where there are even lots of boxers that are even much better compared to Terence Crawford. There are more dangerous boxers that Spence will face once he moved up that can destroy his record.

It's not about the Spence record but there are other thing/s they are addressing why the fight is still not official.

For what's that thing, we don't know, and all we need is to wait.

You are just pointing out the cons and negative characteristics.

Just because gamblers are addicted, they will automatically show negative and unusual behavior? That's a wrong impression. There are lots of gambling addicts but still responsible in the end. How about those professional gamblers, considered gambling addicts, that always gamble every day?

In the end, it's our responsibility to make good things out of our gambling activity. If we allow ourselves to fall into the trap, then that's a big problem.

Clearly, the user is shilling the site about that chargeback.

There's no such thing as a company that can cover the loss of a user when got scammed by a shit company, especially in the crypto world.

How that company can even make profits for such service and doings where in the first place, scam sites don't engage or talk to anyone. Avoid any company that claims can recover the money from a scam site. I tried to visit that chargeback site to see more of their shit information but I can't access it.

What did you mean by that expression? That the community is wrong at their advice? That you blame the community as you should bring big profit?

Then what's your goal of still posting here?

If you really believed in the inside information you are getting at whatever source, then just follow what you like to do and don't engage the community asking for any advice or suggestions so you won't feel regret next time. Go take a loan and take the risks. No one will stop you.

Simple as that.

That was a tough and difficult task as you don't know anything. At least if that's your plan, you have already done your homework for a long, not by asking here, but by engaging in real-life persons that involve in such activity. I also doubt that you will find a partner here since what will be your contribution as you don't know anything.

Not discouraging you but it's better to talk that around your circle so that you will not find a random partner here that might take advantage of you.

Building and running a casino should not just because you are interested in it. As I mentioned above, try to find some people around your circle first.

As far as my sports betting journey is concerned, we really don't need to memorize these sets of tips but it's a big help for staters.

When I first engage in sports betting, I don't know or even intended to learn the basics. What I did is to just stick to the sports and leagues that I personally know and have knowledge of it. While continuing to do sports betting regularly, I have become used to doing it and the rest is history.

What I'm trying to say is that EXPERIENCE is the best foundation we have. As long as we progress, we will automatically learn what to do on the way.

I don't mind this stuff honestly. I just gambling on my own.

If you are responsible enough to play wisely, there should be no problem.

Just play relaxed and be comfortable so that we are not stressed. Gambling in moderation is good but it doesn't mean we should always keep it that way. Look at those professional gamblers, gambling almost every day but they are still disciplined and responsible gamblers in the end.

16 years without playoffs appearance, no seriousness on this team. I didn't even hear them joining the free agency hunting or looking for a big fish.

What they are doing is just allowing their current roster to develop on their own. But with that strategy, look at them now.

Yes, they are a powerhouse team before but that is just history now.

The 4-month timeframe is too short and GGG is now catching his age.

Regardless of the result here in the trilogy, GGG can't really make it to the point to become in 100% shape after 4 months after the trilogy to fight his mandatory challenger. Canelo might give him strong damage that needs months to be fully healed.

But as we are just speculating here, only GGG knows what to do in that situation and all we need is to wait.

Going back to his fight here against Canelo, the odds are really tempting for him. I'm sure he won't retire right away if he loses to Canelo here but will also put some money to him as maybe this will be his last fight.

Seriously, that will be the effect of that shitty situation that was shared by OP? Do you really think people will lead into thinking that sports betting is not the right place to gamble just because of that? Sports betting is a big market and it can't be just ruined with that small fix match.

There are lots of sports and matches!

What may be appropriate here is that gamblers won't trust that league anymore since it's prone to game fixing.

Not unless that league will be serious in giving sanctions and penalties to all those involved to build their reputation again. Although it will take time.

Playing for fun doesn't make sense. If you want to play fun, there's another way without risking your money.

We gambled to expect money in return. That's more fun, right?

If you guys will just keep gambling for fun, you don't realize how much money you are losing now to make you fun.


It's not easy to do. There are no exact figures about the amount we afford to lose. If we set a $100 bankroll and lose it, there's always a high chance that we will another money on our bankroll to continue our gambling session.

Be responsible enough to stop. That's the only solution not to go beyond our limit.

In fairness to James Harden, even though already considered out of his prime, he is still consistent in getting good numbers. Since departing from the Houston Rockets, he has a good average and stats playing at the Brooklyn Nets and some few games in the Philadelphia Sixers, especially in the playoffs.

It means chemistry is not a problem with James Harden and he easily adapts to the Sixers system even though there's already a main scorer there.

It also shows that Harden is a good pair and better duo with a player on another position and not the same type as his unlike on his previous teams where he shared roles with other main scorers in the PG and SG position making it a bit of hard execution in making good plays.

The question is not valid to ask here. Why? Simply because we don't understand why they do gambling out of culture.

Therefore, how can we even answer that if in the very place we are not used to or grow up in that kind of situation? If we were born in a culture like that there will be no question like that obviously. I know there's a freedom of expression here but to say it sounds funny is out of the line.

If you don't understand their culture then stay out of it.

That's why it's called "risk" in the first place, right? Obviously, what you have mentioned are all "what if".
 
Of course, we will just face the risk of something that is worth putting a shot. Why invest in casino tokens just that simple without even doing further research if those are somehow worth putting money into? The DYOR acronym is not created for nothing.

There's no point in comparing it to Bitcoin for obvious reasons our options are not only limited to Bitcoin-related investments.