Nicehash is easy to use and is more profitable.
It is easy to use, but could you please try to explain how it is more profitable? Whattomine in 98% of cases shows something other is more profitable, sometimes even >15%. So, please explain, I would like to learn how it is more profitable. |
|
|
|
Thread was not started about sellers of hash power, but buyers  I'm also interested is it profitable to buy hash power in situations other than appearance of new coins and price peaks. Or you mine and just wait for higher price? |
|
|
|
|
SATA connectors deliver only 54W, molex connector delivers full-spec PCIE 75W. It's simple, avoid SATA risers and SATA adapters/convertors.
|
|
|
|
|
Is anywhere available ETN network hashrate distribution? Nethash is ~140MH/s but there is no single pool that is even close to that hashrate, and most of them are often ddos-ed on daily basis ...
|
|
|
|
|
@BHTeam There is also wrong data with OnexCoin. For hours on crypto-coinz.net page says 120,047,074 H/s and 3 diff for Onex, but quick visit to Onex block explorer shows drastically different values.
|
|
|
|
next time check at least first payment, you loose only 4-5 hours of mining depends on payments schedule for the pool
Well, I did, first 4 payments were ok. |
|
|
|
So we mined 13 hours for nothing on bigmine.org, because nothing is coming on coinsmarkets from 01:11AM? What a lame situation from all sides (dev, pools, exchanges, ...)  |
|
|
|
C-cex site has been on maintenance for many hours! when can we get access to our account again?? Maintenance forever??
I would recommend withdrawing all what you have on ccex, if it starts working again By reputation of this exchange, you may never know when it will go to permanent "server maintenace" together with all your coins. I'm using it now just for Payeer payout. BTW, is there any other exchange with Payeer payout (withdraw)? |
|
|
|
Coin icons are at full height and width because there is no css property for width. It should be something like this: <td id="imageTd" style="border-top: 1px solid #BEBEBE; border-bottom: 1px solid #BEBEBE; vertical-align: middle; width: 100px;"> Edit: This broken table view is visible on screen resolutions larger than 1440px width. |
|
|
|
|
Now it works 1-2 minutes, and then "Server Maintenance" next 5-10 min, and it repeats continously ... It's impossible to trade normally. Is ccex doing anything on server upgrades and is there any ETA for solving those "Server Maintenance" messages? Does admin understand that both users and ccex are at loss? Or maybe it's time to forget all this and look for a new exchange ...
|
|
|
|
Now waiting for Cryptonight algo coins  Great work BHTeam! |
|
|
|
|
At least, all this situation showed who's for what. Im for clean, uncompromised, BTCZ.
BTW, it's no more listed on whattomine.com.
|
|
|
|
Hello everyone! We launched the site in Russian ( https://btcz.tech/), we will gradually fill it with information. Also launched the node There are all preconditions that the coin will continue to grow!  Site is done great - fast, clean, simple and informative! Congrats! |
|
|
|
snap Maybe you misunderstood me. Maybe I misunderstood you. In the article on this link there is nothing new for me. Nominally, many coins fit the definition: "Only controled supply or supply by calculable criteria allows that every published unit of one currency have the same value". But we can have different cost of electricity and consumed energy of video cards, which we extract, which allows for example you to extract for the same production capacity the different numbers of coins. Correspondingly for you the cost of the extracted coin will be less than for me. We understood each other that both of us agree something has to be done Lets just do that properly, following BTCZ white paper, section III, "Proposals Systems / Voting". |
|
|
|
You want artificially to lower supply after some people mined milions of btcz (and that way rise price)? Slim shaddy First of all, bitcoin was created as a means of payment, and all money is subject to inflation. Reducing the speed of issuance of new coins is a involuntary measure. I, as a simple member of the community, support this action. But what about those people who mined milions of btcz and hold? Will they also be subject of inflation? Or some people will suddenly became "milionares"? We have to think about this, because this sudden lowering of block rewards for 10x!! after just 3 months instead of halving after 4 years (as declared) can be seen as - "refined premine". And I don't support that. And generaly, I think BTCZ should stay as-is and those who don't like it, well, thay can always fork into new coin This is not a premine. It was not originally founded by one group of people for personal enrichment. The decision to change the award for the block was taken by the community. Those who extracted millions and become "millionaires" extracted them under equal conditions, stipulated by the algorithm and the complexity of the network. Millionaires can become those who bought this coin on the stock exchange when it grew in price. You do not call the "refined