If there is a project that has a concept that is almost the same as SON but the project has several advantages that precisely these advantages are the weakness of the concept held by SON. How does the team in overcome it?
I think every project has advantages and weaknesses in the concept. And every project always has a plan to always make new breakthroughs to be in demand by many people. It may be that at the beginning the concept of a project still has some shortcomings but with the development of it could have exceeded the concept of its competitors. Are you part of the team? If yes it seems like I want a more technical answer or maybe an example is given to do the comparison. I'm not part of the team. I am just monitoring the progress of this project because in addition to having different concepts and I also want to know if this project can be used as an investment in the future. Are you sure that SON tokens can be an investment in the future? Why not pick a coin that clearly has a market value to invest? Because so far I have never seen a token price with a promising selling price. And only used as a means of exchange to buy coins. I have not decided to invest, because as I said I am monitoring the progress of this project. Everyone has different tricks and ways of choosing an investment. And you assume token as a tool used to buy coins, is not that the same with investment. Just like storing a token in bulk and when the token price goes up to buy the desired coin at a cheap price. Our understanding of investments is a little different I think. When buying SON tokens in large quantities and selling them when the price goes up to buy a coin at a cheap price I think it is trading. Except buy SON tokens at the lowest prices held within a certain timeframe to expect profit and sale when the price is above the purchase price. Although in reality not always as expected. You are arguing about SON to be an investment, while crowdsale has not started yet. Sounds like silly.  Not me who wants to invest but him. I just wait when the crowdsale will start. By the way do you know when it will start? Find your own latest news on the official site skynet. Don't just talk about things that have not started yet and don't be lazy. Relaxed friends just because many want to know whether SON has a good enough potential for the future. So many questions about it. Because people will be interested if a project has a concept that will continue to grow not just walk in place. Keep that in mind. |
|
|
|
If there is a project that has a concept that is almost the same as SON but the project has several advantages that precisely these advantages are the weakness of the concept held by SON. How does the team in overcome it?
I think every project has advantages and weaknesses in the concept. And every project always has a plan to always make new breakthroughs to be in demand by many people. It may be that at the beginning the concept of a project still has some shortcomings but with the development of it could have exceeded the concept of its competitors. Are you part of the team? If yes it seems like I want a more technical answer or maybe an example is given to do the comparison. I'm not part of the team. I am just monitoring the progress of this project because in addition to having different concepts and I also want to know if this project can be used as an investment in the future. Are you sure that SON tokens can be an investment in the future? Why not pick a coin that clearly has a market value to invest? Because so far I have never seen a token price with a promising selling price. And only used as a means of exchange to buy coins. I have not decided to invest, because as I said I am monitoring the progress of this project. Everyone has different tricks and ways of choosing an investment. And you assume token as a tool used to buy coins, is not that the same with investment. Just like storing a token in bulk and when the token price goes up to buy the desired coin at a cheap price. Our understanding of investments is a little different I think. When buying SON tokens in large quantities and selling them when the price goes up to buy a coin at a cheap price I think it is trading. Except buy SON tokens at the lowest prices held within a certain timeframe to expect profit and sale when the price is above the purchase price. Although in reality not always as expected. You are arguing about SON to be an investment, while crowdsale has not started yet. Sounds like silly. Not me who wants to invest but him. I just wait when the crowdsale will start. By the way do you know when it will start? |
|
|
|
If there is a project that has a concept that is almost the same as SON but the project has several advantages that precisely these advantages are the weakness of the concept held by SON. How does the team in overcome it?
I think every project has advantages and weaknesses in the concept. And every project always has a plan to always make new breakthroughs to be in demand by many people. It may be that at the beginning the concept of a project still has some shortcomings but with the development of it could have exceeded the concept of its competitors. Are you part of the team? If yes it seems like I want a more technical answer or maybe an example is given to do the comparison. I'm not part of the team. I am just monitoring the progress of this project because in addition to having different concepts and I also want to know if this project can be used as an investment in the future. Are you sure that SON tokens can be an investment in the future? Why not pick a coin that clearly has a market value to invest? Because so far I have never seen a token price with a promising selling price. And only used as a means of exchange to buy coins. I have not decided to invest, because as I said I am monitoring the progress of this project. Everyone has different tricks and ways of choosing an investment. And you assume token as a tool used to buy coins, is not that the same with investment. Just like storing a token in bulk and when the token price goes up to buy the desired coin at a cheap price. Our understanding of investments is a little different I think. When buying SON tokens in large quantities and selling them when the price goes up to buy a coin at a cheap price I think it is trading. Except buy SON tokens at the lowest prices held within a certain timeframe to expect profit and sale when the price is above the purchase price. Although in reality not always as expected. |
|
|
|
If there is a project that has a concept that is almost the same as SON but the project has several advantages that precisely these advantages are the weakness of the concept held by SON. How does the team in overcome it?
