Bitcoin Forum
June 17, 2024, 05:30:09 PM *
News: Latest Bitcoin Core release: 27.0 [Torrent]
 
  Home Help Search Login Register More  
  Show Posts
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 »
161  Alternate cryptocurrencies / Speculation (Altcoins) / Re: Are you surprised at the price of ETH? on: April 02, 2018, 08:30:18 PM

Are you surprised at the price of ETH? what is the reason?

If you think logically then the situation is adequate and we should not be surprised at the fall of this coin. IСOs can not raise capital and people lose their interest. ETH price is connected with IСOs, so it's just an obvious consequence.

Currently value of ethereum is expected, since most of the crypto currency price in the market are declining. Base on coin market cap it was due to large numbers of full outing of investment, a lot of withdrawals and trading, in facts those are commonly reasons of decreasing value of crypto currency in the market. But those common reasons are giving high impact to the crypto currency industy.

Yes, I'm very surprised at the price ETH . to be honest, did not expect there would be less than 500$ .I think now is the time to buy ETH . the market is stabilizing and I expect an upswing in the fall and everything will return to how it should be.


We cannot says the stability of ethereum together with the other altcoins in the market, because all possibilities are happening thru unexpected situation. but who knows maybe sooner or later price of ethereum are running up so fasts.
162  Other / Meta / Re: J.r Member on: April 02, 2018, 02:37:31 PM
hey guys . I have just been J.r Member . I dont know how to get merit to be member. what is the best thing for me to do to get merit ?
Hey bro! most of your posts in the previous are one liner, aside from that you are participants of twitter bounty campaign so rests of your posts are link. I suggest to posts in different sections of bitcointalk, give some participants advise how they can improve their quality of their posts. In addition, you need to have a posts that very helpful, with sense and something topics who can get the attention of the others. For me this is the best ways to earn merit, hoping that I can help you.

Giving merits for OP like that will encourage other to make this kind of posts. People are free to spend their merits as they like. But then we'll have every 2nd post of how to earn merits. Everybody knows how, but it would take devoting serious time and hard-work. Something what most people clearly lack as they continuously looking for easy shortcuts.
You are right, more lower ranks will encourage to makes nonsense topic and in worst they were possibly evolve as spammers in the future.
163  Economy / Services / Re: bustadice signature campaign(FULL) on: April 02, 2018, 11:58:47 AM
Btctalk name: ACvinegar
Rank: Member
Current post count: 118
bustadice Name: ACvinegar
Wear appropriate signature: Yes

If you don't mind sir yahoo, I just want to take the available spot in this campaign.
164  Other / Meta / Re: New new rank requirements on: April 01, 2018, 10:23:49 AM
Politeness
How polite you have been in your posts, using language such as "please" and "sir". Politeness is after all the cornerstone of any good community.

Indonesians and Filipinos are going to be leading the pack in politeness.

Our Pleasure Sir, Haha, Filipinos are real polite because people from third world country are Hospitable and knows how to respect. However, I have read some reply post that this is just a joke and i do believe that sir theymos implement this for a purpose that is why I am now currently confused on how it is done, but still, sooner or later i'll know this if this was a joke or a rule which can guide everybody. Thank You!
Yes it is true, most of the Filipino's are hospitable even in the other countries. However using "sir" and "please" I guess as signed of respect for the other users they using that terms. All people have own politeness on their own, sometimes it was secretly or hiding.
165  Other / Meta / Re: New new rank requirements on: April 01, 2018, 09:07:35 AM
I'm really confused? example I was now in member rank? how ratings do I need to ranking up in full member? What basis all I need to fulfill?
The answer of the new rank requirements are at the end of the animation Wink


Ow!! I get it, thank you sir. On the first I post my fmerit together with the others are high. Maybe ranking up now was depending on the fluctuation of the animation or when they are ends up? It is a good challenges again to the lower rank. Thank you again sir!
166  Other / Meta / Re: New new rank requirements on: April 01, 2018, 08:49:59 AM
I'm really confused? example I was now in member rank? how ratings do I need to ranking up in full member? What basis all I need to fulfill?
167  Other / Meta / Re: New new rank requirements on: April 01, 2018, 06:15:26 AM
LOL, when you see Pharmacist having a politeness score of 1195, you know that this new system is April Fool's joke!  Grin

It actually is a real stat (counting instances of "thanks" etc. in posts). But he has a lot of posts. Smiley
You sound cute, trying to protect your April Fool's day. But the real fun is reading the posts of people complaining about newly added rank up complexities!
Fun Fact: This is the first time Theymos replied me. Guess my meme was good enough!
Whether it is true or not? I see that it will gonna be a hot topic today.
168  Other / Meta / Re: New new rank requirements on: April 01, 2018, 06:00:05 AM
New merit system was too much confusing? sir theymos can you please elaborate it?

