$500 is not a huge money for people to worry about investing, there are many people willing to invest if your project is reputable. But look at what's going on, you try to create virtual credibility by creating new accounts and adding comments. I underestimate this action, I haven't checked your site, but from here, I can doubt its credibility. This is a big lesson for you in the future, don't try to do something artificial 

To be honest, I lack experience in gambling, I have not played for a long time 
This means that if we win but have not completed the wagering requirement, we cannot withdraw the money, and we must continue to bet, it risks a loss on subsequent bets, right?
I just think that if you lose a small amount, it won't affect the amount you deposit 

Now I understand why it's a burden, thanks for your explanation 

I do not know why it is a burden? Quite curious about your saying  in fact, it doesn't affect the amount of money you have, if you win, you can withdraw your winnings, or if you lose, it will reduce your losses. May be I'm ignorant, so please explain me what you mean 

I am not sure this is where I can ask questions  I just look at BPIP to see information about my account. There is a little weird here 

Why is my trust color black  Although I'm not a DT member, I don't have any negative trusts either, so why is black  It makes me feel negative. Is it a sign to mark that I'm not a reliable person?

Not sure what is going on, but accessing bitcointalk is becoming difficult, the download time is long, the response is slow  Even when I access my messages, it is disconnected completely. This is not good at all  And this topic took a long time for me to read the content 

Personally, I do not support this topic appearing here   Although there were a few issues surrounding the campaign he was launching, there were no significant losses   running a campaign without escrow  is sometimes not the fault of the manager, it is also the personal opinion of the head of the project, the choice was made by the manager, he can take the risk and accept it, anyway, that campaign is okay.
This time, he was in a hurry, but objectively, the signature was not provided, so the participants did not need to change the signature and suffered no losses. Participants only take a moment to post the application, no problem at all.

This happened due to his inexperience, but not too bad to be called stupid  

---

EDIT:
I wrote a post with longer time than yahoo and it seems like I'm repeating what he said LOL

Thanks to everyone for your kind comments  There are very specific examples that I can see, it's completely new, I think I should change my mind about this topic    Implementing 20 posts in Gambing may be difficult for me or many others, but it is also very easy for regular users  Anyway, I still feel that it doesn't suit me, I don't have much interest in Gambling

So why not recruit more mods based on each language  If language is the key to their impact, we can find more mods based on their language and expertise. I believe that choosing the mod is not difficult for this forum 

I've never known anyone like that   I understand what you are talking about, but having 20 posts in one section seems to be a big limitation to the topics you are going to be involved in   maybe I'm not a regular user there so I can't understand. For me, this rule is something that I cannot complete if I want to participate  

Whether real or a joke, what you are saying quite sensitive. They said the campaign will start on Wednesday, so there's still a long time to complete the deposit, there's nothing to worry about it.

I don't know if you've watched or applied for the EuroGambler campaign? If not then you can view it here. I'm not here to promote it, I'm here to question their rules 
they have a big campaign with 25 open positions, amazingly high pay rates, everything looks great to join, right?  To be honest, I had wanted to join it to earn generous payments 
But wait, I abandoned my intention immediately when I read their rules 
Did you see that? OMG I am quite surprised by this rule. Some campaigns require posts in Gambling because it is required for their website, I can understand, but the minimum 20 posts is a cause for concern
Imagine what we are going to do and write in Gambling  absolutely I couldn't think of what I could say there to achieve 20 posts.

What about you, who will be involved in it, what will you do to have 20 posts? I don't mean to offend, but can this make new shitposters here?

---

Just for discussion, not make any negative reviews about EuroGambler campaign

First of all, this is not a support to anyone  I just want to express my opinion on this matter
About AlexSimion, have you delved into the cause and timing of this flag and how it being created? Are you just backing something long ago without any research? Because you see it was created by Lauda  I just want to say that flags should be supported once you understand them

About Andulolika, I think the messages you sent him cause this topic to appear here  It does not matter what the purpose of the message is, but you are giving trouble to yourself. I think you should not do the same thing in the future, or at least, you should be polite as with me 

From what we can see here, it is clear that Starsky886 has been hacked and sold to another person. The difference between posts and the change of passwords and emails is real evidence

About Aivaryamal, I have seen your explanation with cryptomilady, can you provide proof of this help? Please quote the message from him 
But I don't believe if someone can forget their payment wallet address, in cryptomanspbmgdn case, I believe strongly that you are the owner of all these accounts and that you are confused when entering wallet addresses.
How is he needed to copy your post to write POA  They come in different formats, you're the owner of both accounts, and in some silly way, you forgot to use the correct address.

The DT please let the negative trust return to the original position

I don't think someone will open a selling quality posts service although it is quite interesting LOL  If someone has time to create quality articles, I guess they will focus on their own account. It is also related to the security of the account  Selling account  seems more profitable than selling quality
Can you give some examples?
But it will be a big problem for altcoin's bounty campaigns  Most of them only require your rank to be greater than the newbie 
Not really, it depends a lot on the project being developed. To be honest, most of them are shitcoins, but there are a few bright spots in them

To be honest, I don't think the merit is so expensive  Its actual price will be much lower, in places and people that we cannot see, $20 is just the price to start a service, I think nobody wants to buy it.
Certainly the merit trade is always going on in this forum 
There is a little difference in my mind.  Certainly they already know about the issue we are talking, but this is not a threat to them, because it is not a complete allegation and no flag was sent. So all they need to do is stay silent, no matter what is going on  silent to overcome the storm 

No, as you can see, there's no punishment, no tagging restrictions, nothing happens 
Finding undetected users is unnecessary  Because there's no remedy or solution, nothing, I'm just posting here to see what everyone's opinion is about, this topic doesn't work to denounce such users.

LOL  Very easy money for anyone  I'm thinking about making money by selling merit, well, I'm going to get rich quickly with the amount of merit I can earn  Just kidding 
In the end, problems like this continued and I think no way to stop them. I didn't complain when I didn't get the desired amount of merit, I find cheating in merit seems too easy  It's not fair to many people out there

Agree on your installation, it is very helpful  
But I want to talk a little about this guy's service. It is a service that operates without consent from the people affected, or in other words, they are forced. I believe not everyone knows about such settings. I have been added to groups that I did not want   And when I talked about it in his topic, he gave me a ridiculous negative trust  

In fact, many users with signatures are still very active in their posts, so ignoring them all is unfair  I think you should ignore the users that you don't like, it will take a lot of time but that's the best way

Or if you feel uncomfortable with the signatures on this forum, you can ignore it in the account settings: Look and Layout Preferences

Honestly, this is the first thing that comes to my mind when reading your title LOL 

I like your way of saying  People should be responsible for what they did, if they make a mistake when they don't know something, which means they didn't study well before starting to do it, it's their fault. Go ahead, guy, you will have a good future if you continue like that 

So Xinxan's account could be hacked and now it's used for other purposes, there are too many ways to think in this case.

---

I will do the rest with the merit you gave me  Merit should be circulated on this forum, whenever I see a worthy post, I will send merit  Thank you very much!

---

I was surprised at the price of a merit, it was terrible  as I said above, maybe his account was hacked, he didn't work for a long time.

---

Thanks for your information, but I don't have the authority or ability to check it, I just want to hear from everyone.