|
Something was messed up big time on my computer.
At some point I decided to import your key again into another wallet and the 30k mysteriously showed up.
And I managed to transfer them into another wallet.
So now they are miiiine, all miiiine, my preciousssss....
The story is longer, I thought for more than 1h that I forgot the password from my main account. But I recovered that too, so tomorrow I will merge the funds.
Though the market value is not big, I remember how hard I mined my first 1000 HVC, I never thought I'll have 34k+
Thank you
|
|
|
|
|
Bitcoin will not replace government-owned currencies. Not in the near future.
Bitcoin will be a wonderful alternative to them. Will be the payment to access the best public ledger. And it will (continue to) be an asset.
|
|
|
|
I found it in PMs; was just a little bonus for the stats graphs. If the txid can't be found then it can be presumed lost - or, rather, it can be presumed to have never occurred. Coming up on a year since OP last was around here, too. Oh well, enjoy the 2k at least   thank you |
|
|
|
Looks like - for whatever reason - the chain you're on isn't seeing the 30k transaction (last one on file in the wallet). The remainder was indeed the 2276(.64049771) HVC prior to that transaction. Not sure what I got 30k for, but I suspect it'll be mentioned in this thread somewhere. Here's the only details I seem to be able to get off of it (no blockchain on file): txid: 77be04c32d62a7e96c7e484186ecf7e66541a41c042db5495be1d7543ca7b8f8-000 addr: HTQUFnH79dorHhfJATgLDUAwNpQ2Xa9LLb date: 2014-jun-19 Not sure if this coin had a fork or whatever - haven't looked at it in a very long time, only came here to drop the graphics after that last reply But if you can recover it, it's all yours ( or whoever beats you to it  ) Edit: from the file timestamp on the wallet.dat, it should have been valid at least through 2014-oct-09 or it would have dropped ( I think? who knows! ) 2014-jun-19 is about the days you were playing with hvc:// But I've found nothing about fork. So I really don't know... |
|
|
|
But if we could some how force the miners to always include transactions that had appeared it the mempool, or at least make it a risk not too then this problem would be solved.
That's inane. the first and best spam filter is letting miners pick transactions based on economic factors. As long as the incentives are not completely warped, this system works. What you are proposing is making any tx spam attack completely trivial. It would also make DoS attacks by high OPs count and low size tx very effective. A lot more than currently, as they can easily be thwarted by their own nature: low miner profit. OK, but does this look correct to you? : some pools got the finder fee + a few transactions and moved on, while people were crying on forum(s) that their transaction is stuck for .. days, though they paid the normal fee or even more in some cases (certainly I don't care about the transactions tried out with 0 fee, those are on their own risk). So while some miners / pools played fair, some not. And this is something that has to be fixed / enforced. And then the "spam attacks" or "test" like done not that long ago should not cause so much trouble. And then they could stop (because if nobody notices, it's costly, and boring, and useless). |
|
|
|
We'll probably see it relaunched under a different name in the next few days
Maybe that's why he gave out the money instead of selling all his HVC |
|
|
|
First of all thank you. It was.. fun to find the key and to see if it works, after one entire day of being published here. However, although I emptied your wallet, you gave the private key only for one of your wallets, containing 2276+ HVC. And from what I've seen, nobody else withdrew lately money from there, so I assume that you still have 30k HVC. I don't complain, I just doubled my HVC, and again, it was fun |
|
|
|
|
The future of Bitcoin lies in global use.
When the big exchanges will not be only from USA and China, when every country will have at least in airports and shopping centers bitcoin ATMs, when you'll be able to buy with BTC from your fav shop in your city/country, when selling bitcoin for your local currency is not an issue / a tough task, then Bitcoin is a succes. Globally.
|
|
|
|
Damn I'm late :-/ Anyway that's good to hear you found a buyer. How much did you sold that account?