Aside on that too much requirements to rank up is very unfair to the newly participants? Do you have any exemption with that newly requirements?

I was expecting too much complaint's regarding on that merit system.
169  Economy / Reputation / Re: Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign on: April 01, 2018, 02:00:54 AM
Original account Aderiho Bitjones with wallet address of 17jivibLT1RnzHxZY9AeAVBUPccZTfwAEV was joined in "CellBlocks SIG and Avatar Campaign" together with their alt accounts coinbitrade with wallet address of 176TBB3BKDfxLcE55GUaFpNUKAhuSSnQyw

As reference it was reported for many times but still, they were allowed to join in signature campaign and they cannot get any sanction or negative trust. Proof that this is reported were shown on those link below:
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32429312#msg32429312
170  Economy / Services / Re: [ICO] ONSTELLAR | Subject Specific Social Platform | Signature campaign on: March 28, 2018, 02:19:22 PM
Dear sir is that campaign active for a one week or not? Also we will get our payments today or not?


Rules:

- First week of the campaign start on 22 March 2018 to end on 28 March 2018 23:59UTC.

Hey buddy, as per rules today is the last posting day, so it means that counting and paying will be possible tomorrow.
171  Other / Archival / Re: sMerit for quality users [ Wednesday Challenge] week 3 on: March 28, 2018, 02:42:57 AM
hugeblack this is mine, hoping you consider my posts. Thank you in advance!

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3195586.msg33132226#msg33132226
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3174841.msg33030316#msg33030316
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2737418.msg32402083#msg32402083
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3114287.msg32211310#msg32211310
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2457066.msg31955089#msg31955089
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827596.msg31626433#msg31626433
172  Economy / Services / Re: Yocoin Sig campaign(Change to new sig code) on: March 27, 2018, 12:10:12 PM
Yahoo62278, if you have available spot in this campaign I just want to take it, looking for your consideration.

Btctalk name: ACvinegar
Rank: Member
Current post count: 109
BTC Address: 1FX9X8uJhMhN4t9ZCipHojjs5HRjqs1bHh
Wear appropriate signature: Yes
173  Other / Meta / Re: [List] Suspected users that are abusing merit 3.0 on: March 26, 2018, 03:18:13 PM
Just review these accounts, they are exchanging and abusing merit system.

Bagaji                                                                       Merit sent to
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1073550   BUK2016
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1155136   XCANA
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1095848   Yarsk
   
BUK2016   
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=936465   Ahiaba
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1155136   XCANA
   
XCANA   
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1073550   BUK2016
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1004188   Bagaji
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=920843   Idrisu
   
Yarsk   
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1224828   cizatext
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1073550   BUK2016
   
Ahiaba   
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1004188   Bagaji
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1224828   cizatext
   
cizatext   
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1095848   Yarsk
   
These account are very suspicious and eye catchy because they are sharing of merits rotationally.   
   

   
   
Yarsk merit sent to cizatext (bustadice signature campaign(FULL))
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1224828

February 04, 2018, 03:08:05 AM: 1 to cizatext for Re: Bitcoin is a life changer
January 27, 2018, 06:47:31 PM: 1 to cizatext for Re: will bitcoin rise up to $20000?
January 27, 2018, 10:34:44 AM: 3 to cizatext for Re: will bitcoin rise up to $20000?

cizatext merit sent to Yarsk (Decent Signature Campaign)
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=merit;u=1095848

February 03, 2018, 08:52:05 AM: 2 to Yarsk for Re: Why do people want Bitcoin?
January 27, 2018, 07:04:46 PM: 1 to Yarsk for Re: What was your first thought about bitcoin?
January 27, 2018, 04:23:20 PM: 2 to Yarsk for Re: Should I buy BTC?   
      
This account of Yarsk and cizatext are obviously exchanging merit, just visit the link above as proof.         