I think every project has advantages and weaknesses in the concept. And every project always has a plan to always make new breakthroughs to be in demand by many people. It may be that at the beginning the concept of a project still has some shortcomings but with the development of it could have exceeded the concept of its competitors. Are you part of the team? If yes it seems like I want a more technical answer or maybe an example is given to do the comparison. I'm not part of the team. I am just monitoring the progress of this project because in addition to having different concepts and I also want to know if this project can be used as an investment in the future. Are you sure that SON tokens can be an investment in the future? Why not pick a coin that clearly has a market value to invest? Because so far I have never seen a token price with a promising selling price. And only used as a means of exchange to buy coins. |
|
|
|
|
What are the vital components in creating Intelligence Machines?
|
|
|
|
|
It's bad to join pump and dump group, whales are playing us!
|
|
|
|
|
I think this is expensive enough.
|
|
|
|
|
Had it occurred to me if later this project is successful whether Skynet Core will be marketed freely or just for the IoT device developer company only especially who became the partner of this project?
|
|
|
|
On whitepaper I found the term Neuromorphic Hardware System. I still do not understand what it is and how it works. Maybe someone knows?
Yes I also wonder if there is a tool that can mimic the biological nervous system in humans, but after I looked it might be a system device that works to connect between network chains to other device systems. Maybe. |
|
|
|
On Scalability SON Horizontal architecture key features like what can be presented?
As I know it can present some things about Delegated Proof of Stake, Scalable Platforms, Communication Protocols, Decentralized Exchange, Infinite Sharding, & Two Dimensional Blockchain. Do you understand from each point that you submit earlier? Because in my opinion it has not answered the whole of the question I gave. Have you read the whitepaper? Because my answer comes from there. Please check it yourself and start to be an independent person. Calm down, I've read it. Because there are some things that I do not understand so I ask in this forum. The language is too technical and confuses me. If you can give a more simple understanding there is no harm in sharing knowledge. |
|
|
|
On Scalability SON Horizontal architecture key features like what can be presented?
As I know it can present some things about Delegated Proof of Stake, Scalable Platforms, Communication Protocols, Decentralized Exchange, Infinite Sharding, & Two Dimensional Blockchain. Do you understand from each point that you submit earlier? Because in my opinion it has not answered the whole of the question I gave. |
|
|
|
|
On Scalability SON Horizontal architecture key features like what can be presented?
|
|
|
|
|
For what it provides some background, the main difference between Tendermint and Ethereum on this project?
|
|
|
|
|
How does SON solve problems such as scalability, overhead, and limitations of applications in traditional blockchain networks?
|
|
|
|
What are the hardware constraints in implementing blockchain?
I guess hardware is not optimized for blockchain networks and may not support the safe usage of cryptocurrencies. Is it required of special hardware to provide functionality to support existing tasks? |
|
|
|
|
What are the hardware constraints in implementing blockchain?
|
|
|
|
|
What are the main competitors of skynet? And why do you think you will be more successful?
|
|
|
|
How is the team's effort to attract IoT companies to cooperate?
Explained by the team at https://t.me/SkynetOpenNetwork "we are making License Free RISC-V chips, meaning that there’s no license fee like ARM Cores when you deploy our designs. In this manner, by providing a license-free alternative to monopolies in this industry, many IoT companies are willing to work with us to make our blockchain system on chips and actually deploy them into IoT devices around the world." Who will be making the chips? |
|
|
|
How about IoT? It seems that this project also uses it on blockchain network, what would be another constraint?
I think that's true because Network architectures cannot handle billions of interactions that IoT devices make every day, and do not support adoption in the real world. These blockchains also cannot interact with one another as they focus on their own applications rather than working together. Even newer DAG solutions have heavyweight operations, where sending a transaction forces small devices to do proof of work. As a result, traditional blockchains and even newer versions are not suitable for IoT Devices. What happens if it remains forced? Would something terrible happen? I just want to know because I don't really understand about this. Of course the dude, from what I read when this is still forced will not be able to do Proof of Work Mining because Smaller devices cannot be turned into miners as they face computation and power restraints. And also can't to Storing Data because they face memory and storage restraints. And there are still some other points. But the worst is Cold Storage, with IoT devices getting hacked from things like BotNet, devices cannot safely store or utilize cryptocurrency. As a result, some deep learning distributed applications and blockchain operations might not be suitable for the Internet of Things devices. Wooww is very risky if it remains forced. Indeed everything that is perceived not all ends as expected. But well hopefully the team has found the intersection so that this project can run as they intended. By the way thanks pal for the explanation. |
|
|
|
How about IoT? It seems that this project also uses it on blockchain network, what would be another constraint?
I think that's true because Network architectures cannot handle billions of interactions that IoT devices make every day, and do not support adoption in the real world. These blockchains also cannot interact with one another as they focus on their own applications rather than working together. Even newer DAG solutions have heavyweight operations, where sending a transaction forces small devices to do proof of work. As a result, traditional blockchains and even newer versions are not suitable for IoT Devices. What happens if it remains forced? Would something terrible happen? I just want to know because I don't really understand about this. |
|
|
|
|
Show Posts