premine" produced bitсoin in 2010 when the complexity of the network was low and people extracted thousands of them. Simply, many then did not believe in him. And innovators, those who believed and tried to get deservedly received their award. You don't need to explain that BTCZ is not premine, it's known. In your example you forgot one thing about BTC - it never changed halving period and that way affecting rate of supply, and thats why everyone had equal chances. I just wanted to tell btcz community that artificial change of supply can be seen badly in other comunities, potentional future investors and especially market exchanges. It could be considered "refined premine". There was no equal chance for all. I did not have a computer at that time. I could not get bitcoin. I just did not know about him. For me, bitcoin is the first in its industry of digital money but not the standard. Bitcoin developers did not provide scalability of the network. The awarding of the award for the block was taken for some of their criteria conditionally for 4 years, but who said that it is true? The markets and the industry are too volatile. On the contrary, it is attractive for me as an investor that we can fast react by consensus and make positive adjustments to the digital asset - btsz. Only dynamic models are viable, we do not have to turn our coins into a stone statue. Now the market requires a reduction in supply. And we must take action. After all, one of the goals btcz is to increase the cost and turn into a payment instrument. We'll leave BTC disqusion, and continue just on BTCZ ... First, it is not market requiring change of supply. Most voices for that change come from HODL-ers which expected fast price surge and fast profits. But yes, there deffinitely needs to be change of supply, this model of supply planed by btcz developers is not sustainable. It's just theirs oversight (or is it?) of values while planing coin. Second, artificial change of btcz supply like proposed in this thread will convert BTCZ into scam coin. By that model you'll have part of same coins worth more and other part of coins worth less - on same market. Only thing which could be changed without significantly affecting value of mined btcz on market and unmined btcz is period of halving. Instead of 4 years, that could be easily changed to 1 year, 6 months, something like "Camel" distribution (see Sumo coin supply), or something else. Just that way would be fair for everyone. Your main argument - By that model you'll have part of same coins worth more and other part of coins worth less - on same market. But with fluctuations in the price of the exchange, the value of the coins that were extracted yesterday and today also changes. In cases of a decrease or increase in the complexity of a network with the same capacity, the volume of production also changes the value of the extracted coins, respectively. This is happening in the same market. There will always be coins produced and received with different values. If that is happening than it is scam coin By your example, you want to say that my fresh mined 1 BTCZ is worth yours 0,5 yesterday mined BTCZ's  Only controled supply or supply by calculable criteria allows that every published unit of one currency have the same value ... I recommend reading this link - https://en.bitcoin.it/wiki/Controlled_supply |
|
|
|
You want artificially to lower supply after some people mined milions of btcz (and that way rise price)? Slim shaddy First of all, bitcoin was created as a means of payment, and all money is subject to inflation. Reducing the speed of issuance of new coins is a involuntary measure. I, as a simple member of the community, support this action. But what about those people who mined milions of btcz and hold? Will they also be subject of inflation? Or some people will suddenly became "milionares"? We have to think about this, because this sudden lowering of block rewards for 10x!! after just 3 months instead of halving after 4 years (as declared) can be seen as - "refined premine". And I don't support that. And generaly, I think BTCZ should stay as-is and those who don't like it, well, thay can always fork into new coin This is not a premine. It was not originally founded by one group of people for personal enrichment. The decision to change the award for the block was taken by the community. Those who extracted millions and become "millionaires" extracted them under equal conditions, stipulated by the algorithm and the complexity of the network. Millionaires can become those who bought this coin on the stock exchange when it grew in price. You do not call the "refined premine" produced bitсoin in 2010 when the complexity of the network was low and people extracted thousands of them. Simply, many then did not believe in him. And innovators, those who believed and tried to get deservedly received their award. You don't need to explain that BTCZ is not premine, it's known. In your example you forgot one thing about BTC - it never changed halving period and that way affecting rate of supply, and thats why everyone had equal chances. I just wanted to tell