In reference to this findings now I saw a solid proof that those accounts are exchanging merit. Please see the evidence below

Those accounts are connected to each one, at the first I accused them of exchanging merit. But now I will prove that accusation I made have concrete evidences.

Bagaji   - 16gxeoPYa1iPaFduExQWTnEcage1UxNtwb
Bagaji   - 1FsJYoXFYss6NbX5osNcMg3w7Nh6ZkwMAX
BUK2016   - 1HP3uJDezYxpBgXytVv1deF3xsmPXVyojC
XCANA   - 1NZHQDbuZo2Q8LiY2L4t6Dt3TGUY6MkfUN





In additional aside from obviously exchanging merit, Yarsk and cizatext are owned by one person. Their wallet are also connected including "awawo" which is not included to the findings

yarsk   - 13vPVvAmxVEVupD1Xw1Mrug1qJMqvM3SVf
awawo   - 16tQDs75K9ot3Wgs7nGqUoJS6Bu8qzp7k6
cizatext   - 1BejwuDBA33gT8Zmg76wvdAARAv7qWK7PG
awawo   - 18bHBnvpjgX1DEMreMsqaKmySwcfN1oz9Y



PS. Timelord2067 was already detected that lapses but still they were not stop creating fraud inside bitcointalk.
Link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2544574.msg27526519#msg27526519

Be careful to those account, because they are fraudsters.

174  Economy / Reputation / Re: Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign on: March 26, 2018, 11:51:24 AM
I'd already made the connection between Lorrylore and hua_hui:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=239151 lorrylore
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=553644 namelessname
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?action=profile;u=332981     hua_hui

hua_hui is also running the PolicyPal campaign but his alt lorylore is also on it as is his own account:



Which is against his own campaign terms:

Rules:

- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.



This is why there should be more scrutiny on random accounts becoming campaign managers because there far too much incompetence and shadiness going on with them. His campaigns should probably be looked into because I'm sure he's probably paying a load more of his alt accounts.


With you respect, I think they need to sanction them to scared those people who trying to cheat. Aside on that hua_hui was literary abuse their rank and position as campaign manager, not only once or twice. If they tolerate them, they continue make it again and again, or in worst many fraudsters were follow their steps.
175  Economy / Reputation / Re: Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign on: March 25, 2018, 08:00:25 PM

What you mean when you told me to check these links? What wrong if anyone share their ETH address? If you said that no stupid users shared their address to others, I think this forum is full of stupid guys cause it's just a normal thing when you share your wallet address to other people.

Using of same address between original users and their alt accounts are allowed, but I think you cannot get my point in this findings. I post this lapses because both original accounts and alternative accounts are joining in one signature campaign which is prohibited. That is included to the rules and regulation made by the mods.

I still don't understand why you're so vehemently defending him  Huh
I don't defend for him or anyone in this forum Smiley. I just need more evidence, these evidences still not enough for me to believe that they're alts and I think it's also not enough for all other DT member to tag these guys Smiley. That's all.

Evidence I shown in this posts are concrete and solid but if that is not enough for you I don't need to explain more. I do my part and only mods and DT can decide if they can accept the findings I shown.

Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this?

My intention that's why I create this thread is not to destroy the reputation of higher rank like Legendary, all I want is to have fair and equal policy to everyone. It not means that they are in the higher rank they cannot followed the rules and regulations, instead they need to become good example to newly participants and to everyone.
176  Economy / Reputation / Re: Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign on: March 25, 2018, 02:06:24 PM
Your evidences still don't enough to point out they're alt accounts cause there are a lot of stupid guys in this forum are trying to destroy other higher rank account by this way. Do you think a Legendary user in this forum would have a mistake like this? same ETH address in the same campaign? I don't think so. If these accounts give merit for each other, I can ensure that they are alts but for now, it's still not clearly.

