Some Phinnaeus(sic) dude once said there's a sucker born every minute. If it looks like a Ponzi scheme, smells like a Ponzi scheme, quacks like a Ponzi scheme, and you even clearly tell your customer base that it's a Ponzi scheme, you'll still near-overload your servers with activity.

There was more to this Brush 242 guy than meets the eye (no pun intended  ).

I guess it's time for me to officially list my Legendary Member account for sale in Marketplace/Digital goods: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=24792

Is the trust aspect being worked on now, for I no longer see trust thingies under users' accounts? TBC, I haven't changed any of my settings of late.

This reminds me of the time that Jim Fowler, the animal expert, had a Goliath beetle crawling up Johnny Carson's arm. Upon trying to get it off, it kept crawler toward Johnny's face. Then, it took wing, whereupon Jim said he didn't know that it could fly, whereupon Johnny ask, "What else don't you know about this thing? It could be..." (wish I could've found the video)

As they say in the Geico commercials, everybody knows that.


"...Dressed up like a Sheila."

You know me, since you're kin/friends to some photographer, I was goin' for the Scarecrow Effect:

I, too, just got my reply. Anybody want to see it including the complete header?

For a Polish Dumb Fax?

Why the extra work when a readily available system could've done the same thing seconds after the order was placed? Hell, just send the receipt via third-class mail.

Great idea! I'm heading to the gas station to inform them to no longer accept fiat script having the following serial numbers due to how said fiat coinage was used in the past:

<numbers forthcoming>

Great! I'm having trouble finding the settings so that my customized posts won't be indexed by non-users such as search engines. Also, I desire to set some settings so that those who speak ill of me in their customized posts are also not indexable, as I'm sure others desire to have access to them same settings.

I'm having a tad bit of trouble getting my heard wrapped around as to how the thousands of negative trust comments penned by those who've taking their valuable time to warn the Bitcoin community and others worldwide of nefarious activities stemming from bad actors is compressed while BCT benefits via the sale of ads to some of the very same bad actors.

Ergo, it reads to me that this trust thingy is only benefiting our little club here, doing a grave disservice to the rest of the world stumbling upon bad actors because due to somebody's infinite wisdom the vital information needed for them to make an informed decision was nowhere to be found unless they came here and read such under an ad espousing the very entity we're trying to warned them about, e.g., GAW comes to mind, of which I'm sure you've heard of them.

For a prime example, here's an entity with 4,059 negative comments that placed an ad or two on this forum: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=44366



Is it possible that nary a one of them 4,059 posters cared less if the search engines indexed their customized comments or not as long as we in our own little club here are made aware, or did a majority of them now falsely assumed that their vital comments about a bad actor would be available to most anybody outside the BCT Country Club? I'm safely assuming it's the latter, probably not giving it a second thought that their comments would be available on the entire internet, them having complete faith in the administrators of this forum that such was truly the case, again, never taking the time to think otherwise.

Thus, by your comment, the trust system thingy was broken, and that this aspect in question will remain in place regardless of what the new trust system thingy will be, correct?

Will the new trust system thingy have its comments like the following found elsewhere on the internet?: http://lmgtfy.com/?q=%22Failure+to+refund+and+deliver+product+for+over+1+year.+Lies+continually+about+availability+of+their+products.%22

And, following up on that clue, I uncovered the device that mined the Genesis Block:



Note, the Oriental/Persian carpet in Flashman-cum-Satoshi's living room.

The anagram for Ali Shalib Nasrallah is Nails Arab Shillalah. Shillalah, as in the code name for Source Mage GNU/Linux 0.5.

Or: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NSA_Suite_A_Cryptography

I forgot to mention that with just a little effort, Satoshi Nakamoto's white paper could be tweeted in the same fashion as to how I aligned Marc's 26 tweets. BTW, did you find all the Easter eggs?: https://twitter.com/1A1zP1eP5QGefi2

Upon further review, I now have reasons to believe...  

How many more times are you gonna spoon us that ol' chestnut?

Oh shit (no pun intended), soon I'll be able to play videos while taking a shit via rectal commands at the same time I'm penning posts like this one while taking a shit. And, to think that life's been good to me thus far. Here's to the future of the gaming.

What third-party payment provider did ESPN use when BitPay, a third-party payment provider themselves, and the one that got ESPN to accept bitcoins in the first place, paid ESPN bitcoins for the rights, whereupon ESPN immediately had the bitcoins converted to fiat and deposited into their bank account?

BitPay --> ESPN --> BitPay --> BitPay's Bank --> ESPN's Bank

or

BitPay --> ESPN --> CoinBase --> CoinBase's Bank --> ESPN's Bank

The latter wouldn't make any sense, for it was BitPay that got ESPN to accept bitcoins, not BitPay's competition, CoinBase.

The rest of the BS that I penned about CoinWare, et al., was to get you to think about the above. It doesn't make sense! BitPay could've easily just gave ESPN a check and that'll be that. But to state that they gave ESPN bitcoins whereupon the bitcoins were immediately sent back to BitPay so that a conventional fiat transfer can be made doesn't make sense on so many levels.

Just like nobody, and I mean NOBODY can open up an account at BitPay to solely convert their personal BTC to fiat, whether it's a buck, ten dollars, a grand, or a million dollars. BitPay is a third-party payment provider. The key word being third. But, supposedly unknown to BitPay, that's exactly what service they provided to Sonny Vleisides' BFL when they converted over 10 MILLION DOLLARS worth of BTC to fiat under the guise of product purchases where there is NO way that BitPay wouldn't have known that that was exactly what BFL was doing even prior to this PR release: http://www.prweb.com/releases/2013/10/prweb11283333.htm picked up by Reuters here: http://www.reuters.com/article/2013/10/31/idUSnGNX4VPYg9+1dc+GNW20131031

Again, BitPay is a third-party payment provider and not an exchange. Especially, not an exchange to convert tens of millions of dollars worth of bitcoins that were mined via ill-gotten means to fiat, of which is exactly what transpired when BFL did such virtually up to the day of the raid on their facility via the FTC.

To be clear, BitPay was a major player in a multi-ten-million-dollar money laundering scheme conducted by Sonny Vleisides' BF Labs Inc. (Butterfly Labs) and I uncovered it back in late 2013 (not 14), but nary a periodical has touched this. The question is why? And why has BitPay not answered a single email to them concerning this issue?

Wife: Comedian attacked onstage has double skull fracture

No quotes, so you'll have to read the article yourself to believe it.

Bitstamp won't have to buy bitcoins on the open or any other market. Their reserves are well-stocked. In fact, probably the latest bitcoin wallet address belongs to them, if not 5 of the top 10.