btcz community that artificial change of supply can be seen badly in other comunities, potentional future investors and especially market exchanges. It could be considered "refined premine". There was no equal chance for all. I did not have a computer at that time. I could not get bitcoin. I just did not know about him. For me, bitcoin is the first in its industry of digital money but not the standard. Bitcoin developers did not provide scalability of the network. The awarding of the award for the block was taken for some of their criteria conditionally for 4 years, but who said that it is true? The markets and the industry are too volatile. On the contrary, it is attractive for me as an investor that we can fast react by consensus and make positive adjustments to the digital asset - btsz. Only dynamic models are viable, we do not have to turn our coins into a stone statue. Now the market requires a reduction in supply. And we must take action. After all, one of the goals btcz is to increase the cost and turn into a payment instrument. We'll leave BTC disqusion, and continue just on BTCZ ... First, it is not market requiring change of supply. Most voices for that change come from HODL-ers which expected fast price surge and fast profits. But yes, there deffinitely needs to be change of supply, this model of supply planed by btcz developers is not sustainable. It's just theirs oversight (or is it?) of values while planing coin. Second, artificial change of btcz supply like proposed in this thread will convert BTCZ into scam coin. By that model you'll have part of same coins worth more and other part of coins worth less - on same market. Only thing which could be changed without significantly affecting value of mined btcz on market and unmined btcz is period of halving. Instead of 4 years, that could be easily changed to 1 year, 6 months, something like "Camel" distribution (see Sumo coin supply), or something else. Just that way would be fair for everyone. |
|
|
|
You want artificially to lower supply after some people mined milions of btcz (and that way rise price)? Slim shaddy First of all, bitcoin was created as a means of payment, and all money is subject to inflation. Reducing the speed of issuance of new coins is a involuntary measure. I, as a simple member of the community, support this action. But what about those people who mined milions of btcz and hold? Will they also be subject of inflation? Or some people will suddenly became "milionares"? We have to think about this, because this sudden lowering of block rewards for 10x!! after just 3 months instead of halving after 4 years (as declared) can be seen as - "refined premine". And I don't support that. And generaly, I think BTCZ should stay as-is and those who don't like it, well, thay can always fork into new coin This is not a premine. It was not originally founded by one group of people for personal enrichment. The decision to change the award for the block was taken by the community. Those who extracted millions and become "millionaires" extracted them under equal conditions, stipulated by the algorithm and the complexity of the network. Millionaires can become those who bought this coin on the stock exchange when it grew in price. You do not call the "refined premine" produced bitсoin in 2010 when the complexity of the network was low and people extracted thousands of them. Simply, many then did not believe in him. And innovators, those who believed and tried to get deservedly received their award. You don't need to explain that BTCZ is not premine, it's known. In your example you forgot one thing about BTC - it never changed halving period and that way affecting rate of supply, and thats why everyone had equal chances. I just wanted to tell btcz community that artificial change of supply can be seen badly in other comunities, potentional future investors and especially market exchanges. It could be considered "refined premine". |
|
|
|
You want artificially to lower supply after some people mined milions of btcz (and that way rise price)? Slim shaddy First of all, bitcoin was created as a means of payment, and all money is subject to inflation. Reducing the speed of issuance of new coins is a involuntary measure. I, as a simple member of the community, support this action. But what about those people who mined milions of btcz and hold? Will they also be subject of inflation? Or some people will suddenly became "milionares"? We have to think about this, because this sudden lowering of block rewards for 10x!! after just 3 months instead of halving after 4 years (as declared) can be seen as - "refined premine". And I don't support that. And generaly, I think BTCZ should stay as-is and those who don't like it, well, thay can always fork into new coin |
|
|
|
We need to get this coin onto cryptopia Obviously, as CCEX is more time in maintenance mode than properly working It turned out it is 4 wasted btc of btcz community  |
|
|
|
You want artificially to lower supply after some people mined milions of btcz (and that way rise price)? Slim shaddy |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
