As of ~5 minutes ago Gleb Gamow is my alt.

Can you post a picture? 

No, seriously, don't.

If you happen to see YuTü.Co.in please tell him to check his messages. Thx.

So, how does one properly use their DT position?

---

1. You took the loan over a year ago, and after the partial repayment you made, you provided zero communication.
2. The campaign was full at the time, and I'm very picky about who I accept if the campaign is already full. I didn't necessarily consider you untrustworthy at the time; just not trustworthy enough.
3. There are other open campaigns.

Dude, although we haven't crossed paths much, I will say that I've crossed your path enough to think that it's strange as fuck to see your posts with a paid signature underneath them and a paid personal message to the side... Just sayin'

You could keep doing what you were doing as usual, learn it from me, I got more motivated after I got tagged left and right.
I just don't like those people who are in ICO business, I'm trying to make a way out for you here but there is no cooperation from you.

I want to let it slide but when I see that you are in bed with our new staff and you both are invested in your ICO, I can't simply let this one slide, my gut tells me that somebody got rejected in a signature campaign and they asked for your account in exchange for the support on your ICO and some cash/coins and they used your account to enroll in the said campaign but then people called you out and you decided to take control of your account back.

You made a mistake by starting to cover for that certain somebody, don't cover for him/her because clearly they were playing you all this time and now it's your account on the line plus years of hard earned trust and reputation.

I haven't really paid any attention or crossed many paths with Gleb Gamow, but given the recent debacle related to his account, I developed a theory that was touched upon by @hilariousetc: that as part of the sale of this account, Gleb Gamow would provide proof anytime the validity of the account was questioned.

After reading this thread, however, this theory is starting to make less and less sense, unless the new owner of the account specifically asked Gleb to log in to clarify and address any doubts or suspicions.

As someone who knows how to use Photoshop and the "Inspect Element" tool in mozilla-based browsers, my first instinct to the screenshot that was provided by OP was that the text on-screen was customized (via inspector) before the screenshot was taken. If this is not the case, how come the message still hasn't been reported to a moderator so it could be verified?

Either way, I find this whole scenario highly amusing, so thanks for the entertainment. I honestly can't wait to see what outcome there is, if there even will be at all  

EDIT: nvm about the verification by hilariousandco, I just discovered the other thread.

@Gleb, please don't kill yourself man, world doesn't end here and now, I'm sure that we all could find a way to forgive you if you just honestly tell us the truth about the actual buyer. just tell us please and I will do whatever in my power to help you out.

I'm not going to go down the route of claiming it's QS, and I'll be honest I was hoping that this was a fake screenshot right from the beginning. However, you've got to consider how this looks on the outside. If you were relatively new to the forum, and tried selling your account a few years ago when it wasn't so documented that it was a pretty unacceptable thing then I don't think it would be an issue.

But, your account holds a certain respect. It's pretty well known by the majority of the members here, and I just don't think the original owner would not know it's unacceptable to sell an account after being part of the forum for all these years.

I don't want to believe your protecting the buyer, and I don't want to believe it's been sold. But, the fact that you sent that message, and  then there are multiple password changes in among all of this just doesn't seem right.

Yeah, and it's why I'm so conflicted about the issue. All we do know is the PM was sent, and there were password changes. I tend to steer away from pure speculation, but this kind of hits a nerve with me for what ever reason. I remember liking Bruno quite a bit.

Alright, it seems that Bruno has attempted to sell an account before (PG) back when it was an accepted thing to do. Maybe, it's not totally unbelievable that he wasn't aware it's not really accepted anymore.

Whoever is posted with the account right now definitely sounds like Bruno, and matches up with his previous posts. I find it hard to believe that someone who has bought the account would be nailing his language down to a T.

I see that you are trying to legitimately purchase a DT account. this was the thing I needed to tag you with.
You want to preserve his post history? go ahead and archive them. I think this is enough to ask Tomatocage to exclude Gleb as Gleb doesn't even need a DT account due to the fact that he has never left anybody with any feedback. so excluding him wont hurt the "community".

Now that I have people's attentions here, I would like to point to the fact that Tomatocage has an alt account on DT2 with the name "Tomatocage1". as always be vigilant guys and girls.

I'll just leave this here:


Still doesn't explain this either:



The account has almost certainly changed hands regardless of any pictorial or telephonic proof gleb wants to post.


1) You've been here long enough to know how things work around here.
2) If that was the case, why did you use a throwaway account to sell it?


It wouldn't surprise me at all if QS was the one that bought it.

If this was the case wouldn't you have tried selling the account as this account, and not some throw away?

Calling him is useless. It literally proves nothing other than he's willing to potentially protect the person who bought it by claiming he's still in control.

Sold it and then reclaimed? Thus multiple password changes.

Sold it to Quicksy with some sort of revenue sharing deal? Thus Quicksy so eager with proof.

Many possibilities but unless Gleb starts engaging in shady shit beyond sig campaigns I think I'll hold my judgement.

I know he is/was in a legal dispute with one of the scammers he bused several years ago, IIRC, it was with cyberpinoy. I vaguely remember something about claims of something along the lines of stalking (maybe his wife), that very well could have been dubious.

This could mean two things:
1, he could be trying to create doubt as to if he is really posting what is being said by the account in order to muddy the legal waters.
2, he could actually need the money as a result of his legal bills and potentially a judgement against him. As I previously mentioned, he may not be in a position to repay a loan (even though many would likely be lining up to lend to him). If he really needed the money, he may have chosen to sell his account to someone who understood what he was buying instead of entering into a transaction without the intention of holding up his end of the deal in order to get the $600

That made me laugh, I like that you can keep your sense of humor about this.

Can you shed any light on the PM that was produced about selling the account?

Maybe you don't care and are just going to keep doin you; either way inquiring minds and what not.

I got lucky and when I was about to post the above, my phone rang. I easily guessed it was a Bitcoiner confirming my identity. I posted the image above while on the phone with him or her, though it sounded like a him but you can't be too sure of what's real or not in this space.  

Bruno

What is confusing for me is the fact that you never claimed your account to be compromised, you said that you changed email address and password for security reasons, hence no valid excuse to say that a hacker sent a PM to bigmelons25 just to destroy your reputation. I was going to consider you as a victim of a malicious attack on your account, but you said that you are still in control of your account that means you sent PM to sell your account.

Yes I have noticed that you have never left any feedback for anybody, that could be the reason for staying low profile just to sell the account somewhere in time without getting caught.

I would say there is a fairly decent chance it was sold, buy maybe not. The password changes indicate it likely changed hands, however the PM was sent after most of the changes. I don't think the password would change until after the account was sold, and I think these types of PMs would stop once the account was sold.

The only other explanation I can think of is the account sold to someone, and the buyer was trying to flip it.

If Gleb needed money he could have just joined a signature campaign or asked for a loan. It would be interesting to know why he sold the account or if he just lost access to it somehow.


That's not sufficient proof that you are the original owner. All I think it is is that Bruno is still willing to provide this as proof so you don't get busted.


Something still seemed off to me. It's the posting/use of language that is different.

Is this the new owner or what? how come you don't know what a default trust member is after being here for years? it means that your feedback would be visible in trust scores of people if you leave them either positive or negative trust.