Hey there everyone! I am so close but there is still something going wrong. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F96bwxs.png&t=663&c=HXj6NNV2ud1GOg) Anyone know why this happens? Are the boards powered 12v? Doubble check it pls I have a corsair rm750 connected to the boards. I am retrying everything again tonight i'll seewhat happens otherwise i'll set up TW. Other thing a common mistake that I have with some customers. If your boards are with wire terminal did you happened to connect the red wire to + and black to - GND? If so change it to Yellow + and Black - GND. If this is not the case , please excuse me I was not intending to offend you. Best Martin Hi Martin, Thanks for the support! I have the molex connector so that shouldnt be a problem. I will be plugging in the boards one by one tonight to see what happens. The ATX supply is running correct right (PSU fan spinning etc)? The devices themselves will be picked up by cgminer and have there fans spin purely on USB connection. I found them like this once when my psu decided to take a nap. Yeah when there is no 12V supplied to the boards they do take a nap same like PSu
|
|
|
Loshia - just out of curiosity - can you give it a shot with the binary that I used during my initial development and testing? It is available at: http://www.nanofury.com/cgminer-NanoFury-bin-2013-10-02.zipIt supports only one miner (and sometimes doesn't shut it off when you exit) but it would be interesting to see how that one compares. In my initial observations the same miners with bfgminer did a bit better... but it is also possible that just my initial coding was messy. Window build ![Shocked](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/shocked.gif) Which one to use? 48-56? can you post a screen shot of it?
|
|
|
I really do hope you know that stuff already, do you?
you betcha! i've already got a miner in November 500ghs from bitfury and I had no problems with it. Super ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
It's a goldrush. Everybody think it is easy to earn money. That drive the difficulty upwards. Not everyone will earn their money back. Some will make profit and others don't. Not all my gear will make their BTC back. But like all the guys who started earlier, we have deep pockets, we can take a lot of losses untill the hashrate stabilize. If you pay your Terraminers with US Dollars, then I wouldn't worry much. BTC price looks very volatile, but compare with 2011 and before it is nothing. You shouldn't worry about that too much. The more people jump into this, the more difficult it is to mine BTC, but the higher the prize of BTC will be. The total sum is that you will earn more if you can keep it profitable. Have faith.
I reed a lot about difficulty/price increasing.. and I dont, I never thought that make moneys is easy. Really for miners, if difficulty increase hard the price will increase hard too, so you will earn less btc but they will value more... I'm not really understanding what can goes wrong... why price is falling down this days? Do your homework dude about technical details. There is nothing you can do about btc price at all. just make sure you are 100% prepared in terms of all tech details taht is the best you can do at the moment. And be sure that before you make a decision you ask first here. I am not telling you that my opinion is the best of the best. Not at all. But you can read what people say and use your had to make a right choice according to your judgment In practice you are getting 50% of your roi for first two - three weeks of mining if you are lucky. So once again make sure 0% downtime for the first month
|
|
|
any pre-order is a bad choice ....
but it is the only way to get gh/s for a good price.. I sow many people selling gh/s for $ on e-buy or like that, but, really, very bad prices.. i'm paying only 3$ per gh/s with cointerra.. I think is a very good price. I'm only afraid about late or that btc price fall down... Remember the saying: If you are afraid of wolfs do not go to the woods. But you will understand it better when time comes. If i was in your shoos i would read as much as i can about ip's subneting DHCP,DNS, how to setup the device and so on so that i would not waste a minute to discover all that stuff when miner came. I would check my fuses/wires if they can take the load. I will prepare everything upfront. It is a way more different then plugging a fridge in your home ![Grin](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/grin.gif) I really do hope you know that stuff already, do you?
|
|
|
Don't forget I always create drivers for cgminer that report hashrate based on real shares generated, not some arbitrary amount of hashes done (that doesn't translate into meaningful hashrate). I can happily make you a build that shows you making 2.5TH if you like. Make sure you check your pool to see how many effective shares you're submitting with your other drivers... People don't like the truth.