Why you cannot try to visit this link:

hua_hui

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1aOKDlEvIFd8nvJ-1tvJDAHBU-2FDuKfk-MP53bY7iEQ/edit#gid=251980404

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2199275.msg23369370#msg23369370

misterbigg

https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/187rOvYdoYKHHthcmzvrKcN2UQ5d9E2FU6sOO07ZC5GY/edit#gid=700361341

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2057194.msg22179816#msg22179816

I cannot destroy the reputation of those Legendary users because on the first time I saw it, I was shocked that's why I reviewed it clearly. Why do they need to sharing/exchanging their merits? that is not my basis boy. That proof is enough because no stupid users shared their wallet address to others.
177  Economy / Reputation / Cheating thru using dual of account in signature campaign on: March 25, 2018, 01:07:25 PM

- Must wear our signature code and avatar
- Do not post all 20 posts within a day or 2. You are supposed to spread out the posting across the whole week.
- No red trust score.
- No multiple accounts/farming accounts.
- If you leave half way, you will not get paid for that week.
- This signature campaign will last for 8 weeks.
Week 1 Mar 14 to Mar 20
Week 2 Mar 21 to Mar 27
Week 3 Mar 28 to Apr 3
Week 4 Apr 4 to Apr 10
Week 5 Apr 11 to Apr 17
Week 6 Apr 18 to Apr 24
Week 7 Apr 25 to May 1
Week 8 May 2 to May 8


You have to wear our signature code and avatar before applying.
- Fill this Google form : https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSf3bnZnhXq2CBp-0ZeWV0-erltlwK9HbDMvwDW3o5L_UUm9bw/viewform

Rates, paid in tokens:
Legendary : $800/week
Hero : $600/week
Senior : $400/week
Full member : $200/week
 Member : $100/week
Jr. Member : $50/week

Limited to 10 participants/rank.

Check your weekly allocation here.
Fishcoin Signature Spreadsheet : https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit?usp=sharing


That are the rules made by hua_hui but even him, he cannot followed their own rules. As per investigation Signature campaign manager hua_hui was join as participant of their own signature campaign named "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"

During investigation I was found two (2) cases of dual accounts are joining in the signature campaign, as proof I will attached the copy of spreadsheet including the link below:





Link: https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/1UZyiLnBHD605Fo1voSGS5qaacb1fxFjRO_2hJLGHC_s/edit#gid=1403601995

These are the support information for the regarding dual accounts applied in "[BOUNTY] 🐟🐟Fishcoin🐟🐟|Twitter Bounty|Attractive Signature Up to $800/week"


BlockFolksHQ - 0x5829AFDc06EA5de1364B3c43367562BA67ed83ad this account is alt account of hua_hui

Proof:

subodhmore123aqs - 0x0FFa2B4178d928AA9311d5a049cb1c6E256e1589 this account is alt account of misterbigg

Proof:

Their wallet address are the same in the photo I attached, be aware with them because they are a signature campaign cheater.

178  Economy / Services / Re: [ICO] ONSTELLAR | Subject Specific Social Platform | Signature campaign on: March 24, 2018, 05:38:55 AM
Woshib


I just want to inform you that two (2) of your participants accepted were used by one (1) person, if you review their wallet accounts they are connected to each one. DarkStar_ is already founded it, Show the proof below:



Kindly review this link: https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=1702409.msg25815844#msg25815844

ladydark - 1ARKJdvYSyhTYuAS6P9N8NX6k9q8U8EivT

farhaan - 15aPsiv9mYUZ3tRR9P3h56g6aDBxmTc7XE


Those accounts are trying to cheat again, so be aware with them.

As update in relation to the current findings filharvey also attempting to join in this signature campaign, but suddenly he/she cannot accept due to inconsistent posting.

179  Other / Meta / Re: Activity & new membergroup limits on: March 23, 2018, 09:19:12 PM
I thought we are having new rules again, but this thread is an old one right?
Maybe?? but we need to get ready whatsoever changes happen. Because weather we like it or not, we need to like it very much! theymos can't stopped developing the system of bitcointalk I feel that he have a good plan in the future. So just follow with the flow!
180  Other / Off-topic / Re: sMerit Post-Review on: March 22, 2018, 02:59:06 PM
Hi bill gator,

I just want to submit some link that I think who have good quality, so if you have some spare time can you please review the link below:

https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32429312#msg32429312
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=3114287.msg32211310#msg32211310
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2896910.msg32260190#msg32260190
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2457066.msg31955089#msg31955089
https://bitcointalk.org/index.php?topic=2827596.msg31626433#msg31626433

I'm average English speaker so I'm trying to send this link, maybe because for some merits,

looking forward you consider my request. Thanks in advance.
Pages: « 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 [9] 10 11 12 13 14 »
Powered by MySQL Powered by PHP Powered by SMF 1.1.19 | SMF © 2006-2009, Simple Machines Valid XHTML 1.0! Valid CSS!