Let's say .. a (very) little more than the last "official" 0.08. If you wouldn't have crossed out the 0.08 to put the 0.07, you would have had a "let's do this" before the PMs started coming. |
|
|
|
Thank you. The group is interesting, I like it. I will read its posts and I may post too now and then. And if you pay for it, it's a nice addition |
|
|
|
|
I just got an approved post with fb account Jozsef Bertus.
BTC: 1KBKTnYoyQ3hc4mBmF4iytwn7AotiMEDRJ
|
|
|
|
Whats the Best bang for buck way to profit with bit coin?  Go to a dice site, use money from faucet, bet all and win, do this 20-30 times in a row, then withdraw. Good luck, you'll need it Now for real: I think that one of the best businesses is to have a mining pool where you can add all types of coins to be mined. It needs investment, skill and dedication, but it's a good business where some can earn nice money - bitcoin and altcoins too. |
|
|
|
What price would you offer for an account with 250-300 potential activity and about 1/3 of that real activity?
So it's a member account? I'd like to offer 0.08btc0.07btc i mean for that account At 0.08 I was thinking if I should say yes. At 0.07 I am sure that I will wait. I am not in a hurry to sell, time works in my favor. Good luck with your search! Take your time dude I'm ok with 0.08btc if the quality of posts weren't bad, also can I see it's profile link? If yes, you can send me a private message, if not, it's ok Thanks for wishing me good luck Thanks for your thread. I've got quite some buyers in PM. Either this price was far too low, either this business is going too well, I don't know.. However I sold that account. |
|
|
|
What price would you offer for an account with 250-300 potential activity and about 1/3 of that real activity?
So it's a member account? I'd like to offer 0.08btc0.07btc i mean for that account At 0.08 I was thinking if I should say yes. At 0.07 I am sure that I will wait. I am not in a hurry to sell, time works in my favor. Good luck with your search! |
|
|
|
|
What price would you offer for an account with 250-300 potential activity and about 1/3 of that real activity?
|
|
|
|
You get the payment for this "job" either PM me your addy or post it. BTW for trying everaja gets a consolation prize of 0.002 as well. I have my Bitcoin address in profile... however, here it is: 1KBKTnYoyQ3hc4mBmF4iytwn7AotiMEDRJ Also, I have a bonus - 2 of the images can be cropped for better fit/look: https://i.imgur.com/U7HEfQf.jpghttps://i.imgur.com/50DhBKT.jpgThanks. |
|
|
|
1. I think that first we need to force the miners don't "run away" with finder's fee and a few transactions confirmed when there are old transactions waiting and max (current) size not filled yet.
This is a much bigger problem than block size, because the block size doesn't matter at all if miners don't use it well.
2. Then, maybe the block size could be adjusted - with some smart formula - to be bigger only when bigger is needed (edit: meaning when there are old transactions waiting for more than a certain time). So a "smart" BIP1xx.
I have thought about this. We can publish a bitcoin node that does not relay *new* blocks which have a certain percentage of transactions that were never seen in the mempool, and also blocks that are not near max blocksize if there are still many transactions with fees pending in the mempool. This will make miners very very afraid to mine mini blocks or with fake transactions (transactions that were never released to the mempool) since the risk of having their block orphaned increases exponentially against other miners who do mine the transactions that were in the mempool. This bitcoin node doesn't even have to be running, just the idea that it might be out there would be very frightening to miners. If this can be done, I'd propose to be done for real. Because if you say so, they may or may not believe you. Instead, if they indeed see this happening (blocks found, then rejected/orphaned) they'll stop playing with fire. |
|
|
|
|
Although the only reason I use freebitco now and then is because of such prizes, never rolled more than 9993.
|
|
|
|
If you read well between the lines, you can see all the info Even if there was not a good/real decision making process, I can understand that. Bitcoin is still young. But the current course of actions tell that in the future there will be a decision making process, which has to be made good. Mike still doesn't seem to like that. Understandable, it'll make his decisions look foolish. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