Just for the reference Con. My intentions are not to offend you like Zich said: With cgminer technobit i do have According to kano suggestion https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=170332.msg3358609#msg3358609Two nanos: Elapsed: 45959 Dev1 Diff Accepted: 29,184.00 Dev2 Diff Acepted: 25,088.00 My worker is mining at 512 so variance is quite big but but both are above 2.5 Gh/s. Bitfury chip is capable of it for sure So i am living math to you. In general at osc 54 it should be a way more than 2Gh/s Best However i think that 3.10 when run for a little bit longer will have same results Any way i will test it myself when i am able to and will let you know Best
|
|
|
Thanks to Everybody!!!!! I got the TP Link which I pre flashed from amazon. Bought an extra one just in case I bricked it. After reading everything on the forums.... Putty and Miners working just fine and HASHING!
Super Happy mining!
|
|
|
It looks like official Nanofury support has been added to CGminer 3.10.0
-T
Can someone share the hash rate output from 3.10? Thanks Not good ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fs26.postimg.org%2Fjgpcnwcnd%2Fcgminer310.jpg&t=663&c=7zJQ1LJWUns_nA) Yeah it seems not good but testing time is to low. It should run at least an hour or so. 5 mins are just not enough to avoid variance ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
It looks like official Nanofury support has been added to CGminer 3.10.0
-T
Can someone share the hash rate output from 3.10? Thanks
|
|
|
Hey there everyone! I am so close but there is still something going wrong. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F96bwxs.png&t=663&c=HXj6NNV2ud1GOg) Anyone know why this happens? Are the boards powered 12v? Doubble check it pls I have a corsair rm750 connected to the boards. I am retrying everything again tonight i'll seewhat happens otherwise i'll set up TW. Had some similiar behavior as I attached two HEX16A2 with Sata to Molex adapters to my current PSU. As it turned out, the Sata To Molex Adapter was touching the board and could not be inserted completly. A knife and some minor tweaks to the adapters and everything is working fine. Maybe you could check, if this might be the case with your setup, too. ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) Nice but be careful each board eats a lot of amps clocked so it is not a good idea for sure to use the adapters
|
|
|
And remember in reality you need to pay some pool fee and/or some downtime due to various reasons so remove 5 % at least
are you serious? 5% less? ![Angry](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/angry.gif) downtime?!?!?!?! lol... now I'm starting to understand why is better sells miners than mine with them...... 5% may be high for downtime, 1-2% is more likely (in a 24hr day that assumes the miner is not mining for 15-30minutes (internet outages, setup rearrangement, tweaking/tuning, etc) as for the calcs, assume the miner arives at the end of february if lucky, not at the beginning Add a pool fee and some stales/rejects unavoidable and you are there 5 % is the bottom line for me ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif) Plus shipment in the last day of February and arriving about 5 of march i I am not mentioning the fact that maintaining a miner is not a newbie friendly thing. It is not like a having a fridge and when red light flashesh just to go to a local store and replace it..And listen to the manager excuses offering you one fridge for free and licking your ass... If you folow my mind. And so on and on and all that nasty stuff is happening at the beginning when you supposed to make the most of your ROI A week or two lost makes a big difference
|
|
|
Using 3.10.0 for about 3 hours now and I just got a cluster of four AMU zombies. No big deal, but I should probably have mentioned that for the last few versions, on the rare occasions that I still get zombies, they almost always come in clusters of four.
Seems like your hub is the one to blame. Lsusb -v?
|
|
|
just received one of my 6 hex16b miner,
this a really good miner, power consumption is very low 40GH/s for 46 Watts ^^
with oc I get 45 GH/s for 57 watts
Nice results ![Smiley](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/smiley.gif) But when I measured 12v rail 45 GH my multimeter told me 4.8 amps ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Folks like you are buying miners dude with your thinking... Once again good luck and pls when you break even pm pm me I am serious no jockeys here
|
|
|
I bought 2 Terraminer IV in November.. unfortunately "February batch". I'm looking every day about hashrate and difficulty and I'm less and less convinced I made a good purchase.
what do you think about it? I spent 12.600$ shipping included, bitcoins price is going down (when i placed my order the price was 1000$+ and it was raising, hashrate was very low and difficulty too).
is possible that when i'll get miners bitcoin's price will be more stable on 1000$? or I have to assume that the price will be like 600$?
when i bought miners i checked on cex.io/calc my future profit and it should be like 40 BTC first month!!!! now is 28 BTC that should be very good! but do I have to belive it??!
