When it happens (not if) it will come as a complete surprise to everyone when it does (myself included probably), the way I see it is now that blockchain technology is being introduced into the mainstream of finance - BTC and the little association that banded together years ago to promote and protect it (at a price to join) will lose control of the blockchain guidance that it wielded like a new weapon in the world, altcoins and the shotgun approach to answering the worlds financial problems will outrun BTC as long as young developers challenge the status quo and think outside of the box and continue to keep moving in a decentralized fashion that enables users to reach beyond borders that others in power have put in place to promote their own wealth.
My short answer is yes=altcoins will match Bitcoin and pass it, do your research.

Thats it, takes some time to learn how to walk or talk, small amounts are a good way to learn.

Well thank you sir, low cost transactions is kind of half of what Charlie tried to say on CNBC, the other half of what he was saying is decentralized, this coin is not controlled, it has no central power devaluing it and we that have a little bit (or alot) are truly who give it any value, kind of like Art ya know, LTC is the coin you could buy you morning coffee with (if you dare to stop holding it)

Hmmm  what do you want help with? I also have an old computer around and so I  kinda relate.. but my own has a working hard drive with a little history on it pics and what not that I never transferred and the the only reason I hold on to it, I would be willing to sell it for the right price if your interested 

You have to admit this is funny though right? When somebody comes in late to something expecting some type of airdrop or whatever, I laughed for a second over this 
anyway..I hold some of these coins and hope more people adopt the idea, solar is a good way to become independent, independent avoiding one bill anyway, in the U.S. energy is so costly and  if there was a crypto involved in just promoting solar and showing people how the transactions of selling back to the grid with contracts could benefit them then more solar would make its way on top of houses and less people would pay for municipal energy.

I do not see the BUBBLE people speak of, Crypto is a hot topic, banks and businesses are running to the crypto scene trying to to figure out how to get in, BTC is on its way to pass the 30,000 dollar value that once seemed a far way off when it was under 500 dollars and it will stay as volatile as it has always been, but transferring it is a pain, I want my money and I don't want to see it "pending", LTC is trusted with a track record and I am willing to bet its forks will do well also, not sure I will need to use LTC for my transfers always but as long as its the quickest I will buy it and use it to buy the satoshi coins I want.

The developers of both teams are both doing work toward improving their projects, by diversifying your investment and holding both you will limit the risk involved in investing, if you believe in one over the other just put it all in one and do what you can to support it and bring more support to the community surrounding it.

Could be anything, but I think that cause it transfers so quickly and at a low cost people are learning to buy it rather than anything else if they are going to move their crypto from one site to another, I bought ETH, BTC and LTC on one site and learned real quick that LTC was the best option for transfer's, I want quick transactions and low transaction cost's, so lets say I was able to profit with arbitrage - LTC rates high among the top 5 coins capable of moving around and I would be able to make more money with the low transfer fee's .

As Litecoin start's to get the biggest pump its ever seen, I think bittrex among other popular sites are getting more traffic than planned for, it is kind of cool to watch how high it can get - I shouldve bought at 7 cents and held dang it, now Im buying the other 7 centers (well 1 of em).

No, did you get burned?

Apparently Charlie Lee will be on CNBC in the morning, pretty much half of the US investors will get a glimpse at Crypto over their morning cup of coffee.
And in light of the recent btc surge ltc really does look like a good investment.

Looks like some people buy alot of coins while alts are in the red, I see some green candles that have some very heavy btc flowing into the coin in the last few hours, so what is happening with Altcoins??? They are on the way back up after a day in the red?

My take on airbnb is surely quite different than yours, so much better to rent a house on airbnb than stay in a hotel for extended periods of time, a token moving in a similar direction is something I could use.

You know I guess its just me being pissed off about this, I have the tower i started everything on and so its all recorded clearly on the disk, I do not like one bit that these guy's took a project they worked on and took it's logo and ticker, there are lots of abbreviations that can be used.

Read through my post, I believe the devs were also involved in developing the qt for activecoin in 2014 that i payed to have built. I could understand the abbreviations become a problem, but logo and abbreviation and the same person behind it?? No.. Achain is straight up a pull from my creative idea.

Ok so I have a question for those that are in the know on how our community should deal with Coin vs Coin.

The issue is complicated but here is a brief incomplete summary.

In early 2014 I decided to start a coin to get more people interested in crypto coins.
In 2014 I launched ACT - it was designed to target people that lived active lives to get them interested in crypto and the goal for the coin was for it to be used for buying recreational items and anything they would need to live an active lifestyle'
also to reward people that contributed while engaged in a active lifestyle, now honestly I knew it was too soon to start niche type of coins but i wanted to reserve the ticker and the logo and idea for a project i was passionate about and I believed it could weather the lows and survive, ACT (activecoin) had good hashrates and behind the trading scenes appeared to have good support - I was able to get it listed on an exchange honestly when at the time some exchanges insinuated and suggested that for a fee they would list coins (and I decided not to buy into exchanges), I bought into miner leases to keep hashing for those that were interested in the project and spent money on it that I earned at my day job to reward auctions on my facebook page https://www.facebook.com/Activecoin/ I might have gone about things wrong at the time in attempting to market the crypto but I have always had plans to invest in ACT and revive the blockchain I started that surely has a place in the world in many ways.

So the Issue is:
Achain has been using ACT as the ticker for their coin, it is tradable and listed on many different exchanges.
They have been using the same logo as activecoin: ACT
They have appropriated a brand that technically should be protected unless released by myself or those that hold ACT (activecoin) in a community vote while the chain is online.
I believe that the developers of achain were involved in the production of activecoin - using a copy of the bitcoin qt client that they sold to me through the bitcointalk.org forum.
To revive the blockchain of ACT (activecoin) at this point would be a head to head position against the Achain developers.
I am very upset that my creative content for an idea of a crypto was used without my consent.

-Chris-




 

I am completely and utterly disturbed by achain, the devs chose to not only use the ticker of Activecoin but also the same logo, if there was some type of legal recourse to take here i would pursue it cause I am very irritated that the ticker is being used, I have always had plans to revive Activecoin to ensure the miners that put hash power into it could be reimbursed for their investment, I just do not know what route to take right now.
Any advice would be appreciated.

 - Activecoin -

I think Alts are all going deeper, and at this point there will not be a BTC correction cause it truly is a great addition to anyone's portfolio, the only correction coming is in Alts, they are undervalued at the time cause the only digital currency is an Altcoin - Bitcoin has become more than it was built to be and cannot be used to buy coffee or pizza without a high transaction fee, yet if crypto is what you want to pay with there is 10 or 20 coins that have less of a fee - I personally use LTC when I move my crypto value but thats cause its what I am familiar with.

Look.. these ETH guys have been developing blockchain for years, you really think a little kitty is going to take down the network they have put their heart and soul into?If they encourage an offchain option it will be the time to worry about ETH, this is what ETH was rolled out for, less people play games than the people that need to send email chains back and forth securely, if ETH can't handle 5 more games just like the kitties than Blockchain Technology for transferring information is doomed, ETH is poised to take a lead in the race of token networking and smart contracts and the kitties should forever be referred to as the "damn kittens" that somehow managed to smash the competition.

Pushed it to it's limit is all, when I reach my limit I personally push a little harder to hit my goal, kitties and all ETH is here to stay, I would bet on it.

I do like the "years ago" included in your statement, frigging Achain stole my logo and ticker from years ago, I am not a fan of Achain