Thanks!
Dude, What matters is: 1. If February batch will be on time and will not turn to be March or April batch due to some delays. My feelings tell me that it will be April or may delivery but i hope to be wrong on it 2. What will be diff by then. Let us hope that Chinese new year will slow things down because a lot of miners are silently mining there and everywhere I would say that according to my feelings you will struggle to get even in both BTC or USd assuming BTC price stays around 1000 USD And this does not apply to you only but for all preorder shit that is going on. Nothing against you and Terraminer for sure If you get your miners on time diff will be to high - less likely if you get your miners delayed same as above - more likely The only way to get out of this is: if you think in USD termes - Mine at a loss for next year or two and wait for btc to raise. No other way to break even in USD only. But question remains if you both 12 Btc for for instance how much profits are you losing... If btc collapses it does not matter The only once who will get out of the collapse clean are ASIC vendors themselves ![Wink](https://bitcointalk.org/Smileys/default/wink.gif)
|
|
|
Raspberry PI Make Error: make all-recursive make[1]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer' Making all in lib make[2]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' GEN arg-nonnull.h GEN c++defs.h GEN warn-on-use.h GEN signal.h GEN stdint.h GEN string.h make all-recursive make[3]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' make[4]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' CC dummy.o AR libgnu.a make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/lib' Making all in compat make[2]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat' Making all in jansson-2.5 make[3]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' make all-recursive make[4]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' Making all in src make[5]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5/src' CC dump.lo CC error.lo CC hashtable.lo CC load.lo CC memory.lo CC pack_unpack.lo CC strbuffer.lo CC strconv.lo CC utf.lo CC value.lo CCLD libjansson.la make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5/src' make[5]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/jansson-2.5' Making all in libusb-1.0 make[3]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' make all-recursive make[4]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' Making all in libusb make[5]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0/libusb' CC libusb_1_0_la-core.lo CC libusb_1_0_la-descriptor.lo CC libusb_1_0_la-io.lo CC libusb_1_0_la-sync.lo CC os/libusb_1_0_la-linux_usbfs.lo CC os/libusb_1_0_la-linux_udev.lo CC libusb_1_0_la-hotplug.lo CC os/libusb_1_0_la-threads_posix.lo CCLD libusb-1.0.la make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0/libusb' make[5]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' make[5]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' make[4]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat/libusb-1.0' make[3]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat' make[3]: Nothing to be done for `all-am'. make[3]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat' make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/compat' Making all in ccan make[2]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/ccan' CC opt/libccan_a-helpers.o CC opt/libccan_a-opt.o CC opt/libccan_a-parse.o CC opt/libccan_a-usage.o AR libccan.a make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer/ccan' make[2]: Entering directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer' CC cgminer-cgminer.o CC cgminer-util.o CC cgminer-sha2.o CC cgminer-api.o CC cgminer-logging.o CC cgminer-usbutils.o CC cgminer-libbitfury.o CC cgminer-driver-icarus.o CCLD cgminer
cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_reset': /home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:226: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings' /home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:233: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer' /home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:239: undefined reference to `mcp2210_set_gpio_settings' cgminer-libbitfury.o: In function `spi_txrx': /home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:255: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer' /home/minepeon/cgminer/libbitfury.c:265: undefined reference to `mcp2210_spi_transfer' collect2: error: ld returned 1 exit status make[2]: *** [cgminer] Error 1 make[2]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer' make[1]: *** [all-recursive] Error 1 make[1]: Leaving directory `/home/minepeon/cgminer' make: *** [all] Error 2
./autogen.sh?
|
|
|
Hey there everyone! I am so close but there is still something going wrong. ![](https://ip.bitcointalk.org/?u=http%3A%2F%2Fi41.tinypic.com%2F96bwxs.png&t=663&c=HXj6NNV2ud1GOg) Anyone know why this happens? Are the boards powered 12v? Doubble check it pls I have a corsair rm750 connected to the boards. I am retrying everything again tonight i'll seewhat happens otherwise i'll set up TW. Cool just pls try one board first connected into tplink directly to avoid hub issues
|
|
|
|